
An EV Roadtrip Shows The Value Of Hotel Charging And How To Price It
Map of an EV road trip. Lightning bolts are mostly hotels, Stalls are superchargers
Most of the debate on EV charging infrastructure focuses on the desire for fast charging stations, which recharge a car in 30-60 minutes. Up to $7B of federal money has been allocated to build those, though this may vanish with a recent executive order from President Trump. These stations have value, but it turns out that charging at motels is even more important, and it gets almost no attention. The issues around how to get charging at most hotels, how to make it convenient and how to price it are key issues for EV travel infrastructure.
Ideally, when taking a road trip, one stays at a hotel with EV charging which refills the car overnight while the driver sleeps. Such charging is vastly cheaper (in fact, often provided free to guests) and more convenient, as it involves no driving out of your way or time spent waiting—it happens when you sleep. The driver wakes up to a full, warm car and depending on their itinerary may do all their driving on that energy, or on hard-slog road trips, can at least get to lunch for a fast charge. In shorter range cars or very intense driving, they may use another fast charge before their hotel.
This is important because fast charging has become very expensive. It's not unusual to see fast chargers costing 60¢/kWh. Tesla stations tend to be 40-50¢. It's hard to make a business fast charging and that's forced many providers to charge these very high prices. (The average cost of electricity in the USA is now up to 17¢/kWh, but depends on the state and time of day, ranging from 9¢ to 40¢.) Fast charging thus costs anywhere from 10 to 15 cents per mile, which is similar to, and sometimes more, than the cost of gasoline in average cars, and more than that for an efficient hybrid. EV owners definitely didn't buy their EVs to pay more for energy than they did with gasoline cars.
Because hotel charging is often free to guests, that can make a big difference. For drivers going 400-500 miles/day, that means one hotel charge and one fast charge, and cuts the total cost in half. On a recent road trip I took of 2800 miles from California to Utah, the first half was slower paced, and the second half was a fast return home. I picked up 500 kWh at superchargers and roughly 300 kWh from hotels (all free except one hotel at 25¢/kWh.) That made my trip much cheaper, and about $200 less than in my old gasoline powered Acura TL, and of course, lower emissions. For the first half the trip, the ratio of hotel and fast chargers was about even.
Two Teslas charging at a hotel at Bryce Canyon National Park. The left one is keeping itself warm ... More and meling the snow.
I also gained from charging my first and last 200 miles at home from my solar panels. While that power's already paid for, any power like this that I use rather than feed back to the California grid effectively loses me just 7¢/kWh. (Alternately, home solar at today's interest rates costs about 10¢/kWh.)
Can it be Free?
My typical hotel charge was around 40 kWh. At the average Utah price of 11.4¢, that's around $4.50 cost to the hotel. At the national average closer to $7. The value to me is much greater, because otherwise I will have to pay 40-60¢ at a fast charger, or around $20, plus a lot of inconvenience. This easily justifies going to a pricier hotel if it has charging, and you get all the other benefits of the higher-end hotel. But today we're seeing many different pricing decisions by hotels:
Many hotels are being pulled to the 'minibar' style of pricing, a premium or super-premium price well above the ordinary retail price, because the hotel guest is a captive customer getting convenience. Those who do so can make a modest profit on charging, and also reduce contention at their stalls, as guests will no longer use the charging unless they truly need it. (It's ironic that minibars often lose money even at their high prices and are mostly being removed from hotels.)
The more interesting dynamic applies to how guests choose their hotel. Today, EV roadtrippers are more rare—on this trip, outside of Las Vegas and Reno, we didn't see another EV charging at these hotels, though the stalls in those Nevada cities were full and cars were turned away. Those EV roadtrippers who do look for it will always choose a hotel with charging over one without if they are even roughly comparable. They will choose a hotel with free-to-guests charging over one that charges premium fees, even if the former hotel is $20 more per night, for simple financial reasons—you get the free charge and a better hotel for the same total spend.
Today, almost all road trip hotels provide breakfast 'free' to guests. Estimates suggest this simple breakfast costs the hotel around $4-$5 per person, or $10-$15 per room depending on occupancy. More expensive hotels often charge extra for breakfast but for the mid-range motorist hotels, free-to-guests breakfast is now a must-have feature in rural America. It costs more per room than charging, so that suggests we might get a world were free-to-guests charging is a standard amenity in order to get EV driving guests. At the same time, the minibar pricing plan is also growing in popularity.
There's an irony that metered stalls cost a lot more than simple ones, so in many cases the premium fee is charged to cover the cost of being able to do billing. Many of the free-to-guests chargers are Tesla Destination Chargers, which Tesla provided free to many hotels. Tesla doesn't forbid the hotel charging, but there was no mechanism so most don't. (This is changing as Tesla now supports billing.) Even so, a fancy public station with credit card processing can cost 5 times as much, for the equipment, as a basic one, though the electrician can cost more.
