logo
Española school ordered teachers to delete student immigration data during inquiry, union alleges

Española school ordered teachers to delete student immigration data during inquiry, union alleges

Yahoo15-05-2025
The entrance to Española Valley High School in an undated photo. The union representing Española teachers filed a labor complaint related to an effort to collect, and later delate, student immigration data at the high school. (Photo courtesy EVHS)
The union representing teachers at an Española high school has filed a complaint with the state labor board, alleging the school committed an unfair labor practice when it asked teachers to collect — and, soon after, delete — student immigration data in recent weeks.
As Source reported last month, the National Education Association initially issued a cease-and-desist letter to the Española School District superintendent regarding the high school's effort to collect student immigration data as part of a standardized workplace readiness exam, though a spokesperson for the exam company told Source New Mexico that the company has no need for that information and does not ask test administrators to collect it.
In response to the NEA letter, the superintendent told the union that teachers were no longer required to collect student immigration data. However, soon after, high school leaders 'began requiring educators to delete the information they had previously collected regarding students' immigration and citizenship statuses,' NEA spokesperson Edward Webster said in a news release Thursday.
Española high school sought students' immigration status as part of standardized test
Deleting the information amounted to 'destruction of evidence during an open union investigation' and prompted the union to file a Prohibited Practice Complaint with the Public Employee Labor Relations Board of New Mexico.
The new complaint alleges the school violated aspects of the Public Employee Bargaining Act of New Mexico, which defines unfair labor practices as those that violate employee rights and carry legal consequences.
The state labor relations board had not yet scheduled a hearing for the case, according to its website.
Española Superintendent Eric Spencer, who will retire in late June, did not respond to a list of questions Thursday from Source NM. He has previously said that his staff is working with the union on the matter and that, 'The district takes all matters of student confidentiality seriously.'
According to the union, the emailed letter from the union cited the 1982 Plyler v. Doe U.S. Supreme Court case that guarantees the right to a free, public education for all children, regardless of their immigration status.
Mary Parr-Sanchez, NEA-NM president, said in a news release Thursday that the effort to collect student immigration information plays into the Trump administration's targeting of immigrants. She noted that the Española school district and others around the state have students in different and precarious immigration statuses, including students brought to the United States as minors and others who are seeking asylum due to political persecution.
'The current administration is targeting children in this country because of the color of their skin and origin of their birth,' Parr-Sanchez said in a statement.
'This is no different than the harassment that our Las Cruces students experienced when they were going to a swim meet in Albuquerque when ICE officers boarded their private bus and demanded proof of citizenship from children,' she said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pat Williams, last Montana Democrat to serve in the House, dies at 87
Pat Williams, last Montana Democrat to serve in the House, dies at 87

Boston Globe

time3 days ago

  • Boston Globe

Pat Williams, last Montana Democrat to serve in the House, dies at 87

His most notable election came in 1992, when Montana had been chiseled down to a single congressional seat, from two, after the 1990 census. Williams, who represented the state's more liberal forested western half, faced Rep. Ron Marlenee, a Republican who served the conservative ranchland of eastern Montana. Advertisement The left-versus-right showdown was fought over the use of the state's vast natural resources and whether the New Deal-era safety net for the vulnerable still mattered. Williams won narrowly, with 51% of the vote. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up In Washington, he was a co-sponsor of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, which gave workers 12 weeks of unpaid time off to care for a newborn or a sick family member. Multiple attempts to enact the law under Republican Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush had failed. Williams called those administrations 'frozen in the ice of their own indifference' to working people. The law was signed by President Bill Clinton, who boasted of it nearly every day during his successful reelection race in 1996. A former schoolteacher, Williams was also on the front lines of a conflagration over the National Endowment for the Arts. Conservative senators in 1990 sought to abolish the agency because of grants it had made that supported photographers Robert Mapplethorpe and Andres Serrano, whose transgressive work was condemned by critics like Donald Wildmon of the American Family Association as blasphemous or obscene. Advertisement Williams was the chief author of a bipartisan compromise that preserved funding for the arts endowment while leaving decisions about obscenity to the courts. He became known as the savior of the NEA. He was also the sponsor of a pet bill, the Professional Boxing Safety Act, which required safety standards for professional fighters. Congress passed it in 1996. 'Yeah, I fought as a kid in Butte,' Williams told The New York Times. 'Back there you had to be a Democrat, and you had to be able to fight. Boxers are workers and deserve health protection.' John Patrick Williams was born Oct. 30, 1937, in Helena, Montana, the state capital. His parents, Shelton and Libby Williams, owned a candy shop in Butte. Evel Knievel, the daredevil motorcyclist, was a cousin who was born in Butte one year later, and the two boys tussled and played often, according to a Knievel biography. The family's hometown was built on copper mining, which had attracted waves of Irish immigrants. It was staunchly pro-union and embraced the working-class populism of the New Deal. Williams graduated from Butte High School in 1956 and earned a Bachelor of Arts from the University of Denver in 1961. He returned home to teach in the public schools from 1963 to 1969. Butte voters sent him in 1967 to the Montana House of Representatives, where he served two terms. Advertisement His wife, Carol Griffith Williams, whom he married in 1965, also became a state lawmaker, serving as the Democratic leader in the Montana Senate. She survives him, as do a son, Griff; two daughters, Erin and Whitney Williams; and five grandchildren. Williams first sought federal office in 1974 but lost the Democratic primary for a House seat to Max Baucus. Four years later, when Baucus moved up to run successfully for the Senate, Williams was elected to replace him in the House. When he announced that he would not seek reelection in 1996, joining the faculty of the University of Montana at age 59, he said his greatest regret was not to have revived a bill vetoed by Reagan that would have protected 1.4 million acres of pristine Montana wilderness. Reagan said he wanted to protect jobs and mining development in the state. Williams considered the jobs-versus-the-environment trade-off a false choice. 'A clean environment,' he said in 1992, 'has been and will be an absolute cash register for this state.' This article originally appeared in

