logo
Reign Of ‘Hurt Sentiments' Will Destroy Democracy

Reign Of ‘Hurt Sentiments' Will Destroy Democracy

News1811 hours ago
Last Updated:
Only grounded, objective criteria - threat to public order, incitement to violence, defamation, obscenity - should govern permissible restrictions.
The Supreme Court has rightly slammed the Karnataka government and the state film chamber for siding with the enemies of free speech. The apex court was aghast that no action was taken against those who threatened violence over the release of actor-politician Kamal Haasan's movie, Thug Life.
The state government told the court that it had not imposed any restrictions on the film and also pledged to provide full security if the producers chose to release it. It was heartening to see in this case that the SC not just gave relief to the Thug Life makers but also wanted action against those who had issued threats.
The apex court Bench, headed by Justice Ujjal Bhuyan, was hearing petitions on June 19 filed by the Thug Life producer and a third party seeking guidelines on hate speech and threats of violence.
Thug Life was scheduled for release in Karnataka on June 5, but got embroiled in controversy following Haasan's comment that the Kannada language was 'born out of Tamil." The comment was widely resented by pro-Kannada groups, which demanded an apology from Haasan. Taking a brave stance, he refused to apologise, despite the threat of imminent commercial losses because of the non-release of the movie in the state.
The Karnataka Film Chamber of Commerce (KFCC) also took a tough stand, saying that Thug Life would not be released without an apology from Haasan. When Haasan approached the Karnataka High Court, it chided him for his remarks and asked him to apologise.
When the matter reached the Supreme Court, it not only criticised the Karnataka government but also reprimanded the state High Court for having urged Haasan to apologise. 'There is something wrong with the system when one person makes a statement and everyone gets involved. Why should the High Court say 'express an apology'? That is not its role," the SC said.
On June 17, the Supreme Court pointed out that the rule of law requires a person to be able to release a film that has been certified by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC). The court warned the state that it could not allow 'mobs and vigilante groups to take over," asserting that public sentiment should not override legal rights.
It was only after the SC snub that the Karnataka government pledged to maintain law and order and ensure the peaceful release of Thug Life. The government clarified that it had not imposed any restrictions on the film's release and would provide necessary protection and security.
This was not the first case in which the adversaries of free speech exploited the notion of 'hurt sentiments" to justify censorship. Public intellectuals assist them by raising the wrong questions, by debating whether protests over a film, book, or song are justified, and by asking whether someone's feelings were really hurt. They should be asking instead: can hurt sentiments be a basis for banning anything?
Under Article 19 of the Indian Constitution, freedom of expression may be regulated only by 'reasonable restrictions" for state security, friendly relations, public order, decency, morality, contempt of court, defamation, or incitement to offend. But nowhere does the Constitution permit restrictions based solely on hurt sentiments or feelings. The distinction is vital: while reasons can be scrutinized and debated objectively, sentiments are personal and cannot be uniformly measured or validated. Dictionaries define 'sentiment" as emotional attitudes or opinions influenced by feeling, and 'feeling" as unreasoned emotional reactions. By their nature, these are subjective—what deeply offends one group may leave another unmoved. Take, for example, the case of M.F. Husain: some Hindus found his work as hurtful, while others didn't.
It must be mentioned here that the anti-blasphemy law, Section 299 of BNS, is used to gag free speech. Section 299 (which was earlier Section 295A of the IPC) says: 'Whoever, with deliberate and malicious intention of outraging the religious feelings of any class of citizens of India, by words, either spoken or written, or by signs or by visible representations or through electronic means or otherwise, insults or attempts to insult the religion or the religious beliefs of that class, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both."
Section 299 is logically untenable as it criminalises speech based on feelings, which—as we mentioned earlier—are subjective. Therefore, it is antithetical to India's constitutional spirit as it imposes vague restrictions on freedom of expression.
The extant court cases are symptomatic of the systemic toxicity that sentimentalism has generated over the decades. Sentimentalism, along with its sibling sanctimoniousness, has supplanted reason in public discourse and political debate. Ranting, canting demagogues and intellectuals set the agenda, resulting in the silencing of dissent, throttling of creativity, and often atrocities against those who speak out—all in the name of soothing 'hurt sentiments.'
This trend must be reversed. As Justice Bhuyan said, 'There is no end to hurt sentiments in India. If a stand-up comedian says something, sentiments are hurt, and there is vandalism… Where are we heading?"
The reign of hurt sentiments must be dismantled from law and public life. Only grounded, objective criteria—threat to public order, incitement to violence, defamation, obscenity—should govern permissible restrictions. Otherwise, democracy will degenerate into mobocracy.
The author is a freelance journalist. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views.
First Published:
June 26, 2025, 16:10 IST
News opinion Opinion | Reign Of 'Hurt Sentiments' Will Destroy Democracy
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Kanakakunnu Palace unfit for protected monument status'
‘Kanakakunnu Palace unfit for protected monument status'

New Indian Express

time9 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

‘Kanakakunnu Palace unfit for protected monument status'

