logo
HECS cuts have passed the Senate. Will they make university fairer?

HECS cuts have passed the Senate. Will they make university fairer?

Labor's pre-election pledge to cut student and apprentice loans by 20 per cent has now passed parliament, becoming the first piece of legislation enacted by the newly re-elected Albanese government.
"We promised it and we've delivered," federal Education Minister Jason Clare told reporters on Thursday morning.
The bill passed on Thursday also contains an increase in the repayment threshold, meaning a debtor can now earn up to $67,000 a year before the minimum repayment kicks in.
Mr Clare said raising the threshold makes the system "fairer".
The pledge to cut debts was evidently popular with many voters during the 2025 election campaign, and comes at a cost of about $16 billion.
Student organisations, industry groups and independent politicians say there are other ways of spending that money to fix the tertiary sector. Here's what they're calling on the government to do.
In 2021, the Morrison government changed the way university fees were structured through a program called Job-ready Graduates. The scheme aimed to use price signals to drive enrolment in courses in areas of skills shortages like nursing, mathematics and agriculture. Course fees for those subjects fell, while the cost of courses in history, law and media increased.
Analysis from the University of Melbourne in 2023 found that the program was having a minimal impact on student enrolments, with less than 2 per cent of students choosing to enrol in a course they otherwise wouldn't have because of the scheme.
"The Job-ready Graduates package is holding Australia back. It's time to replace it with a system that actually supports our future workforce," head of Universities Australia Luke Sheehy told triple j hack.
Even the Coalition's spokesperson for education, Jonno Duniam, acknowledged that it should be scrapped.
"The point has been made that the program isn't working. If a program isn't working, whether it be ideology or otherwise, there's no point sticking to it," Mr Duniam told triple j hack.
The Greens and independent MP Monique Ryan wanted amendments to the bill to cut HECS and HELP loans that would immediately end the "unfair" Job-ready Graduate program.
"Labor should have dumped Morrison's Job-ready Graduates fee hikes the second they came into power. The scheme is a cruel, punitive mess that does nothing except punish students with high fees," Greens education spokesperson Mehreen Faruqi said.
The government would need to legislate to change the existing fee structure, but any such bill would have the support of the Greens and other key crossbenchers, like independent ACT senator David Pocock.
The Universities Accord, a broad-ranging review of the higher education system, found that Australia would need 80 per cent of its workforce to have a tertiary qualification by 2050 to be globally competitive.
To achieve that goal, the proportion of disadvantaged students with a qualification will need to drastically increase. Of the entire student population in 2023, just 2.2 per cent were First Nations, 12 per cent had a disability, 15 per cent were from low socio-economic backgrounds, and 18 per cent were from rural and regional areas, according to figures from Universities Australia.
The Accord recommended implementing a needs-based funding model for universities like the Gonski funding model used in schools, which allocates more funding to schools with a greater number of students who have higher needs.
The government has set up the interim Australian Tertiary Education Commission to work out the new funding model, and has pointed to the work underway by this body as a reason why it won't immediately scrap the Job-ready Graduate program.
But Ms Ryan said the government shouldn't wait for the new funding model to scrap Job-ready Graduates.
"The Australian Tertiary Education Commission won't be functional till 2026, and is not going to be able to change university fees till 2027. We have young people studying arts and law degrees this year, spending more than $22,000 a year on those courses," she said.
"They should have been doing the work to get a new model in place over the last three years. What have they been doing on Job-ready Graduates for the last three years? There's urgency here," Senator Pocock said.
Last year, the government introduced changes to the way student loans were indexed. Indexation refers to the way existing debts are calculated to consider fluctuations in inflation, year on year.
The changes would see indexation based on either the consumer price index, which calculates inflation, or the wage price index, whichever is lower.
But student groups, the Greens, independents and the Coalition say that shouldn't be the end of it. They want more change in this space.
Independents like Ms Ryan and Senator Pocock want the government to change the timing at which indexation is applied.
Currently, HECS-HELP debts are deducted from a debtor's pay cheque, but the overall amount owed doesn't decrease until after the debtor has filed their tax return. Debts are indexed annually on June 1, before tax returns are lodged, which means the amount indexed and added to the debt does not reflect the amount owed.
Former shadow education minister Sarah Henderson said the government should cap indexation at 3 per cent.
"Australians with a student loan or those planning to undertake tertiary studies should not be blindsided by high indexation driven by high inflation, as has occurred under Labor over the past three years," Senator Henderson said.
The National Union of Students wants debts to be frozen during periods of high inflation.
"It is outrageous that during a cost-of-living crisis, the Australian government would profit billions of dollars off of student debt," former NUS president Bailey Riley told a Senate inquiry.
The Greens also want to scrap indexation altogether.
"Unless indexation is removed, students will be in this hamster wheel, always chasing their debts, which keep getting bigger and bigger," Senator Faruqi said.
From July this year, students undertaking compulsory work placements as part of a nursing, teaching, social work or midwifery course will be paid to undertake those placements.
But the government is under increasing pressure to extend the payments beyond the four existing courses to other allied health and medical courses.
"It really is odd to exclude our medical students from the same financial help other students receive while expecting them to undertake practical placements, often in rural, regional and remote areas," the president of the Australian Medical Association, Danielle McMullen, said.
"Psychologists are only meeting 35 per cent of the federal government's psychology workforce goal, and exclusion from the paid placement scheme will entrench this shortage," head of the Australian Association of Psychologists Tegan Carrison said.
Occupational therapy student Arabella Hely told triple j hack that allied health students are dropping out because they can't afford to live without income during their compulsory placements.
"I know I've had to drop down to part-time study to be able to support myself. So many people are dropping to part-time study or deferring completely."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Break it Down: Fortescue commits $3.5M to fast-track Myall JV with Magmatic
Break it Down: Fortescue commits $3.5M to fast-track Myall JV with Magmatic

