Road rage at 136 km/hour speed to chase ex's wife: Indian-origin woman Sharanjit Kaur jailed in New Zealand for killing man
An Indian-origin woman, Sharanjit Kaur, has been sentenced to four years in jail after she pleaded guilty to reckless driving causing death of Jonathan Baker. The road rage took place on June 27 last year and the sentence was handed down by Hamilton District Court, New Zealand.
According to reports, Kaur was triggered after she saw a photograph of her ex, referred to Mr R in court documents, with his wife and family at an Indian restaurant. It is not clear whether the man was her ex or current partner. Kaur confronted the man and then started following the wife, referred to as Mrs R.
Court documents revealed that Kaur followed Mrs R at high speed, tailgating, brake-checking, and attempting to intimidate her.
She drove recklessly on the wrong side of Boyd Road at speeds between 125–136 km/h before smashing into Baker's vehicle. He died instantly and Kaur sustained minor injuries.
'Mistress chasing the wife...like a bad novel'
49-year-old Baker's widow Andrea told the court how devastated she was when she received the news of her husband's death. She said her Christian faith prompted her to forgive Kaur. 'In forgiveness for me comes freedom in the long run... I do forgive you, my hope is with you hearing these words...
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Pernas e tornozelos inchados? Descubra o que pode ajudar a drenar agora
aartedoherbalismo
Undo
learn from it and do some good.'
Baker's mother-in-law Colleen told the court that Kaur killed a totally innocent man. 'The mistress chasing the wife... is beyond comprehension, it's like a bad novel'.
She said a drunk or drugged driver-or even an angry wife chasing a mistress - would have made some sense.
Kaur's lawyer Anjeet Singh said she knew nothing she could say would alleviate the Bakers' pain, but her client 'accepts full responsibility'. She said the photo 'led to a psychological collapse... Something more than rage'. The photo brought forth years of turmoil and uncertainty around her eight-year relationship, she said pleading for home detention, which was rejected.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
22 minutes ago
- Mint
SEBI bars Jane Street from securities market over ₹4,843 crore illegal gains: How the saga unfolded — A timeline
Markets regulator SEBI has barred US-based Jane Street Group from the securities markets while directing it to disgorge unlawful gains of ₹ 4,843 crore for allegedly manipulating stock indices through positions taken in derivatives segment. The disgorgement amount that SEBI has listed might be the highest one it has ever directed. The Jane Street (JS) Group has come under Sebi's scrutiny for allegedly manipulating index levels in the stock market to earn illegal profits. The company did it primarily with the highly liquid Bank Nifty and Nifty index options segments. SEBI had launched an investigation into Jane Street early last year. Here is a timeline of the events. Jane Street sues two US employees for allegedly stealing confidential prop trading strategies that were being used in India, earning the company $1 billion during the previous year. SEBI analyses based on Jane Street dispute for unauthorised use of proprietary trading strategies in Indian markets. The two ex-employees countersue Jane Street, claiming they led the India options trading strategy and turned the business huge in the country. US Court gives Jane Street a May deadline to list details about the trade secrets that were allegedly stolen. US judge junks counterclaims, backs Jane Street saying that it did not file the complaint in bad faith. In India, SEBI asked NSE to examine the trading activity of Jane Street inside the country to ensure no market abuse was involved. SEBI talks to Jane Street in late August, group submits details in writing about its options trades. SEBI issues a circular separately to announce F&O curbs for retail traders; markets affected. NSE submits its response to SEBI, following its conclusion of the investigation into the Jane Street Group Jane Street settles its lawsuit in the US without disclosing the terms of the agreement. SEBI, alarmed by the abnormal volatility on weekly index options on expiry days, notices Jane Street's large risk positions in the F&O segment. It forms a team to further examine the issue. SEBI team finds Jane Street violated Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices (PFUTP) regulations. NSE sends a cautionary letter to Jane Street on SEBI's instructions and advises it to avoid taking large cash-equivalent position as well as certain trading patterns. Jane Street replies to NSE's letter. NSE tells Nuvama Wealth, Jane Street's India trading partner, that it had closed the investigation following the reply, as per a Bloomberg report. Jane Street continues to run very large cash-equivalent positions in index options, despite NSE's letter and its reply. SEBI releases interim order, asks Jane Street from accessing markets over ₹ 4,843 unlawful gains
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
37 minutes ago
- First Post
Families of Air India crash victims allege compensation coercion, airline denies
Victims' families have claimed they were coerced by Air India into signing documents detailing their financial dependency on the deceased, seemingly to reduce compensation amounts read more Debris of an Air India plane that crashed moments after taking off from the Ahmedabad airport. Pic/PTI Weeks after the Air India Flight 171 crash in Ahmedabad claimed 241 lives, the families of the victims have accused the airline of pressuring them during the initial compensation process. They allege Air India threatened 'no compensation' if they did not complete a company-provided questionnaire. Families also claim they were coerced into signing documents detailing their financial dependency on the deceased, seemingly to reduce compensation amounts. In response, Air India has dismissed these allegations as 'unsubstantiated and inaccurate.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The crash occurred shortly after the Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner took off from Ahmedabad en route to London, killing all but one of the 242 passengers and crew members on board. UK-based law firm levels serious allegations Stewarts, a UK-based law firm, has been retained by families of over 40 passengers from the UK and India. Partnering with Ahmedabad-based firm Nanavati and Nanavati, Stewarts is assisting Indian families in pursuing claims against Air India, Boeing, and other potentially liable parties, according to an official. In a statement, Stewarts reported that Air India required families to complete a questionnaire to receive an advance payment, forcing them to fill it out in intense heat without guidance on its legal terms and questions. The firm further stated that Air India has been pressuring families to complete the questionnaire, threatening to withhold compensation if they fail to comply. The questionnaire, reportedly necessary for an advance payment, includes legal terminology that the airline allegedly failed to explain, raising concerns that it could be used to minimise future compensation. 