German president warns against forgetting WWII lessons on anniversary
"We know where isolation leads, where aggressive nationalism and contempt for democratic institutions lead. We have already lost democracy once in Germany," Steinmeier said in a speech to Germany's lower house of parliament, the Bundestag, attended by foreign diplomats based in Berlin.
"Let us trust in our experience! Let us stand up for our values. Let us not freeze in fear," he said.
The president emphasized that May 8 has become central to the identity of the whole of Germany.
Today, he said, Germans no longer need to ask whether May 8 represented liberation. "But we ask: How can we remain free?"
International order under attack
Steinmeier noted that the United States was currently calling into question the international order built after World War II.
He said Washington's policies and Moscow's full-scale invasion of Ukraine marked a "double break with history."
"Russia's war of aggression and America's breach of values mark the end of this long 20th century."
Steinmeier said the fascination with authoritarianism and populist temptations are also gaining ground in Europe, and doubts about democracy are being voiced.
Extremist forces in Germany
The German president expressed concern about the rise of extremist forces in the country.
These forces mock the institutions of democracy, poison debates, play on people's fears, trade in fear and incite people against each other, he said.
"Anyone who wants good for this country must protect coexistence, cohesion and the peaceful reconciliation of interests. I expect this of all democrats in this country," Steinmeier said to prolonged applause in the lower house of parliament.
The anniversary comes just two days after the new German government under conservative Chancellor Friedrich Merz took office, with the far-right, anti-immigrant Alternative for Germany forming the largest party in the opposition.
Directing a warning towards the AfD, Steinmeier cautioned against attempts to "close the book on our history and our responsibility."
He said he was surprised by the stubbornness with which some people, "unfortunately also in this house," were calling for this.
"Let us not flee from our history. Let us not throw its lessons overboard, especially when they demand something of us. That would be both cowardly and wrong," he said.
Bundestag President Julia Klöckner echoed this warning in her speech at the opening of the special ceremony in parliament.
"To this day, not everyone is aware of the monstrous extent of the German crimes. Or worse still, many no longer want to deal with it," she said.
Forgotten victims of the war
Klöckner highlighted the forgotten victims of the brutal war, emphasizing the suffering of the Polish nation, and of the scale of German destruction in modern-day Belarus and Russia.
She also brought up the plight of the German women who faced sexual violence by invading forces, drawing a direct parallel to the conflict in Ukraine.
Among others, the Israeli and Ukrainian ambassadors to Germany, Ron Prosor and Oleksii Makeiev, as well as the president of the Central Council of Jews in Germany, Josef Schuster, sat in the public gallery during the memorial service.
Ambassadors from Russia and Belarus were not invited to the ceremony due to their governments' involvement in the war against Ukraine.
80 years on
The event marks eight decades since Nazi Germany's unconditional surrender, which came into effect late on May 8, 1945 - when it was already May 9 in Moscow.
The war, started by Adolf Hitler's regime in 1939, resulted in the death of between 50 million and over 60 million people worldwide, most of them civilians.
The Soviet Union was particularly hard hit, with around 27 million dead. Germany lost around 6.3 million people, including many soldiers.
Fighting in the Asia-Pacific continued for several months after the defeat of Nazi Germany. Japan surrendered to the Allied forces, ending hostilities, on September 2, 1945.
Commemorations were taking place in capitals including Paris and Ottawa. Moscow will hold its annual Victory Day parade on Friday. London held a smaller parade earlier in the week.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
6 hours ago
- New York Post
Aussie running for Boston suburb mayor says there's ‘no chance' he'll change his name despite Jeffrey Epstein comparison
He's not name-dropping. An Australian man named Geoffrey Epstein is running for mayor in a Massachusetts town — and he rejects any comparisons to the convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, according to a report. Epstein, who goes by 'Geoff,' said he wasn't afraid of the overt homophonic resemblance his name bears to that of the notorious, dead sex trafficker. Advertisement 3 Geoffrey Epstein attends the Framingham Democrats summer barbecue on July 27, 2025. Geoff Epstein for Mayor/Facebook 'That other one is a dead American and I am a live Aussie,' Epstein, who is seeking office in Framingham, a Boston suburb, told HuffPost Tuesday. 'But, of course, there is all the horrifying criminality and darkness of the other guy,' the aspiring pol said, adding, 'I have lived my life trying to be straight up and improving things.' Advertisement Epstein said there was 'no way' he would change his name to avoid association with the degenerate criminal, who officials said committed suicide in a Manhattan lockup in 2019. 'I like my name and I am proud of my family,' he said, adding his family proudly fought in World War II. The Aussie, who noted he was born on September 11, further stands apart from his doppel-namer by way of holding a Ph.D. in theoretical physics, whereas Jeffrey Epstein dropped out of Cooper Union before attaining a degree. He is not the first politician to fight off associations with the infamous sex trafficker. Advertisement 3 Epstein, who goes by 'Geoff,' said he wasn't afraid of the overt homophonic resemblance his name bears to that of the notorious, dead sex trafficker. Geoff Epstein for Mayor/Facebook 3 Convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein in a mugshot after his arrest in 2019. Kypros New York State Assemblyman Harvey Epstein was mocked on Saturday Night Live last year for having a name that recalled not only Jeffrey Epstein, but convicted rapist Harvey Weinstein. Advertisement 'It was a total surprise,' Epstein told The Post the day after the show aired. 'Imagine if you were watching SNL and there was a parody about you.' 'Your name is your name. It is what it is. Both [Jeffrey Epstein and Harvey Weinstein] are horrific,' the pol added.
