Mehbooba Mufti calls for end to ‘spectre of war'; says ‘NC wants more war and bodies'
File photo: J&K's former CM and PDP president, Mehbooba Mufti (Picture credit: PTI)
SRINAGAR: With tension still running high between India and Pakistan, even as Operation Sindoor remains on pause, J&K's former CM and
PDP
president,
Mehbooba Mufti
, Saturday said the spectre of war must end so that people can plan their lives and revive the economy.
She accused the NC leadership of war-mongering, and said it wanted 'more war and more dead bodies'.
'Jammu and Kashmir should be a bridge of understanding, friendship and cooperation, not a theatre for war,' Mehbooba said, addressing her party workers. She said her party was committed to peace and dialogue, and warned against the war rhetoric.
It was the people of J&K who bore the brunt of war and violence, the PDP chief said, comparing the region to 'grass trampled under the feet of two fighting elephants'.
'PDP will continue to raise its voice for peace and channel the sentiments of the people,' she said.
Mehbooba said the statements of the NC leadership, including party patriarch Farooq Abdullah's call for intensified military action against Pakistan, reflected a dangerous mindset.
Criticising Abdullah for reportedly supporting assaults 'more brutal than the Balakot strike', she said: 'These leaders want more war and more dead bodies.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Nachhaltig wohnen: Luxuscontainerhäuser günstiger denn je
Visionary Echo
Tìm Ngay
Undo
It is only PDP that has consistently advocated for an end to hostilities and has spoken for the people's right to live a life of dignity.'
The PDP President also expressed concern over the ongoing crackdown in the region.
'Our youths are being jailed, and the Public Safety Act is being misused. If such draconian measures were truly effective, incidents like Pahalgam would not have occurred. If the goal is to fight militancy, don't wage war against the poor people of JK, many of whom are languishing in jails outside the state.
Their families cannot even afford to visit them.'
Mehbooba said NC was constantly attempting to appease BJP at the cost of people's interests and their own mandate. Referring to Kiran Rijiju, she said: 'The minister who introduced the Waqf Bill was later welcomed and garlanded in Kashmir by the NC leadership. NC, despite having 50 MLAs, didn't even allow a resolution to be passed in the J&K Assembly against the Waqf amendment.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
Canada kicks out Chinese surveillance giant Hikvision over national security threat
The Canadian government has ordered Chinese surveillance technology company Hikvision to shut down its Canadian operations, citing national security concerns. Industry Minister Mélanie Joly announced the decision late Friday(June 27), stating the move follows a formal national security review under the Investment Canada Act. The review involved intelligence and security assessments provided by Canada's national agencies. "The government has determined that Hikvision Canada Inc.'s continued operations in Canada would be injurious to Canada's national security," Joly wrote in a post on X. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Buy the Dip: Top 5 Dividend Stocks with Growth Potential Seeking Alpha Read Now Undo Hikvision, formally known as Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology Co., Ltd., is one of the world's largest manufacturers of surveillance cameras and related equipment. The company has operated in Canada through a subsidiary since 2014. The decision comes amid growing international scrutiny of Hikvision. The US, UK, and Australia have previously placed sanctions or restrictions on the company over allegations that its technology was used in the surveillance of Uyghur Muslims in China's Xinjiang region, allegations Beijing has denied. Major retailers such as Best Buy and Home Depot stopped selling Hikvision products as early as 2021. Live Events While Canadian officials did not disclose the specific threat that triggered this review, the Investment Canada Act allows Ottawa to investigate and block foreign investments that pose potential risks to national security. In a statement issued Saturday, Hikvision said it 'strongly disagrees' with the government's decision. 'We believe it lacks a factual basis, procedural fairness, and transparency,' the company said. 'Instead of evaluating our technology on its cybersecurity merits, the decision appears to be driven by the parent company's country of origin, reflecting broader geopolitical tensions and an unjustified bias against Chinese companies.' Hikvision added that it fully cooperated with Canadian authorities and submitted all requested documentation. Along with the shutdown order, Minister Joly said the federal government will ensure that departments, agencies, and Crown corporations do not purchase or use Hikvision equipment moving forward. She also announced a review of government buildings to identify and phase out any legacy Hikvision devices. 'I strongly urge Canadians to take note of this decision and make their own decisions accordingly,' Joly added. The Chinese Embassy in Ottawa has not yet commented on the decision.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Eric Trump for US President? Donald Trump's son reveals his plans for White House
