logo
MK Ranjitsinh Jhala: ‘I'm curious to see all animals with my own eyes'

MK Ranjitsinh Jhala: ‘I'm curious to see all animals with my own eyes'

Hindustan Times16 hours ago
Before writing nature and wildlife-focused books, you played a key role in the drafting of the Wildlife (Protection) Act of 1972. How did this opportunity come to you? Wildlife author MK Ranjitsinh Jhala.
In 1971, I was brought to the Ministry of Food and Agriculture from Madhya Pradesh. Wildlife protection was of relatively little importance to the Indian government, so this ministry also looked after forests. My [IAS] batchmate, who was also a deputy secretary, knew of my interest in wildlife. He invited me to show Mrs Gandhi my movies on wildlife, which I had made as a collector of the Mandla district, which had the Kanha National Park. That was in 1970.
In 1969, a conference was organised by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), which was inaugurated by Mrs Gandhi, so she knew something about conservation and was interested in wildlife. As I recollect, on 20 September 1971, Mrs Gandhi called a meeting in her office, inviting people dealing with wildlife. There was Dr Karan Singh, who was then the Chairman of the Indian Board of Wildlife, [Kunwar] 'Billy' Arjan Singh (of Dudhwa National Park fame), Anne Wright, and Kailash Sankhala (who was then occupied with a grant under the Nehru Fellowship). I was the youngest and the juniormost chap there.
When Mrs Gandhi asked what could be done for wildlife, Dr. Singh said it was a state subject, but Arjan Singh really went for it. He asked, 'What priority, Madam Prime Minister, does wildlife have in your scheme of things?' To which she replied, 'I love wildlife, but it can't take precedence over human beings.' It was the politician in her speaking. But evidently, she got a little annoyed. Then, after being nudged by Moni Malhotra, I spoke about Articles 248 and 250 of the Constitution and told Mrs Gandhi that we need a wildlife legislation. And that the state governments are starved for funds. We need to provide capital expenditure and non-recurring expenditure for the conservation of wildlife, particularly national parks and sanctuaries. And the maintenance, recurring costs will be borne by the state government. She thought it was a good idea and the meeting was dispersed. Two days later, a note came to my minister, which said Ranjitsinh should be put in charge of wildlife in India, so that's how it started, how I went over and drafted the act. And would you believe it? The act was drafted in six months and passed in the first session because of Mrs Gandhi's patronage. Eighteen states, including one non-Congress-ruled, passed resolutions in their respective state assemblies empowering the Government of India to legislate on a state subject under the Constitution before I had finished drafting it because Mrs Gandhi had written letters to all the chief ministers requesting the same. Until about 2002, I was involved in its amendments, too. But it seems that the priorities of the successive governments have changed, and I regret to say this but the Wildlife (Protection) Act is regarded as a stumbling block towards development, which isn't development at all.
You've dedicated your latest book Mountain Mammals of the World to your grandchildren, noting that they should go to the mountains instead of looking at the mountains on their computer screens. In your view, what are the reasons for this diminishing interest in the present generation to explore nature?
The interest hasn't decreased. The emphasis has changed, which is on safari parks and zoos. The precedence of ex-situ conservation over in-situ (natural) conservation, in my opinion, is wrong.
The other thing is that there's a sharp focus on select mega mammals, which are the be-all and end-all of wildlife visits. People don't go to see a park or build a communion with nature. They go to see a tiger, a lion, or an elephant, or a rhinoceros in Kaziranga, etc. They don't go to savour nature. They ogle at animals. And the poor animals are just bored to death. That's not wildlife viewing; it's very myopic as you are denying yourself the pleasure of seeing hundreds and thousands of other animals. And that's a failure on the part of a lot of us, starting from myself, the media, and everybody else, because we've collectively not popularised the wealth of animals.
You also note that mountains, Buddhism, and Kashmir were the three elements that inspired you to work on this book.
During my MA, I studied ancient history, and I was fascinated by Buddhism. I'm a Buddhist at heart. I stood first in the university paper on Buddhism, which is what I told the Dalai Lama, who has written an Introduction to the book. Buddhism is a way of life, not a religion. There's a separate code of conduct for the Upāsaka/ Upāsikā, a lay follower, for example.
I've covered 119 taxa, species and subspecies of the mountain mammals of the world. Out of these, approximately 80 taxa are found in Asia, and almost half of them are in the Buddhist-dominated mountains of Asia. Some are surviving only because of the Buddhist monasteries. Had it not been for them, these species would've been long gone. I've personally witnessed this. From the rooftop of Rizong Gompa (a Buddhist monastery in Ladakh), I saw wolves chasing a herd of shapu (urial). The males ran up the mountain, and the females and younger ones ran towards the monastery to seek sanctuary there. That's Buddhism.
Then, today, the largest number of mountain mammals anywhere is in Kashmir state. Or shall I say, in the undivided Kashmir, which was handed over by Dr. Singh's father Hari Singhji to the Union of India. The state had about 30 species and subspecies out of 119. There's no other place like that in the world, especially for mountain mammals. My first exposure to mountain mammals was in Ladakh in 1958 when I was still a college student and subsequently in 1960, when I saw and photographed hangul (the Kashmir stag), the Tibetan Argali, the blue sheep and the rest. I saw my first snow leopard there. I've been all over the world but I haven't seen them anywhere except Kashmir. This is the wealth of Kashmir. Compare this to Africa, which has only four species of mountain mammals. The whole of South America — only two. The highest mountain range outside Asia, the Andes, runs from one end of the top of the continent right to the bottom, running 8,900 km, only two! In one nala of Ladakh, Phobrang in the Chang Chenmo area, in one day of walking for 14 hours and riding a horse, I saw six, which is equivalent to the number of them found in the two continents of the world.
