Miami to offer free citizenship classes for immigrants after feds cut funding
On Monday, Miami District 4 Commissioner Ralph Rosado announced that his office would allocate up to $10,000 to subsidize Miami-Dade County Public Schools' Fast Track to Citizenship courses, offered through the school district's adult education program.
Earlier this month, the Miami Herald reported that Miami-Dade County Public Schools would stop offering the courses after the U.S. Department of Homeland Security determined the program 'no longer effectuates the program goals and the Department's priorities,' making it so that all federally funded work under the grant 'will be unallowable.'
READ MORE: Miami-Dade school district ends citizenship classes for immigrants after federal cuts
'This is much more than just about funding a program,' Rosado said at a press conference Monday. 'It's about living our values as Americans and as Miamians. It's about living the values of opportunity and the belief that Miami's variety is our strength.'
The course, which supports lawful permanent residents seeking U.S. citizenship, includes help with the 20-page naturalization application and preparation for the exam. Citizenship preparation courses have been taught through Miami-Dade schools in some form since at least the 1970s. The Fast Track to Citizenship courses were previously funded by the state before they were funded by the federal government.
Rosado said his office would allocate up to $10,000, based on an estimate that approximately 150 people apply per year for a course that costs up to $65. He said that should be enough to keep the program running for another year. Rosado said his office has been in contact with the school district about his initiative.
For now, the funding will only be available for residents in the city of Miami, where about 58% of residents are foreign born and more than 70% are Hispanic or Latino, according to U.S. Census Bureau data. Rosado said it will go into effect in the fall, when the current grant is set to run out, but that he would work to make the funding available sooner if there's a shortfall.
Rosado's announcement landed weeks after the city voted to enter an immigration enforcement agreement with ICE, deputizing Miami police officers with immigration enforcement powers. The commission voted 3-2 to enter into what's called a 287(g) agreement; Rosado was one of the three who voted in favor.
Mayor Francis Suarez said the citizenship program has 'a clear track record of providing an important service to our community' but that it 'became a victim of funding cuts to Miami-Dade County public schools.'
'This financial investment will guarantee that those who are already on a pathway to citizenship will not face any obstacles in achieving that dream,' Suarez said.
To apply for the program, Rosado said Miami residents can call (305) 558-8000 or go to adulteducationworks.com.
In March, when the federal government announced it was ending funding for the Fast Track to Citizenship classes through Miami-Dade County Public Schools' adult education program, four locations continued to offer separate citizenship classes through the district's continuing education program. The school district told the Herald those citizenship courses will continue.
But the courses are fee-based and can be expensive depending on the number of students who enroll. Students split the cost of teachers' salaries and materials based on the number of students. When the Herald first reported that the district was offering fee-based courses, there was no information on its website or social media, and the district said interested students had to show up in person at the locations to express interest and enroll.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
32 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump Says Epstein Poached Young Women From Mar-a-Lago - CNN NewsNight with Abby Phillip - Podcast on CNN Podcasts
Trump Says Epstein Poached Young Women From Mar-a-Lago CNN NewsNight with Abby Phillip 47 mins MAGA defended the president, claiming he cut ties with a friend over dark secrets, but Donald Trump is ditching that defense. Turns out, one included a young Epstein victim. Plus, one group declares the man-made crisis in Gaza a famine, as one man gaslights and another demands credit. Also, conservatives insist other nations pay the tariffs. One Republican wants Americans to get rebate checks to ease the pain, but not all Americans. And New York's deadliest shooting in a quarter century sparks reaction about guns, immigrants, crime, and mental health. Plus, tsunami alert for entire U.S. West Coast after quake.
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Pete Buttigieg says Dems are too attached to a ‘failing' status quo
In a recent interview with NPR, Pete Buttigieg shared some powerful thoughts about where the Democratic Party — and the country — needs to go from here. He made a compelling point: it's not enough to just fix what Donald Trump broke. Instead, Buttigieg argues, Democrats have to go further. They need to reimagine the entire system so that it actually works for people today. It's a wake-up call. For years, Buttigieg has pushed the idea that the government needs more than a fresh coat of paint — it needs a full renovation. In his conversation on 'Morning Edition,' Buttigieg highlighted a few critical points. 'Democrats have been slow to understand the changes in how people get their information,' he said. 'Slow to understand some of the cultural changes that have been happening and — maybe most problematic of all — too attached to a status quo that has been failing us for a long time.' And that's really the crux of it. There's a gap between the way the party sees the world and how everyday Americans are experiencing it. Buttigieg is saying out loud what many have been whispering: the old ways of doing things just aren't cutting it anymore. He went on to say: 'Right now, you've got an administration that is burning down many of the institutions that we have in this country, which is wrong. It is also wrong to imagine that we should have just kept everything going along the way it was. If our politics, our economy and our culture were healthy, the rise of a figure like Donald Trump would have never happened in the first place.' He's not just criticizing Trump—he's challenging Democrats, too. Buttigieg is pointing to something deeper: that the system itself hasn't been working for a long time. And pretending we can go back to 'normal' just isn't going to cut it. Instead of just repairing departments like Education or USAID, he is pushing for transformation. He wants these institutions to be more modern, more accountable, and more connected to the real needs of today's America. But it's not just about structure. It's about trust. Buttigieg is warning that public faith in government has eroded — and that's opened the door for conspiracy theories, misinformation, and extreme politics. If Democrats want to win people back, they have to stop avoiding the hard questions and start making bold, meaningful changes. In the end, Buttigieg's message is simple but urgent: the Democratic Party has to evolve. That means letting go of what no longer works and being brave enough to build something new. It's about tuning in to how people live now — how they get their news, who they trust, what they need — and designing a government that reflects that. Looking ahead to 2028 and beyond, this could be a real blueprint for Democrats. Buttigieg isn't asking them to look back; he's challenging them to look forward — with open eyes, open ears, and the courage to truly listen to the people they're supposed to represent.
