Bolus sues over Lackawanna County commissioner vacancy
Bolus filed a lawsuit April 10 in Lackawanna County Court against Democratic Lackawanna County Commissioner Bill Gaughan that seeks to bar him from having county-paid legal representation in pending litigation over the vacancy of former Commissioner Matt McGloin.
Gaughan and the county initiated litigation last month seeking to remove the Lackawanna County Democratic Committee from the process of replacing McGloin, a Democrat who resigned in late February.
The vacancy litigation pits Gaughan/the county against the Lackawanna County Democratic Committee over whether the vacancy should be filled pursuant to the county's Home Rule Charter or a state court rule. The charter process had the Democratic Committee picking three candidates to forward to county judges, who then would select one to fill the McGloin vacancy. The Gaughan/county challenge to the charter process claims it is trumped by Pennsylvania Rule of Judicial Administration 1908 of 2019, which says the county court — not a political party — shall receive applications from any interested candidates for the position.
Lackawanna County Senior Judges Carmen Minora, Robert Mazzoni and Vito Geroulo sitting as a panel will hear oral arguments Tuesday in the vacancy litigation.
The lawsuit by Bolus, a Republican, raises arguments similar to those of Republican Lackawanna County Commissioner Chris Chermak — mainly that Gaughan acted unilaterally and if he wants to pursue the litigation, he should do so individually, with his own personal attorney and pay for his own legal bills.
County Comissioner Chris Chermak listens to commissioner Bill Gaughan's comments at the conclusion of the Lackawanna County commissioners meeting at the Lackawanna County Government Center in Scranton on Wednesday, March 19, 2025. (REBECCA PARTICKA/STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER)
Bolus has been a vocal critic of Gaughan for years and has portrayed him as a cartoon skunk on a tractor-trailer festooned with political messages. Bolus filed his lawsuit on a 'pro-se' basis, meaning without an attorney, and as a tort against Gaughan, and not as part of the vacancy litigation. Seeking a judgment in excess of $50,000, Bolus also filed on April 11 a companion petition for a preliminary injunction to stop Gaughan from using taxpayer funds to litigate the vacancy issue.
'By the time a civil case is litigated, the tax payer funds will have have been spent already,' Bolus' petition for an injunction says.
As of Thursday afternoon, the court had not taken any action on Bolus' injunction petition. Whether he has legal standing to pursue such a lawsuit or whether it follows rules of civil procedure, or whether it might be rendered moot if the vacancy dispute is resolved first, all remain to be seen.
Gaughan also had not yet formally responded in court to Bolus' lawsuit. In a phone interview Thursday, Gaughan said: 'I did receive it and I had a very, very good chuckle, a good laugh. I don't take Bob Bolus seriously at all. He's a fruit fly. He's a nuisance to society and this will most likely get dismissed, like almost every other lawsuit he's had.'
Bolus argues he has legal standing to pursue the lawsuit as a property owner, resident and taxpayer in the county.
Last week, the panel of judges did not allow the Democratic Committee's top candidate, former county economic development Director Brenda Sacco, to enter the vacancy litigation as an intervenor, ruling that she has no legal standing in the matter and her interests are adequately represented by the committee.
The Democratic Committee also contends that Gaughan and the county lack legal standing to pursue the vacancy litigation. But Gaughan and the county reject that claim, citing law giving municipalities and their officials standing to challenge the constitutionality of actions affecting their government functions and interests.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Andrew Cuomo, conceding his failed primary campaign was flawed, takes to NYC streets
Andrew Cuomo is shifting gears and taking personal responsibility for running what he admits was a lackluster campaign in the Democratic mayoral primary, acknowledging that any strategic mistakes ultimately fall on him. 'It was my campaign, I take the responsibility — period,' Cuomo told the Daily News in a series of interviews from the campaign trail Wednesday. 'The buck stops with me, and we did not effectively communicate.' Now running as an independent in November's general election against Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani, Cuomo said he will be taking a very different tact. 'Better use with social media, reaching out to more young people and touching more people,' Cuomo said of his new focus while riding the Q train from 96th St. to 72nd St. in between stops to talk to voters on the Upper East Side, where he largely got a positive reception. 'He's for New York, and all that other stuff that happened with him doesn't matter,' Annie Albarian, 65, a registered Republican and Upper East Side resident who plans to vote for Cuomo in November, said, a reference to his 2021 resignation as governor. Cuomo, who resigned amid sexual and professional misconduct accusations he denies, said he will during the general election campaign be doing more retail politics, like riding the trains, walking the streets and interacting directly with voters. Mamdani defeated Cuomo in the primary by a 12% margin after running an energetic campaign grounded in that type of direct outreach. By contrast, Cuomo ran a 'Rose Garden' campaign of sorts during the primary, largely staying out of the public spotlight and relying on a supportive super PAC to spend heavily on ads for him, as nearly all polls projected he'd easily defeat Mamdani and his other opponents. 'All the political geniuses said we had a big lead and the campaign played it safe, I played it safe, uncharacteristically, and that was a mistake,' he said on the Q train. As part of Cuomo's general election bid revamp, a source familiar with the matter said he also plans to hire a new campaign manager, a new social media team and a new consulting firm to spearhead strategy for him. During the primary, Cuomo relied heavily on Mercury, a PR firm headed by his longtime ally Charlie King. Though his style may change, Cuomo signaled Wednesday he will continue to pitch himself as a battle-tested manager who has the type of deep experience New York needs at a time of myriad challenges, like a housing crisis and federal funding cuts from President Trump. He will also continue to paint Mamdani, a 33-year-old Queens Assembly member, as too inexperienced and his policy platform, which includes a promise to freeze rent for stabilized tenants, as too radical and unrealistic. 