One factor that could change this would be a facility for guaranteed reservations. Drivers want to be sure they can charge, though in most places today if they can't, they just have to waste time at a fast charger, perhaps during dinner after they check in and see all stalls are taken. Drivers will likely be willing to pay reservation costs that cover the cost of the electricity, so the hotel gets that paid for while also winning a stay. At present, there are no systems for hotels to automate reservation of charging stalls, but this can come. Today's option involves a hotel staffer putting a cone in a space or parking a car in one to hold it.
Guests will still stay at hotels with premium fees, but they will no longer consider them an automatic win over other hotels. As the EV transition progresses, there will be few hotels with no charging, the only question will be the price, whether a spot can be reserved, and if not, how many stalls there are. Hotels without charging will just not get any EV guests at some point, and be pushed to make the change. Fortunately, with modern power management, hotels can often install lots of stalls without boosting their electrical service, as long as power use in the hotel goes down at night, leaving capacity for the cars. (Disclaimer: I have an investment in a company which sells such tools.)
One possible pricing scheme, not in use today would be a combination price, such as a low ($5) flat reservation fee (or even free) for a typical charge of up to 40 kWh (around 160 miles) with reasonable per-kWh fees above that to recover costs on large battery cars.
Footnote: A large fraction of hotels have an exterior 120v dedicated plug they will let you use. Carry your adapter. It may seem of limited use to add only 50 miles (which is about all such a plug will do) but that means more time and options in the morning, and it's like having a bigger battery. 30a RV plugs (different adapter) can give you 100 miles, which can make a real difference, especially if staying 2 nights.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New Report Reveals Who the Celtics Will Not Trade
New Report Reveals Who the Celtics Will Not Trade originally appeared on Athlon Sports. The Boston Celtics have already checked off their biggest priority this offseason by trading Jrue Holiday and Kristaps Porzingis to get under the NBA's second tax apron. However, they may not be done dealing. For all the players who could be traded away, The Athletic's Jay King reported on Friday that there's one player Boston plans to keep. Advertisement "Speculation has surrounded Sam Hauser's future because it likely wouldn't be difficult to find a taker for his four-year, $45 million contract, ... but the Celtics are said to be more focused on avenues that would allow them to hold onto Hauser, who has proven himself as a valuable rotation piece and one of the NBA's best shooters," King wrote. Boston Celtics center Kristaps Porzingis (8) and forward Sam Hauser (30)© David Butler II-Imagn Images King also confirmed the Celtics' desire to keep Al Horford and Luke Kornet this offseason, which hypothetically could lead to trading Hauser's contract to make room to re-sign them without crossing the NBA's second tax apron. However, as King wrote, that doesn't appear to be the case. If that's not enough, Jake Fischer reported that there haven't been any rumbles about a potential Hauser trade while explaining why Boston wouldn't trade him. Advertisement "I haven't heard any credible buzz about Sam Hauser's inclusion in serious trade conversations," Fischer wrote. Fischer added, "The interest would surely be there given Hauser's perimeter prowess and the value contract he holds over the next four years, but the Celtics have largely achieved their financial goals by moving Holiday and Porziņģis. They don't have to trade Hauser." If Hauser's not up for grabs, but the Celtics want to save money, the most obvious trade candidates would be their newest non-rookie players: Anfernee Simons and Georges Niang. Related: NBA Fans React to Celtics Trade Report on Saturday Related: Knicks Could Pursue Celtics Champion After Recent Boston Trades This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 28, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Modern love: Gen Z turning to AI to do their dating dirty work — breakup texts and apologies
Artificial intelligence is now writing 'It's not you, it's me' texts for Gen Z. A new national survey from dating assistant Wingmate found that 41% of young adults have used AI to help end a relationship, with women slightly more likely than men to let the bots do the dirty work. The survey, which polled over 1,000 U.S. adults who've used AI for dating, shows just how deep AI has embedded itself in modern romance. Nearly half of 18- to 29-year-olds said they've turned to AI tools to write breakup texts, apologies or manage relationship conflict. The most common uses include dating-bio optimization, conversation starters, replying to messages and resolving conflict. Roughly one-third of users sought direct dating advice, and nearly half turned to AI for help writing apologies or other emotionally sensitive messages. For some, it's about simplicity: 29% said dating became 'simpler' with AI, and 21% said it helped them talk to more people. Others said it boosted their confidence — with more than half reporting better conversations when using AI. But when it comes to the end of a relationship, things can get . . . robotic. TikTok features a growing number of videos where users expose breakup messages they claim were clearly AI-generated. One viral post captioned 'When he sends a breakup text that looks entirely written by ChatGPT, em dashes and all' has racked up nearly 240,000 views. Another shows a woman running her breakup message through an AI detector, which immediately labels it 100% GPT-generated. Not everyone's convinced AI belongs in their love lives. While most respondents said it was useful or neutral, a few called it inauthentic and more than one in five admitted they use it but don't tell anyone. Dr. Jess Carbino, former in-house sociologist for Tinder and Bumble, said it can be depriving to outsource the task of breaking up with an individual to AI. 'Individuals might also mistakenly assume that what AI generates in this domain is valid or appropriate, when matters of the heart often are more delicate, require nuance and merit personalization,' Carbino told The Post. Still, many say it helps. With 57% claiming they'd trust AI over a friend for dating advice, the business of AI-powered romance is booming. Third-party services like YourMove AI and Rizz market themselves as full-on dating copilots — offering help with everything from flirty openers to awkward conversations. YourMove, which now claims over 300,000 users, promises to put your texting 'on cruise control.' For $15 a month, it generates text messages in seconds, rewrites bios, boosts photos and critiques dating profiles. Rizz takes a similar approach, offering 'personalized responses that are sure to impress your crush,' with weekly plans starting at $10 — and no clear limit on how much emotional heavy lifting the bot will do. Even ChatGPT offers breakup-specific tools, including a 'Breakup Text Assistant' where users can specify tone, relationship length and how much closure they want to give.

Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Last day of production arrives at Fairmont Novelis plant
FAIRMONT — At some point Friday evening, Novelis employees will hold a dinner amongst themselves. The mood will be somber. 'We have a dinner today to celebrate, but, you know, it's not really a celebration to me,' Novelis mill operator and Fairmont Deputy Mayor Josh Rice said. 'A lot of the other guys that were retirees came in there and just kind of wanted to give the guys a shoulder and let them know that they were there for them. And how sad it was that this place is ending.' Novelis stopped production at its Fairmont facility on Friday. The company announced it would close its Fairmont plant on March 31, with a final date set for June 30. The plant manufactured aluminum fin stock, which is used in heat exchangers for automotive radiators and heating and cooling equipment such as HVAC. For a while, however, plant employees held out hope the plant would be purchased by a different company. It was not to be. 'We thought we was going to get bought out by a company called Commonwealth,' Randy Hines, a 30 year employee, said. 'So we thought we was gonna still be here for a little bit, or they would just take over and resume as normal. But that deal fell through. It's kind of like being divorced and then getting back together and getting divorced again.' Hines said it was like being fired twice. Rice said the company called employees on Tuesday and told them to just stay home, and that the company would continue to pay through June 30. Rice and a few others kept working to make sure the last items were shipped out of the plant and everything was closed and powered off correctly. The power actually went off during an outage from a storm on one of the nights. Rice said there was a certain finality to it. While the plant has ceased operations and sent employees home, a skeleton crew is staying behind for final shutdown checks. They will ensure no oil leaks from the machines and that nothing hazardous is left in the building. Those employees will remain for an additional three months and are receiving bonus pay. The plant has been a mainstay in Fairmont for over 100 years. It's closure has also impacted longtime residents emotionally. 'We have said goodbye to so many other factories in Fairmont during my lifetime,' Marcella Yaremchuck said. 'But this last goodbye seems to be the hardest.' Emotions have run high at the plant. Rice said he saw some of the employees cry. He said all the equipment is still at the plant, some of it brand new that hasn't even been used yet. It's sitting there waiting for someone else to come in and take over. Hines said some employees applied to work at the Novelis facility in Alabama. Hines' nephew actually runs the place. However, uprooting family and relocating is hard, so those five employees are carefully considering if they want to make the move, Hines said. As for employees who have left completely, Hines said between 10 and 15 went underground, to work in a coal mine. Those employees lacked the longevity at the company to get good severance, so they got out when they could, Hines said. Hines said rumors the plant would shut down surfaced every few years. Hines didn't pay to much attention to them, since they never came to pass. Until one day they did. The Times West Virginian reached out to Novelis for comment but they couldn't provide comment by press time. Fairmont City Manager Travis Blosser said the city has seen an amazing outpouring of support for the families and employees that will be affected by the closure. 'Several organizations and local companies have held job fairs specifically for the workers who need to find new employment arrangements,' Blosser said. 'We at the City will continue to work with Novelis and the state development office to ensure that property gets back into productive use as soon as possible.' Blosser said the City is committed to making Fairmont an attractive place to do business. However, the City's business environment may also feel the downstream effects of the plant's closure. Rice pointed out that plant employees spent their wages in Fairmont, procuring goods and services for themselves and their families. Rice added the loss of health insurance will mean a lot of patients will lose coverage and medical providers will lose patients. Rice is cautious with hope these days. There's rumors of another interested buyer. But after having their hopes dashed, no one wants to risk having their hearts broken again, he said. 'It hurt harder the second time than it did the first time,' Rice said. 'So people don't have very high hopes that it's going to open back up. But I hope it will. I have faith in it. That plant can't sit there, as nice of a plant as it is. It's kept up. I just don't see it sitting there for too long, empty.'