Fine witnesses who mislead select committees, MP urges
Mark Pritchard warned that witnesses 'get away with it' if they provide inaccurate evidence and statements.
According Parliament's rulebook Erskine May, the Commons has not imposed a fine in 359 years, since 1666, the year the Great Fire of London broke out.
'Of course, there is the ministerial code, there are the Nolan Principles, and there is the contempt of Parliament procedures, but there hasn't been a fine since that time,' Mr Pritchard told the Commons.
'And for members and non-members alike, what is the deterrent? What is the incentive, even, for telling the truth to this place?
'Ministers of course can be brought back to the House, correct the record, but people giving evidence to select committees? There really is a gap at the moment.
'Isn't it time we put fines on a statutory basis for members and non-members alike so that we can always be assured that people are incentivised to tell the truth, and have a deterrent should they be tempted not to tell the truth?'
Commons Leader Lucy Powell said Mr Pritchard had raised a 'very, very serious issue'.
She added that there are 'many, many ways for members to hold ministers account', including by raising points of order, asking questions, and making complaints through a standards procedure.
Conservative MP Mr Pritchard later told the PA news agency: 'The current sanctions for ministers and MPs work quite well, but for non-member witnesses giving evidence to Parliament, the sanctions are weak to non-existent.
'Fines for contempt before a select committee, for example, need to be put on a statutory footing.
'This will act as both a deterrent and incentive for all public officials and external witnesses who might be tempted, on the rarest of occasions, to mislead Parliament whilst giving evidence before any of Parliament's committees.'
The Wrekin MP added: 'Currently, anyone apart from members and ministers can lie to Parliament, if they were so tempted, and get away with it.
'That is a significant gap in Parliament's powers to scrutinise.
'Other Parliaments have considerably more powers than Westminster to sanction anyone who lies to the legislature.'
New Zealand's House of Representatives is one such Parliament, where its members can agree to fine people up to 1,000 US dollars for contempt.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Residents concerned over new housing updated on any plans
Residents concerned over the idea of new housing in Swindon have been rest assured that there are "no plans" for a new development. Wroughton and Wichelstowe residents were quick to share their concern over new potential housing being built on the field adjacent to Ashen Copse. The local parish council have reaffirmed that there is no indication of new housing and Councillor John Hewer released a statement. He said: "As Chair of Wroughton Parish Council, and on behalf of our parish councillors, I would like to let our residents know what we Wroughton & Wichelstowe Parish Council (WWPC) knows, we are seeing increasing anxiety from residents around the possibility that a couple of fields adjacent to Ashen Copse may be developed for housing. "We have not been given any official information about this. However, I have met with the landowner to establish what the possible plans are. "The land owner acknowledged that a land agent had contacted them about possible development on his land, however he confirmed to me that no plans had yet been presented to him and he promised to contact WWPC when this happens. "It is quite common for land agents to contact land owners who have put forward land to SBC for possible development, but this does not necessarily mean this will proceed." The land is located west of Wroughton where there is plenty of rural grounds headed towards Bassett Down. Recommended reading Comedian joins campaigners at Oasis concert in bid to save sports hall Residents react to 400 new homes to be built near Swindon What's happening to the Adver's former home in Old Town? The statement made by Councillor Hewer also expressed the commitment that the parish had to fight against unwanted land use. He continued: "WWPC will always give information that we can confirm as fact, but do not inform or comment on speculation. "WWPC have always robustly challenged any unwanted and inappropriate planning applications. "As an example, at last night's Planning and Highways meeting (29/07/2025), we strongly objected to the application for 14 houses proposed by a developer to be squeezed in between existing houses on Langton Park. "The Swindon Borough Council draft Local Plan has been published. "WWPC requested that Swindon Borough Council (SBC) hold a public meeting in Wroughton to explain their proposals to residents. "They refused a public meeting but have agreed to hold a public drop-in event for residents as part of SBC's consultation. This will be at the Ellendune Community Centre on the 6th October from 5 to 7pm."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
X criticises Online Safety Act - and warns it's putting free speech in the UK at risk
The Online Safety Act is putting free speech at risk and needs significant adjustments, Elon Musk's social network X has warned. New rules that came into force last week require platforms such as Facebook, YouTube, TikTok and X - as well as sites hosting pornography - to bring in measures to prove that someone using them is over the age of 18. The Online Safety Act requires sites to protect children and to remove illegal content, but critics have said that the rules have been implemented too broadly, resulting in the censorship of legal content. X has warned the act's laudable intentions were "at risk of being overshadowed by the breadth of its regulatory reach". It said: "When lawmakers approved these measures, they made a conscientious decision to increase censorship in the name of 'online safety'. "It is fair to ask if UK citizens were equally aware of the trade-off being made." X claims the timetable for platforms to meet mandatory measures had been unnecessarily tight - and despite complying, sites still faced threats of enforcement and