Queensland to repeal diversity quotas for Brisbane Olympics board
The change to the Organising Committee for the Olympic Games (OCOG) board is contained in an obscure clause in broad-ranging legislation sponsored by the deputy premier, Jarrod Bleijie, in May. It is not mentioned in either its explanatory speech or explanatory notes.
According to a written briefing by the Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning, made during consideration by a parliamentary committee, the bill would 'enhance efficiency and effectiveness' by 'removing certain requirements for the appointment of OCOG board directors'.
That includes 'that 50% of nominated directors be women' and 'that at least one of the independent directors is Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander'.
The bill has yet to pass parliament but is certain to do so if all government members vote for it.
Renee Carr, the executive director of Fair Agenda, said 'women should be an equal part of making the critical decisions that shape its legacy'.
'There's been important progress in recognising women's contribution to sport – as athletes, coaches, and in leadership. We should be leaning into what's possible, not going backwards,' she said.
'Hosting an event of this scale will impact Queensland's economy, infrastructure and tourism. Women's voices and expertise must be an equal part of planning a games that delivers for the whole community.'
The executive director of QUT's Carumba Institute, Prof Chelsea Watego, said the plan to remove the requirement was an 'appalling decision'.
She said the Sydney Olympics was able to make decisions with a board that included an Indigenous representative, Lowitja O'Donoghue, so there was no case that excluding them would make it more efficient.
'It just tells you how far backwards Queensland has gone under an LNP government,' she said.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
Watego said that Brisbane, Queensland and Australia would be on the international stage.
'We're under a microscope, and we have to think very seriously about what this tells the world about who we are as a nation, who we are as a state, and the location of Indigenous peoples and women in relation to that.'
Minister for the Olympic and Paralympic Games Tim Mander said: 'The Crisafulli government has accepted the recommendation of the independent 100 Day Review of the Games to streamline governance arrangements.
'The act is currently before the state development, infrastructure and works committee.'
The Planning (Social Impact and Community Benefit) and Other Legislation Amendment bill 2025 has a wide-ranging scope, and more than 700 individuals and groups made a submission during a parliamentary inquiry process.
Among other changes, the bill will reduce the size of the OCOG board from 24 to 15.
It also amends regulation of renewables projects to make them easier for opponents to challenge in court and exempts Olympic venues from legal challenge.
The OCOG board is appointed by multiple different agencies separate from the state government, such as the federal sports minister and the president of the Australian Olympic Committee.
A legal provision will still apply requiring consideration of the state government's policy on gender equity on boards. The policy sets a non-binding target for gender equity, and does not cover Indigenous representation.
The Brisbane Olympics will be held from 23 July to 8 August 2032, with the Paralympics running from 24 August to 5 September. Queensland has never held an Olympics but has hosted the Commonwealth Games, most recently in 2018.
A binding provision that the 2032 games be 'climate positive' has also been reportedly removed from the Olympic host contract. It will now aim 'at removing more carbon from the atmosphere than what the Games project emits'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
24 minutes ago
- The Guardian
New Zealand attorney general warns her government's electoral reform could breach human rights law
New Zealand's prime minister Christopher Luxon has defended his government's plans to overhaul its electoral laws, despite warnings from his own attorney general the changes could breach human rights law and disenfranchise more than 100,000 voters. The right-wing government last week announced its plan to shake up electoral laws it said were 'outdated and unsustainable', including closing voter enrolment 13 days before election day, reinstating a total ban on prisoner voting and prohibiting anyone from providing free food, drink or entertainment within 100 metres of a voting station. Since 1993, voters have been allowed to enrol to vote during the two week advance voting period and, more recently, on election day, casting what is called a 'special vote'. Luxon told RNZ on Monday the late enrolments had led to weeks-long delays in counting votes. 'We want everyone to participate in our democracy … but we need to make sure that people are registered in advance of voting,' he said. But in a report to parliament, the attorney general, Judith Collins, warned the proposal 'appears to be inconsistent' with the Bill of Rights, including the right to vote and the right to freedom of expression. Collins noted that during the 2023 general election, there were more than 200,000 special votes cast, including 97,000 people who registered for the first time during the voting period, and nearly 134,000 people who changed electoral districts during the voting period. 'This gives some indication of the number of people who may be affected, and the farther out the registration deadline from polling day, the greater the disenfranchising impact is likely to be,' Collins said. Changing the enrolment deadline to one to seven days before polling day would 'impose less onerous limits on the right to vote', she said. Special votes are more likely to come from younger people and areas with larger Māori, Asian and Pasifika communities, and these communities may be more affected by the proposed registration deadline, Collins said. With respect to the blanket ban on prisoner voting, Collins said it would disenfranchise those who have a right to vote 'and cannot be justified'. Luxon said the attorney-general has a statutory obligation to examine whether legislation will contravene the Bill of Rights and the government would consider that advice. Collins declined the Guardian's request for further comment. The proposed changes have drawn ire from opposition parties, who believe the government is weakening democracy. 'As a country we should be encouraging voter turnout and making changes to support that – not shutting them out,' said Duncan Webb, Labour's justice spokesperson. 'This is an appalling change that will make it harder for a lot of people to exercise their democratic right.'
