Miss World beauties bowled over by city's timeless charm and royal heritage
If walking through the iconic Charminar and Laad Bazar and splurging on shopping were 'overwhelming' experiences, they were floored by Hyderabad famed royalty when they were treated to an exquisitely spread lavish dinner at Chowmahalla Palace. They were spoilt for choice quite literally seeing the delicacies that were served.
On arrival, they were welcomed with the captivating beats of 'Hadrami Marfa' and the regal sounds of 'Naubat or Nakkare' drums, which echoed through the historic lanes of the city. The Heritage Walk was a cultural immersion, a highlight of the pageant's ongoing celebrations in Telangana, including a showcase of the rich history, vibrantly priceless crafts, and royal traditions of the region.
At the iconic Charminar, the delegates were greeted by a 12-member troupe playing marfa drums, creating an electric atmosphere. The contestants were enlightened about the history of the Charminar. They then strolled through the bustling lanes of Laad Bazaar, known for its traditional bangles, pearls, and intricate zardozi embroidery.
The delegates had the opportunity to visit renowned stores like Hyderabad Bangles, Mujeeb Bangles, Kanhaiyalal, Motilal Karwa, Gokuldas Zariwala, K.R. Kasat, Jaju Pearls, A.H. Zariwala, and Afzal Miya Karchobwale. What was a pleasant surprise for them was witnessing live demonstrations of bangle-making techniques, a unique artisanal craft that is symbolic of the city.
The Heritage Walk culminated at the architectural marvel Chowmahalla Palace, where the contestants enjoyed an unforgettable culturally loaded evening.
It included a specially arranged mehndi ceremony and an opportunity to wear the traditional and ever elegant Nizam era attire, providing them with a truly immersive experience into the royal heritage of Hyderabad. The delegates also explored Nizam-era exhibits, including ancient weapons, royal household items, and historical artifacts, all of which gave peep into the region's grandiose past.
Miss World CEO Julia Morley reflected on the significance of the event, stating, 'Hyderabad's rich heritage and vibrant culture have made this experience truly unforgettable for the contestants.
It is moments like these that celebrate the power of global unity and cultural exchange, reminding us that the essence of beauty lies not just in appearances but in the deep connections we form through shared history and traditions.'
The evening concluded with a royal feast featuring Hyderabadi delicacies such as biryani, mirchi ka salan, qubani ka meetha, dum ka murgh, and kebabs. Enlivening the evening was a live musical concert that provided a melodic touch to the night.
Meanwhile, the 72nd Miss World Festival journey continues as the delegates have been split into two groups for further exploration of Telangana's cultural treasures.
On May 14, Group 1 (Americas and Caribbean) will visit the historic Warangal Fort, the 1000-pillar Temple, and the Bhadrakali Temple, while Group 2 (Africa) will head to the UNESCO-listed Ramappa Temple for a traditional Perini dance performance. On May 15, the groups will have a spiritual experience at Yadagirigutta temple and later acquire first-hand knowledge about the rich weaving traditions of the UNWTO-recognized Pochampally village, renowned for its iconic Ikat weaves.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Centre suggests six cuts in movie 'Udaipur Files', Supreme Court continues stay its release
The Centre on Monday informed the Supreme Court that it has suggested six cuts in the movie "Udaipur Files - Kanhaiya Lal Tailor Murder". "In personal opinion any further action than what has been recommended by the competent authority will be infringing Article 19. I have gone through the order," Solicitor General Tushar Mehta informed a bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Select a Course Category Healthcare healthcare CXO Degree Digital Marketing Data Analytics Operations Management MCA Others Leadership Technology Data Science Design Thinking Management Cybersecurity Finance Artificial Intelligence Project Management PGDM Product Management MBA Data Science others Public Policy Skills you'll gain: Financial Analysis in Healthcare Financial Management & Investing Strategic Management in Healthcare Process Design & Analysis Duration: 12 Weeks Indian School of Business Certificate Program in Healthcare Management Starts on Jun 13, 2024 Get Details The top court asked Mehta to place the order on record. