Trump says deal for ceasefire in Gaza is closer after Israel agrees on terms
Neither side has accepted the proposal announced on Tuesday (July 1, 2025) by Mr. Trump, who has admonished Hamas that if the militant group does not buy into the offer, its prospects will get worse. It's not clear what conditions Israel agreed to.
The efforts to reach a truce are unfolding in the wake of powerful Israeli and American strikes on nuclear sites in Iran, which has long supported Hamas, and just days before Mr. Trump is scheduled to meet with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Washington.
Here's a look at the situation and the challenges it might present.
Details of the proposed ceasefire are just beginning to emerge. But rather than being completely new, the potential deal seems to be a somewhat modified version of a framework proposed earlier this year by Mr. Trump's Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff.
Mr. Trump said on Tuesday in a social media post that Qatar and Egypt have been working on the details and would deliver a final proposal to Hamas.
An Egyptian official involved in the ceasefire talks told The Associated Press that the proposal calls for Hamas to release 10 more hostages during the two-month period — eight on the first day and two on the final day. During that period, Israel would withdraw troops from some parts of Gaza and allow badly needed aid into the territory.
The war began on Oct. 7, 2023, when Hamas-led militants attacked southern Israel, killing 1,200 people and taking roughly 250 hostages. The group is believed to still have some 50 hostages, with fewer than half of them thought to be alive.
The Egyptian official, speaking on condition of anonymity because he was not authorised to talk to reporters, said a sticking point over how aid would be distributed had been resolved with Israel.
He said both sides have agreed that the United Nations and the Palestinian Red Crescent would lead aid operations and that the Israeli- and U.S.-backed Gaza Humanitarian Fund would also continue to operate.
The unraveling of Iran's regional network of proxies, capped by the blow inflicted on Iran during the recent 12-day war with Israel, has left Hamas weaker and more isolated in the region. Iran was a key backer of the militant group, but its influence has waned, and it's now preoccupied with its own problems.
At the same time, Mr. Trump has made it clear to Israel that he wants to see the Israel-Hamas war end soon. While he has been supportive of Mr. Netanyahu, Mr. Trump had tough words for Israel in the opening hours of last week's ceasefire with Iran, when he pressured Israel to scale back its response to an Iranian missile attack. That could help persuade Hamas to embrace a deal.
A diplomat briefed on the talks said there is now a 'big opportunity' to reach an agreement. 'The indications we're getting are people are ready.'
He said Mr. Trump's harsh talk toward Israel has 'given a bit of confidence to Hamas' that the U.S. will guarantee any future deal and prevent a return to fighting. The diplomat spoke on condition of anonymity because he was discussing behind-the-scenes diplomatic contacts.
The Egyptian official said Israel has not yet agreed to a proposal to withdraw its forces to positions held in early March after a previous ceasefire officially expired. Since then, the Israeli Army has seized large swaths of Gaza to put pressure on Hamas, and it's not clear whether Israel is ready to return to those same positions.
An Israeli official characterised the agreement as a 60-day deal that would include a partial Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and a surge in humanitarian aid to the territory.
The mediators and the U.S. would provide assurances about talks on ending the war, but Israel is not committing to that as part of the latest proposal, said the official, who was not authorised to discuss the details of the deal with the media and spoke on condition of anonymity.
The Egyptian official said Hamas will have to review the proposal with other factions before submitting an official response.
One point that does seem to have been ironed out is the question of who will administer Gaza.
Israel has said Hamas cannot run the territory, and the Egyptian official said the proposal would instead put Gaza under a group of Palestinians without political affiliations known as the Community Support Committee once a ceasefire is reached.
Potentially complicating the effort, Mr. Netanyahu reiterated his hard-line position Wednesday, vowing that 'there will be no Hamas' following the 60-day ceasefire plan.
A previous ceasefire agreed to in January established three phases, but the two sides never made it past phase one.
During that time, however, there were multiple exchanges of Hamas-held hostages for prisoners held by Israel, and critical humanitarian aid was able to reach Gaza.
When phase one expired on March 1, Israel sought to extend it while Hamas argued that phase two should go ahead as planned.
