Small business sales drop
123RF
Small business sales underperformed in the second quarter of the year, with weakness concentrated in the North Island.
The latest Xero Small Business Insights indicates sales fell 0.1 percent in the three months ended June over the year earlier, which was consistent with the downturn seen over the the past 12 months.
The latest sales data was tracking under the long term average of 6.3 percent growth, and well below the 3 percent growth seen in Australia over the second quarter.
However, the month of June was the best since April 2024, with sales up 4.4 percent.
The agricultural sector was another bright spot with a 11 percent increase in sales in the June quarter, making it the third quarter in a row for double digit growth.
However, Xero country manager Bridget Snelling said the resilience of the agricultural sector was not enough to offset weakness elsewhere, with the construction sector hit particularly hard with a 6.4 percent drop in sales.
She said the sector's sales had been falling since late 2023, with retail and manufacturing sales also down.
"Despite consistent OCR (official cash rate) cuts by the Reserve Bank since August 2024, we're yet to see the expected boost to consumer and business activity.
"While there are some bright spots like agriculture, the overall picture remains muted."
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
7 hours ago
- Scoop
Who's Really To Blame For Our Economic Troubles?
New Zealand's economic downturn is proving hard to shake - but economists say when it comes to identifying the cause, it's not as simple as pointing the finger at government spending cutbacks or the Reserve Bank's interest rate hikes. Although conditions are expected to improve as the year progresses, the economy remains sluggish. The primary sector is providing one of the few bright spots. Last weekend, when issuing an annual update, Kiwibank chief economist Jarrod Kerr blamed the Reserve Bank's decision to thrust the economy into recession to tamp down problem inflation. Some readers contacted RNZ saying that was too simplistic and letting the government off the hook for the impact its spending cutbacks and public sector job cuts were having. "My wife's MPI office in Christchurch reduced headcount by about 10 percent," one wrote. "For each public service worker cut, two to three private sector jobs went with it. The cancellation or freezing of so many infrastructure projects saw my industry (engineering) lay off a quarter to a third of the workforce." So who's to blame? "The overstimulus of the economy from both the government and the Reserve Bank in 2020 and 2021 meant the economy was unsustainably overheated," said chief forecaster at Infometrics Gareth Kiernan. "The government and the Reserve Bank got us into the mess we were in, in the first place, and therefore had to get out again." While normally monetary and fiscal policy would work to smooth the economic cycle, that was not the case this time, which made the upswing hotter and the downturn bleaker. "Normally, if the economy is going hot, they tend to pull things back. And if the economy is slowing down and we're heading to recession, you typically get more government spending and lower interest rates and that sort of thing. That's not what we've had over the last five years because they pumped things up too much and had to cool the jets on the other side. "Both the government and Reserve Bank needed to, they had no choice. "Government spending decisions have exacerbated the recession but they had no choice because they also exacerbated the boom before that." Too much spending He said, in December 2022, government consumption spending was 13.5 percent higher than had been forecast before the pandemic hit. "It's still 7.5 percent larger than we were forecasting now… so they've pulled it back in line but it's still larger than it would otherwise have been expected. "Government investments - infrastructure, schools, hospitals, whatever else - by mid-2024, that's 18 percent larger than we were forecasting." Spending was still 13 percent higher, he said. "That puts some context around the fact that yeah, government has been tight but we still haven't undone or unwound all of the massive government-related Covid boom. "That's also reflective of the fact that fiscal numbers over for the next five years are only just getting back into surplus if you're lucky." Kiernan looked at GDP broken down into household spending, government spending, business investment and exports and imports. He compared the current situation and the experience of the past two years to what normal growth might have been if it had kept going from the 2022 base at a 10-year average rate. "Government investment grew