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 15 most beautiful women in the world Undo Senior advocate Gaurav Bhati, appearing for filmmakers, submitted the Centre was exercising its revisionary jurisdiction and recommended six cuts in film scenes and they have been complied with. Justice Kant told Bhatia that film producers would have to comply with the directions of cutting the scenes, unless they wished to challenge the order. Live Events Senior advocate Maneka Guruswamy, appearing for accused Mohd Javed, seeking the stay on the movie's release, said the interim stay should continue till the apex court decided the issue. The bench went ahead to continue the stay till further orders and posted the hearing on July 24. On July 16, the top court asked the filmmakers to await the decision of the Centre-appointed panel to hear objections against the movie. The top court told the filmmakers while the accused in the Kanhaiya Lal tailor murder case couldn't be compensated for the loss of reputation if the film releases, the filmmakers could be compensated in monetary terms. The high court on July 10 stayed the film's release on a plea of Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind president Maulana Arshad Madani, invoking powers of the Central Government under Section 6 of the Cinematograph Act, 1952, till the representation is decided by the Central Government, for which the high court granted one week time. The top court had asked the Centre's panel to take a decision immediately without loss of time after hearing all the parties and ordered to give a hearing to the accused in the murder case. The top court also directed the superintendent of police of the jurisdiction concerned to assess the threat perception and take necessary action in providing life and property of family members of filmmakers and the son of a tailor, who were reportedly receiving threats. The filmmakers claimed of having received a Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) certificate with the board suggesting 55 cuts and the film was due to be released on July 11. The top court said despite the film receiving the CBFC certificate, the Centre had the power to suggest further cuts in scenes or even stop the film from screening and one should await the decision of the competent authority. Udaipur-based tailor Kanhaiya Lal was murdered in June 2022 allegedly by Mohammad Riyaz and Mohammad Ghous. The assailants later released a video claiming that the murder was in reaction to the tailor allegedly sharing a social media post in support of former BJP member Nupur Sharma following her controversial comments on Prophet Mohammed. The case was probed by the NIA and the accused were booked under the stringent Unlawful Activities Prevention Act, besides provisions under IPC. The trial is pending before the special NIA court in Jaipur.
India Today
16-07-2025
- India Today
Controversy may help film's performance: Top court defers 'Udaipur Files' hearing
The Supreme Court on Monday deferred the hearing on petitions relating to the controversial film 'Udaipur Files: Kanhaiya Lal Tailor Murder', observing that the ongoing row could actually aid its performance."If there is a controversy, the movie is likely to perform well," Justice Surya Kant remarked, in a lighter vein, while hearing the matter alongside Justice Joymalya bench was hearing two petitions - one filed by Mohammad Javed, an accused in the Kanhaiya Lal murder case, and the other by the makers of the film challenging the Delhi High Court's stay on its The court said it would await the outcome of the proceedings before the Centre and posted the matter to next Monday, July 21. "We expect that the committee constituted by the Centre will hear the matter immediately, without any loss of time."The court allowed Javed, who was not a petitioner before the Delhi High Court, to appear before the committee. "We also permit Mohd Javed, as petitioner, to appear before the committee." The committee hearing was scheduled for 2:30 PM on the time of writing, the meeting of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting committee was underway, with representatives of the filmmaker, a representative of Kanhaiya Lal's son, members of Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind, and the lawyer for the accused Mohammad Javed in Advocate Menaka Guruswamy, appearing for Mohammad Javed, said the film dealt with two sub judice matters - the Kanhaiya Lal murder case and the Gyanvapi case."The movie portrays the judiciary as well in a certain way. The movie is bordering on hate, and bringing the judiciary into disrepute. There is much at stake. They can't claim free speech to violate fair trial or lower judiciary's reputation."She said, "It is something that generates violence. It's vilification of a community. Not one positive aspect about the community shown."Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind President Maulana Arshad Madani, said, "When HC asked us, I personally saw the movie. I was shaken in every sense of the word. If any judge were to see it, they will be shocked. Its complete theme is of hate against the community... Not one positive aspect about the community shown... homosexuality, judicial matters, treatment of women... A democratic nation certifying such movie... unimaginable.""I had watched the movie... It's a thematic dissertation of hate... I am normally on the other side to say it should not be stopped... Please see the movie. It is something that generates violence-seeds violence-it's vilification of an entire community-violence, hate, homosexuality, denigration of women, child abuse by one community-unthinkable that a democratic nation would allow such a movie to be certified," Sibal Kant responded, "Our judicial officers are not school-going children that they can be swayed by movie dialogues... absolutely confident about their objectivity... sense of detachment." He also said, "I was wondering how Mr Sibal found time to see the movie."advertisementSenior