Expert Commentary: NZ Privacy Commissioner Provides Clarity For Retailers On Facial Recognition Technology
Finding published yesterday by NZ Privacy Commissioner on supermarket facial recognition trial places retailers on notice, says FRT technology risk expert.
Nicholas Dynon is Brand Strategy & Innovation Director at Optic Security Group. He is a certified security risk professional and counter terrorism practitioner.
'The inquiry report found that the live facial recognition technology (FRT) model trialed by Foodstuffs North Island Limited (FSNI) in 25 of its supermarkets complied with New Zealand's Privacy Act. While the Privacy Commissioner assessed the level of privacy intrusion as high due to every shopper's face data being collected, the privacy safeguards in the trial reduced it to an acceptable level.
'The outcome has been met with strong and immediate political support, with Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith lauding the result as 'great news' and stating that he now expects the Ministerial Advisory Group for Victims of Retail Crime to 'continue to look at this technology as an option to be used more widely'.
'The outcome also provides some much-needed clarity for retailers – and other organisations – who have held back on considering FRT as a potential solution to their security issues due to the fear of ending up on the wrong side of privacy legislation. But it's not a green light.
'The Privacy Commissioner has highlighted several changes that FSNI needs to make in order to make its trial permanent or to expand it to more stores. The Office of the Privacy Commissioner (OPC) has also set out nine key expectations for organisations that are considering using FRT.
'Compliant FRT deployment is about more than just the technology itself. Factors such as identifying and assessing the specific purpose for which you want to use FRT, maintaining watchlists, protecting the system from misuse and information breach, communications to customers, staffing and training, customer interventions, incident response, managing enquiries and complaints, and maintaining and monitoring the system, are all critical to compliance – and they involve significant research, planning, testing, and careful implementation.
'At the same time, retailers should be aware that the results of an OPC survey published just weeks ago demonstrate that many New Zealanders are not supportive of the use of FRT in retail stores.
'The survey of over 1,200 New Zealanders found that 41% of respondents are 'concerned' or 'very concerned' about the use of facial recognition technology (FRT) in retail stores to identify individuals. A total of 25% are neutral on the topic, 31% are either not so concerned or not concerned at all, and 3% are unsure. 49% of Maori respondents indicated concern over FRT in retail.
'For retailers considering FRT, this means not only ensuring all the privacy legislation boxes are ticked but also taking a step back and asking whether FRT is the most appropriate solution to your security problem.
'Inappropriate FRT deployment exposes an organisation not only to legal risk but also to significant reputational risk. Engaging with trusted experts to understand the privacy dimensions and factors influencing social licence to operate this emerging technology are critical.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
2 hours ago
- 1News
More people are learning to eat out on their own
Father and foodie Andre reserves a "table for one" every couple of weeks — he prefers to try fine dining restaurants alone. The Auckland-based IT professional is a 'busy guy' with a family and a demanding job. 'Sometimes it's nice to just have a bit of chill out time on your own, go somewhere, and eat some food,' he says. 'Probably about a third of the time that I would dine out, I would go on my own.' While sampling degustation menus and new 'nice' restaurants is Andre's idea of a good time, his wife and two teen children are not as into food as he is, so he's happy to go solo. ADVERTISEMENT 'If my wife doesn't want to accompany me to a particular restaurant, but I really want to go, then I'll go solo. It's totally fine. Even if I travel with my wife, I will probably eat half the number of meals solo.' Statistics show that Andre is, ironically, not alone. A rise in the number of people making solo reservations seems to be a global trend. Restaurant Reservation Service OpenTable reported an 8% increase in solo dining reservations in the US last year compared to 2023, and the UK and Canada saw an increase of more than 10%. The phenomenon has become ever apparent across the ditch too, with the average Australian dining solo 49 times in 2024 according to a national hospitality report. NZ Restaurant Association CEO Marisa Bidois says it's likely New Zealanders are following suit. A member poll conducted by the association in 2022 found 30% of responding restaurants reported an increase in solo dining. 'I think that it's probably becoming more acceptable as dining out is becoming part of our everyday life more,' Bidois says. ADVERTISEMENT 'Travelling on your own is certainly becoming more common over the years. So, as we see our tourist numbers tick up, we may see more [solo diners] as well.' Bidois also acknowledges the cost-of-living crisis as a possible reason for the increase. 