through 2023 and early 2024. It's done its fair share of contribution to how the economy has gone in a positive sense. "If I attribute all of the private sector investment and household spending and the slow growth there to interest rates and in Reserve Bank policy… then you put around about two-thirds of the underperformance of the economy over the last two years down to interest rates, 20 to 25 percent on to the government side of things when you take consumption and investment together and the other 10 percent or so is exports underperforming." Senior economist at ANZ Miles Workman said it was a question of how the Reserve Bank responded to the government's fiscal policies. "The faster the government gets the books back into the black, by restraining spending or increasing taxes, the more likely the RBNZ will need to lower the OCR, which would offset lower demand from fiscal policy settings by shoring up demand from households and businesses. "In other words, it's not as simple as saying government policy has caused X percent of the slowdown and the RBNZ has caused Y percent. The RBNZ's policy stance is a function of fiscal policy settings." 'A con job' Economics professor at the University of Auckland Robert MacCulloch said there had been mishandling of the economy by governments on both sides in recent years. "The narrative the parties are using, that the other party is to blame for our problems… I'm past it now, that all the problems we've got are because of [Jacinda] Ardern and [Grant] Robertson and Labour messed it up, then Labour say the same about National. I think it's a con job on the people of the country. The country hasn't been doing great now for quite a long time under both major political parties." He said the wage subsidy had been a significant source of debt, but while it was introduced by the Labour government, National had put pressure on to extend it for bigger firms, which increased the cost. "Luxon's getting angry saying we inherited a shambles. I mean, what's he talking about? His party voted in favour of the all the fiscal and monetary policy. They were wildly enthusiastic about the wage subsidy scheme." He said the cuts the government were enacting were immaterial in the scheme of the fiscal pressures looming from the ageing population. "The cuts in bureaucracy they've done are just a couple of percent of those increased pressures on health and pensions. They're going to have to grapple with how you deal with those huge outflows with the ageing population… the Nats don't have a plan to rein in the cost of those major programmes." Tough job for Reserve Bank The chief economist at the NZ Initiative, Eric Crampton, said the labour market was "certainly in worse shape" than it had been from mid-2021 to mid-2023. "But employment rates during that period were the result of substantial overheating from debt-fuelled spending and substantial monetary stimulus. They could not be sustained without severe inflationary consequence. It is wrong to blame anyone for labour markets not looking now like they did in 2022." He said monetary policy would always be expected to move last. "That doesn't mean monetary policy is slow. It means that whatever the bank does in monetary policy takes into account what everyone else has done and is expected to do. So if the fiscal authority announces a track - a Budget, Budget policy statement - monetary policy adjusts to take that into account. The Reserve Bank moves last - it makes its move after seeing what everyone else is doing. "Governments can be more and less helpful with all of that. But a bank following an inflation target ought to be taking account of what Parliament is doing. " He said the Reserve Bank had a tough job at present. "While the employment statistics are comparable to where they were around 2016-2017, government estimates still suggest that there is a remaining output gap - that the economy is running a bit below potential. However, there are inflationary pressures both in the non-traded sector and in tradeables. The bank's failure to keep inflation within bounds over the Covid period should have it sensitive to the risks of going above-target again. So I wouldn't want to blame them too much for current unemployment except to the extent that the bank's errors during the Covid period makes things a bit harder now. " He said keeping inflation within its target was the best thing the Reserve Bank could do to ensure long-term stable employment. "Given inflation risks, the bank would likely need to act to offset fiscal stimulus, if Parliament decided to provide further fiscal stimulus - we are still running a substantial deficit as well."
1News
7 hours ago
- 1News
Who's really to blame for New Zealand's economic troubles?