New York Post
9 hours ago
- New York Post
Sydney Sweeney's voter registration revealed amid American Eagle's ‘good jeans' ad backlash
Her jeans are red. Actress Sydney Sweeney's voter registration has come to light amid the woke backlash surrounding her controversial American Eagle denim campaign. The 27-year-old 'Euphoria' actress has been registered with the Republican Party of Florida in Monroe County since June 2024, according to public voter records viewed by The Post. 4 Sydney Sweeney in American Eagle jeans. American Eagle The starlet's party affiliation was first reported by Buzzfeed News Saturday, after a viral post on X that read: 'was about to make a whole youtube video exploring sydney sweeney's choices not defending her but going through her career context and i just found out this lady is an actual registered member of the republican party as of 2024.' 4 The 'White Lotus' starlet is a registered Republican voter in Florida. Getty Images for Armani beauty The post was part of a fierce firestorm ignited by lefty critics over the provocative ad featuring the blonde-haired, blue-eyed 'White Lotus' starlet — with some even comparing it to 'Nazi propaganda' that's promoting racism and eugenics. In one video released as part of the marketing campaign, Sweeney explains that genes are passed down from parents to offspring 'often determining traits like hair color, personality and even eye color,' before proclaiming, 'my jeans are blue.' A narrator then chimes in, 'Sydney Sweeney, has great jeans.' 4 Illustration of the Republican and Democratic party logos. eMIL' – In another ad, the actress approaches a billboard with her likeness and the phrase, 'Sydney Sweeney has great genes,' which she alters to cross out 'genes' and write 'jeans.' American Eagle shot back at critics Friday, defending its denim campaign and the 'Anyone But You' star. ''Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans' is and always was about the jeans,' the company said in a statement. 'Her jeans. Her story.' 'We'll continue to celebrate how everyone wears their AE jeans with confidence, their way,' the statement said. 'Great jeans look good on everyone.' 4 The ad sparked debate over 'Nazi propaganda,' racism and eugenics. American Eagle Even the White House jumped into the fray, with President Trump's communications director, Steven Cheung, coming to Sweeney's defense in a post late Tuesday that called the left-wing blowback 'cancel culture run amok.' While Sweeney herself has yet to respond to the public reaction, this is now the second time the Emmy nominee has ruffled feathers in liberal circles. Sweeney faced sharp criticism in 2022 after her family threw a 60th birthday party for her mother, where revelers wore red caps that played on the MAGA slogan – 'Make Sixty Great Again' — and 'Blue Lives Matter' shirts. She said at the time the family hoedown was misinterpreted as an 'absurd' political statement. Sweeney's reps didn't immediately return requests for comment.
Politico
9 hours ago
- Politico
Europe's Future Depends on Confrontation, Not Compromise
So far, Europe has not been able to mount an effective response to the threat from Russia, because to do so requires an entirely new, and bold, paradigm for European governance. Instead, we have seen European countries floundering, taking scattershot actions in the direction of their goal, with no real appetite for confrontation. The history of sanctions imposed on the Putin regime over the course of the war in Ukraine is a perfect illustration. Eighteen tranches of sanctions have been signed into law, and yet Putin is still able to wage his war, maintain the offensive on the battlefield, and engage in business with his international cronies. There is still plenty of room to inflict economic damage on the regime, even after all these rounds, because none of the sanctions were designed to deal a decisive financial blow. They are exemplars of the incremental approach to policy-making that the EU embodies, one that aims to nudge the adversary to the negotiating table gently. Of course, this kind of approach does not work on a dictator; indeed, it only feeds their aggression. Another example is the 1 million 155-millimeter artillery shells that were supposed to be sent to Ukraine. Half a year later, Europe had to admit that a union of 27 countries was unable to produce or procure that amount. To add insult to injury, Russia announced that North Korea had provided 1 million shells from its own stockpiles. One of the poorest nations in the world had, apparently, out-performed the most prosperous continent in supplying ammunition to its wartime ally. In the absence of European leaders willing to accept authorship for its new path forward, the continent's future might very well be written in Moscow. If Putin were to attack a NATO country that is also a member of the European Union, that would shake the foundations of European unity like nothing before. And so it is worth asking whether a Europe that is unable to defend its own people can have any meaningful future. A meeting held after the bombing of a European capital to discuss a compromise resolution would serve only as the tombstone for the European project itself. Even if the worst-case scenarios do not materialize, the Union's current ineffectiveness has already become crippling. Could today's Europe have the vision and ability to create something like the Schengen Area or the monetary union? Can it meaningfully enlarge if deadlock eventually reduces it to the status of a mere spectator in the war against Ukraine, the hybrid war against Moldova, or the non-military takeover of Georgia? The inescapable conclusion is that the EU is risking irrelevance and evaporation unless fundamental changes are made to the Treaty itself. This is obviously a monumental task, but after witnessing so many bottlenecks and breakdowns in the current system we at least have a clear picture of what the necessary changes would need to look like. And the basic proposal isn't even new. In 2017, German and French leaders floated the idea of a 'multi-speed Europe,' proposing the most fundamental overhaul of the framework of the EU to date. Had it not been for the Covid-19 pandemic and Russia's war on Ukraine that followed, this proposal could have evolved into a more vocal debate on the regionalization of the Union. This idea still has the potential to make a comeback, particularly in the Nordic-Baltic region, where countries are actively seeking stronger security and defense integration, and where the Russian threat is clearly understood. Meanwhile, parts of Western Europe are already diverging in interests from those in the North. And in the illiberal bloc, Hungary and Slovakia are eagerly awaiting elections in Czechia, hoping a new government will join their anti-European, pro-Russian ranks.