The second phase would have compelled Hamas to release all the remaining living hostages in exchange for more Palestinian prisoners, a lasting ceasefire and a full Israeli withdrawal from the Gaza Strip.
That was always seen as difficult, because it would have forced Israel to choose between its two main war goals — the safe return of the hostages and the annihilation of Hamas.
On March 18, Israel broke the ceasefire with new airstrikes and resumed hostilities.
In Gaza, residents expressed hope that this time, a ceasefire will bring an end to the war.
'We are seriously tired,' said Asmaa al-Gendy, who has been living in a tent camp in Deir al Balah with her two children. The family has been displaced and starved and endured "every form of torture in the world.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Gazette
20 minutes ago
- India Gazette
Good news for apple farmers: Centre raises MIP of apples to Rs. 80/kg from Rs. 50/kg
Shimla (Himachal Pradesh) [India], July 4 (ANI): In a major relief for apple growers across the country, including those in Himachal Pradesh, the Modi government has raised the minimum import price (MIP) of apples from 50 to 80 per kg. The revised price came into effect on June 3, 2025, following approval from the Union Agriculture Minister. Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) state spokesperson Chetan Singh Bragta shared the information during a press conference in Shimla on Friday. He described the move as a reflection of the Modi government's farmer- and horticulturist-friendly mindset, and credited its strong political will for the decision. Calling it a visionary and bold step, Bragta said the hike in MIP will curb the illegal inflow of foreign apples and help local producers get fair prices for their produce. He also noted that this is a continuation of the government's pro-farmer policy, recalling that in 2023, the Modi government had introduced MIP for apples for the first time at 50 per kg, a step no previous administration had taken. Highlighting India's efforts toward agricultural self-reliance, Bragta stated that no apples have been imported from China since 2018, highlighting the Modi government's clear and strict policy measures that prioritise local horticulture. Turning his attention to the Congress-led Himachal Pradesh government, Bragta questioned the state's efforts and asked what concrete steps the state government had taken for the orchardists so far, while the central government was taking such big decisions for the farmers. Bragta reiterated that the Modi government remains committed to increasing farmer income, protecting their interests, and advancing the goal of a self-reliant India. He added that the latest MIP hike has brought new hope for the nation's apple producers. (ANI)
Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
What July 4 means for Indian students facing visa restrictions in the US
What July 4 means for Indian students facing visa restrictions in the US As the United States celebrates its Independence Day on July 4, the ideals of freedom and opportunity resonate globally. However, for Indian students residing in the US, particularly under President Trump's administration, these ideals are increasingly juxtaposed with apprehension. Recent policy shifts have cast uncertainty over their academic and professional futures, challenging the very essence of the American Dream. In 2023, over 7,000 Indian students overstayed their US visas, prompting the Trump administration to propose stricter immigration policies. These include eliminating the "dual intent" provision for student visa applicants, which currently allows students to express the intention to stay in the US post-graduation. The proposed changes would require students to prove their intent to return to India after their studies, potentially complicating the visa application process for many. Visa restrictions and their impact on Indian students The Trump administration's stringent visa policies have led to significant challenges for Indian students. In 2025, approximately 4,000 student visas were revoked within the first 100 days of the administration's term. These revocations were often based on minor infractions, such as traffic violations, and disproportionately affected Indian students. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like One plan. Total peace of mind. ICICI Pru Life Insurance Plan Get Quote Undo Furthermore, the administration has implemented social media vetting for visa applicants, raising concerns about privacy and fairness. Educational institutions respond to policy changes Prominent US universities have expressed concern over the administration's policies. Harvard University, for instance, reported that 788 Indian students would need to transfer or depart by the 2025–26 academic year if current policies remain unchanged. The university has termed the policy "unlawful and disruptive," highlighting the adverse effects on its international student community. The broader implications for Indian students The tightening of visa regulations and the uncertainty surrounding future policies have led many Indian students to reconsider their plans to study in the US In 2024, the US issued over 86,000 F-1 student visas to Indian students, a significant decrease from the 130,000 issued in 2023. This decline reflects the growing apprehension among prospective students about the stability and inclusivity of the US educational environment. Between resilience and retreat For students like Ananya Patel, a graduate engineering student at a midwestern university, July 4 brings a mix of pride and apprehension. 'It's hard to celebrate freedom when you're constantly worried about whether your visa will be approved or if you'll be asked to leave after graduation,' she said. Still, many are choosing to stay and adapt. Legal counselling services and student-led advocacy groups are helping peers navigate shifting policies. Others are considering alternative destinations, including Canada, the UK, and Australia, where post-study work rights are more stable. A quieter, more complicated July 4 As the US marks another year of independence, Indian students find themselves caught between two American identities — one rooted in openness and progress, the other in caution and control. For them, July 4 is not just a historic date on a calendar. It is a question: how much freedom can you celebrate when the system doesn't always protect you? Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
The Wire
36 minutes ago
- The Wire
How Will Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' Impact US Climate Policy?