'He's not a Democrat,' Cuomo, a lifelong Democrat, said when asked how he justifies challenging the Democratic nominee in November's contest. 'A socialist won in the Democratic primary.' Cuomo's own policy platform remains a bit diffuse, with several of his proposals, including for addressing the local housing crisis, light on details. Cuomo's Wednesday campaign jaunt included advantageous locations. In riding the Q, he was on a section of the Second Ave. subway he as governor helped build — and while underground he touted it repeatedly as a major accomplishment, at one point stopping by a plaque with his name on it. Later in the day, he invited The News to join him at an apartment complex in East New York that he helped build in the late 1980s while running HELP, a low-income housing development firm. 'He's loving, he's kind, he's generous, he's the best landlord we had ever,' Leotha McLean Chase, who has lived in the housing complex since it opened in 1992, said outside the building before affirming she's voting for Cuomo in November. No matter his strategy, Cuomo faces an uphill battle. As the Democratic nominee, Mamdani is polling as the favorite to win in November, given the city's overwhelmingly Democratic electorate. During the primary, Mamdani generated a groundswell of support from young voters by centering his campaign on a slate of policy proposals focused on affordability, and he has racked up key institutional support since then, including from powerful unions that used to back Cuomo. Cuomo's path to election is further complicated by Mayor Adams, who's also running as an independent in November and appeals to a similar constituency of moderates and conservatives, potentially cutting into the ex-gov's base of support. In formally entering the November race earlier this week, Cuomo proposed that all independent and Republican candidates in the running should commit to dropping out in September and coalesce behind the person who's polling best in a head-to-head matchup with Mamdani to maximize their chances of beating him. So far, Cuomo's polling as Mamdani's biggest threat. But Adams and Republican mayoral nominee Curtis Sliwa have already affirmed they will not entertain such a polling proposal, with the incumbent saying Cuomo's the one who should drop out. In speaking to The News on Wednesday, Cuomo said he's nonetheless hopeful Adams — who's hobbled by continued fallout from his corruption indictment and relationship with Trump — will eventually come around to the idea that he should drop out if he's not polling as the most credible candidate to beat Mamdani. 'Right now, I'm sure he believes he will be the stronger candidate, and, great, run your campaign, and if he's the stronger candidate, I will defer,' Cuomo said. 'But I'm running my campaign, and if I'm the stronger candidate, he should defer.' Frank Carone, Adams' campaign chairman, said that isn't going to happen. 'As I have said repeatedly there is no chance of that — none, zero, zilch. Any objective person can see that Mayor Adams and his administration have one of the best records in history in delivering for working class New Yorkers,' Carone said, pointing to an increase in small businesses, drops in some crime categories and an uptick in housing construction. 'Any suggestion to the contrary is delusion and psychotic arrogance.'
The Hill
23 minutes ago
- The Hill
900 DOJ attorneys urge Senate to reject Bove nomination
More than 900 former Justice Department attorneys are urging the Senate Judiciary Committee to reject the nomination of Emil Bove for a lifetime judicial appointment. Bove, who previously served on President Trump's criminal defense team, is now in the No. 3 role at the Department of Justice (DOJ) and has been nominated for a judgeship on the Third Circuit Court of Appeals. The extraordinary outpouring came from attorneys from the Kennedy administration to the current Trump administration who pinpointed Bove as a key figure behind numerous firings and policy shifts, calling him a 'leader in this assault' on the Justice Department. 'Emil Bove has been an architect and enforcer of many of the attacks on DOJ and its employees,' said Stacey Young, executive director and founder of Justice Connection, which organized the letter. 'His nomination to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals sent shockwaves across DOJ's workforce, and should alarm all Americans concerned about the Department's future and the survival of the rule of law.' The Senate Judiciary Committee is set to consider Bove's nomination Thursday, as well as that of Fox News host Jeanine Pirro to serve as a U.S. Attorney. The letter runs through a string of recent controversies in which Bove has played a role. He was central in pushing the dismissal of the bribery charges brought against New York Mayor Eric Adams, prompting a wave of resignations from members of the department's Public Integrity Section. He was behind terminations of prosecutors who worked on Jan. 6 cases and a request to turn over a list of FBI agents who investigated riot cases. It also focuses on recent allegations from a DOJ whistleblower who said Bove told top department officials they may need to consider saying 'f— you' to judges who might block the administration's invocation of the Alien Enemies Act to send migrants to Salvadoran prison. Bove has said he couldn't recall whether he used the expletive, but told lawmakers during his confirmation hearing that he 'certainly conveyed the importance of the upcoming operation.' 'Each one of the undersigned would testify, under oath, that we have never — and would never — tell a Justice Department attorney to consider defying a court order. Moreover, the Justice Department's later defiance of judicial mandates in the cases where Mr. Bove previewed doing so further suggests that disregarding court orders was Mr. Bove's intent all along,' the letter states. Bove's nomination looks poised to proceed, as Sen. Thom Tillis (N.C.), the only Republican on the panel to previously oppose a Trump nominee, has said he would follow the staff recommendation. 'We ask that before the Judiciary Committee votes on this nomination, you rigorously examine the actions Mr. Bove has taken at DOJ and the effects they've had on the Department's integrity, employees, and mission-critical work,' the attorneys wrote. 'It is intolerable to us that anyone who disgraces the Justice Department would be promoted to one of the highest courts in the land, as it should be intolerable to anyone committed to maintaining our ordered system of justice.'
