Policy U-turn? New govt notice hints at easier local sourcing rules for telecom equipment makers
Under current rules, telecom equipment manufacturers must source 50-60% of their total bill of materials locally to be selected as Class-I local suppliers—the preferred bidder category—in tenders floated by public sector undertakings and ministries for certain products.
However, in a notice dated 3 June, the Department of Telecommunications said India's limited components ecosystem posed challenges in achieving 50-60% local sourcing for electronic and telecom products. 'Recognizing this constraint, the conditions for local content qualification also requires a review," DoT said.
But just eight months earlier, in October, the department had said 36 telecom equipment categories had sufficient local capacity and competition, and maintained a 50-65% local value-addition requirement for products such as ethernet switches, unified threat management platforms, 4G mobile systems, optical fiber, and certain Wi-Fi products.
Domestic telecom equipment makers warn that any relaxation in the local sourcing policy would undermine India's self-reliance or Atmanirbhar Bharat agenda and give an unfair advantage to multinational firms.
'There is no need to reduce local content for telecom equipment. None of the domestic design-led players have raised the issue," said Rakesh Bhatnagar, director general of Voice of Indian Commtech Enterprises (VoICE), which counts Tejas Networks, HFCL Ltd, VVDN Technologies Pvt. Ltd, and STL Tech, among its members.
'It appears to be a back-door opening being made to support MNCs (multinational companies) and is totally going against the policy announcements being made at the highest level."
Also read | Telcos slam Trai's satellite spectrum pricing as unfair, call for comprehensive review
According to Bhatnagar, given the ongoing situation of neighbourly hostilities, India should ensure that no software and programmable parts in sectors such as electronics, telecom, space, and nuclear energy come from foreign suppliers.
On the other hand, executives at foreign telecom equipment makers say a short-term relaxation is essential considering India's continued dependence on imports for key components such as semiconductors, advanced chipsets, and specialized telecom modules.
Lately, companies such as Finland-based Nokia and Sweden's Ericsson have been lobbying the Indian government to relax certain rules so they can participate in government tenders, industry executives said.
'We are looking at all the possible options to participate in government tenders and pitch the government to relax certain rules," said an executive at a global equipment maker, adding that while a majority of the company's supplies go to private firms, the government sector is also a big revenue area for telecom equipment.
Nokia, Ericsson, Tejas, HFCL and VVDN did not reply to queries emailed on Friday.
Also read | Trai, telecom companies spar over data demand
Make in India: Hits and misses
India's local value-addition rules—issued as part of the Public Procurement (Preference to Make in India) Order, 2017 policy—specifies the eligibility criteria for manufacturers to be classified as Class-I local suppliers to government departments.
Local-value addition refers to the percentage of a product's manufacturing cost that comes from components and processes done in India. Manufacturers meeting a minimum threshold—typically 50% or more—are classified as Class-I local suppliers, giving them preference in government tenders over other companies.
In March, the government approved a $2.7-billion ( ₹22,919 crore) outlay to incentivize local manufacturing of electronics components, setting goals for domestic and foreign entities to establish local component manufacturing facilities at subsidies of up to 50% of the project costs.
With the scheme, the government aims to increase the local value addition to 40% in electronics manufacturing from 20% now.
State-owned Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd (BSNL) managed to roll out its 4G network on indigenous telecom stack developed by Tejas, Tata Consultancy Services Ltd, and the Centre for Development of Telematics. But several private companies still rely on equipment developed by global companies for a significant portion of their networks.
Also read | How Samsung and 20 others missed out on an ambitious incentives scheme
'A short-term review of local content requirements is important to ensure that manufacturers remain competitive while the component ecosystem matures," said Paritosh Prajapati, chief executive and founder of Sweden-based GX Group, which is also a beneficiary of India's productivity-linked incentives (PLI) scheme for the telecom sector.
He, however, acknowledged that any such relaxation could put pressure on smaller and mid-sized domestic players, especially those still in the process of building scale.
'Any relaxation must continue to incentivize companies to shift R&D (research and development), design, and IP (intellectual property) rights to India, aligning with the vision of Atmanirbhar Bharat," Prajapati said.
