
Taliban Tells Afghan, 45, Who Married 6-Year-Old: "Wait Till She's 9"
The girl's father and the groom were arrested in Marjah district, though no formal charges have been filed. The girl is currently with her parents, as reported by Hasht-e Subh Daily. The marriage arrangement involved the customary practice of walwar, where the bride price is set based on the girl's physical appearance, education, and perceived value.
The incident has sparked intense outrage across social media, with users expressing shock, heartbreak, and condemnation over the situation. Photos from the ceremony, depicting the man alongside the noticeably young girl, have triggered strong backlash online and among human rights advocates.
Child Marriages in Afghanistan
Since the Taliban regained control of Afghanistan in 2021, the country has seen a significant increase in child and early marriages, driven by deepening poverty and stringent restrictions on women and girls, particularly the prohibition of female education. Notably, Afghanistan lacks a legal minimum age for marriage. The previous civil code, which established 16 as the minimum age for girls, has not been restored.
According to a report by UN Women from last year, the Taliban's ban on girls' education has contributed to a 25% surge in child marriages and a 45% increase in early childbearing nationwide, exacerbating the vulnerability of young girls in an already precarious socio-economic landscape.
Human rights organisations have consistently called for urgent international intervention, emphasising that child marriage poses severe risks to girls' physical, mental, and social well-being. These groups highlight that girls coerced into early marriages frequently endure dire consequences, including premature pregnancies, which carry heightened health risks, as well as domestic violence and profound social isolation. Activists stress that these practices not only violate fundamental human rights but also undermine Afghanistan's long-term social and economic stability, urging global leaders to prioritise measures that protect and empower young girls.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Did FATF just call Pakistan's bluff on terror financing?
Did FATF just call Pakistan's bluff on terror financing? Jayanta KalitaRajesh Sharma Jul 13, 2025, 15:34 IST IST Days after condemning the Pahalgam carnage, the Paris-based intergovernmental body has identified state-sponsored terrorism as a global threat. It also gave details on how groups like Jaish and Lashkar used sham NGOs and digital platforms to raise and move funds In a first, the Paris-headquartered Financial Action Task Force ( FATF ) has turned its attention to state-sponsored terrorism, identifying it as a 'longstanding TF [terrorist financing] threat to international peace and security as well as to the stability of regional financial and political systems'. The latest FATF report vindicates India's longstanding stance by indirectly referencing Pakistan 's role in supporting terrorism. In June, the global money laundering and terrorist financing watchdog condemned the April 22 Pahalgam carnage and said such attacks would not have been possible 'without money and the means to move funds between terrorist supporters'.


Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Two accused in Raja Raghuvanshi murder case given bail by Meghalaya court
A local court in Meghalaya granted bail to two co-accused in the murder of Indore businessman Raja Raghuvanshi, who was killed during his honeymoon allegedly by his wife, in May this year, reports said on Sunday. A portrait of late Indore-based businessman Raja Raghuvanshi, in Indore. (ANI) The two accused - Lokendra Singh Tomar and Balbir Ahirwar - were granted bail on Friday, according to PTI news agency. Tomar is the owner of the flat in Indore where Sonam had stayed after fleeing Meghalaya and Balbir was the security guard at the property. Sonam Raghuvanshi, Raja's newly wedded wife, is accused of killing him during their honeymoon in Meghalaya with the help of her alleged lover Raj Kushwaha. The duo granted bail faced charges related to obstruction of justice and tampering with evidence at a flat in Madhya Pradesh's Indore, where Sonam and her alleged boyfriend Raj Kushwaha had stayed after the murder of Raja Raghuvanshi. Raja Raghuvanshi went missing on May 23 while on honeymoon with wife Sonam in Meghalaya, while the latter was missing for several days and was believed to have been abducted. Raja Raghuvanshi's mutilated body was found in a deep gorge in Sohra area of East Khasi Hills district on June 2. Raja and Sonam Raghuvanshi left for their honeymoon from Madhya Pradesh's Indore to Meghalaya's Shillong on May 20. In June, after an over two-week long search, Sonam Raghuvanshi was found at a 'dhaba' in Uttar Pradesh's Ghazipur, over 1,200 kilometres away from Meghalaya. She reportedly surrendered before the police. Raja had married Sonam on May 11. Sonam and Raj Kushwaha were accused of plotting and hiring three hitmen - Akash Rajput, Vishal Singh Chauhan and Anand Kurmi - to murder Raja Raghuvanshi. Sonam, Raj Kushwaha and three arrested hitmen are now in judicial custody. A Meghalaya court on July 4 extended the judicial custody of Sonam Raghuvanshi and her alleged boyfriend Raj Kushwaha by another 14 days. On June 21 the court had remanded the two prime accused to 13-day judicial custody which ended on Friday.