Forbes
3 hours ago
- Forbes
As The EPA Moves To Gut A Key Climate Rule, The Risks To Public Health Intensify
WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 30: A bronze sign marks an entrance to the US Environmental Protection ... More Agency (EPA) headquarters building on January 30, 2024, in Washington, DC. (Photo by J.) In a sweeping move today, the Environmental Protection Agency has sought to undo the legal scaffolding for confronting climate change. EPA head Lee Zeldin announced that the agency would forge ahead with a proposal to repeal the 'endangerment finding,' a rule established in 2009 that enables the regulation of greenhouse gas emissions vis-à-vis the Clean Air Act. The Trump-era EPA had set its sights on the endangerment finding at least as early as March, when the agency unveiled '31 historic actions in the greatest and most consequential day of deregulation in U.S. history.' These actions, a set of large-scale environmental rollbacks, included a call for 'reconsideration of the 2009 Endangerment Finding and regulations and actions that rely on that Finding.' The endangerment finding comprises two key parts, both explicitly centered around 'public health and welfare.' The first clause states that the increased atmospheric levels of six greenhouse gases imperil humanity's well-being, and the second clause specifically implicates new motor vehicles and their engines for helping drive harmful pollution by way of these emissions. In an interview on Fox News, Administrator Zeldin provided further context on the EPA's new proposal to gut the endangerment finding, saying, 'We're not going to go along with applying extreme economic pain on Americans who can least afford it.' He also provided a characterization of the opposition to the proposal, noting, 'There's going to be a lot of hyperbole, scare tactics, extreme rhetoric that will come from climate zealots.' Indeed, that the EPA would seek to unravel the endangerment finding is part and parcel with President Trump's longstanding portrayal of climate action as a policy nuisance and economic impediment. The administration's storyline has repeatedly set up a binary between climate action and economic prosperity, painting advocates of the former as indifferent to the latter. In fact, on his first day in office, when President Trump sought to extricate the U.S. from the Paris Agreement for a second time, he issued an executive order that reinforced the economic framing, stating, 'It is the policy of my Administration to put the interests of the United States and the American people first in the development and negotiation of any international agreements with the potential to damage or stifle the American economy.' But the facts remind us that viewing climate action as a zero-sum game with economic growth is counterproductive on several fronts. First, the explosion of renewable energy capacity means that forfeiting the opportunity to be at the vanguard of this global movement is a veritable disservice to economic prospects. While the Trump administration has sought to stifle clean energy commitments in favor of unleashing fossil fuels, other countries are taking note and expanding investments in renewables research and technologies that promise to define the future. Moreover, the notion that reigning in greenhouse gas emissions undermines economic prosperity overlooks the mountain of evidence that the climate crisis is injurious to public health, a reality that the endangerment finding acknowledged and sought to address. For example, this summer alone, millions of Americans have sweltered under extreme heat, with climate change being implicated in the greater 'intensity, frequency and duration' of heatwaves. Several studies have attempted to quantify the economic disruption wrought by heat, with the estimates including some $100 billion or 2.5 billion hours of labor. Children are especially vulnerable to high heat and have logged learning losses when schools are ill-fitted with sufficient cooling measures. Elementary and middle school students in multiple states have historically seen their school days cut short when the temperatures pose unmitigable risk. While the Biden administration had compiled a comprehensive National Heat Strategy to begin counteracting these widespread effects, it's safe to say that, in the current moment, a robust response of comparable magnitude appears to be all but lacking. This means that not only are we presently failing to scale up adaptations to the downstream effects of unchecked greenhouse gas emissions, but we're also torpedoing our preventative stopgap by targeting the endangerment finding. And this is just one facet of how the climate crisis and public health are intertwined and why regulating greenhouse gas emissions is core to breaking this cycle. This is to say nothing of wildfires, floods, tropical cyclones, allergy seasons, infectious disease transmission, food insecurity, and associated mental health impacts that are reshaping life on a climate change-stricken planet. From this cascade, the World Health Organization projects 250,000 more annual fatalities from 2030 to 2050, as well as $2-4 billion in annual health expenses by the next 5 years. Just last year, the U.S. suffered more than $182 billion in losses from weather and climate-related catastrophes. The images of victims of Hurricane Helene, which decimated homes and left people without clean water for weeks, are still searing. The EPA's proposal to reverse course on a critical tool for combating climate change will have far-reaching consequences. 'The public health and welfare of current and future generations,' a prescient phrase from the text of the endangerment finding, will be squarely among them.
