
Pakistani men more likely to be suspects in grooming cases
Figures from the 43 police forces in England and Wales show that nearly one in 10 (9.7 per cent) of the suspects in group-based child sexual exploitation cases were Pakistani in the period from January 2023 to September 2024.
This is more than three times their representation in the general population, where Pakistanis account for 2.7 per cent, according to the 2021 census.
The figures were disclosed under freedom of information laws by the team behind the first national police scheme to collect and analyse police-recorded 'group-based' child sexual abuse, including the ethnic background of perpetrators.
The Hydrant Programme was set up by police after criticism in the 2022 Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse by Prof Alexis Jay of the 'widespread failure' to collect 'good quality' data on the abusers, victims and the offences.
Her report warned that failure to provide accurate data had contributed to a 'one-sided and often uninformed debate' about the ethnic backgrounds of perpetrators, and hampered the pursuit of offenders and support for victims.
Since then, recording the ethnicity of child grooming gang members has been a requirement for police.
Historically, police forces and prosecutors have failed to take action against groomers, some of whom are of British-Pakistani origins, amid fears they would be branded racist or Islamophobic.
In 2012, while head of the Crown Prosecution Service, Sir Keir Starmer admitted that in 'a number of cases presented to us' there was 'an issue of ethnicity that has to be understood and addressed', saying that prosecutors must not 'shy away from that'.
Deputy chief constable Becky Riggs, the police lead on grooming in England and Wales, acknowledged that there was an over-representation of Pakistanis but rejected suggestions that they were 'predominantly Pakistani men'.
She said: 'We can only go with the data because that is presenting the evidence base for us. There is a truth that there is a proportion of perpetrators – whom we will relentlessly pursue in terms of these crimes – who are Pakistani men. Our data tells us that.'
The data show that 67 per cent of suspects were white, 2.6 per cent Indian, 2.4 per cent black African, 1.5 per cent black Caribbean and 1.1 per cent Bangladeshi.
By contrast, 90 per cent of victims were white, only 0.1 per cent Pakistani or Bangladeshi and zero per cent Indian. Some 1.4 per cent were black African and 0.8 per cent black Caribbean.
Grooming, which is defined by police as a form of group-based child sexual exploitation, accounted for 717 offences reported to police in 2023 and 572 in the first nine months of 2024.
This represents 17 per cent of group-based child sexual offences, with the biggest threats to children being abused within the family or by other children.
Group-based abuse itself accounted for 4,228 offences, or 3.7 per cent of all 115,489 child sexual abuse and exploitation crimes in 2023, including online.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
36 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Cabinet minister refuses to rule out tax rises after welfare U-turn
A Cabinet minister has refused to rule out tax rises as he said there will be 'financial consequences' from Sir Keir Starmer's welfare U-turn. Pat McFadden also said ministers 'will keep to the tax promises' in the Labour election manifesto. Rachel Reeves has seen the £4.8 billion predicted savings from welfare changes whittled away through the Government's changes to planned welfare reforms to keep backbenchers onside. In a late concession on Tuesday evening, ministers shelved plans to restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment, with any changes now only coming after a review of the benefit. Almost 50 Labour MPs revolted despite the concessions. Mr McFadden, The Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, told Times Radio on Wednesday that there will be 'financial consequences' to the decision, and indicated that they would be set out at the budget expected in the autumn. Economists at the Institute for Fiscal Studies and Resolution Foundation think tanks warned that Tuesday's concessions meant Ms Reeves could now expect no 'net savings' by 2029/30 – a key year for meeting her fiscal targets. 'So many moving parts' Mr McFadden told BBC Breakfast he is 'not going to speculate' on what could be in the budget, but said that ministers 'will keep to the tax promises' in their manifesto. Asked explicitly whether he could rule out tax rises, the Cabinet minister told the programme: 'I'm not going to speculate on the budget. 'We will keep to the tax promises that we made in our manifesto when we fought the election last year. But it doesn't make sense for me to speculate on something where, as I say, there are so many moving parts of which this is only one element.' Ministers have repeatedly insisted that Labour will not raise taxes on 'working people', specifically income tax, national insurance or VAT. But Ms Reeves also remains committed to her 'ironclad' fiscal rules, which require day-to-day spending to be covered by revenues – not borrowing – in 2029/30. Despite the last-minute concessions, a total of 49 Labour MPs rebelled and voted against the legislation, the largest revolt of Sir Keir's premiership. Overall, the legislation cleared its first parliamentary hurdle by 335 votes to 260, a majority of 75. The changes were announced by minister Sir Stephen Timms to MPs in the Commons, and came after a first round of concessions offered last week did not seem enough to quell the rebellion. Mr McFadden described the wrangling as a 'difficult process', but told Times Radio that the Government 'got to a position where the second reading of the Bill was passed'. Rachael Maskell, MP for York Central, had tabled an amendment designed to halt the legislation, which was backed by a total of 44 Labour MPs. Ms Maskell said on Wednesday that the concessions signalled a 'change in power between the Prime Minister' and disabled people. She told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that Tuesday saw 'the Bill disintegrating before our eyes'. Ms Maskell added: 'And I think throughout the day, what we saw was a change in power between the Prime Minister and his Government and disabled people across our country, they having their voice at the heart of Parliament, and that's why I put the reasoned amendment down.' The York Central MP also said that she is 'glad' that the debate was 'had in public' and 'now disabled people should feel empowered to have their voice at long last in an ableist Parliament '.


