logo
FEMA cuts natural disaster grants; Portsmouth loses $24M, Virginia Beach spared

FEMA cuts natural disaster grants; Portsmouth loses $24M, Virginia Beach spared

Yahoo15-04-2025
The Federal Emergency Management Agency has canceled a popular grant program that previously awarded millions of dollars for Hampton Roads projects meant to protect against natural disasters.
On the chopping block is a $24.2 million award slated for the Lake Meade Dam, a drinking water reservoir operated by Portsmouth.
FEMA announced this month it will cut the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities program, or BRIC. Under the Biden administration, $1 billion was made available for BRIC over five years through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, and FEMA reports $133 million to date has been provided for about 450 project applications across the country.
FEMA announced all applications from 2020-2023 have been canceled, and any funds not distributed to cities will go back to the Disaster Relief Fund or the U.S. Treasury. But not every BRIC-funded Hampton Roads project will lose out. A $25 million grant for Virginia Beach's Eastern Shore Drive Drainage Project was already allocated and city officials said the project was spared.
Funding through the BRIC program was allocated to cities for hazard mitigation activities or projects that promoted climate adaptation and resilience, and the award required a funding match from the awarded communities. In the cancellation announcement, FEMA called the BRIC program 'wasteful and ineffective' and stated it was 'more concerned with political agendas than helping Americans affected by natural disasters.'
The defunded Portsmouth project is the biggest blow to the region. The funding was supposed to help enhance protection and stabilization of the Lake Meade Dam, located in Suffolk. Portsmouth maintains the dam, which serves as a critical reservoir for drinking water. The project would strengthen the dam, upgrade spillways and retrofit the reservoir to prevent overtopping during extreme precipitation, when water spills over the top of a dam. The project would help protect 80 residential properties and about 30 businesses within the dam break inundation zone.
A Portsmouth spokesperson did not respond by Tuesday afternoon to questions about the grant.
The Hampton Roads Planning District Commission, a regional organization representing 17 local governments in Hampton Roads, also had BRIC funding cut. Matt Klepeisz, communications administrator for the HRPDC, said about $200,000 had been dedicated to updating the Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan. The plan, updated every five years, recommends specific actions to protect residents, businesses and development from environmental hazards that pose the greatest risk. Those risks include hurricanes and flooding.
Klepeisz said the team has applied to other funding opportunities to support the updates.
U.S. Sens. Mark Warner and Tim Kaine joined Reps. Bobby Scott and Jennifer McClellan in writing a letter to Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem about the cuts to Virginia projects, specifically noting the loss of money for the Portsmouth project as well as a $12 million grant for improvements to the Richmond Water Treatment Facility.
'The potential revocation of existing BRIC awards is an unanticipated shock to Virginia localities that have budgeted, planned and in some cases begun work on these crucial projects,' the Democrats' letter reads.
In Virginia Beach, about $25.1 million was awarded in 2021 to help pay for improvements done through the Eastern Shore Drive Drainage Project, and the city will match the grant with about $10.7 million. In 2023, the City Council voted to approve the ordinance that would accept the funding.
The awarded funding in Virginia Beach is planned to be used in the first stage of the multiphase drainage project. The project will include drainage improvements, the addition of large stormwater pump stations, an automated tide gate and the deepening and widening of the Cape Henry Canal to help reduce flooding in the Shore Drive area of the city. According to the city, the improvements would protect neighborhoods of extreme rain events, including 614 properties and 'community lifeline' facilities.
Virginia Beach said in a statement officials were aware of the potential cuts, but funding for the Shore Drive improvements likely will not be affected. A FEMA dashboard for BRIC projects shows the money was already obligated.
'Our FEMA liaisons have communicated that they do not foresee the City being at risk of losing the grant funds for this flood protection project,' a city statement reads.
The BRIC cuts are the latest federal grant cancellation to hit a climate resiliency project in Hampton Roads. Hampton is expected to lose out on $20 million after Environmental Protection Agency grants to address flooding were targeted for cancellation.
In a time where flood infrastructure projects are increasingly expensive to execute, federal funding is an avenue that many cities take to fight against negative impacts of climate change. The total cost of the Flood Protection Program in Virginia Beach has increased to more than $1 billion as the result of hikes in material and labor. Meanwhile, Hampton Roads has several large-scale construction projects underway leading to a short supply of contractors and heftier contract prices.
Eliza Noe, eliza.noe@virginiamedia.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Biden defends controversial autopen use for mass clemency decisions in NYT interview: ‘A whole lot of people'
Biden defends controversial autopen use for mass clemency decisions in NYT interview: ‘A whole lot of people'