Eric Trump, the 41-year-old son of U.S. President Donald Trump, has indicated that he may one day pursue a bid for the nation's highest office, potentially paving the way for a second-generation Trump to enter the political fray. In an interview with the Financial Times , Eric Trump suggested that his personal experience over the past decade in the spotlight has prepared him for a possible political journey, though he expressed concern about the impact such a decision might have on his family. Also Read | Apple spends half a billion dollars on California real estate in a week — is Tim Cook planning something big? "Could Do It": Eric Trump Opens the Door to Politics Speaking candidly, Eric Trump remarked, 'The real question is: 'Do you want to drag other members of your family into it?' Would I want my kids to live the same experience over the last decade that I've lived?' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Dream Kitchen Within Reach? See How HomeLane Get Quote Undo He added, 'If the answer was yes, I think the political path would be an easy one, meaning, I think I could do it. And by the way, I think other members of our family could do it too', as quoted in a report by USA Today. These remarks mark a rare moment of direct contemplation from Donald Trump's son about his own potential in politics. While often appearing at campaign events and rallies, Eric Trump has largely remained focused on business, steering clear of day-to-day political strategy, unlike his older brother. Live Events Businessman with Political Roots Eric Trump currently serves as co-executive vice-president of the Trump Organization, which recently entered the mobile communications sector. He manages the family's expansive real estate and branding empire alongside his brother Donald Trump Jr., who has himself expressed a tentative interest in running for public office. In May, the elder Trump sibling noted he 'maybe one day' could seek the presidency. Married to Lara Trump, the current co-chair of the Republican National Committee (RNC), Eric has remained influential behind the scenes in Republican circles. However, his public posture has been less politically charged than his brother's, who is frequently vocal on conservative platforms and active in rallying support for his father's ongoing political career. Also Read | Trump's Big, Beautiful Bill sparks panic among MAGA voters: 'We'd lose everything' A Family Steeped in Political Ambition The Trump family's flirtation with politics dates back to the 1980s, when Donald Trump was first floated as a potential candidate for president. As early as the 1988 election cycle, grassroots efforts attempted to draft the New York businessman into the race, with Trump exploring campaigns under both Democratic and Reform Party labels. He officially entered and later withdrew from the 2000 presidential race before launching his successful 2016 bid as a Republican. Eric and Donald Jr.'s musings reflect a continuation of that legacy, one that has now been cemented by Donald Trump's return to the White House in 2025. The elder Trump's political brand remains dominant within the Republican Party, giving his family members a prominent platform from which to contemplate public office. Also Read | Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize? After Pakistan, now Congo joins the push A Future Political Dynasty? While no official moves have been made, Eric Trump's comments underscore the possibility of a Trump political dynasty, especially at a time when voter loyalties and name recognition play an outsized role in U.S. elections. With his father back in power, the younger Trumps may find an increasingly receptive conservative base willing to extend their support to another generation. For now, however, Eric Trump appears content to keep his focus on business — but the door to politics, as he notes, remains open. FAQs What did Eric Trump say about running for president? In an interview with the Financial Times , Eric Trump said he believes he 'could do it' when asked about a potential run for president. However, he expressed concern about the impact such a move could have on his family, especially his children. Has Eric Trump officially announced a presidential campaign? No, Eric Trump has not officially declared his candidacy. He simply acknowledged that the political path would be 'easy' for him if he chose to pursue it.
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
What are the issues around deportation?