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM: In a significant development in the ongoing legal battle over the conservation of the historic Kanakakunnu Palace and its heritage grounds, the archaeology department has reported that extensive unscientific renovation using modern materials has eroded the palace's historical and archaeological authenticity. A detailed inspection report by the department painted a grim picture of the palace's current condition. Once a stately residence built during the reign of Sree Moolam Thirunal, and later modified by Sree Chithira Thirunal, the palace has undergone multiple structural alterations that have significantly changed its interior architecture. Vitrified tiles have replaced the original Italian flooring, traditional wall paintings have been repainted with acrylics, and partition walls and false ceilings have been installed using gypsum boards to accommodate a proposed Digital Museum. The affidavit filed by Additional Chief Secretary Rajan Khobragade before the High Court made it clear that the archaeology department has ruled out the possibility of declaring Kanakakunnu Palace an ancient monument. However, recognising its cultural significance and historical value to the city of Thiruvananthapuram, the government has decided to preserve the structure as a heritage building rather than as an archaeological monument.

Commuters complain of ‘preference' to Kerala govt officials on Ro-Ro vessels
Commuters complain of ‘preference' to Kerala govt officials on Ro-Ro vessels

New Indian Express

time9 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

Commuters complain of ‘preference' to Kerala govt officials on Ro-Ro vessels

KOCHI: The Vypeen-Fort Kochi Ferry Passengers Association has shot off a letter to the Kochi corporation, alleging that a 'preferential' treatment is being meted out to government officials to get on Ro-Ro (Roll-On Roll Off) vessels in the Fort Kochi-Vypeen section during the morning and evening peak hours. Commuters have also highlighted the need for more vessels to better handle passenger influx, contradicting the 'claim' of the corporation before the High Court that only a smaller number of passengers use the facility. 'Government employees working in various departments are being extended preferential treatment. Those carrying ID cards are allowed to violate the queue and travel ticket-less, which results in the common people, who stand in a queue, waiting for long hours before they can hop on to the vessel,' the letter addressed to the corporation secretary read. While stating that a heavy rush is being experienced round-the-clock, the association rued that ordinary passengers are affected by the 'preferential treatment' as they often couldn't catch the first Ro-Ro upon arrival at the boat jetty. 'All commuters value time and need to reach their respective places of work on time. Being in a government service doesn't make one eligible for the 'emergency service'. Many officials arrive in their private vehicles during the peak hours, and jump the queue. The same is against the principles of equality and social justice as ensured in the Constitution. When we contacted the Kerala Shipping & Inland Navigation Corporation (KSINC), which is operating the Ro-Ro service, they said they are giving special treatment to the government employees as the same was approved by the corporation,' said Francis Chammany, president of the association.

'Will Be Thrashed Wherever They Go': Nishikant Dubey Targets Thackerays Over Marathi Row
'Will Be Thrashed Wherever They Go': Nishikant Dubey Targets Thackerays Over Marathi Row

News18

time15 minutes ago

  • News18

'Will Be Thrashed Wherever They Go': Nishikant Dubey Targets Thackerays Over Marathi Row

Last Updated: The ongoing language row in Maharashtra has reignited fierce political tensions, with both Uddhav and Raj Thackeray taking strong stances in favour of promoting Marathi language. Amid the ongoing language row in Maharashtra, BJP MP Nishikant Dubey has launched another scathing attack on Raj Thackeray and Uddhav Thackeray and said that wherever they go, the public will thrash them. 'Raj Thackeray and Uddhav Thackeray are not some royal figures… I am a Member of Parliament; I don't take the law into my own hands, but wherever they go — in any state — the public will thrash them, peet peet ke maarengi inko," said Dubey during a podcast with ANI. His remarks came while he was responding to a question asked about an earlier statement made by Dubey. A day after MNS workers assaulted a food stall owner in Thane district's Bhayandar for not speaking Marathi, Dubey had said,"If you are courageous enough and beat those who speak Hindi, then you should beat all those who speak Urdu, Tamil, and Telugu. If you are such a big 'boss', come out of Maharashtra, come to Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Tamil Nadu – 'tumko patak patak ke maarenge'… We all respect Marathi and the people of Maharashtra, who fought for India's independence." Maharashtra Language Row The ongoing language row in Maharashtra has reignited fierce political tensions, with the Thackeray family — both Uddhav Thackeray of Shiv Sena (UBT) and Raj Thackeray of Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) — taking strong stances in favour of promoting the Marathi language. Recently, in Nagpur, the MNS workers created chaos at a bank. Several MNS workers launched a protest against Union Bank of India's Seminary Hills branch in Nagpur after the bank allegedly refused to process an insurance claim because the FIR submitted was in Marathi. In another case, an auto-rickshaw driver in Maharashtra's Palghar was thrashed in public, allegedly by the supporters of Uddhav Thackeray's Shiv Sena (UBT) and his cousin Raj Thackeray's MNS, over his refusal to speak Marathi. A food stall owner in Thane district was beaten up allegedly by activists of a regional political party for not speaking in Marathi on Tuesday. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store