India's PLI scheme has got global giants such as Apple Inc., Ericsson, Germany's Siemens AG, China's Foxconn, and The Netherlands' Philips NV investing and producing more in India, he pointed out.
As per the government's October notice, product design work done in India must contribute up to 55% towards meeting the domestic-value addition policy's 65% threshold.
However, 'there is very less design being done in India as the products are being assembled through contract manufacturers", said an executive at a local telecom gear maker, requesting anonymity.
Also read | Next-gen telecom tech to get ₹1,000-crore yearly R&D boost under telecom policy
Cracks in compliance
The Department of Telecommunications, besides reviewing product-wise local content requirements, also plans to review conditions of inputs, including design, to be qualified as local content and the criteria for calculating local content for software products.
'While the Indian component manufacturing ecosystem is thriving, the government has to handhold it to help it build a stronger foundation to achieve the stated goal of $500 billion in electronics manufacturing by 2030," said Harsh Walia, partner at law firm Khaitan & Co.
'In order to do so, lowering the threshold may encourage more realistic compliance and foster growth in the sector while still promoting domestic production. However, it should be balanced to ensure continued support for local industries and avoid excessive reliance on imports," Walia said.
'By offering turnover and capex linked incentives for manufacturing of listed products, the government aims to increase investment in the (telecom) sector, which will further strengthen the manufacturing for telecom equipment and assist in its exponential expansion," he added.
The Public Procurement (Preference to Make in India) Policy (PPP-MII) was introduced with the goal of strengthening domestic manufacturing and reducing dependency on imports, especially in critical sectors. The broader policy is handled by the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT), with other ministries notifying the same based on their respective areas to boost domestic manufacturing.
Also read | The ambitious and ambiguous rise of Huawei as a telecom giant
There have been multiple complaints, however, that tenders floated by various ministries have not been at par with DPIIT's rules and favour foreign brands.
In 2024, DPIIT scrutinised 867 tenders on a random basis. Of these, 259 tenders were found to be non-compliant with the provisions of the Public Procurement (Preference to Make in India) Order, 2017.
Reasons for non-compliance included mention of specific brands, excessively high turnover requirements, global tenders floated without approval from a competent authority, failure to follow notifications issued by the nodal ministry, and insistence on foreign certifications.
In 2023, a government investigation also found an incorrect claim of local content by bidders that had won tenders floated by state-run organisations such as Maharashtra Metro Rail Corporation Ltd and Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
a minute ago
- India.com
Mahindra XUV.e9 Pack Two Walkaround: Features, Tech & Design Highlights of Mahindra's Premium Electric Coupe SUV
Experience the futuristic design and innovation of the Mahindra XUV.e9 Pack Two in this detailed walkaround. With its sleek coupe SUV stance, bold LED lighting, and aggressive styling, the Pack Two variant represents Mahindra's evolving electric design language. This video highlights the exterior elements, unique styling differences from Pack One and Pack Three, and concept clues that hint at future production versions. We also dive into the platform and EV tech powering this next-gen electric SUV. While the interior remains partially hidden, we offer a quick preview of its likely layout and tech features. If you're curious about Mahindra's electric future, the XUV.e9 Pack Two sets the tone for what's coming in the Indian EV space.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
a minute ago
- First Post
What does US import from Russia as Trump rants about India's oil trade?
