logo
Draymond Green said what many Black people feel. But then he missed the point

Draymond Green said what many Black people feel. But then he missed the point

New York Times12-05-2025
The stereotype of the 'angry Black man' or 'angry Black woman' is very real. On a daily basis, it follows us into boardrooms, classrooms and corporate offices. So when Draymond Green defended himself after his latest technical foul by saying he's tired of the 'agenda to try to keep making me look like an angry Black man,' it really bothered me.
Advertisement
Not because the stereotype doesn't exist, but because he missed the point.
Green's brief exchange with reporters after the Warriors' loss, in which he received his fifth technical foul of the playoffs, included no acknowledgment of personal responsibility. Over the course of his career, Green has accumulated more than 200 technical fouls and has been suspended six times, once for putting Rudy Gobert in a headlock, another for hitting LeBron James in the groin during the 2016 NBA Finals and again for stomping on Domantas Sabonis' chest during the 2023 playoffs.
Years ago, Green took a break from the team to 'work on' himself after he was indefinitely suspended for the season after he struck Jusuf Nurkic in the head. He missed 16 regular season games. If that time taught him anything, it's hard to tell. His words and, more importantly, some of his actions on the court continue to tell a different story.
I've worked in corporate America for over 18 years, including many as a manager. As a Black man, the majority of my managers and direct reports have been White men and women. In both cases, I've had to learn — sometimes the hard way — how exhausting and real the 'angry Black man' stereotype can be.
I've watched White managers yell, lose control, act unprofessionally, and face little to no consequence. Among my Black co-workers, we'd often share the quiet truth we all know: 'If we did that, we'd be out the door.' We'd share it almost laughing, because we knew there's no world where we could act that way and not have every single stereotype plastered onto us, along with a possible pink slip.
I remember the only job I ever quit was over a decade ago. I knew I wasn't going to receive the promotion I believed I had earned, and I'd made peace with that. I even started saving money in preparation. During my review meeting, after hearing all the pluses and minuses of my performance, I calmly said:
'I appreciate you taking the time to build this out. I've thought long and hard about this. I'm going to move on, but I'm thankful for everything you've done for me.'
Advertisement
That was it. A respectful exit. A few hours later, my phone lit up with calls from co-workers saying they'd heard I'd 'exploded,' that I was 'very upset,' that I had 'raised my voice.' None of that was true. But somehow, my quiet, clear decision to leave was twisted into something angry and volatile. The manager in the room was White. So was my co-manager. I didn't expect that reaction from them, but I also wasn't surprised.
I remember one of the first times I got pulled over — it was with a group of my Black and Latino friends — and the cop patted me down and said, 'Just give me the weed or the drugs, man.' We were pulled over because we resembled the description of a suspicious car with multiple people in it. I was so upset. They quickly let us go after making us exit and patting us down. But even in that moment, I knew any show of anger could likely have ended up with me on the news, with my name and life being mentioned in the past tense.
I know friends who tell me how straight they sit up, how they put their hands on the steering wheel, how they simply look ahead — almost like a robot — to avoid scaring a police officer when they pull up. Because we know any little thing is going to be viewed as a sign of disrespect, and we've seen countless examples of the amount of leeway a Black person gets.
The 'angry Black man/woman' tightrope is one we walk every day. We live in a world where our emotions are constantly viewed through a distorted, racialized lens.
Green has to walk that rope too — but not in the same way. So much that comes with being a rich athlete protects him on a daily basis. Many of us don't have the privilege of going home to gated communities, working under strong unions like the NBPA, or being protected by ironclad contracts like NBA players. We can't speak freely on camera without risking serious consequences; and while NBA players may face fines, there's a significant difference between being fined and being fired. A decade-old tweet from an NBA player might spark controversy, but a similar one from an everyday person could cost us our careers.
Advertisement
For the rest of us, being perceived as threatening — even when we aren't — can change everything. When Green uses 'the angry Black man' stereotype to explain the consequences of actions he predominantly instigates, he's not raising awareness of a stereotype that too many casually joke about without ever taking seriously. It's a reality we all face daily and even if Draymond instigates many of these events he's also likely been worn down (which he likely has) by years of being called a 'thug' or 'violent.' Both things can be true.
Green isn't being labeled an angry Black man because he's passionate or expressive — though I'm sure some people view him that way. He's being criticized because he keeps crossing the line. When he commits reckless fouls, derails his team's momentum, or racks up suspensions, it's not about race — it's about accountability. It's about how his actions affect his team and how they reflect on him.
There have been countless moments where I've stayed quiet through microaggressions and coded language — not because I didn't have the words to respond, but because I knew that saying anything might label me as 'difficult' or 'hostile.' That kind of self-monitoring, that constant emotional restraint, is a toll that many people simply don't understand because they've never had to live it. Being the enforcer and tough guy on the Warriors is a role Green shouldn't abandon. It's actually a part of the game that many who loved the NBA from a couple decades ago miss during this more free-flowing era. But when Green repeatedly crosses the line, it not only turns off fans from his playing style, but also from his refusal to take accountability for his actions.
Being Black and angry shouldn't be a crime. It should just be human. We get angry like everyone else. But we don't have as many get-out-of-jail free cards and we don't get the benefit of the full array and range of human emotion.
One dynamic that Draymond deals with that the rest of us don't is the role race plays in how Black athletes are covered in the media. Consider some numbers from a 2021 report from The Institute for Diversity and Ethics in Sport (TIDES) on newsroom diversity:
Like many other industries, the sports world has failed in covering athletes of color and adding people of color to the press corps. How many Black reporters are in NBA and NFL locker rooms consistently? How many Latino reporters are in MLB locker rooms? Not many. More than before, but surely not what it should be.
So while I may disagree with Draymond's usage, I also don't understand what it is to be a Black athlete in a predominantly Black sport where the people covering you often don't look like you. I'm sure that takes its own brand of mental gymnastics for any Black person, and exhausting is one of the words that immediately comes to mind. I also don't know how much of what he said was influenced by the interaction he had with a fan who disrespected him and called him a 'monkey' at the game. When he shared his feelings at the end of the game, it could have been highly influenced by that interaction. Black players are not only covered predominantly by Whites but they also play sports in front of them as well.
Advertisement
And, to be clear, this is not about conforming to White standards of behavior. Most newsrooms are White. Most athletes — outside of the NHL — are people of color. What's celebrated as exciting or fiery for Conor McGregor, Johnny Manziel or Baker Mayfield is labeled as arrogant or out of control for Shedeur Sanders, Barry Bonds or even Muhammad Ali.
The double standards are real. The bias is real. But accountability matters, too. And invoking a real stereotype to excuse behavior cheapens the experience for those of us who must carry that stereotype with us every day, in spaces that won't give us the benefit of the doubt.
And while Green is using it to explain away bad nights on the court, the rest of us are busy living with it every single day – with no way of ever getting rid of it.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sun Belt approves move to lure Louisiana Tech from Conference USA, AP source says
Sun Belt approves move to lure Louisiana Tech from Conference USA, AP source says