The Independent
36 minutes ago
- The Independent
Tory conference to be held in ‘smallest house in the world', Welsh minister jokes
The Tories will be able to hold their first post-election conference in the 'smallest house in the world' due to their reduced numbers, a Welsh minister has joked. Ken Skates, the cabinet member for North Wales, has said the Welsh Conservatives will fit 'in the porchway' of The Smallest House after next May's Welsh parliament election, during questions in the Senedd on Wednesday. The home, which sits on Conwy's seafront in north Wales, is believed to be the smallest house in the United Kingdom. Measuring just 72 inches wide, the house, which has not been lived in for some time, has become a tourist destination. The minister's comments followed a question about the impact a proposed tourism levy would have on the north Wales economy from Gareth Davies, Tory MS for the Vale of Clwyd. The Visitor Levy Bill, which is going through the Senedd, will allow councils to charge up to £1.30 per person per night for staying in tourist accommodation, with the money going towards local infrastructure. Mr Skate's joke also comes 10 months ahead of the next Senedd election, where recent polls have put the Tories in a predicted fourth place. The Westminster party was also wiped out in Wales in the general election last year, going from 14 seats to zero. However, Labour is also expected to face a difficult battle in May's elections. Recent polling by Survation placed them at 27%, with Reform and Plaid Cymru close behind on 24% each, while previous YouGov polling had the incumbent party in third place. Mr Skates told Mr Davies he visited Conwy following the Welsh Labour Conference, which was held in Llandudno last weekend. Addressing Mr Davies, he said: 'At the end of the conference, I thought I'd just spend a little more time in the area. 'I actually went over to Conwy as well, which is a fabulous place too. 'You'll be aware that it has the smallest house in the world on the seafront there. 'I was told that your party is going to be holding your post-election conference in the porchway, in that particular tourist attraction next year.' Mr Skates added that he would be discussing the visitor levy with the north Wales business council on Friday, calling the fee an 'opportunity,' which he insisted had been welcomed in other areas like Manchester. Mr Davies said he 'appreciates the sharpness and the wit of the Cabinet Secretary' but argued the levy could lead to a decrease in people staying in Wales, with many councils having already ruled out implementing it.


The Independent
36 minutes ago
- The Independent
Lords reform task force proposed amid moves to oust hereditary peers
A dedicated task force has been proposed by the leader of the House of Lords to consider the next stages of reforming the upper chamber. The select committee would specifically consider the introduction of a participation requirement and a retirement age, said Baroness Smith of Basildon as these issues had been raised consistently by peers and had been in Labour's election manifesto. The Cabinet minister made the suggestion as she sought to reassure peers that promised future Lords reform 'will not flounder', after the planned removal of hereditary peers. Responding, to concerns it would be 'a very good and highly-qualified talking shop', Lady Smith stressed it was important for the House to take a view and so press ahead with changes on its own or be used to pave the way for legislation if required. Although subject to discussion, Lady Smith hoped the committee could be set up within three months of the House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill being passed and its findings be considered within a year. The Lords leader outlined the proposal as peers prepared to vote on plans to oust bloodline members, which has faced heavy Tory criticism. The House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill, which has already been through the Commons, will abolish the 92 seats reserved for members of the upper chamber who are there by right of birth. The Bill delivers on a promise in Labour's election manifesto and was promoted as the first step in a process of reform. Having held extensive meetings with peers, Lady Smith said: 'I think the House is seeking reassurance that the plans for the next stage of reforms will not flounder, and the Government is serious about its intention for further reforms. 'Can I say I've been greatly encouraged by support for two specific issues have been mentioned so many times … and that is on retirement and participation.' She added: 'We all value the role of this House as being self-governing, and I am keen that as a House, we take some ownership in moving forward on other issues. 'But reflecting on discussions and advice, I feel we need a formal and recognised process that is supported by the House. 'I've considered the mechanisms we could use, and I've concluded the best way forward would be to establish a dedicated select committee to look at the specific matters that members have indicated they're keen to make progress on. 'I am open to discussing other mechanisms, but that's the way forward I think may work the best. 'Obviously, I will discuss further with usual channels (party whips) before putting any such proposal to the house, but I would hope the House could probably set up such a committee within three months of the Bill gaining royal assent, and by this time next year, the House be able to consider the committee's findings.' Tory former Lords leader Lord Strathclyde said: 'What authority will this committee have? Would it be regarded by the Government as having authority? 'In other words, would its conclusions, or if it is passed by the House, would it be carried on by the Government, or would it be what I rather suspect, it will be a very good and highly-qualified talking shop, but it won't in the end, lead to anything because the Government will very easily be able to ignore it completely?' Responding, Lady Smith said: 'Well, I really hope that wouldn't be the case. 'There some things that may be able to be done by the House itself, but if the House comes to a conclusion on matters that need legislation, then I think there's an easier way to put through legislation if the House has taken a view. 'So, I'm very keen to have the House express a view.' 'But there may well be things that we can do without legislation. If that's the case, we can proceed. 'Where legislation is required … we have a manifesto commitment for legislation, and we determined to press ahead to these two issues.' Lady Smith acknowledged the manifesto proposal for members to retire at the end of the Parliament after they reached the age of 80 could create problems because it created a cliff-edge and see an exodus of peers. She said: 'If there are better suggestions, I would be happy to consider those.' She told peers: 'It would be purely on the issues of participation and retirement age. 'I'm quite keen to make progress on these issues, and I think by having what I call bite-sized chunks, I've always referred to these two issues as being stage two (of reform). 'There seems to be a consensus around the house that those are two issues the House wants to deal with, and that's why I've chosen those two specific issues because they were mentioned so often by members.'