The Hill
23 minutes ago
- The Hill
GOP split on whether Trump should fire Powell
Republican lawmakers are split over if President Trump should fire Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, with some pushing him to nix the central bank head and others encouraging him to be patient. Trump indicated to some lawmakers that he plans to fire Powell during an Oval Office meeting Tuesday evening, a White official and a second source told The Hill. But by Wednesday, the president was walking back some of his sentiments, telling reporters, 'I don't rule out anything but I think it's highly unlikely. Unless he has to leave, fraud.' The idea of Trump pursuing Powell's removal before his term is up next year rattled the markets, causing them to dip on Wednesday before finishing up. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose half a percent on the day and the S&P 500 was up 0.3 percent. It was clear, as Trump has indicated before, his words have a real-time impact on stocks and bonds. But just who is advising Trump on the matter appears to be somewhat of a mystery. Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) was in the camp of believing that firing Powell was a bad idea, citing that markets are watching. 'No. Long term, the markets watch very carefully the independence of the Federal Reserve,' he told The Hill on Wednesday. 'I think when the time comes to reduce interest rates – and I think the time is coming – I think the fact that he has maintained his credibility with the markets will help and will send a really positive message to the markets.' 'By allowing the Fed chair a recognition and a stability in his tenure is going to work to the president's advantage long term,' Rounds added. When pressed on if the president is hearing that message enough, Rounds said he wasn't sure who has his ear. 'I don't know who that would be. I think [Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent] would clearly understand that and I'm hoping that his other advisers would be counseling him in the same way,' he said. Sen. John Hoeven (R-N.D.), meanwhile, said feelings about whether to nix Powell were mixed within the GOP conference. 'It depends who you ask,' he said. Some Republicans in the House were cheering for Powell to be out, including Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) who shared reporting about Trump being likely to fire Powell soon and said 'told you.' 'Jerome Powell better lower those interest rates. You heard @POTUS 's statement just now. Plenty of smart people with common sense begging for the job. Ball is in his court. If he doesn't lower rates he will be FIRED. Bookmark this,' she said on X. But feelings in that chamber are mixed, too. Rep. Byron Donalds (R-Fla.), who is running for Florida governor, said he's not on board yet on supporting removing Powell. 'I'm not there yet, but I'll tell you that the president doesn't rule anything out,' Donalds said in an interview at the Hill Nation Summit. 'It's pretty clear the president is frustrated about where short-term interest rates are,' Donalds said. Trump went back and forth about removing Powell this week, reportedly drafting a letter to do so that he showed the lawmakers in the Oval Office meeting on Tuesday evening. But by the next day, he called such reporting 'not true' and said no letter had been drafted. Earlier this week, Bessent said there was a ' formal process ' underway to select Powell's successor. Powell's term as chair of the Fed's board of governors ends next year and his term as a governor goes until 2028. No president has ever fired a Fed chair before, and there are serious doubts that the presidential powers include the legal authority to do so. Trump's main quarrel with Powell is that the Federal Reserve's interest rate-setting committee hasn't dropped interest rates this year, a move that would make lending cheaper and likely please financial markets. Powell said earlier this month that the Fed has held rates aloft specifically because of the anticipated price effects of Trump's tariffs, which have likely just started to show up in the national price data. Asked if the Fed would have cut rates more if it weren't for the tariffs, Powell said, 'I think that's right.' That puts Fed policy squarely at odds with Trump's desires. Prices in the consumer price index rose to a 2.7-percent annual increase in June, up from 2.4 percent in May, likely due to the cost of tariffs being passed on to consumers. Prices rose in heavily imported goods such as apparel, appliances, and home furnishings, which was a smoking gun for tariff inflation for many economists. Republicans also just passed a law including large-scale tax cuts, which are traditionally thought to be economically stimulative, though projections show very little growth coming from the cuts. 'If President Trump's goal was to get interest rates down, doing nothing would've been a much better course of action than imposing sweeping tariffs and passing a huge, deficit-financed tax cut,' Kevin Rinz, a senior fellow at the Washington Center for Equitable Growth, wrote in a commentary. 'Antagonizing the Fed and actively threatening to fire Chairman Powell only makes it harder to get to the point where prices are stable and rates can come down,' he added.