New York Post

time34 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Biden defends controversial autopen use for mass clemency decisions in NYT interview: ‘A whole lot of people'

Former President Joe Biden defended his use of an autopen during a recent interview, shedding light on his administration's rationale for the controversial use of the technology. The interview with the New York Times was centered around his use of an autopen during the last pardons that he made during the end of his administration. In his final weeks in office, Biden granted clemency and pardoned more than 1,500 individuals, in what the White House described at the time as the largest single-day act of clemency by a US president. Speaking to the Times on Thursday, Biden said that he 'made every decision' on his own. 'We're talking about [granting clemency to] a whole lot of people,' the Democrat said. However, the Times reported that Biden 'did not individually approve each name for the categorical pardons that applied to large numbers of people,' according to the former president and his aides. 3 Biden signs an executive order related to government services in the Oval Office of the White House Dec. 13, 2021. Getty Images 'Rather, after extensive discussion of different possible criteria, [Biden] signed off on the standards he wanted to be used to determine which convicts would qualify for a reduction in sentence,' the Times's report read. Instead of repeatedly asking the president to resign updated versions of official documents, his staff used an autopen to put Biden's signature on the final version. Biden's comments came as Republicans attacked him for his autopen use on a massive number of official documents. 3 Former President Joe Biden signs an executive order at the White House in Washington, DC, on Oct. 30, 2023. Xinhua News Agency via Getty Images In June, President Donald Trump sent a memo to the Department of Justice directing Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate the autopen use and to determine whether it was related to a decline in Biden's mental state. 'In recent months, it has become increasingly apparent that former President Biden's aides abused the power of Presidential signatures through the use of an autopen to conceal Biden's cognitive decline and assert Article II authority,' Trump wrote. 'This conspiracy marks one of the most dangerous and concerning scandals in American history. The American public was purposefully shielded from discovering who wielded the executive power, all while Biden's signature was deployed across thousands of documents to effect radical policy shifts.' 3 Former President Joe Biden defended his use of an autopen during a recent interview, shedding light on his administration's rationale for the controversial use of the technology. Also in June, Trump told reporters that he thought it was 'inappropriate' to use an autopen at all, though past presidents have used them. 'Usually, when they put documents in front of you, they're important,' Trump said. 'Even if you're signing ambassadorships or – and I consider that important, I think it's inappropriate.' 'You have somebody that's devoting four years of their life or more to being an ambassador. I think you really deserve that person deserves to get a real signature… not an autopen signature.' Fox News Digital's Breanne Deppisch contributed to this report.

Biden defends frequent autopen use at end of term
Biden defends frequent autopen use at end of term