Educational Freedom Accounts now universal in New Hampshire in new law
Educational Freedom Accounts now universal in New Hampshire in new law

Yahoo

time5 days ago

  • Yahoo

Educational Freedom Accounts now universal in New Hampshire in new law

Gov. Kelly Ayotte signed a bill into law Tuesday that makes so-called "school choice" universal in New Hampshire. SB 295 makes the school voucher program known as Education Freedom Accounts universal in New Hampshire by eliminating the household income limit of 350% of the federal poverty guidelines for all students. This means that all families regardless of income level will have the potential to access the program that allows families to use annual state education funds for private and homeschooling expenses. This bill establishes universal eligibility as soon as July 2025. It includes a 10,000-student cap on the program for the 2025-2026 school year, which would double the program that currently contains 5,321 students. For each subsequent year, the cap would be increased by 25% if total enrollment of the prior year is greater than 90% of the that year's enrollment cap. Ayotte had called for an expansion of the EFA program, but this bill goes further than what she had outlined. Ayotte's plan called for removing income limits for students who had attended public schools for at least a year, but to keep the 350% income cap (about 112,000 for a family of four) on students who have already been homeschooled or were already enrolled in a private school. Ayotte signed the expanded bill into law Tuesday. 'Giving parents the freedom to choose the education setting that best fits their child's needs will help every student in our state reach their full potential," she said in a statement. More: Open enrollment will hurt NH public school students: Seacoast superintendents speak out Republicans have been attempting to expand the EFA program for the past few years, arguing that families should be able to choose the best school for their children. 'With the passage of this bill, we are now able to deliver universal school choice for all New Hampshire families,' said Sen. Victoria Sullivan, R-Manchester, who sponsored the bill, in a statement. 'These changes will give families more options that will help New Hampshire's future leaders flourish in school environments that best suit them.' But Democrats have long fought against the program, saying that it will cost the state too much money, hurt public schools that are already underfunded and benefit already wealthy families. 'Get out your wallets folks. Wealthy people want subsidies from taxpayers like you to send their kids to private schools,' said Rep. David Meuse, D-Portsmouth, adding that the law is expected to 'increase the state's obligation to pony up your tax dollars for the GOP school voucher scam by tens of millions of dollars over the next biennium while many state services will be cut due to declining state revenues.' Teachers' unions in the state are also against the program. In a statement released after the signing, the largest teachers' union in the state, NEA-NH, said that the law will hurt public schools. 'All students deserve a high-quality education and the support they need to thrive. Unfortunately, expanding the unaccountable voucher scheme will exacerbate the already inequitable public education funding system in New Hampshire,' said NEA-NH President Megan Tuttle. 'Limitless vouchers will take millions of dollars out of public schools to subsidize private school education for a few at the expense of nearly 90% of students who attend community public schools.' NH Education Commissioner Frank Edelblut has long supported the program. His seven children were homeschooled. "New Hampshire's Education Freedom Account program has already transformed lives by giving families access to the educational pathways that best fit their children's needs," he said in a statement. "Expanding this opportunity through universal eligibility is a bold and forward-thinking move that reimagines what education can be, providing every student with the opportunity to reach their full potential and experience a bright future." This article originally appeared on Portsmouth Herald: 'School choice' now universal in NH after governor signs bill into law