The Guardian
32 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Independent MP Nicolette Boele calls out parliament's lack of ambition in her first speech
Nicolette Boele, who sensationally beat Liberal candidate Gisele Kapterian by just 26 votes in the seat of Bradfield, gave her maiden speech to parliament on Monday, saying Australia is moving towards a decentralised and more people-centred rather than party-centred democracy. She said there was 'widespread conviction' that politicians were 'incapable of dealing with systemic longstanding issues' such as regulating online media platforms, climate change, gambling and housing affordability, adding that unlike previous reform to gun laws, or the introduction of medicare, the parliament was not ambitious enough
The Guardian
33 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Minns government rejects pro-Palestine march across Sydney Harbour Bridge over timing and ‘chaos' fears
Organisers of a pro-Palestine rally have offered to delay their march across the Sydney Harbour Bridge by a week after the New South Wales government said it would not support a protest of that scale and nature this Sunday. On Monday, the Sydney-based Palestine Action Group announced it planned to change the course of its near-weekly rallies through the CBD and instead walk across the iconic bridge to the US consulate. The premier, Chris Minns, responded that the government could not support a protest of that size across the bridge this weekend. 'We cannot allow Sydney to descend into chaos,' Minns said in a statement. 'The NSW government cannot support a protest of this scale and nature taking place on the Sydney Harbour Bridge, especially with one week's notice. 'The bridge is one of the most critical pieces of infrastructure in our city used every day by thousands of people. Unplanned disruption risks not only significant inconvenience, but real public safety concerns.' Sign up: AU Breaking News email Minns said police were 'in discussions with organisers' about other routes they can take and 'are working to ensure community safety is upheld'. The Palestine Action Group announced the rally in a social media post, talking about the starvation of people in Gaza. 'This is a genocide. Even if, under global pressure, Israel temporarily allows some food into Gaza, it will not mean the end of Israel's goal of ethnically cleansing the [Gaza] strip.' The group said 'this extraordinary situation' has led it to call for a March for Humanity over the bridge on 3 August 'to save Gaza'. Josh Lees, a spokesperson for the group, said if the premier needed more notice in order to support the rally, then the group could organise the march a week later. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'In 2023, the Harbour Bridge was closed for several hours to shoot a scene for a Ryan Gosling film. It is regularly closed at short notice for maintenance or emergencies. It was closed for the historic 2000 march for reconciliation and the 2023 World Pride march. It can be temporarily closed to help stop a genocide,' Lees said. The group has submitted what is known as a 'form one' to police. The form is a notification to hold a public assembly that, if accepted by police, would protect those attending from being potentially charged under anti-protest laws. In 2022, the then NSW Liberal government legislated – with support from Labor – a maximum penalty of two years in prison and a $22,000 fine for protesters who obstruct facilities such as ports and transport hubs. The penalty also applies to protests on main roads. Last year, the Palestine Action Group faced a supreme court challenge by NSW police after the force knocked back its form one application to hold two pro-Palestine events in October. The group managed to come to an agreement with police that it would change the route of a rally on 6 October and an event on 7 October would be a standing vigil.