The story so far:At least seven West Bengal residents who were pushed to Bangladesh by the Border Security Force (BSF) on suspicion of being Bangladeshis were brought back to India after the intervention of the State government. Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee said on June 25 that residents speaking in their native Bengali language are being branded as Bangladeshis in some Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-ruled States. Several people who were pushed from Assam to Bangladesh also returned as they were found to be Indians or that their citizenship cases were sub-judice. Why have matters escalated? After the regime change in Bangladesh in August 2024, the police across the country were asked by the Union Home Ministry to detect Bangladeshis who had illegally entered the country and were living here on forged documents. The drive assumed momentum after the Pahalgam terror attack in April and the subsequent 'Operation Sindoor'. The Ministry has issued instructions to States to deport undocumented migrants but in most cases pushbacks are happening. Around 2,500 suspected Bangladeshis have been pushed back so far. On May 10, Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma said that the government has decided to implement the 'pushback' mechanism to check infiltration instead of going through the legal route which is a long-drawn process. Home Minister Amit Shah has asked top intelligence officials to make an example of 'infiltrators' by detecting, detaining, and deporting them. In 2022, at an Intelligence Bureau meeting, Mr. Shah had asked officials to identify around 100 illegal migrants in each State, check documents and arrest and deport them. He asked them to continue with the crackdown even if neighbouring countries do not accept the undocumented migrants. What is the difference between deportation and pushback? Deportation is a legal process which involves detaining and arresting a foreigner suspected to be living in India without documents or who has entered the country illegally. The case is presented before a court and after exhaustion of all legal avenues, which includes conviction by the court, the country which the foreigner belongs to is contacted and the deportation takes places once the identity is confirmed. Pushbacks are not a legal procedure and there are no stated rules. They happen when a foreigner has been caught by the border security force on the international border and, depending on the intensity of the case or the discretion of the border personnel, they are either arrested, made to face the law here or pushed back. Since citizenship and foreigners are Union List subjects, it is the Home Ministry which delegates powers to deport foreigners to State governments. In 2024, the Ministry told the Jharkhand High Court that since the 'Central Government does not maintain a separate federal police force exclusively dedicated to the task of detection and deportation of illegally staying foreigners, action in this regard has been entrusted to the State police.' What is the Immigrants (Expulsion from Assam) Act, 1950? On June 9, Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma said the State government was likely to enforce a 1950 law to identify and evict illegal foreigners, adding that under the law, district commissioners are empowered to declare individuals as illegal immigrants and initiate eviction proceedings. The 1950 Act was passed by Parliament amid communal disturbance and violence following the Partition of India in 1947 and creation of East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) bordering West Bengal, Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura and Mizoram. The Act says that 'it extends to the whole of India', but has Assam-specific provisions. Section 2 of the Act says that if the Union government is of the opinion that any person or class of persons, having been ordinarily resident in any place outside India are detrimental to the interests of the general public of India or any Scheduled Tribe in Assam, the Union government may by order, 'direct such person or class of persons to remove himself or themselves from India or Assam within such time and by such route as may be specified in the order'; and 'give such further directions in regard to his or their removal from India or Assam as it may consider necessary or expedient'. What are the laws for foreigners? Till April this year, matters relating to foreigners and immigration were administered through 'pre-Constitution period' laws enacted during the First and Second World Wars, which were the Foreigners Act, 1946, Passport (Entry into India) Act, 1920, the Registration of Foreigners Act, 1939 and the Immigration (Carriers' Liability) Act, 2000. In April, Parliament enacted the Immigration and Foreigners Act, 2025 repealing the old laws. Unlike Pakistan and Bangladesh borders, the rules for movement of people along Nepal and Myanmar are different. Nepal has a free-border agreement with India, and a Free Movement regime (FMR), allowing movement of people residing within 10-km on either side, exists along the India-Myanmar border. Following the May 2023 ethnic violence in Manipur, the Ministry in 2024 decided to fence the entire 1,643-km Myanmar border in the next 10 years. Post the military coup in Myanmar in February 2021, over 40,000 refugees from Myanmar belonging to the Chin ethnic group who are closely related to the Mizo community crossed over to Mizoram. On March 10, 2021, the MHA sent a letter to the State governments of Nagaland, Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur and Mizoram that the refugees should be identified and deported and that the State Governments have no powers to grant 'refugee' status to any foreigner as India is not a signatory to the UN Refugee Convention of 1951 and its 1967 Protocol. The refugees continue to live here. What is behind this recent drive? Since the April 22 terror attack at Pahalgam, the police has intensified the drive to detect undocumented migrants. Initially, they were taken by trains to border districts and then pushed to Bangladesh by the BSF. In some instances, migrants after being up picked from Rajasthan, Gujarat, and Maharashtra, were flown by planes to Agartala in Tripura and transported to the Bangladesh border by BSF personnel. The police and the BSF record biometrics and photographs of the undocumented migrants. It is to be noted that the BSF has never acknowledged any of the pushbacks. The Ministry has asked the States to verify the claims of undocumented migrants who claim Indian nationality after which District Magistrates are to send a report within 30 days, failing which the Foreigners Regional Registration Officer would deport them. In 2022, the Unique Identification Authority of India was asked to maintain a 'negative list' to stop undocumented migrants from procuring identity documents in the future.
