Lorna Slater says she has the experience to remain co-leader of the party
On Wednesday morning the Lothians MSP was in her local park speaking to the media.
She outlined why she believes that The Scottish Greens are in the ascendancy. She said: 'The Scottish Greens have really grown, and our success over the last few years has been really significant. With going into government for the first time, increasing our number of MSPs and of course, our number of councillors across the country, Greens are more influential than ever.
'In next year's Holyrood election, we have the far right coming to Scotland with an anti-trans, anti-immigrant, racist agenda. Climate denial has already arrived in The Scottish Parliament, and The Scottish Greens need to clearly stand against that.'
Asked about the Deposit Return Scheme which was disastrous for The Scottish Government and for Ms Slater personally, she explained that the legislation was already in place – and that she had tried hard to implement it.
She said: 'The legislation was passed in 2020 before I was elected, and it was my job to get it launched in Scotland. We were weeks away from launch.
'Biffa the contractor had sites all over Scotland. We had businesses all over Scotland who had their reverse vending machines installed. We were ready to go for launch when the UK Government, spearheaded by Alister Jack, decided to shut down the scheme.
'That was so frustrating, and it was an abuse of Scottish devolution, of the Scotland Act, because Scotland, under the Scotland Act, has the power to implement those kind of schemes.
'Unfortunately, post Brexit, that internal market act now exists, which the UK Government can use to stop Scotland from taking forward recycling schemes.
'Fortunately, now the UK Government has finally, after years of prevarication, passed the legislation for their deposit return scheme down in England. So we will be getting a deposit return scheme in Scotland, but unfortunately, that will be on England's schedule instead of the schedule voted for by The Scottish Parliament.'
She also explained that the Greens had a range of achievements against their name including the free bus travel for under 22 year olds. She continued: 'The next co leaders will be sharing a platform with Nigel Farage, and Russell Findlay, who are climate denying, anti immigration, and anti trans. The Scottish Greens need to push back against that, and I've got the experience and the confidence. I'm the last woman party leader standing in Scotland, and I want to be on that platform, taking them on with an anti racist, human rights agenda where we're looking at actually making Scotland a fairer and greener place, tackling the climate crisis and continuing to put in place policies that matter to people.'
The nominated candidates are: Dominic Ashmole, Ross Greer MSP, Gillian Mackay MSP and Lorna Slater MSP.
Any combination of the four candidates may be elected and the election process opens on 13 August, closes on 22 August and the results will be published on 29 August.
Any hustings for the leadership roles will begin on Monday 4 August.
Lorna Slater MSP
Like this:
Like
Related
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
44 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Inside SNP's internal battle as ‘real reason' for Kate Forbes resignation revealed
Her Scottish Government critics have been described as a 'nest of vipers' Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) KATE Forbes decided to quit Holyrood after tiring of being undermined by Cabinet colleagues, insiders have claimed. The Deputy First Minister revealed she will depart in May for more time with husband Alasdair and daughter Naomi. Sign up for the Politics newsletter Sign up 3 Kate Forbes will stand down as an MSP next year 3 MSP Kate Forbes plays with her daughter Naomi at nursery in Scottish Parliament Credit: Euan Cherry - Commissioned by The Times 3 Kate Forbes with husband Ali and their daughter Naomi Credit: EPA It came as a source described her critics in the Scottish Government as 'like a nest of vipers" who made her life "as difficult as possible." The Deputy First Minister chose daughter Naomi's third birthday to tell boss John Swinney she was ditching the cauldron of Holyrood to enjoy 'the precious early years of family life'. But party sources said Ms Forbes had also grown tired of being 'undermined' by cabinet colleagues who saw her as a threat to Housing Secretary Màiri McAllan — seen as a future Nats leader. One insider said: 'Perhaps if Kate hadn't been getting tripped up at every step by people who are meant to be on her side then she would have stayed on. 'But given the personal sacrifices, it is clearly not worth the effort any longer. 'The family issues are clearly a huge factor for Kate but may not have been insurmountable if other things were different.' In her letter to the First Minister, Ms Forbes, 35, said she had given 'careful thought' to her future before deciding she 'does not wish to seek re-election' at next May's Scottish Parliament elections. And she told broadcaster LBC of a lack of 'support' for parents at Holyrood. She added: 'I'm not the first mum who's also an MSP to cite motherhood as a reason for standing down.' The Skye, Lochaber and Badenoch MSP since 2016 said: 'It is partly because of the eight-hour return drive I do every week, and the minimum five-hour drive across the constituency. Kate Forbes picks her biggest scandal of the SNP's time in power 'It's one thing to try to get home every night to see them, it's another to face the prospect of going full weeks without being there.' Another source said: 'John Swinney simply saw Kate as window dressing for a certain section of the Scottish electorate. 