fines, "encouraging over-censorship". "A balanced approach is the only way to protect individual liberties, encourage innovation and safeguard children. It's safe to say that significant changes must take place to achieve these objectives in the UK," it said. A UK government spokesperson said it is "demonstrably false" that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech. "As well as legal duties to keep children safe, the very same law places clear and unequivocal duties on platforms to protect freedom of expression," they added. Users have complained about age checks that require personal data to be uploaded to access sites that show pornography, and 468,000 people have already signed a petition asking for the new law to be repealed. In response to the petition, the government said it had "no plans" to reverse the Online Safety Act. Reform UK's leader Nigel Farage likened the new rules to "state suppression of genuine free speech" and said his party would ditch the regulations. Technology Secretary Peter Kyle said on Tuesday that those who wanted to overturn the act were "on the side of predators" - to which Mr Farage demanded an apology, calling Mr Kyle's comments "absolutely disgusting". Regulator Ofcom said on Thursday it had launched an investigation into how four companies - that collectively run 34 pornography sites - are complying with new age-check requirements. Read more from Sky News: These companies - 8579 LLC, AVS Group Ltd, Kick Online Entertainment S.A. and Trendio Ltd - run dozens of sites, and collectively have more than nine million unique monthly UK visitors, the internet watchdog said. The regulator said it prioritised the companies based on the risk of harm posed by the services they operated and their user numbers. It adds to the 11 investigations already in progress into 4chan, as well as an unnamed online suicide forum, seven file-sharing services, and two adult websites. Ofcom said it expects to make further enforcement announcements in the coming months.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Channel migrant crossings hit 25,000 mark earlier than any year on record
The number of migrants crossing the Channel in small boats has hit 25,400 at the earliest point in the year since records began. Some 898 migrants made the journey in 13 boats on Wednesday, bringing the total for 2025 so far to 25,436, according to Home Office figures. Small-boat arrivals this year are 51 per cent higher than at the same point in 2024, when the figure stood at 16,842, and 73 per cent higher than at the same point in 2023, when it was 14,732. It is the highest number of asylum seekers to have reached the UK in the first seven months of the year since the first migrants reached the UK on small boats in 2018. Last year the 25,000 mark was passed on Sept 22, and in 2023 it was Oct 2. The first year in which at least 25,000 arrivals were recorded was 2022, when the milestone was passed on Aug 27. The total in that year went on to hit a record 45,774 by the end of December. Modelling, first published by The Telegraph, has forecast that the number of illegal migrants will hit nearly 45,000 if the sea and weather conditions are as benign as they were in 2024. Sir Keir Starmer is hoping that new measures announced in July after an Anglo-French summit with Emmanuel Macron, France's president, will reduce the number of projected crossings. At the summit, the Prime Minister agreed a one in, one out deal with France. It would mean Channel migrants will be sent back to France in return for a similar number of asylum seekers. Ministers believe it will act as a deterrent. The shadow home secretary has said that Channel crossings are 'now a national emergency'. Reacting to the figures, Chris Philp said: 'Almost 900 people crossed the Channel yesterday, meaning 25,000 people, mainly young men, have crossed the Channel this year. 2025 is the worst year on record so far and the Labour Government are doing nothing to stop the crossings. This is now a national emergency.' He also claimed that the UK's deal with France 'will not even make a dent'. France is also preparing to introduce tougher tactics where officers from an elite police unit will intercept the people smugglers' boats at sea within 300 metres of the coast. They have also been experimenting with jet skis laying nets to snag the dinghies' propellers. Last week, Sir Keir secured a pledge from Friedrich Merz, Germany's chancellor, that they will introduce a new law by the end of the year to enable police to seize boats for use by people smugglers in the Channel. David Lammy, the Foreign Secretary, also in July announced financial sanctions of two dozen people smugglers. Labour has set up a new Border Security Command to oversee efforts by Border Force, police and intelligence agencies to target people smuggling gangs and disrupt the migrant, boat and equipment supply chains from outside and inside Europe. On Thursday, the National Crime Agency announced that it had seized 25 inflatable boats from a lorry in Bulgaria that was destined for the Channel. The seizure – the biggest single detection of small boats in 2025 – was made at the Kapitan Andreev checkpoint near the border with Greece and Turkey. A Borders bill currently before Parliament will also give Border Force and police officers new counter-terror style powers to search and arrest suspected people smugglers and seize phones from migrants. A new offence of endangering lives at sea with a jail term of up to five years will also target smugglers. On Wednesday, pictures showed multiple boats arrive in Dover carrying people wearing life jackets. Others showed Border Force boats following each other into the port. They were filled with people standing on outside decking. An RNLI lifeboat sailed two miles into French waters to rescue more than 90 migrants crammed on to a single dinghy, before bringing them back to Dover. Bad weather prevented any crossings on Thursday. A Home Office spokesman said: 'We all want to end dangerous small boat crossings, which threaten lives and undermine our border security.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more. Solve the daily Crossword