The Print
2 hours ago
- The Print
SC to hear suo motu plea on ED summoning lawyers for legal advice on Monday
The case comes in the wake of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) summoning senior lawyers Arvind Datar and Pratap Venugopal. A bench of Chief Justice B R Gavai and justices K Vinod Chandran and N V Anjaria will hear the matter. New Delhi, Jul 13 (PTI) The Supreme Court is slated to hear on Monday a suo motu case over the issue of investigation agencies summoning lawyers who offer opinions to parties and represent them in cases. However, on June 20, the ED directed its investigating officers not to issue summons to any advocate in money laundering investigations being carried out against their clients, adding that an exception to this rule can only be made after 'approval' by the agency's director. The central probe agency, tasked with combating money laundering crimes, issued the circular for the guidance of its field formations, stating that 'no summons' should be issued to any advocate in violation of Section 132 of the Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA), 2023. 'Further, if any summons needs to be issued under the exceptions carved out in proviso to Section 132 of the BSA, 2023, the same shall be issued only with the prior approval of the director, ED,' the agency said. The counsel had offered legal advice to Care Health Insurance Limited on the employee stock ownership plan given to Rashmi Saluja, former chairperson of Religare Enterprises. The summons were condemned by the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) and the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association (SCAORA), calling it a 'disturbing trend' that struck at the very foundations of the legal profession. The bar bodies had urged the chief justice of India to take suo motu cognisance of the matter. On June 25, a bench of justices K V Viswanathan and N Kotiswar Singh observed the legal profession was an integral component of the process of administration of justice and that allowing police or probe agencies to directly summon lawyers for advising clients would seriously undermine the autonomy of legal profession and was a 'direct threat' to the independence of the administration of justice. The bench had framed a couple of questions in the matter. '…when an individual has an association with a case only as a lawyer advising the party, could the investigating agency/prosecuting agency/police directly summon the lawyer for questioning?' the bench asked. Another question read, 'Assuming that the investigating agency or prosecuting agency or police have a case that the role of the individual is not merely as a lawyer but something more, even then, should they be directly permitted to summon or should a judicial oversight be prescribed for those exceptional criteria?' The bench said since it was a matter directly impinging on the administration of justice, 'to subject a professional… when he is a counsel in the matter… prima facie appears to be untenable, subject to further consideration by the court'. The order came when the top court was hearing a plea of a Gujarat-based advocate, challenging an order of the high court passed on June 12. The high court in March 2025 refused to quash a notice summoning the lawyer before the police in a case against his client. The top court, however, directed the state not to summon him till further orders and stayed the operation of the police's notice issued to him. It said the lawyers engaged in legal practice, apart from their fundamental right under Article 19 (1)(g) of the Constitution, had certain rights and privileges guaranteed as legal professionals and further as a result of statutory provisions. Article 19 (1)(g) of the Constitution deals with the right to practise any profession or to carry on any occupation, trade or business. Underlining the issue as important, the bench called for the assistance of the attorney general, the solicitor general, the chairperson of the Bar Council of India, and the presidents of the SCBA and SCAORA. The top court had asked the apex court registry to place the case files before the CJI for passing appropriate directions. PTI PKS SKY SKY This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.