News.com.au

time4 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

Break it Down: Fortescue commits $3.5M to fast-track Myall JV with Magmatic

Stockhead's Break it Down brings you today's leading market news in under 90 seconds. In this episode, host Tylah Tully looks at news from Magmatic Resources (ASX:MAG), which has locked in a $3.5 million exploration budget with joint venture partner Fortescue (ASX:FMG). The funds will be used at the joint ventured Myall project in New South Wales for drilling across FY25-FY26. Watch the video to learn more. While Magmatic Resources is a Stockhead advertiser, it did not sponsor this content. Originally published as Break it Down: Fortescue commits $3.5M to fast-track Myall JV with Magmatic

‘Hit to global growth': Australia to feel the impacts of Trump tariffs
‘Hit to global growth': Australia to feel the impacts of Trump tariffs

News.com.au

time13 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

‘Hit to global growth': Australia to feel the impacts of Trump tariffs

Australia may have avoided the worst of the US tariffs, but it is still likely to impact every household in a few key ways. Starting August 1, US trading partners faced a wave of fresh levies. US President Donald Trump signed in higher rates for many countries under a new executive order, but so far has left the original baseline tariffs at 10 per cent. Australia does not have an additional 'reciprocal tariff' and only faces the base rate. AMP chief economist Shane Oliver said while Australia would not be directly impacted, there would be second order impacts. 'It is good news for Australian companies but the threat to global growth remains significant,' Dr Oliver said. 'The average tariff rate is 20 per cent …. well up from the two to three per cent tariff going to the US at the start of the year. 'There is going to be a hit to the US economic growth and global growth as there is a big increase compared to last year.' This slowdown is the biggest threat to the Australian economy. Interest rate In a win for mortgage holders and a loss for savers, the fallout from Trump's tariffs could see interest rates cut further than previously anticipated. Dr Oliver said on the back of slowing economic growth households with a mortgage could benefit from lower rates. 'It won't push prices up in Australia …. if anything, the weaker economic growth environment that might unfold could mean less inflation,' he told NewsWire. 'But there is this perverse thing because of the uncertainty imposed on global growth. 'It could mean lower than otherwise interest rates and households with mortgages will benefit from that.' The RBA minutes from July showed while interest rates were kept on hold, the board was already debating the impact of Trump's tariffs. The minority in favour of a cut argued that US tariff policy would be a drag on future global economic growth, Australia's economy is subdued, household spending was weak and the economy lost momentum. 'Uncertainty in the world economy remained pronounced and the material increase in US tariffs – even if not as extreme as had been announced in early April – would be a drag on future growth abroad, and thereby domestic economic activity and inflation,' the minutes of the RBA's monetary policy meeting said. Jobs market While interest rate falls could help mortgage holders, the same economic fallout could smash the Australian jobs market. In its latest release of jobs data, the ABS revealed Australia's unemployment rate jumped to 4.3 per cent — its highest level since the post pandemic recovery. Still, it remains lower than the long term average. Dr Oliver also said Australians might find the overall economic market tougher in the foreseeable future, which would impact jobs. 