Axios

time4 hours ago

  • Axios

Biden defends frequent autopen use at end of term

Former President Biden insisted that he authorized the wide use of his signature via autopen at the very end of his presidency, according to a rare interview that the New York Times published Sunday evening. Why it matters: Senate and House Republicans and President Trump's Justice Department are conducting investigations into how Biden's aging affected his ability to be president. Some, particularly House Oversight Chairman James Comer, have been probing whether White House officials abused Biden's use of the autopen, which does not require the president's physical signature. Driving the news: "I made every decision," Biden told the Times. He said he used the autopen on granting widespread clemency and pardons to particular groups because "we're talking about a whole lot of people." At the very end of his term, Biden took action to reduce jail time for almost 4,000 federal convicts. Many of those pardons and clemency actions were signed using an autopen–including those signed to pardon members of Biden's family, the Times reported. Zoom in: Emails the Times obtained show that after Biden met with senior aides on Jan. 19, the day before Trump's inauguration, the Democrat's chief of staff Jeff Zients emailed a larger group of aides and wrote: "I approve the use of the autopen for the execution of all of the following pardons." Biden told the Times, "I made every single one of those. I understand why Trump would think that, because obviously, I guess, he doesn't focus much. Anyway, so — yes, I made every decision." He and aides said Biden did not approve every individual categorical clemency, but he did hold extensive discussions on the matter before signing off on the criteria for them, according to the times. A Biden spokesperson declined to comment further. Comer told Axios in a statement: "The House Oversight Committee will continue pursuing answers about this historic scandal to prevent such an abuse from happening again." Between the lines: Biden's 10-minute interview with the is his first interview with the paper since he became president in early 2021. Biden's staff largely shielded him from the press as his ability to communicate declined in his old age, something that aides attributed to a stutter from his childhood. State of play: Current and former Biden aides have been interviewed by Comer's committee in recent weeks.

ICE Barbie Delayed Texas Aid While Asking Instagram Which Portrait to Order
ICE Barbie Delayed Texas Aid While Asking Instagram Which Portrait to Order

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

ICE Barbie Delayed Texas Aid While Asking Instagram Which Portrait to Order

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem waited four days to sign off crucial aid for the Texas floods—but did find time to post on social media about her official portrait. Four officials at the Federal Emergency Management Agency, which falls under the umbrella of the Department of Homeland Security, told CNN that a newly introduced requirement for Noem's signature on any contract and grant over $100,000 delayed their response to the flooding in Texas, where 120 people have died and a further 150 are missing. CNN reported that FEMA was unable to move Urban Search and Rescue crews into position when waters started rising on Friday because it needed Noem's signature, which did not come until Monday. It is unclear why Noem waited until Monday to sign off. But some of what she did at the weekend while the Texas tragedy unfolded is known. Noem asked her Instagram followers on Sunday which image they preferred for her official portrait as the former governor of South Dakota.'Which one do you like for the official Governor's portrait to hang in the South Dakota State Capitol? Thank you David Uhl!' she posted. The rescue teams were not the only delayed aid. Texas also requested aerial imagery from FEMA to bolster search and rescue operations, but that was similarly delayed because Noem's approval was needed for the contract, a source told CNN. Callers to FEMA's disaster call center have also been forced to wait longer for a response since Noem's signature was needed to bring in additional staff, CNN reported. Multiple FEMA officials told the network that acting FEMA Administrator David Richardson has been given little authority by Noem. Last month, CNN obtained a memo indicating that all Homeland Security contracts and grants over $100,000 must first be approved by Noem before the funds are released. The memo stated that funding requests must include details such as the mission's impact, dollar amounts, timeliness issues, descriptions of the supplies or services, and a plan of action. But it appeared to have caused chaos inside FEMA. 'We were operating under a clear set of guidance: lean forward, be prepared, anticipate what the state needs, and be ready to deliver it,' a longtime FEMA official told the news outlet. 'That is not as clear of an intent for us at the moment.' Former FEMA Director Deanne Criswell told The Source with Kaitlan Collins that the new rule could have cost lives. 'What happened, I think, here, is that we couldn't move, or FEMA couldn't move those resources in like they normally would, to be on the ground ready once they found out how bad the situation was,' she said. 'And you lose time, and that's time that can cost lives in the end. And so it's really important for emergency managers to always be proactive and thinking ahead and getting resources in place.' Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin told CNN, 'FEMA is shifting from bloated, DC-centric dead weight to a lean, deployable disaster force that empowers state actors to provide relief for their citizens.' 'The old processes are being replaced because they failed Americans in real emergencies for decades,' she said. Editor's note: Due to an editing error, this story briefly referred to Kristi Noem as incorrectly as a former North Dakota governor. She was governor of South Dakota.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store