From the array of species and subspecies you've explored and documented, what is that one story related to any of them you find the most interesting?
Perhaps when I first saw a snow leopard. After so many years of trudging and travelling, suddenly on a cold winter morning, I saw it. And I watched it for more than an hour. And so was seeing Markhor for the first time in Kazinag, with the Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) above and [to my left], silhouetted against the sky and the backdrop of snow, was this huge male with corkscrew horns towering above him. Horns higher than his shoulder height, standing statuesque with wind rippling his wavy long beard. The sighting of the Caspian stag (maral) was also wonderful.
But there is an incident in the book about my encounter with the mountain gorillas, which is rather saucy. There were 25 of us [on the expedition]. But this old female gorilla sort of scrutinised 25 of us, all wild-lifers and picked me. I do believe that animals have a sense of perception and they can make out people who they like and whom they don't. They get vibes of some sort. And I've got that kind of response from both wild and domestic animals. That has been my experience. The fact that that female came to me just to touch me and go back was a bit of a defining moment.
In the last few years, you've made special efforts to see animals you failed to observe in your youth. Which are the ones you want to see now?
I'm curious about seeing all animals with my own eyes. And, if possible, photograph them. That has taken me all over the world. But that aside, seeing species other than the ones you've already seen is always interesting. So, I travel, go to local places, and just savour the ambience. For the last few years, I've maintained a list of 10 animals and I keep on seeing some of them, not so many now. Then, I also strike out some and others go into that list.
But there are several animals I've never seen. For example, the Amur leopard. I've seen it in captivity though. They're gorgeous. Then, the Amur (Siberian) tiger — the largest cat in the world. They're much larger than ours. All tigers came from the north. So, I want to go and see one. I went to Lazovsky (Nature Reserve), near Vladivostok, with my daughter Radhika. The Director of the Reserve said, sure, sir, you come and stay here. I asked him what are the chances of sighting the tiger, to which he replied that, sir, if you stay here for a month and go out in the winter, which is minus 30 degrees Celsius, you may see one. I didn't have a month to spend there, so that was that. Then, I tried to see the mountain tapir but failed to see one in the Andes. I have seen the Dall sheep but not the others, for example, Stone's sheep, a variety, in Yukon. I haven't seen the snow sheep. But, as luck would have it, I've seen almost all of them. There are a few left, and I'd like to see them if I can and if age allows me to.
As people often encroach upon animals' space, I was wondering about your views on photographing animals in the wild.
People not only intrude upon animals' privacy, but also upon their movements. Just to get better pictures, they block the movement of animals. There's also, unfortunately, baiting to get animals, which is illegal, but is still practised. Then, there is this practice of muscling out the other man and going ahead of him in the jeep or whatever you can to get a better photograph of a particular animal. The interest of the animal is completely compromised. I abhor that. I hope I've not done that myself.
Anyway, if you're going to photograph animals, they don't want you there, but you're there, so the least you can do is not bother them. Firstly, if you disturb them, then it'll not be in your interest. Secondly, it's just not right. I also feel that some animals have become so immune to disturbances that they don't really mind at all, but one must mind their manners.
I read that you want 'the moronic belief in the medicinal efficacy of rhino horn' to end someday. Could you share your views on exploiting wildlife principally for commercial purposes?
One is the therapeutic or propounded quality of some of the products, like the rhino horn, a classic example, which is just keratin. It's the same material as your fingernail. Many of the horns or the other items, which are used for improving sexual potency or rectification of some venereal diseases and whatever — there is no scientific proof for that. But the belief is such, especially regarding Chinese and Tibetan medicine. However, I must say that their popularity is decreasing. And if the governments do not sponsor it, if they discourage it, it will die out very soon. There are a few others where their efficacy cannot be doubted. And I am talking particularly about musk. It has been used by man for at least 5,000 years. In Paris, I met this big shot from the Chanel organisation. And he said there is no substitute or a commodity in the whole world like musk. It's used as a base for perfumery. I've smelt a pod of a musk deer, shot almost 70 years ago, which still smells aromatic. The problem is that apart from its base in perfumery, its efficacy, even in some aromatic things, is genuine. How do you stop this business as usual? The Chinese have musk deer farms. And you can siphon off musk from the navel gland of the male musk deer. The females don't have them. But as long as there is a supply from these farms, the demand for musk will remain and as long as there is a demand, the illegal supply from animals killed in the wild will continue. The Nepalese and others have huge nets and they drive animals — they don't bother to make out whether it's a male or a female. If it's a male, they'll get the musk. If it's female, they'll get its meat (it's delicious). So they will still be [hunted] to eat the meat. The musk deer will always be pursued, until and unless people stop using musk at all, for whatever it's worth.
Saurabh Sharma is a Delhi-based writer and freelance journalist. They can be found on Instagram/X: @writerly_life.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Don't give China pass, burn relationship with ‘strong ally' India: Nikki Haley
Don't give China pass, burn relationship with ‘strong ally' India: Nikki Haley