Washington Post

time7 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Sun Belt approves move to lure Louisiana Tech from Conference USA, AP source says

NEW ORLEANS — The Sun Belt Conference has formally approved a proposal to extend a membership invitation to Louisiana Tech, a person familiar with the situation said. The person spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity on Monday because the Sun Belt has not announced the membership offer, and Louisiana Tech has not announced its decision to accept it and leave Conference USA.

Trump admin asks appeals court to pause order requiring officials to stop immigration arrests without probable cause
Trump admin asks appeals court to pause order requiring officials to stop immigration arrests without probable cause

CNN

time9 minutes ago

  • CNN

Trump admin asks appeals court to pause order requiring officials to stop immigration arrests without probable cause

The Trump administration on Monday asked a federal appeals court to pause a sweeping order from a California judge that required officials to stop making immigration arrests without probable cause in the southern part of the state. The ruling issued Friday by US District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong ordered the Department of Homeland Security to develop guidance for officers to determine 'reasonable suspicion' outside of the apparent race or ethnicity of a person, the language they speak or their accent, 'presence at a particular location' such as a bus stop, or 'the type of work one does.' The ruling applies only to the seven-county jurisdiction of the US Central District of California, which includes Los Angeles and surrounding areas. Justice Department attorneys asked the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals to put Frimpong's order on hold while they challenge it before the appeals court. The administration said in its emergency appeal that Frimpong had overstepped in her ruling, accusing the appointee of former President Joe Biden of a 'judicial takeover' of executive branch policy. 'It is untenable for a district judge to single-handedly 'restructure the operations' of federal immigration enforcement and usurp 'ongoing judicial supervision of an agency normally, and properly, overseen by the executive branch,'' DOJ attorneys wrote in court papers. The administration is also asking the appeals court to issue an 'administrative stay,' which would put Frimpong's order on hold for a short period of time while the court weighs whether to put it on hold for much longer. Attorneys with the ACLU of Southern California, which helped bring the case, are urging the 9th Circuit to reject the request for a short-term pause. The legal challenge alleged that the Department of Homeland Security — which oversees Immigration and Customs Enforcement — has made unconstitutional arrests and prevented detainees' access to attorneys.