'Not everyone is in a position to head out for dinner at any one time. And if you're a real foodie, and that's what you're putting your money aside for, you still want to be able to treat yourself.' Auckland chef Al Brown told RNZ last year that his restaurants, which include inner-city Best Ugly Bagels and Depot Eatery, have experienced a rise in customers who are dining by themselves. He says there seems to be more confidence around the activity – and also credits a rise in solo travellers. '[People are] really enjoying their alone time in an atmosphere which is full of theatre. You're being looked after, you're eating a delicious plate of food hopefully – there is a whole lot of feel-good around that. "You don't know what is going to happen so there is a little bit of anxiety. But generally, in hospitality, we're trying to look after people. That's our big thing; making people feel comfortable and giving them a great experience. When you come in alone, you get special treatment, there is no question about that.' ADVERTISEMENT Brown recognises that all owners want their tables to be full, but says the importance of taking care of solo diners should not be underestimated. 'If you look after a good single diner, every time they come to the city, they'll came back to you for sure.' Nosh Restaurant dish featuring Wild Rabbit from Eastherbrook Farms 2019 (Source: Takimi Mazesoba, a booth-style ramen restaurant with a layout specifically designed to cater to solo diners, opened in Takapuna on Auckland's North Shore in January. Adjustable partitions along the tables allow customers to separate themselves from others, creating a private booth with a sense of personal space. The restaurant's layout is inspired by aspects of dining culture in Japan — a nation where nearly a quarter of the population eat out alone. Restaurant operating manager Amy Wu says the booths are designed in response to changing modern lifestyles where people are increasingly valuing space and autonomy. ADVERTISEMENT 'This is not about isolating people, but rather about providing freedom of choice and respecting individual comfort. Many people today enjoy having personal space while still being part of a shared environment,' she says. 'People no longer feel that eating alone must be awkward — instead, it can be peaceful, restorative, and enjoyable.' She says it's mostly young people who savour their brothless-style ramen dish in solitude. Wu believes the layout attracts more solo diners to Takimi Mazesoba than traditional restaurants. 'We believe that offering privacy as an accessible standard, not as a luxury, creates stronger loyalty. 'Many customers have shared that they feel no awkwardness dining alone here as they see others doing the same.' The Restaurant Association survey showed more traditional restaurants are looking at how they can best accommodate a growing demand for friendly solo dining options, Bidois says. ADVERTISEMENT 'Some people had specific areas in the restaurant with a nice outlook where a solo diner could sit and enjoy the view, a lot of shared tables and shared spaces and some people were adaptable with the menu as well,' she said. And after 25 years of solo dining, Andre has developed his own list of what makes a restaurant ideal for a meal alone. 'It's always nice if they have a predefined section asking 'What kind of table do you want' on the booking page,' he says. 'With the proliferation of shared plates, which isn't particularly solo dining friendly, it can make picking options difficult. When I dined in Europe lots of restaurants I went to offered half-size entree or half-size sides." He also rates restaurants that offer a degustation menu for one. Filipino-flavoured Bar Magda and Italian-inspired Amano are among Andre's top picks for places to dine solo in his hometown. For those who want to eat out alone but need that extra confidence boost, the seasoned solo diner says, 'the fear in your head is typically worse than the reality'. '...Sometimes you'll go to a restaurant where people are kind of furtively looking at you and thinking 'Has he been stood up?'. But to be honest, I don't really give a toss about any of that. I'm there for the food; I'm there for the experience and I don't seem to notice anybody else.' By Aisha Campbell for
Otago Daily Times
13 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Half say risk data insufficient — insurer
File photo: Getty Images Nearly half of New Zealanders report they do not have enough information about the climate-related risks to their properties, a major insurance provider says. Tower Insurance chief executive Paul Johnston welcomed the release of the report "A proposed approach for New Zealand's adaptation framework", calling it a step towards greater certainty for communities, councils and insurers. The report by seven specialists, representing iwi, banks, economists, insurers and local authorities, has called for a 20-year transition period to a "mature adaptation framework" to balance the need to spread out costs associated with climate change adaptation with creating the right incentives to act. Mr Johnston said Tower had advocated for nationally consistent hazard modelling and greater data transparency, for all New Zealanders, for some time. "Tower's research shows that 48% of New Zealanders say they lack information about their property's exposure to climate-related risks and natural disasters," he said. "The insurance sector has a vital role in New Zealand's ongoing response to the increasing impacts of climate-related weather events and insurers need long-term certainty around climate adaptation policy to remain attractive to global reinsurers and help keep insurance accessible and affordable. "Risk-based pricing plays a vital role in this by helping to send important market signals." The company urged the government to act swiftly and deliver a bipartisan adaptation framework to provide long-term certainty for all New Zealanders, he said. — APL