Megan Beyer and Gregory Houston: America's greatest export may be its culture
Megan Beyer and Gregory Houston: America's greatest export may be its culture

Chicago Tribune

time6 days ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Megan Beyer and Gregory Houston: America's greatest export may be its culture

As the United States navigates rising geopolitical competition and a rapidly evolving digital economy, one of our most effective yet underused assets is American culture. From film and fashion to music, museums and design, the arts are not just expressions of creativity — they are powerful drivers of economic growth, job creation, urban revitalization and global influence. We have worked across both sides of the aisle and believe these are not partisan issues. Investing in arts and culture is good policy — plain and simple. It strengthens our tax base, supports small businesses, enhances public health and well-being, and reinforces America's leadership on the world stage. While some continue to debate funding for the National Endowment for the Arts or question the value of cultural diplomacy, the data speaks for itself. According to the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, the arts and cultural sector contributed $1.1 trillion to the U.S. economy in 2021 — representing 4.4% of gross domestic product. This is not an abstraction. It includes over 5.2 million jobs in industries such as film, publishing, advertising, performing arts, museums, architecture and design. To put that in perspective, arts and culture contribute more to the GDP than agriculture, transportation or construction. This growth isn't confined to coastal metropolises. Cities such as Louisville, Kentucky, and Boise, Idaho, have embraced cultural innovation as core to downtown revitalization and economic development. Local creative economies drive tourism, real estate and small business growth — making the arts not just aesthetically important but also economically strategic. While the COVID-19 pandemic decimated live performance venues and museums, the resilience of the creative sector has been striking. The NEA reported that employment in the arts rebounded sharply in 2022, with creative occupations growing faster than the broader labor market. Federal relief programs — such as the $135 million distributed through the American Rescue Plan to arts organizations — helped stabilize institutions and workers; but the long-term opportunity lies in treating the arts as infrastructure. Beyond borders, culture is currency. The U.S. exports billions of dollars annually in cultural goods and services, including film, streaming media, video games and music. American music dominates global playlists; American movies lead international box offices. Make no mistake: When a teenager in Sao Paulo wears a hoodie inspired by Marvel's Iron Man, or when K-Pop groups emulate Beyoncé's stage choreography, that is 'soft power' at work. The U.S. Department of State has long used culture as a diplomatic tool — from jazz tours during the Cold War to recent hip-hop diplomacy initiatives in the Middle East. These efforts don't just make friends; they reinforce the American narrative of innovation, diversity and freedom. Sports diplomacy programs build goodwill and boost the economy. When American athletes and coaches engage youths abroad — often through partnerships with the NBA, WNBA, NFL and MLB — they promote leadership and inclusion while expanding global fan bases, increasing merchandise sales, and opening new markets for U.S. sports and media. Yet, despite this immense value, the federal government spends $200 million annually on the NEA . That's dwarfed by the per capita arts spending of Canada, the United Kingdom and virtually every European Union nation. Globally, the U.S. State Department allocates around $740 million annually for educational and cultural exchange programs — far less than China's estimated $10 billion to $15 billion annual investment. As global powers compete to shape the values and narratives of the 21st century, America's ability to lead through cultural engagement is both a strategic necessity and an economic opportunity. Cultural exports drive tourism, open markets and amplify the global appeal of American innovation and values. To stay competitive, we must treat cultural diplomacy as a smart, forward-looking investment. If arts and culture strengthen our communities at home and our influence abroad, why aren't we investing in them like the strategic assets they are? To unlock the full potential of American culture, we need a bold national strategy that includes: In the 21st century, influence is not just about military might or technological dominance — it's about whose stories shape the future. America's creative edge remains one of its most valuable assets. Let's recognize the arts not as charity, but as smart policy — fueling jobs, generating tax revenue, revitalizing communities, and advancing U.S. trade and influence around the world. Megan Beyer was director of the President's Committee on the Arts and the Humanities from 2015 to 2016 and director of the Office of Art in Embassies from 2021 to 2024. Gregory Houston is president and CEO of International Arts & Artists (IA&A).

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store