Advocate Gaurav Bhatia, appearing for the producers, told the court, "I got a valid certificate from CBFC... they didn't go to the valid authority... went to the High Court on the last date without even disclosing legitimate interest."He said, "My film was supposed to release at midnight. The order came at 8 pm. Nearly 1,750 theatres across India had booked the movie. We lost six crucial days."He also submitted that "the producer and director of the film as well as the son of the victim who was brutally murdered in 2022 are getting repeated threats to their life." The court directed the police to assess the threat perception and take steps to protect Kant said, "Balance of convenience is in their favor... if movie is released, it can lead to irreparable loss... but if there is delay, you can be compensated." The court noted that Section 6 of the Cinematograph Act gave the central government the power to suspend or revoke court observed, "If the film is released then both these pleas are infructuous... the revision petition before the government is also infructuous."It added, "We have impressed on the counsels for the parties to join the proceedings before the government committee and extend their cooperation for speedy disposal."The Delhi High Court had earlier said, "The high court vide impugned judgment has not expressed any opinion on the merits, especially regarding the allegations regarding content of the movie." The order was passed in a batch of pleas, including one filed by Maulana Arshad Madani, who contended that the film was communally Lal Teli, an Udaipur-based tailor, was murdered in June 2022, allegedly by Mohammad Riyaz and Mohammad Ghous, who claimed it was in retaliation for a social media post in support of former BJP leader Nupur Sharma. The case was taken up by the National Investigation Agency and is under trial before a special NIA court in Jaipur. The film is based on these events.- Ends
Hans India
16-07-2025
- Hans India
SC asks Centre to ‘immediately' decide on 'Udaipur Files' certification
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday asked the Centre to 'immediately' decide the revision pleas filed against the CBFC certification granted to the film 'Udaipur Files'. A Bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymala Bagchi was dealing with a plea filed by film producer Amit Johnny, who has challenged the Delhi High Court's order that had temporarily stayed the release of the movie based on the Kanhaiya Lal murder case. In a brief hearing, the Justice Kant-led Bench asked the panel constituted by the Centre under Section 6 of the Cinematograph Act to decide the revision pleas 'immediately without loss of time'. Section 6 vests the Centre with adequate powers to declare a film to be uncertified or pass orders providing for interim measures, including suspension of the film from public exhibition. Posting the matter for further hearing on July 21, the apex court remarked, 'We can wait for some time. We are told that a committee has been formed, and the Union (government) is looking into it. We can have the benefit of the Union of India's view. Suppose the Union says there is nothing wrong with the movie, then we will see that. If they recommend some cuts, then also we can peruse the same. If the Centre was not taking up the matter, then it was different.' The film revolves around the brutal murder of Kanhaiya Lal, a tailor in Rajasthan's Udaipur, in June 2022 by Mohammad Riyaz Attari and Ghaus Mohammad by slitting his throat. One of the accused in the Kanhaiya Lal murder case, Javed, had filed a writ petition before the Supreme Court and has sought a stay on the release of 'Udaipur Files', arguing that the release of the film could prejudice the ongoing trial proceedings pending before the Special NIA court. A day before its scheduled release, the Delhi High Court, in its order passed on July 10, had temporarily halted the release of the controversial movie till the Centre decides the revision plea of the petitioners challenging the grant of the CBFC certification. A Bench of Chief Justice D.K. Upadhyaya and Justice Anish Dayal was dealing with a batch of pleas, including a plea filed by Maulana Arshad Madani, the President of the Islamic clerics' body Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind, seeking a direction to quash the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) certification granted to the film. As per the petition filed by Maulana Arshad Madani, the CBFC certification was granted in violation of Section 5B of the Cinematograph Act, 1952 and the Guidelines for Certification of Films for Public Exhibition, since the release of the film 'Udaipur Files' has the potential to inflame communal tensions and disrupt public order, severely undermining the fabric of religious harmony in the country. The Chief Justice Upadhyaya-led Bench allowed the petitioners as well as the general public to file within two days revision plea before the Union government under Section 6 of the Cinematograph Act. The Delhi High Court had asked the Centre to decide the revision pleas within a week after giving an opportunity of hearing to the producer. Further, it had ordered that the prayer for interim relief, if made, will also be considered and decided.