New Zealand's economic downturn is proving hard to shake — but economists say when it comes to identifying the cause, it's not as simple as pointing the finger at government spending cutbacks or the Reserve Bank's interest rate hikes. Although conditions are expected to improve as the year progresses, the economy remains sluggish. The primary sector is providing one of the few bright spots. Last weekend, when issuing an annual update, Kiwibank chief economist Jarrod Kerr blamed the Reserve Bank's decision to thrust the economy into recession to tamp down problem inflation. Some readers contacted RNZ, saying that was too simplistic and letting the Government off the hook for the impact its spending cutbacks and public sector job cuts were having. "My wife's MPI office in Christchurch reduced headcount by about 10%," one wrote. "For each public service worker cut, two to three private sector jobs went with it. The cancellation or freezing of so many infrastructure projects saw my industry (engineering) lay off a quarter to a third of the workforce." ADVERTISEMENT So who's to blame? "The overstimulus of the economy from both the government and the Reserve Bank in 2020 and 2021 meant the economy was unsustainably overheated," said chief forecaster at Infometrics Gareth Kiernan. "The government and the Reserve Bank got us into the mess we were in, in the first place, and therefore had to get out again." Normally monetary and fiscal policy would work to smooth the economic cycle but that was not the case this time, which made the upswing hotter and the downturn bleaker. "Normally, if the economy is going hot, they tend to pull things back. And if the economy is slowing down and we're heading to recession, you typically get more government spending and lower interest rates and that sort of thing. That's not what we've had over the last five years because they pumped things up too much and had to cool the jets on the other side. "Both the Government and Reserve Bank needed to, they had no choice. "Government spending decisions have exacerbated the recession but they had no choice because they also exacerbated the boom before that." ADVERTISEMENT Too much spending Budget (generic illustration). (Source: 1News) He said, in December 2022, government consumption spending was 13.5% higher than had been forecast before the pandemic hit. "It's still 7.5% larger than we were forecasting now… so they've pulled it back in line but it's still larger than it would otherwise have been expected. "Government investments — infrastructure, schools, hospitals, whatever else — by mid-2024, that's 18% larger than we were forecasting." Spending was still 13% higher, he said. "That puts some context around the fact that yeah, government has been tight but we still haven't undone or unwound all of the massive government-related Covid boom. ADVERTISEMENT "That's also reflective of the fact that fiscal numbers over for the next five years are only just getting back into surplus if you're lucky." Kiernan looked at GDP broken down into household spending, government spending, business investment and exports and imports. He compared the current situation and the experience of the past two years to what normal growth might have been if it had kept going from the 2022 base at a 10-year average rate. "Government investment grew through 2023 and early 2024. It's done its fair share of contribution to how the economy has gone in a positive sense. "If I attribute all of the private sector investment and household spending and the slow growth there to interest rates and in Reserve Bank policy… then you put around about two-thirds of the underperformance of the economy over the last two years down to interest rates, 20 to 25% on to the government side of things when you take consumption and investment together and the other 10% or so is exports underperforming." Senior economist at ANZ Miles Workman said it was a question of how the Reserve Bank responded to the Government's fiscal policies. "The faster the Government gets the books back into the black, by restraining spending or increasing taxes, the more likely the RBNZ will need to lower the OCR, which would offset lower demand from fiscal policy settings by shoring up demand from households and businesses. ADVERTISEMENT "In other words, it's not as simple as saying government policy has caused X% of the slowdown and the RBNZ has caused Y%. The RBNZ's policy stance is a function of fiscal policy settings." 'A con job' Economics professor at the University of Auckland Robert MacCulloch said there had been mishandling of the economy by governments on both sides in recent years. "The narrative the parties are using, that the other party is to blame for our problems… I'm past it now, that all the problems we've got are because of [Jacinda] Ardern and [Grant] Robertson and Labour messed it up, then Labour say the same about National. I think it's a con job on the people of the country. The country hasn't been doing great now for quite a long time under both major political parties." He said the wage subsidy had been a significant source of debt and, while it was introduced by the Labour government, National had put pressure on to extend it for bigger firms, which increased the cost. "Luxon's getting angry, saying we inherited a shambles. I mean, what's he talking about? His party voted in favour of the all the fiscal and monetary policy. They were wildly enthusiastic about the wage subsidy scheme." He said the cuts the Government were enacting were immaterial in the scheme of the fiscal pressures looming from the ageing population. ADVERTISEMENT "The cuts in bureaucracy they've done are just a couple of percent of those increased pressures on health and pensions. They're going to