'Our clients have shown us the questionnaire. It demands legally significant information using terms with a legal definition which is not being told to families. The information being asked could be used against families by Air India in the future, even though few families will understand how the questions should be interpreted or the test that should be applied for each of the terms used," the firm said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The firm said that they have advised their clients (victim families) not to complete the form, as the company will seek payment for them. 'We are shocked and appalled that Air India is pressurising families for this information when they are at their most vulnerable," the statement said. Air India responds Air India, in its defence, has said it sought only 'basic information' from the families to establish relationships so that compensation is issued to those who are entitled. The airline explained that the question about financial dependency on the deceased was included as a 'fair and necessary' measure to prioritise and process payments for those most in need of assistance. Air India categorically rejects these allegations and refutes them as both unsubstantiated and inaccurate. Air India has been making considerable efforts to process payment of interim compensation (also referred to as advance compensation) as soon as possible, in order to meet the immediate financial needs of affected family members, with the first payments having been made within days of the accident. However, Air India cannot process these payments in an information vacuum. In order to facilitate payments, Air India has sought basic information to establish family relationships to ensure that the advance payments are received by those entitled to them. Whilst the questionnaire does ask family members to indicate with a 'yes" or 'no" as to whether they are 'financially dependent" on the deceased, Air India believes this is an entirely fair and necessary question in order for us to process payments to those most in need of assistance," the Air India statement said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD It said that the families can respond to the questionnaire during their physical presence at the centre established in Ahmedabad or by email. 'Starting 15 June, Air India established a Facilitation Centre at the Taj Skyline hotel in Ahmedabad, where the questionnaire relating to interim compensation is available. In addition, families were sent communications informing them that the questionnaire is also available over e-mail, in the event families do not wish to make a visit to the Centre. Air India staff are present at the Centre to explain the elements of the questionnaire to family members. There is no requirement for family members to complete the questionnaire at the Centre, and several families have chosen to complete the questionnaire at their convenience and submit it over e-mail. Those families who chose to complete the questionnaire at the Centre were provided with copies of their submissions at their request. In addition to being able to ask questions of the Air India staff at the Centre, families are, of course, free to seek legal advice should they wish to do so," the statement said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Jane Street Banned in India LIVE Updates: BSE, other capital market stocks take a hit; all you need to know
Jane Street Banned in India LIVE updates: SEBI, in its order on July 3, announced banning Jane Street, a US-based trading firm, from accessing the Indian stock market for allegedly manipulating the stock market through positions in India's booming derivatives trade. As per a PTI report, this could be the highest disgorgement amount ever directed by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI). What is Jane Street? Jane Street Group was established in 2000 as a global proprietary trading firm in the financial services industry. According to the company's website, it has more than 3000 employees across five global offices. We trade a broad range of asset classes on more than 200 venues in 45 countries. What did SEBI order say? In its interim order, the regulator has debarred JSI Investments, JSI2 Investments Pvt Ltd, Jane Street Singapore Pte Ltd, and Jane Street Asia Trading, entities collectively referred to as the Jane Street Group, from trading until further notice, while continuing its investigation. The Jane Street Group has come under Sebi's scrutiny for allegedly manipulating index levels in the stock market to earn illegal profits, primarily through the highly liquid Bank Nifty and Nifty index options segments. Follow updates here: 04 Jul 2025, 02:48 PM IST The capital market stocks fell today after SEBI barred US trading firm Jane Street from the Indian stock market over alleged manipulation in derivatives trading. Angel One slumped 6%. BSE share price was down 6.4% and Central Depository Services (India) fell 3.5%. Nuvama Wealth Management, which is Jane Street's India trading partner, fell more than 9%. 04 Jul 2025, 02:40 PM IST SEBI, in its 105-page order, accused Jane Street of manipulating the Bank Nifty index—an index made up of 12 top financial stocks and popular in derivatives trading. According to SEBI, Jane Street followed two key trading strategies over more than two years that were designed to unfairly move the index. Here's how it worked: In the morning, Jane Street would buy large amounts of Bank Nifty stocks and futures to artificially push up the index. At the same time, they were placing big bets against the index using options. Later in the day, they would reverse their trades—selling what they bought earlier—to drive the index back down and profit from the drop. SEBI said this created a false sense of market activity, tricking other traders into buying or selling at misleading price levels. On days when Bank Nifty options expired, Jane Street also made large, focused trades near market close, which SEBI says was an attempt to influence the final price of the index in their favour. 04 Jul 2025, 02:21 PM IST Market regulator banned US-based trading firm Jane Street from operating in the Indian stock market, accusing it of manipulating stock indices through its trades in the derivatives segment. In what is SEBI's toughest action yet against a foreign firm, the regulator said in an order on July 3 that Jane Street and its related companies are no longer allowed to trade in India. SEBI also seized ₹ 4,843 crore from the firm, calling it illegal profits made through the alleged manipulation.
