logo
'I don't know what the mayor will do'

'I don't know what the mayor will do'

Yahoo13-04-2025
The first election to choose a mayor for Greater Lincolnshire is just weeks away, but some people say they are still unsure what the role is all about.
On 1 May voters from North East Lincolnshire and North Lincolnshire council areas along with those covered by Lincolnshire County Council, will pick from six candidates to be the mayor of the Greater Lincolnshire Combined County Authority (GLCCA).
The mayor will be handed powers to take over local transport services, build new infrastructure such as roads or business parks and is expected to drive what is being called the skills agenda, in other words making sure that there are enough opportunities to train the next generation of care workers, plumbers or engineers.
But do voters know what their mayor will do for them?
Metropolitan areas such as London and Manchester have had mayors for some years, but it seems that Lincolnshire people are still getting used to the idea.
In fact, many are yet to turn their minds to the local elections in general, as BBC Lincolnshire has been finding out in Lincoln's Steep Hill.
Nicola Lockwood, aged 59, owns and runs Bells Tea Shop. She says "there isn't that much information between everyone".
"We've got the county council, city council, the mayor, an MP and I'm not clear what the mayor's responsibilities are," she said.
When asked what she wants from the new mayor she says "support for small, independent businesses because we're struggling".
"But I don't know if they will have the powers to do that."
Blake Francis, aged 27, works in marketing but says that "apart from the polling card coming through" he has not yet really thought much about the local elections.
"I'll look into it in a couple of weeks," he said.
"The main issues for me would be how public money is being spent and environmental issues."
Teaching assistant Christine Bingley said she thought the mayor "was someone with a big chain around their neck opening fetes" and did not realise it held so much power.
"It shows my lack of knowledge!" she joked.
She says economic growth and jobs is really important to her, alongside health and care provision.
"Recently my mum has had to go into respite care and it costs so much money and there aren't enough staff to look after the people," she said.
Lewis Gollin, aged 25, runs Sculpt Studios barbers on Steep Hill.
He says he "will read up on it all" nearer polling day and will be looking for policies that will make people feel better off.
"We haven't lost clients but they are leaving it longer between appointments to keep costs down as people are worried and are trying to save a bit more," he said.
Kitchen assistant Sam Mather, aged 40, says he "doesn't know a great deal" about the mayor, believing "ignorance is sometimes bliss".
"Immigration is a big issue as I don't think we look after British people enough, not that anyone else is less important, but we seem to take in from all parts of the world and we're not stable enough ourselves."
POSTCODE LOOKUP: Check if there is an election in your area
SIMPLE GUIDE: Everything you need to know about the local elections
GET IN TOUCH: Tell us the election issues that matter to you
FULL COVERAGE: Catch up on all our election stories
Listen to highlights from Lincolnshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here.
What is the Greater Lincolnshire mayoral election?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ghislaine Maxwell rejects DOJ bid to unseal grand jury transcripts as she pursues ‘legal options': ‘Jeffrey Epstein is dead'
Ghislaine Maxwell rejects DOJ bid to unseal grand jury transcripts as she pursues ‘legal options': ‘Jeffrey Epstein is dead'

New York Post

time16 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Ghislaine Maxwell rejects DOJ bid to unseal grand jury transcripts as she pursues ‘legal options': ‘Jeffrey Epstein is dead'