Hollywood heir accused of beheading wife, in-laws dies in custody days before release of key evidence
Hollywood heir accused of beheading wife, in-laws dies in custody days before release of key evidence

Fox News

time10 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Hollywood heir accused of beheading wife, in-laws dies in custody days before release of key evidence

Sam Haskell IV, the Hollywood scion accused of chopping up his wife and in-laws before tossing a disembodied torso into a dumpster, has died in a Los Angeles jail while awaiting trial, according to authorities. Los Angeles District Attorney Nathan Hochman revealed in a statement that prosecutors had damning new evidence against him that was going to be made public at an upcoming preliminary hearing — including that he was having an affair with a 27-year-old woman and had been arrested with a bloodsoaked knife containing the DNA of all three victims. Corrections officers found the 37-year-old dead in his cell Saturday, days before the hearing, where prosecutors were expected to outline the case against him. He previously pleaded not guilty. "Instead of standing before a judge and answering for the crimes he's been charged with, the defendant managed to escape justice," Hochman said in a statement. "This is one last cruel act by someone who did the most horrific things for reasons we will never entirely know. A family that has been dealing with unimaginable loss now has been robbed of their chance to face him, hold him accountable for his barbaric actions, and openly share their grief and their cherished memories of their loved ones." Haskell's attorney did not immediately respond to a request for comment. He previously told Fox News Digital that the court's assertion his client was at risk of self-harm was "wild speculation" and condemned a judge's decision that forced him to appear shirtless or wear a protective vest at prior hearings. Haskell, who opted to face the court without a shirt, was facing three counts of murder for the Nov. 6, 2023 slayings of his wife Mei Haskell, 37, her mother Yanxiang Wang, 64, and her stepfather Gaoshan Li, 71, as well as additional special circumstance allegations. He would have faced life in prison without parole if convicted. "He was obviously an unhinged individual," said Joshua Ritter, a former Los Angeles deputy district attorney and a Fox News contributor. "The crime itself speaks to his mental unrest. It's not so uncommon that we see people commit murders based on financial or marital difficulties, but the idea of going as far as killing your in-laws and chopping their body parts up is very extreme." Hochman's office released a summary of the evidence prosecutors planned to unseal at the hearing. After killing and dismembering all three victims, he allegedly paid $500 to a group of day laborers he asked to remove a series of heavy black trash bags from the home, where they all lived together, according to prosecutors. After picking up the bags, one of the workers looked inside and saw human remains. The day laborers gave the money and the bags back to Haskell and called police. Investigators previously said that by the time officers arrived at his house, Haskell and the bags were gone. Fox News Digital also reported that surveillance cameras at a gym in Encino showed him placing a heavy bag in the dumpster outside. A homeless man looking through the trash made the gruesome discovery and called 911. Police found his wife's car, which had her stepfather's blood inside, Hochman's office revealed Monday. They tracked Haskell to an Airbnb nearby, which investigators allege he had rented for himself and the children he shared with Mei Haskell after the murders. When police arrested Haskell, he was carrying a pocket knife and a Home Depot receipt from a few days earlier listing plywood, a moisture barrier, coveralls and diamond saw blades, Hochman's office said Monday. In his rented SUV, he had a loaded .357 revolver, 32 rounds, a blood-covered knife, the family's passports and a one-way ticket to Japan, according to authorities. They separately seized $67,000 cash during a search on his office. DNA testing on the knife matched blood to all three victims, according to prosecutors. "You do have to take into account the timing of all of this," Ritter told Fox News Digital. "He's been in prison for some time. I imagine he had opportunities for this kind of action before now. But it does seem interesting that it would come on the eve of a date that would expose all of the horrible things that he'd been up to." Police later recovered eight more bags containing bloody evidence, but not the remains of his in-laws — and they said that "large amounts of blood" had been cleaned up at the family home. As for Haskell's alleged 27-year-old mistress, authorities say she told them Haskell told her in October 2023, shortly before the murders, that his parents would be taking over care for his children. Then he invited her on a trip to Japan. In addition to the one-way ticket he had, prosecutors say he bought her a round-trip ticket. "It's interesting to me that, here's a guy looking at life in prison without parole, multiple murders, it's as bad as it's going to get," Ritter said. "There's a strong likelihood that he will never see the outside of the prison again, but he is such a narcissist that he is more concerned with the embarrassment of perhaps his extramarital affair becoming exposed than he is with life in prison — if that is what motivated this." The remains of Mei Haskell's parents have not been found. Haskell's parents, Hollywood producer Sam Haskell III and beauty queen and actress Mary Donnelly Haskell, are known for a series of Christmas movies. His father was also a former talent agent who represented George Clooney and Dolly Parton, among other A-list stars. He declined to comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store