have to grapple with how you deal with those huge outflows with the ageing population… the Nats don't have a plan to rein in the cost of those major programmes." Tough job for Reserve Bank The chief economist at the NZ Initiative, Eric Crampton, said the labour market was "certainly in worse shape" than it had been from mid-2021 to mid-2023. "But employment rates during that period were the result of substantial overheating from debt-fuelled spending and substantial monetary stimulus. They could not be sustained without severe inflationary consequence. It is wrong to blame anyone for labour markets not looking now like they did in 2022." He said monetary policy would always be expected to move last. "That doesn't mean monetary policy is slow. It means that whatever the bank does in monetary policy takes into account what everyone else has done and is expected to do. So if the fiscal authority announces a track — a Budget, Budget policy statement — monetary policy adjusts to take that into account. The Reserve Bank moves last — it makes its move after seeing what everyone else is doing. "Governments can be more and less helpful with all of that. But a bank following an inflation target ought to be taking account of what Parliament is doing. " ADVERTISEMENT He said the Reserve Bank had a tough job at present. "While the employment statistics are comparable to where they were around 2016-2017, government estimates still suggest that there is a remaining output gap — that the economy is running a bit below potential. However, there are inflationary pressures both in the non-traded sector and in tradeables. The bank's failure to keep inflation within bounds over the Covid period should have it sensitive to the risks of going above-target again. So, I wouldn't want to blame them too much for current unemployment except to the extent that the bank's errors during the Covid period makes things a bit harder now. " He said keeping inflation within its target was the best thing the Reserve Bank could do to ensure long-term stable employment. "Given inflation risks, the bank would likely need to act to offset fiscal stimulus, if Parliament decided to provide further fiscal stimulus — we are still running a substantial deficit as well."
RNZ News
10 hours ago
- RNZ News
Greyhound Racing NZ offers 25 percent share in a racing greyhound as competition prize
Greyhound NZ is offering part shares in a racing dog as a prize in a competition. File picture. Photo: 123rf A desperate attempt to salvage a dying industry is how one animal welfare group is describing a competition where a racing greyhound is the prize. Greyhound Racing NZ has been offering a 25 percent share in a racing dog as a prize in a competition where entrants have to say why they oppose a ban on the sport . It comes as the government is outlawing greyhound racing at the end of July next year due to animal welfare issues. It said dog deaths and injury rates had remained consistently high. Greyhound Racing NZ has applied for a judicial review of the government decision to outlaw the industry. It has been promoting a competition where people go into a draw to win shares in a greyhound racer and any prize money it collects. GRNZ board member and greyhound trainer Craig Roberts told Checkpoint they had had over 350 entries to the competition. "We're trying to get out to the general public and just see, get some interest from people that don't really know a lot about greyhound racing." While entrants have to say why they oppose a ban on the sport, Roberts said entries were open to anybody. He said he saw no issues with offering up shares of a dog as a prize. "Greyhound racing is very transparent and very open to the public. So of course I think it's a great idea to give a member of the public the opportunity to share the excitement of owning a share in a greyhound." Roberts said the group would not put up with any "anti-greyhound people" who entered the competition, adding that even if the 25 percent share owner asked for the dog to stop racing, that would not be possible. "[They are just] trying to infiltrate just to disrupt our day-to-day operations of being greyhound participants." The dog on offer belongs to Roberts' son, and he said she was doing "exceptionally well', winning three races in a row. Fifteen dogs have died in the most recent racing season, and hundreds of injuries were reported. Roberts said bar the 15 deaths, the other hundreds of dogs had recovered and were living happy lives. "We don't race our greyhounds to purposely get them injured, obviously as people don't drive a car to purposely have a crash." Animal welfare groups SAFE and SPCA have both raised concerns about the competition. SPCA chief scientific officer Dr Arnja Dale told Checkpoint that the SPCA was aware of the competition and had serious concerns about the ethics of offering a racing greyhound as a 'prize'. "Greyhounds are sentient beings, not commodities to be given away in a competition. Greyhound racing is inherently dangerous. "The last racing season has seen 15 dogs [which] have died or been euthanised as a result of injuries sustained on racetracks." The chief executive of animal welfare group SAFE, Debra Ashton, agreed calling the move a desperate approach to salvage a dying industry whose day has come. "Tactics such as offering the chance to own a quarter share in a dog by writing a submission confirm that this industry has always placed a higher value on using dogs as commodities rather than on animal welfare. "Greyhound Racing New Zealand's focus should now be on doing the right thing by the rest of the dogs who are still being used by winding down races and supporting the rehoming of these dogs." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