'Swinney has not had the courage to stand up to the likes of McAllan and [Education Secretary] Jenny Gilruth. "They will think they've won, but the SNP will be in a worse place and in a worse position electorally without Forbes.' And former SNP special adviser Geoff Aberdein said there was 'no doubt' Ms McAllan has ambitions to rival Westminster chief Stephen Flynn as Mr Swinney's heir apparent — but both lacked Ms Forbes' economic competence. Mr Aberdein told the Holyrood Sources podcast: 'I'm not saying there aren't people in the party who are viewed as credible in the business community, but nowhere near as credible as Kate Forbes. 'There will be some in the party who will be quite pleased by this decision which really frustrates me because, whether you agree with her brand of politics or not, she is a huge electoral asset.' Now a managing partner at the True North think tank, Mr Aberdein said he has been inundated with messages from business leaders lamenting Ms Forbes' departure. He said: 'She's extremely credible to the business community and that is a gap that John Swinney is going to have to fill. 'That is a major problem and I hope it is not a major recalibration, because if you don't have voices within your party that can speak to that then that is a huge weakness.' A senior Scottish Government source rejected the claims that cabinet rivalry was a factor in Ms Forbes quitting. They said: 'This is utter rubbish. Kate has set out her reasons for standing down.' And Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville dismissed claims that Ms Forbes threw in the towel because she had become disenchanted with the SNP. She said: 'Political hacks are trying to find another angle but maybe, just maybe, it's about someone doing what's best for her and her family.' Ms Forbes, who married husband Alasdair MacLennan in 2021, became the Scottish Government's youngest Finance Secretary when she succeeded shamed Derek Mackay in 2020. She came under fire for her views on gay marriage, abortion and trans rights. And she publicly opposed Nicola Sturgeon's doomed plan to allow people to legally change sex through self-declaration. Several senior Scottish Government figures rejected Ms Forbes' stance, including Mr Swinney, despite his own Christian faith. Her profile continued to rise, however, and in 2023 she narrowly lost to Humza Yousaf in a bitter SNP leadership race. Former SNP MP Joanna Cherry acknowledged the Deputy First Minister's announcement that she was stepping down to spend more time with family but said there is 'probably a bit more to it than meets the eye'. She said: 'I have the utmost respect for Kate and I think it's a bit of a disaster for the SNP.' Former SNP MP Angus MacNeill, said: 'Kate wouldn't be walking away if there was a prospect of the SNP delivering independence.' He added: 'When there is no strategy, just cluelessness, a groundhog five years at Westminster's devolved parliament ain't so appealing.' Mr Swinney said: 'I pay tribute to Kate for her invaluable contribution to public life over the last ten years. "The challenges of frontline politics are considerable, and I understand the decision she has made, although I wish it was not the case.'
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
While Trump showed the world how to handle Brussels, Starmer waves the white flag on Brexit
PM's Brexit exit DONALD Trump showed the world how to force a deal with the EU. Terrify them with threats of the loss of billions in lost trade and tens of thousands of jobs … and watch Brussels beg for business. 1 Sadly, Sir Keir Starmer took the opposite approach with his sellout 'reset' deal. Now jubilant European leaders are bent on bullying the UK into accepting their tyranny all over again thanks to its terms. A total reversal of Brexit is closer than ever. The PM has repeatedly promised never to take the UK back into the EU's Customs Union and Single Market. Yet that is effectively what the EU Commission demands as the price of its agreement. Britain must take all EU regulations on food without any say in those rules — and pay penalties for not doing so. We couldn't even import food from outside the EU without its meddling. Technically, there is still time during last-minute negotiations for our dyed-in-the-wool Remainer PM to stop this gross betrayal of Brexit. But on current form he seems vanishingly unlikely to do so. Keir Starmer- hopes for reset with EU do not mean 'reversing Brexit' Boiling over VOTER rage at the immigration explosion is close to boiling point. And even the OBR says public services are seriously stretched because of Britain's over-reliance on migration. Yet tin-eared Labour ministers still lecture protesters outside asylum hotels by telling them 'anger doesn't get you anywhere'. They don't get that Nigel Farage's current success comes from speaking real people's language. Similarly, useless cops appear to have learned nothing from the handling of the identity of the Southport killer. — as Warwickshire police did in the case of an Afghan accused of raping a 12-year-old girl — are an affront to justice. The immigration status and nationality of all offenders should be published for each crime. It's the only way to restore trust. Cell out WHY is the Left's answer to prison overcrowding always to release prisoners or cut sentences? Ex-Chief Inspector of Prisons and human rights activist Dame Anne Owers says a near meltdown in the system means even mandatory life sentences for murder should be scrapped. How about, instead of letting thousands of dangerous criminals back on to the streets, Labour does what the Tories so abjectly failed to do.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Was it Starmer's plan all along to make us so subservient to the EU that we'd be better off back in?