If she can't have them, no one can. Ghislaine Maxwell, the notorious sex trafficker linked to Jeffrey Epstein, on Tuesday opposed the Justice Department's bid to unseal grand jury transcripts from her case, after trying and failing to view the records herself. 'Jeffrey Epstein is dead. Ghislaine Maxwell is not,' her lawyers wrote in a Manhattan federal court filing. 'Whatever interest the public may have in Epstein, that interest cannot justify a broad intrusion into grand jury secrecy in a case where the defendant is alive, her legal options are viable, and her due process rights remain.' 3 Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein's convicted accomplice, wants grand jury transcripts in her case kept secret. US District Court for the Southe The disgraced British socialite — who is serving a 20-year prison sentence — is lobbying the US Supreme Court to review her December 2021 conviction on numerous sex crimes for grooming young girls for abuse by her on-and-off lover Epstein. 'Given that she is actively litigating her case and does not know what is in the grand jury record, she has no choice but to respectfully oppose the government's motion to unseal it,' Maxwell's attorney David Oscar Markus wrote. Maxwell's push to keep the transcripts hidden comes weeks after a federal judge denied her attempt to see them as pursues her appeal. US District Court Judge Paul Engelmayer noted in his ruling that 'black-letter law,' or fundamental legal principle, dictates that defendants cannot review grand jury transcripts, which are by definition secret. 3 The DOJ admitted in a court filing that the Maxwell grand jury testimony will likely not include any revelations. US District Court for the Southe DOJ officials have cited the 'public interest' in urging Engelmayer and a separate judge to unseal transcripts of testimony from an FBI agent and NYPD detective heard by grand juries in Epstein's case in 2019, and in Maxwell's case in 2020 and 2021. But the feds admitted in a 12:04 a.m. court filing early Tuesday that 'much of the information' included in the Maxwell testimony was already made public during her headline-grabbing trial. The Epstein grand jury testimony may yield more new details as he never made it to trial after dying in federal custody, in what was ruled a suicide. 3 Maxwell was Epstein's former lover who groomed young girls for the sick financier to abuse, trial testimony revealed. US District Court for the Southe But the testimony the government is seeking in both cases represents a tiny fraction of the 300 gigabytes of files it says it has about Epstein but has declined to release — sparking an uproar among many of President Trump's supporters. An attorney for Epstein victim Maria Farmer, who testified at Maxwell's trial, wrote a letter to the court late Tuesday urging the judge to unseal both grand jury transcripts. 'Unsealing the grand jury transcripts will illuminate the scope of Epstein's and Maxwell's abuse, provide additional insight into those who enabled his abuse, and bring light to how these crimes were investigated and prosecuted,' lawyer Sigrid McCawley wrote. Lawyers for Epstein's estate separately wrote to the court Tuesday that they take 'no position' on the government's move to unseal grand jury transcripts in his case. Maxwell, 63, meanwhile was moved to a cushy Texas prison known as a 'Club Fed' last week, days after meeting with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, Trump's former criminal defense lawyer. DOJ officials have not explained why the convicted sex trafficker was transferred to a lockup typically reserved for convicts spending far less time behind bars.

Ukrainian raid behind enemy lines kills 330 Russian troops
Ukrainian raid behind enemy lines kills 330 Russian troops

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Ukrainian raid behind enemy lines kills 330 Russian troops

Ukrainian special forces on Tuesday claimed to have killed more than 330 Russian troops in a dawn raid behind enemy lines. Kyiv's defence intelligence (HUR) said a Russian advance in Sumy was 'stopped cold' when troops from its elite Timur unit infiltrated enemy positions and eliminated scores of Vladimir Putin's soldiers in close-quarter fighting and with co-ordinated drone and artillery strikes. HUR did not specify the exact date or location of the battle, but Russia's push into the region has stalled in recent weeks because of Ukraine's strong resistance. A video released by HUR showed Ukrainian fighters approaching the target in a low-flying helicopter before engaging the enemy in a wooded area with assault rifles, machine guns and grenade launchers. Explosions and screams were heard as Ukrainian artillery pounded enemy positions, and dead bodies lay on the ground. Outside the trees, Timur troops could be seen speeding in open-top trucks down unmetaled roads and hand-launching drones in fields. Overwhelmed Russian soldiers were heard over intercepted radio transmissions refusing to attack Ukrainian positions, HUR wrote. '[They were] justifying themselves with far-fetched reasons,' it added. At least 334 Russian troops were killed and over 550 wounded, HUR said. It signed off the video with: 'The armed struggle continues! Glory to Ukraine!' HUR said the operation disrupted Russian supplies of food and ammunition. The action was carried out by the forces of the Chymera, Yunger, Stugna, Siberian Battalion, Aratta, 1514, Paragon, Art Division, First Line, Raven Group, and 6th Special Operations Unit, which are part of the overall Timur Special Unit. Russian forces entered the Sumy Oblast earlier this year after recapturing most of the neighbouring Kursk Oblast in Russia. They aimed to carve out a 'buffer zone' along Ukraine's northeastern border. Ukraine claimed to have halted the Russian advance and even to have recaptured some villages. Severnnyi, a Russian military blogger, wrote on Monday that Moscow's forces had been surrounded in the Oleksiivka area of the region. He said: 'They have us trapped. Water on three sides, and Ukrainians on the fourth.' The elite Timur unit is an umbrella command within HUR that coordinates a number of specialised forces. The group takes its name from its leader, Lieutenant-Colonel Timur, who planted a Ukrainian flag in Crimea for the first time in 10 years in a special operation in August 2024. In March 2024, The Wall Street Journal reported that HUR operators from the Timur unit were actively fighting Russian-aligned forces in Sudan. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Kamala Harris won't cure what ails the Democratic Party
Kamala Harris won't cure what ails the Democratic Party