NZ Herald
13 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Covid inquiry: Time to cut Dame Jacinda Ardern a break – Fran O'Sullivan
Sowing dissension when this country could more usefully focus on setting an ambition that might persuade more talented New Zealanders to build their futures here instead of heading for the departure lounge. Fact: Ardern has agreed to give evidence to phase two of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into the Government's response to Covid-19. If she cares deeply for her reputation – and I am sure she does, given the global acclaim that has come her way after her memoir A Different Kind of Power – she will agree to do that in public during the commission's hearings. Ardern doesn't have to come back to New Zealand for that. If the commission calls her – and it should – it can take evidence via Zoom as is now commonplace in transnational court hearings. Subjecting the former Prime Minister to running a gauntlet of personal and potentially physical abuse by insisting she gives evidence in New Zealand will just set off another wave of paranoid behaviour. It won't help in getting to the facts and motivations which coloured prime ministerial decision-making in the Covid years in the dispassionate manner that is needed. The economic trade-offs where the money printers went overtime and dollars were flung at business – critics lament that now. The country has a debt bubble to digest. But it is notable that some critics come from companies that took the Government's financial handouts but did not remit them back when their fortunes improved. The shareholders were winners. The taxpayers were 'tail-end Charlie' here. Go figure. Commission chair Grant Illingworth, KC, has said the inquiry will take public evidence from those affected by 'social division and isolation, health and education, and business activity'. This is important so New Zealand can learn the hard lessons from the Covid-19 pandemic and craft strategies for when the next pandemic arrives, as it certainly will. It will also provide a bloodletting for those who were most cruelly affected by the former Labour Government's Covid policies. Hearing from the 'victims' is long overdue. And there are personal stories aplenty, as most can attest. The commission also wants to hear from key decision-makers (and experts) about major decisions and their consequences so lessons can be learned. But the inquiry would be incomplete without hearing from Ardern, former Finance Minister Grant Robertson, former health supremo Sir Ashley Bloomfield and others within the tight Beehive circle that ran the country during the Covid years. It is undeniable that Ardern's performances at the 1pm 'podium of truth', where she and Bloomfield updated daily on the latest Covid situation, were required viewing. Her most impressive attribute was her mastery of that press conference. Her coining of the 'team of five million' (drawn from the late Sir Peter Blake's slogans to build public support for his America's Cup campaigns) to unite New Zealanders in 'fighting the virus' was also masterful. And it worked – at least in the initial phases of the pandemic response. People stayed home. The hospitals were not overrun. Lives were saved – although it is noticeable that the current world Covid death rate statistics show that many other countries did better than New Zealand in the long run. But Ardern's Covid honeymoon was quick to sour. Just one year after she pulled off a historic victory by catapulting Labour to an outright win in the October 2020 election, Ardern's reign hit stumbling blocks. Her Government's tardiness in getting sufficient New Zealanders vaccinated before the mid-August 2021 Delta outbreak helped pave the way for a punishing Auckland lockdown. This was Ardern's toughest year as Prime Minister. Cap that with the politically naive decision not to speak with protesters on Parliament's front lawn – instead of at least speaking with their leaders as commonsense former PM Jim Bolger advocated – and it is not surprising that the tide went out on her prime ministership. It was obvious to anyone coming down from Auckland to Wellington during this period that our political leaders were in a bubble of their own. I went to political journalist Tova O'Brien's farewell from the press gallery on the day we were finally allowed to travel domestically again. It was a different world. No paranoia about drunk citizens hassling or mugging people and acting thuggishly, which had become all too commonplace in the Auckland CBD, where I had spent the past four months. It was all bonhomie and drinks aplenty. The atmosphere also brought into sharp focus the lack of reality that coloured those 1pm press conferences to those watching from Auckland. Bizarre traffic light systems, for instance. The Prime Minister's empathetic response to the March 2019 Christchurch massacre, where 51 Muslims were murdered at the Al Noor and Linwood mosques, had earlier propelled her to international superstardom. The world's tallest building – Dubai's Burj Khalifa – had been lit up with a giant image of Ardern embracing a woman at a Kilbirnie mosque. Her leadership was tested not just by the terrorist attack, but by the Whakaari/White Island disaster and the pandemic. It's ironic that few thank her now for throwing so much money at the crisis. That's the pain of having to pay all that debt back. But there is room to examine all of this dispassionately – not try to (figuratively) hang her again as the more deranged attempted when they wheeled out their noose on Parliament's grounds.