WERE we fooled too easily by Sir Keir Starmer's assurances that he had no intention of taking Britain back into the EU? With the publication of the EU's draft documents for the 'reset' in relations between Britain and the bloc, it is tempting to wonder whether there has been a scheme in the PM's mind all along: to make Britain so subservient to the EU that eventually a return to full membership becomes a less-worse option. 3 3 As announced by Starmer and EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen at their summit in London in May, a new 'common sanitary and phyto-sanitary' area will be created. That should mean the end of checks on food imports and exports — as well as petty customs officers confiscating sandwiches from lorry drivers. Needless to say, it comes at a price. In order to escape the border checks, Britain will have to agree to full alignment with EU food standards. And it is becoming increasingly clear what this means in practice: Britain simply agreeing to enact EU standards. French farmers In contrast to when we were members of the EU, however, we will have little say in what those standards should be. We may be consulted, but it is the EU which will make the rules and Britain which is forced to accept them. It is obvious from past experience what is going to happen. EU legislators, heavily lobbied by French farmers and the like, will pass laws which are designed to discriminate against UK-made produce, in order to keep it out of EU markets. We will have no power to stop them. To take an example, Britain spent 27 years fighting the EU for the right to sell our chocolate bars across the Continent. Keir Starmer- hopes for reset with EU do not mean 'reversing Brexit' The EU, under pressure from French and Belgian manufacturers, wanted to impose a limit on the milk content and vegetable fat content of chocolate bars — which just happened to permit products made in France and Belgium but exclude those which were popular in Britain. In a typical piece of EU-style bureaucratic invention, officials tried to come up with a compromise: where UK-made bars would be labelled 'vegelate' — presumably to make them sound so unappetising that no one would want to buy them anyway. Britain eventually won that battle — in 2000, after nearly three decades of bruising political and legal battle. But in future? Britain will have no say. The European Commission will be able to pass a law banning British chocolate bars and there will be little we can do about it. British food manufacturers could, perhaps, appeal to the new 'independent arbitrary tribunal' which will be set up to judge trade disputes, but it won't really be worthy of the name 'independent'. As the EU draft documents make clear, the EU's Court of Justice will become 'the ultimate authority for all questions of EU law'. Needless to say, the EU wants Britain to pay for the privilege of joining its common sanitary area. We will also be under obligation to align our carbon levies with the EU, making it more difficult for a future UK government to escape the straitjacket of Net Zero. Both Britain and the EU are in the process of imposing carbon border taxes — levies on imports according to their embedded carbon emissions. Under the reset, Britain will be expected to align its own system with the EU's. It was exactly these kinds of arrangement which Theresa May and Boris Johnson's governments fought so hard to avoid — not very satisfactorily, it has to be said. We actually ended up with an arrangement which created an internal UK border between Britain and Northern Ireland. But the system which will come about as a result of Starmer's reset will be far worse. It will take us close to being the 'vassal state' that Jacob Rees-Mogg warned about — a vassal state being the name given to states in medieval Europe which were notionally independent but in practice were under the control of, and under obligation to pay taxes to, a much larger empire. No UK PM ever really tried to play the EU at its game — even though they ought to have been in the driving seat in negotiations At the moment, the reset will cover food, animal and plant products as well as a number of high-carbon materials such as steel and cement. Second referendum But this will almost certainly mark just a beginning. Under a Starmer government we will be sucked further and further into the EU's orbit until it becomes a mere tidying-up exercise to rejoin the bloc in full. Donald Trump has just shown what you can do if you negotiate hard with the EU — European Commission president Von der Leyen ended up agreeing to 15 per cent tariffs on EU exports to the US, as well as a commitment to buy more US oil and gas — all for very little in return. Yet no UK PM ever really tried to play the EU at its game — even though they ought to have been in the driving seat in negotiations with the EU because they sell more to us than we sell to them. While Conservatives were trying and failing to get a good deal, Starmer, you might remember, was campaigning for a second Brexit referendum in which — he hoped — Britons would vote to reverse the result of the first. He didn't get his way on that, of course. But that doesn't mean he has given up on trying to reinstate Britain in the EU. To judge by his actions, that may very well be his undeclared ambition.