As Trump threatens steep tariffs on India over its Russian oil imports, data reveals the US quietly continues to import billions worth of palladium, uranium, and fertilisers from Russia. While Washington criticises New Delhi's energy ties with Moscow, its own trade in strategic commodities with Russia raises questions about economic double standards read more Daily newspapers with covers, dedicated to the recent phone call of Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump, are laid out at a newsstand in a street in Moscow, Russia, February 13, 2025. File Image/Reuters US President Donald Trump has been threatening India with steep tariffs over its oil imports from Moscow even as trade data shows that the United States continues to engage in selective but significant imports from Russia — a country Washington has otherwise sought to isolate since the invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Most recently, Trump, in a series of online statements, accused India of buying heavily discounted Russian oil and profiting by reselling it. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD He threatened a hike in tariffs on Indian exports to the United States, going as far as proposing a 25 per cent duty and promising additional penalties. India reacted firmly to this public criticism. According to a statement from the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), India began purchasing oil from Russia only after its traditional energy suppliers diverted output to European markets post-2022. 'The United States at that time actively encouraged such imports by India for strengthening global energy markets stability,' the statement noted. 'It is revealing that the very nations criticising India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia. Unlike our case, such trade is not even a vital national compulsion.' India has repeatedly justified its energy trade with Russia as necessary for maintaining stable and affordable energy costs for its domestic consumers. Hardeep Singh Puri, India's Minister of Petroleum and Natural Gas, remarked in a recent CNBC interview: 'If people or countries had stopped buying at that stage, the price of oil would have gone up to 130 dollars a barrel. That was a situation in which we were advised, including by our friends in the United States, to please buy Russian oil, but within the price cap.' Even former US Ambassador to India Eric Garcetti had stated at a public event last year that 'we wanted somebody to buy Russian oil,' acknowledging Washington's prior encouragement of Indian purchases to stabilise global markets. The Indian government highlighted the continuing trade relationships between Russia and the United States, as well as the European Union, despite sanctions and political rhetoric. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Official data confirms that Europe and America have maintained selective imports of high-priority goods from Russia over the past few years. European Union-Russia trade The European Union's trade with Russia remains substantial. The EU's goods trade with Russia amounted to €67.5 billion ($78.1 billion) in 2024, and trade in services was worth €17.2 billion in 2023. E uropean LNG imports from Russia hit a record 16.5 million tonnes in 2024, surpassing the previous record of 15.21 million tonnes in 2022. Europe's commercial interactions with Russia cover a wide range of sectors including liquefied natural gas, fertilisers, mining products, industrial chemicals, iron and steel, and transport equipment. US-Russia trade The United States also maintained imports from Russia, particularly in strategic areas like nuclear fuel, precious metals, and agricultural products. American imports from Russia totalled approximately $3 billion in 2024, down from $36 billion in 2021, but key items continue to flow. According to the US International Trade Commission: Fertilisers : $1.1 billion in 2024. Palladium : $878 million. Uranium : $624 million. Aircraft engine parts: $75 million. Trade in services, on the other hand, showed resilience. In 2024, US services exports to Russia amounted to $1.3 billion, while imports were $384 million — resulting in a services trade surplus of $873 million, a 43 per cent rise over the previous year. From January to May 2025, US imports from Russia grew 23 per cent year-on-year to reach $2.1 billion, with palladium imports up 37 per cent, uranium up 28 per cent, and fertilizers up 21 per cent. Even the US Trade Representative acknowledges that critical imports such as uranium and palladium are shielded from full sanctions due to the lack of viable alternatives in the global market. A granular look at trade data reveals that the United States continues to purchase a wide range of products from Russia. These include industrial commodities, precious metals, chemicals, and agricultural items. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD According to customs and trade databases, the following were among the top imports in 2024: Fertilisers (urea, potassium chloride, and others) – $1.3 billion Precious metals (palladium, platinum, etc.) – $878 million Inorganic chemicals, including radioactive materials – $695.7 million Uranium hexafluoride for nuclear fuel – $624 million Aircraft parts and components – $75 million Wood and wood products – $89.4 million Machinery and reactors – $80.8 million Animal feed, residues from food processing – $39.9 million Base metals and cermets – $37.3 million Iron and steel products – $13.1 million Edible vegetables, fruits, and preparations – multiple categories totalling over $15 million Rubbers, plastics, and chemicals – Over $10 million Pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and essential oils – Over $2 million Footwear, textiles, toys, and watches – Combined total over $10 million Aluminum, copper, and nickel – Over $28 million combined Other miscellaneous imports – From raw hides to printed books and even live animals Despite claims that the United States and Russia conduct minimal business today, the facts reveal that trade persists in key areas. Also Watch: Fertiliser imports from Russia are also on the rise. Between January and May 2025 alone, the US brought in $806 million worth — 60 per cent more than during the same period in 2021. Uranium imports, too, were 147 per cent higher compared to early 2021, showing no signs of being phased out. 'Russia and the USA do almost no business together,' Trump had claimed. But the numbers tell a different story: trade has narrowed in scope, not vanished. While American imports of Russian crude oil — once valued at over $17 billion in 2021 — have nearly ceased, other categories like fish, nickel, and lead have also dwindled or stopped. Nevertheless, around 90 per cent of what the US still imports from Russia consists of just three categories: fertilizers, palladium, and uranium. With inputs from agencies
NDTV
a minute ago
- NDTV
Amid Friction, Indian Army's Throwback Post On US' Arms Support To Pakistan
New Delhi: The Indian Army on Tuesday took a dig at the United States by sharing an old newspaper clip from 1971 showing how the country has supported Pakistan for decades. The post comes a day after President Donald Trump threatened India over its purchase of Russian oil, saying he will substantially raise tariffs on goods from India. The clip, shared by the Eastern Command of the Indian Army, dated back to August 5, 1971. It showed how the US was supplying arms to Pakistan for decades in the buildup for the 1971 war. "This day, that year build up of war - August 5, 1971," the army captioned the post. #IndianArmy #EasternCommand #VijayVarsh #LiberationOfBangladesh #MediaHighlights "This Day That Year" Build Up of War - 05 Aug 1971 #KnowFacts. "𝑼.𝑺 𝑨𝑹𝑴𝑺 𝑾𝑶𝑹𝑻𝑯 $2 𝑩𝑰𝑳𝑳𝑰𝑶𝑵 𝑺𝑯𝑰𝑷𝑷𝑬𝑫 𝑻𝑶 𝑷𝑨𝑲𝑰𝑺𝑻𝑨𝑵 𝑺𝑰𝑵𝑪𝑬 '54" @adgpi @SpokespersonMoD … — EasternCommand_IA (@easterncomd) August 5, 2025 The newspaper clip mentioned the then Defence Production Minister VC Shukla telling the Rajya Sabha about how the NATO powers and the Soviet Union had been contacted over the arms supply to Pakistan in the backdrop of Islamabad's armed aggression in Bangladesh. While the Soviet Union and the French government had denied supplying arms to Pakistan, the US continued its support, the report mentioned. It also said that both the US and China sold arms to Pakistan at "throwaway prices" - indicating that Pakistan fought the 1971 war with India with weapons provided by the two countries. The US, even now, has gone easy on Pakistan with its tariffs. During his latest bid to reshape the global trade in favour of US businesses, Trump signed a new executive order slapping higher tariffs on dozens of countries - hours before the trade deal deadline on August 1. However, he slashed the tariffs on Pakistan, bringing it down to 19 per cent from the previous 29 per cent. Trump threatens India, New Delhi responds Trump has been threatening India with increasing reciprocal tariffs over its purchase of Russian oil - even as the US is continuing its trade with Russia. On Monday, the Republican leader yet again issued the threat to India, saying he will substantially raise tariffs on goods from India - higher than the already raised 25 per cent tariffs. "India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil, they are then, for much of the Oil purchased, selling it on the Open Market for big profits. They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine. Because of this, I will be substantially raising the Tariff paid by India to the USA," Trump said in a post on Truth Social. India, however, hit back at Trump, reminding him that when it began importing from Russia after the outbreak of the Ukraine conflict, the US "actively encouraged such imports". The foreign ministry also countered the stance of the European Union for singling out Indian refiners over their exports of crude. According to the foreign ministry, while India's imports are "a necessity compelled by the global market situation", the nations criticising it are themselves "indulging in trade with Russia" even when "such trade is not even a vital compulsion". It also listed out the trade pact the nations have with Russia. "The European Union in 2024 had a bilateral trade of Euro 67.5 billion in goods with Russia. In addition, it had trade in services estimated at Euro 17.2 billion in 2023. This is significantly more than India's total trade with Russia that year or subsequently. European imports of LNG in 2024, in fact, reached a record 16.5mn tonnes, surpassing the last record of 15.21mn tonnes in 2022. Europe-Russia trade includes not just energy, but also fertilisers, mining products, chemicals, iron and steel and machinery and transport equipment," an official statement by the ministry read.