'If global growth is weaker that means less demand for our exports, less national income which could adversely affect economic growth in Australia, which could mean the jobs market may not be as strong as it has been,' he said. 'It might be a tougher economic environment generally for Australians meaning it's a little bit harder to get a job.' S uperannuation Investments in shares and superannuation are tipped to be more volatile, although it is unlikely to see the same dramatic drop as the post 'Liberation day falls'. When the tariffs were first announced on April 7, the ASX 200 wiped almost $110bn off as it fell by 4.2 per cent. The market eventually fell to a low point of 7169 points before rallying 22 per cent to the end of July. IG market analyst Tony Sycamore said currently the market reaction was 'subdued' to the tariffs, with investors learning tariffs could be negotiated. 'The combination of these factors has kept market volatility low at this point of time,' Mr Sycamore said. 'What could change this situation, is retaliatory tariffs from impacted countries, which in turn could lead to higher tariffs from the US than the ones announced this morning.' Meat and livestock Australian beef producers are so far the surprising winner out of Mr Trump's crackdown on imports, as limited stock and a lack of supply sees Australia emerge as the last man standing. Commonwealth Bank sustainable and agricultural economist Dennis Voznesenski previously told NewsWire strong demand out of the US would continue to support new all-time highs. 'The US has largely four sources to import beef from abroad, being Mexico, Canada, Brazil and Australia,' Mr Voznesenski said. 'Mexico has a flesh eating bacteria called new age screw worm with the US closing the border to Mexico … Canada exports to the US are down 25 per cent from last year as they rebuild stock and as of August 1 President Trump plans to put a 50 per cent tariff on Brazil.' The economist said US farmers currently had a multiple-decade low supply of beef, meaning they will need to continue to export from other countries. 'Typically with tariffs the objective is to the onshore industry. With some products you can restart quickly, but with cattle it's just not how it works, ' Mr Voznesenski said. Buying medicines Australians as a whole could be paying more for medicines as the US President took aim at 'foreign freeloading nations.' In a group, which alluded to Australia's pharmaceutical benefit schemes, Mr Trump issued a letter to the bosses of 17 drug firms on Thursday demanding they extend 'most favoured nation' pricing to the US. 'Domestic MFN pricing will require you, and all manufacturers, to negotiate harder with foreign freeloading nations,' Mr Trump wrote in the letters. 'US trade policy will endeavour to support this. However, increased revenues abroad must be repatriated to lower drug prices for American patients and taxpayers through an explicit agreement with the United States.' While pointing out the full impact was currently unknown, Dr Oliver said it was conceivable individual Australians or the government would have to pay more for medicines.

Workplace racism costs economy $37b a year: AHRC
Workplace racism costs economy $37b a year: AHRC

AU Financial Review

time34 minutes ago

  • AU Financial Review

Workplace racism costs economy $37b a year: AHRC

The race discrimination commissioner has called on the government to pass changes to the Racial Discrimination Act that would require companies to safeguard against racism in the workplace, saying it was costing the Australian economy $37 billion a year. The Albanese government amended the Sex Discrimination Act in 2022, in line with recommendations from the Australian Human Rights Commission, introducing new 'positive duty' rules that shifted the onus for employers from responding to complaints to preventing harassment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store