Analysts had hoped that the surge of investment and job creation driven by Biden's landmark climate law would serve as a check on efforts to fully dismantle it. Donald Trump showing victory sign; tornadoes in the background to represent climate catastrophe. Photos: Wikimedia Commons With the passage of his party's "One Big Beautiful Bill," Republican President Donald Trump has largely delivered on his promise of curtailing Joe Biden's landmark climate law. Here's a breakdown of how the new legislation will reshape US climate and energy policy. Clean energy tax incentives slashed The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), signed by Biden in 2022, was the largest climate investment in US history, allocating around $370 billion in tax credits for renewable energy projects, efficient appliances, and more. Much of that now faces imminent repeal. "These credits were all huge motivating incentives for clean energy to be built out across the country," said Jean Su, senior attorney at the Centre for Biological Diversity. "With those removed, those renewable energy projects are all at risk of entirely failing." Su noted the cuts come amid surging electricity demand from AI data centres. "Removing tax incentives for clean energy means that all of this new energy demand will be given over to the fossil fuel industry" – resulting in more greenhouse emissions and air pollution. Critics say keeping the US energy mix heavily tied to fossil fuels locks in market volatility, as seen during the Ukraine war. Su added that utilities are incentivised to build costlier fossil plants to boost profits-raising electricity rates in the process. Trump, who received an estimated $445 million from Big Oil during his campaign, has framed the clean energy rollbacks as a victory over what he calls the "Green New Scam." Doug Jones, a tax attorney and partner at Husch Blackwell, told AFP that "wind and solar took the biggest hit." Under the new rules, clean energy projects must be in service by 2027 or begin construction within 12 months of the bill's enactment to qualify for remaining credits. "The pipeline of projects that had begun construction by the prescribed time is eventually going to dry up – I don't know how they're going to start financing these projects without the tax credits," said Jones. He added his clients include Fortune 500 companies now alarmed by the ripple effects of ending the credits, which they have been purchasing from renewable developers – a practice that has infused the market with much-needed liquidity. Tax credits for energy-efficient home and commercial upgrades also now face a shorter runway, expiring June 30, 2026. However, the bill preserves credits for nuclear, geothermal power, hydrogen and carbon capture technologies. Electric vehicles and fuel economy Electric vehicles come in for some of the harshest treatment. Tax credits for new and used EV purchases are set to sunset this year, while charging station installation credits expire June 30, 2026. Albert Gore of the Zero Emission Transportation Project said the bill effectively abandoned "the goal we all share of making the United States globally competitive in the mineral, battery, and vehicle production markets of the future," ceding the market to China. One eye-catching provision allows automakers to effectively ignore fuel economy rules by reducing fines to zero. "If you tell a kid before a test, it's okay, there's no penalty if you cheat, what do you think they're going to do?" said Dan Becker of the Centre for Biological Diversity. Skewing the market Meanwhile, provisions of the IRA that benefited fossil fuel companies remain intact, including billions in subsidies and drilling leases in the Gulf of Mexico. There's a new tax credit for coal used in steel making, while a programme to help gas and petroleum companies reduce waste and methane emissions is nixed. The legislation also clears the way for drilling, mining and logging on vast swaths of public lands, including in the sensitive Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Analysts had hoped that the surge of investment and job creation driven by Biden's landmark climate law – much of it in conservative-led states – would serve as a check on efforts to fully dismantle it. That has largely not materialised, though renewable advocates did win a small concession: the late withdrawal of a provision that would have imposed a devastating new tax on wind and solar. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
