Alan McCarthy obituary
He began his work with Cara in 2006, and served as the chair of its UK allocation committee, as well as honorary secretary and chair of trustees, taking on ever greater responsibilities as its income grew up to £12.5m in 2023.
In particular, he helped to drive forward programmes in Jordan that supported exiled Iraqi academics (2006-12) and allowed 200 Syrian academics to settle in Turkey (2016-24). He also mentored exiled academics in the UK through Cara's fellowship programme.
Alan was born in Belfast, the eldest of four children, to June (nee Hamilton), a nurse, and John, a draughtsman at the Harland & Wolff shipyard. At Friends' school in Lisburn he met Linda Robinson, a fellow pupil, and they married in 1976.
Alan studied microbiology at Bath University, followed by a PhD in bacterial taxonomy at Bradford University, after which, in 1981, he joined a research group I was leading at the University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology. In 1985 he left Manchester to become a microbiology lecturer at Liverpool University, rising to be a professor there in 2002.
Alan's research at Liverpool centred on microbial ecology, nutrient recycling and taxonomy, and he designed novel methods for sustainable waste management and fuel production. He was also active as an administrator at the university.
His sense of humour, informality, wisdom, generosity and empathy were greatly appreciated by his colleagues at Liverpool, as well as at Cara. Those qualities were also brought to bear as a governor of Shrewsbury school and its associated Shrewsbury House youth and community centre in Liverpool.
Alan's home in Cheshire was a social hub, for he was intensely interested in people and always supportive of their interests and activities. In his spare time he loved driving his old red MG sports car, was a wicketkeeper in village cricket teams and a rock and jazz music enthusiast.
He is survived by Linda, their children, Liam, Jack, Alex and Dan, and grandchildren, Anna, Ned and Lucas, and by his sisters Arlene, Frances and Deborah.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
3 days ago
- Times
As the Beatles said, maybe all you do need is love
Perhaps more so than any other band the Beatles devoted much of their wordsmithery to questions of close affection. 'All you need is love,' was one Lennon-McCartney recommendation. 'Love me do' was their first such plea on vinyl, and the Fab Four's epitaph was famously 'the love you take is equal to the love you make'. For some, the lyrics summed up the band's message of peace and harmony; for others, they were hippy dippy smush. Now it turns out that Liverpool's finest may have had a point. Researchers at Pennsylvania State University have been tracking 52 individuals for a month, quizzing them six times every day via their smartphones on whether they had expressed amore, or had received some in return. In this context, the researchers interpreted 'love' broadly: spending time with someone close, gift giving, or expressing affection through words. The conclusion was one Messrs Lennon and McCartney would welcome: when people expressed love to others, they tended to feel more loved in return. However, the study found the reverse was not necessarily true: receiving affection from others did not automatically make people more generous with their love. The researchers admit they expected a two-way relationship: 'It was somewhat surprising to find that increases in feelings of being loved didn't increase expressions of love over time.' Their conclusion is that some individuals are better at receiving affection than giving it. • Why small acts of affection may be the key to feeling more loved yourself The power of love goes deeper than self-fulfilment. Participants in the study reported other psychological benefits. Those who felt more loved scored better on average when it came to mental health and feelings of loneliness. Such studies should always be treated with caution, given their observational nature. But at its heart is a timeless truth: saying 'I love you' costs nothing but can mean everything.
BBC News
5 days ago
- BBC News
The Northern Forest: 10 million trees planted in the north of England
Millions of trees have been planted in the north of England as part of a huge project to boost woodland. So far, 10 million of them have been put in the ground since The Northern Forest project was launched in 2018. The goal is to eventually plant 50 million trees by 2043 in and around cities including Liverpool, Chester, Preston, Manchester, Bradford, Leeds, Sheffield, York and Hull. The latest city to benefit from the project is Liverpool, where volunteers have planted 10 hectares of trees in 20 parks across the city, making up just part of the Mersey Forest. The Northern Forest project started back in 2018 to transform the landscape across much of northern area covered by the scheme is said to be home to 13 million people. However, only 7.6% of it is covered by woodland, which is a lot less compared to the UK average of 13%.It's hoped the planting of 50 million trees will benefit local communities and help wildlife of places have already benefitted from the project, including the areas around eight fire stations in Greater Manchester and Oak Road Playing Fields in Hull, which is next to a river prone to flooding. Why are trees so amazing? Trees are 'tree-mendous' for the environment, and here's why. They can play a really important role in tackling some of the effects of climate change. Carbon dioxide (CO2) is a greenhouse gas which is released into the atmosphere when fossil fuels are burnt. Scientists say it causes heat from the sun to be trapped, causing temperatures on Earth to rise. But trees work as an air filtration system, absorbing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and converting it into oxygen, which is released into the air. That's not all. They also provide a home for lots of wildlife around the world. They can help reduce flooding too, by absorbing some of the water and reducing erosion.
BBC News
08-06-2025
- BBC News
Spending Review to include £86bn for science and tech
An £86bn package for the science and technology sector will help fund research into drug treatments and longer-lasting batteries, the government has said ahead of Wednesday's Spending package also includes up to £500m for regions across the UK with local leaders having a say on how it is spent, the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) Rachel Reeves, whose review will outline day-to-day departmental and investment budgets over the next few years, said investing in the sector would create jobs and boost research backers have warned that the government needs to do more to secure the UK's reputation for science on the world stage. Reeves will set out departmental spending plans on Wednesday, with the package for science and technology expected to be worth more than £22.5 billion-a-year by said "every corner of the country" would benefit, with communities able to direct funding to expertise specific to their Liverpool, which has a long history in biotech, funding will be used to speed up drug discovery. Northern Ireland will receive money to develop defence equipment, while south Wales will use the money to design microchips used to power mobile phones and electric chancellor said: "Britain is the home of science and technology. Through the plan for change, we are investing in Britain's renewal to create jobs, protect our security against foreign threats and make working families better off." Tony McBride, director of policy and public affairs at the Institute of Physics, welcomed the funding but said the government would need to commit to a decade-long plan to train workers."This must include a plan for the skilled workforce we need to deliver this vision, starting with teachers and addressing every educational stage, to underpin the industrial strategy," he Rottingen, chief executive of Britain's biggest non-governmental research funder Wellcome, warned that visa costs for scientists from overseas, financial challenges at universities and a budget that was not adjusted for inflation could hamper the government's ambitions. "The UK should be aiming to lead the G7 in research intensity, to bring about economic growth and the advances in health, science and technology that benefit us all." Earlier this week, Reeves admitted that not every government department would "get everything they want" in Wednesday's review, saying she had turned down requests from ministers and argued a squeeze on funding was a "product of economic reality".Reeves said her fiscal rules on borrowing to pay for public services were "non-negotiable" and insisted they were necessary because of "Conservative maltreatment" of the Treasury said earlier this year that the chancellor's fiscal rules would ensure day-to-day spending was matched by tax revenues, meaning the government would only borrow to chunks will go to favoured departments, with suggestions of an extra £30 billion for the NHS over three insiders have told the BBC they expect the spending review will be "ugly", and that ministers have been fighting over winning small amounts of cash for their respective departments.