Los Angeles Times

timean hour ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Kamala Harris won't cure what ails the Democratic Party

William Henry Harrison, the ninth president of the United States, was the last commander in chief born a British subject and the first member of the Whig Party to win the White House. He delivered the longest inaugural address in history, nearly two hours, and had the shortest presidency, being the first sitting president to die in office, just 31 days into his term. Oh, there is one more bit of trivia about the man who gave us the slogan 'Tippecanoe and Tyler Too.' Harrison was the last politician to lose his first presidential election and then win the next one (Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson managed that before him). Richard Nixon lost only to win way down the road. (Grover Cleveland and Trump are the only two to win, lose and then win again.) Everyone else since Harrison's era who lost on the first try and ran again in the next election lost again. Democrat Adlai Stevenson and Republican Thomas Dewey ran twice and lost twice. Henry Clay and William Jennings Bryan each ran three times in a row and lost (Clay ran on three different party tickets). Voters, it seems, don't like losers. These are not encouraging results for Kamala Harris, who announced last week she will not be running for governor in California, sparking speculation that she wants another go at the White House. But history isn't what she should worry about. It's the here and now. The Democratic Party is wildly unpopular. It's net favorability ( 30 points) is nearly triple the GOP's (11 points). The Democratic Party is more unpopular than any time in the last 35 years. When Donald Trump's unpopularity with Democrats should be having the opposite effect, 63% of Americans have an unfavorable view of the party. Why? Because Democrats are mad at their own party — both for losing to Trump and for failing to provide much of an obstacle to him now that he's in office. As my Dispatch colleague Nick Cattogio puts it, 'Even Democrats have learned to hate Democrats.' It's not all Harris' fault. Indeed, the lion's share of the blame goes to Joe Biden and the coterie of enablers who encouraged him to run again. Harris' dilemma is that she symbolizes Democratic discontent with the party. That discontent isn't monolithic. For progressives, the objection is that Democrats aren't fighting hard enough. For the more centrist wing of the party, the problem is the Democrats are fighting for the wrong things, having lurched too far left on culture war and identity politics. Uniting both factions is visceral desire to win. That's awkward for a politician best known for losing. Almost the only reason Harris was positioned to be the nominee in 2024 was that she was a diversity pick. Biden was explicit that he would pick a woman and, later, an African American running mate. And the same dynamic made it impossible to sideline her when Biden withdrew. Of course, most Democrats don't see her race and gender as a problem, and in the abstract they shouldn't. Indeed, every VP pick is a diversity pick, including the white guys. Running mates are chosen to appeal to some part of a coalition. So Harris' problem isn't her race or sex; it's her inability to appeal to voters in a way that expands the Democratic coalition. For Democrats to win, they need someone who can flip Trump voters. She didn't lose because of low Democratic turnout, she lost because she's uncompelling to a changing electorate. Her gauzy, often gaseous, rhetoric made her sound like a dean of students at a small liberal arts college. With the exception of reproductive rights, her convictions sounded like they were crafted by focus groups, at a time when voters craved authenticity. Worse, Harris acquiesced to Biden's insistence she not distance herself from him. Such clubby deference to the establishment combined with boilerplate pandering to progressive constituencies — learned from years of San Francisco and California politics — makes her the perfect solution to a problem that doesn't exist. Her choice to appear on Stephen Colbert's 'The Late Show' for her first interview since leaving office was telling. CBS recently announced it was terminating both Colbert and the show, insisting it was purely a business decision. But the reason for the broadcast network's decision stemmed in part from the fact that Colbert narrow-casts his expensive show to a very small, very anti-Trump slice of the electorate. 'I don't want to go back into the system. I think it's broken,' Harris lamented to Colbert, decrying the 'naïve' and 'feckless' lack of 'leadership' and the 'capitulation' of those who 'consider themselves to be guardians of our system and our democracy.' That's all catnip to Colbert's ideologically committed audience. But that's not the audience Democrats need to win. And that's why, if Democrats nominate her again, she'll probably go down in history as an answer to a trivia question. And it won't be 'Who was the 48th president of the United States?' @JonahDispatch

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store