Indian Express

time13 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Don't give China pass, burn relationship with ‘strong ally' India: Nikki Haley

The US should not burn its relationship with a 'strong ally like India' and give a pass to China, Indian-American Republican leader Nikki Haley said on Tuesday, amid President Donald Trump's attacks against New Delhi over tariffs and purchases of Russian oil. 'India should not be buying oil from Russia. But China, an adversary and the number one buyer of Russian and Iranian oil, got a 90-day tariff pause,' Haley said in a post on X. 'Don't give China a pass and burn a relationship with a strong ally like India,' she said. Haley, the former Governor of South Carolina, was the US Ambassador to the United Nations under Trump's first presidential term, becoming the first Indian-American to be appointed to a cabinet-level post in the US administration. India should not be buying oil from Russia. But China, an adversary and the number one buyer of Russian and Iranian oil, got a 90-day tariff pause. Don't give China a pass and burn a relationship with a strong ally like India. — Nikki Haley (@NikkiHaley) August 5, 2025 In 2013, she officially announced her candidacy for the 2024 presidential election and withdrew from the race in March last year. Her comments came hours after Trump said India has not been a 'good trading partner' and announced he will raise tariffs on India 'very substantially over the next 24 hours' because New Delhi is buying Russian oil and 'fueling' the 'war machine'. India on Monday mounted an unusually sharp counterattack on the US and the European Union for their 'unjustified and unreasonable' targeting of New Delhi for its procurement of Russian crude oil. New Delhi's response came after Trump asserted that Washington will substantially raise tariffs on goods from India over its energy ties with Russia. Meanwhile, Trump, in an interview with CNBC responded to a question on China and its leader, Xi Jinping, and said, 'We have a very good relationship'. Trump added that he might have a meeting with the Chinese President 'before the end of the year, most likely, if we make a deal.' He said he won't have a meeting if a deal doesn't materialise. 'But we're getting very close to a deal. We're getting along with China very well.' Trump added that China is 'very reliant' on the US. 'My relationship with them is very good. I think we'll make a good deal. It's not imperative, but I think we're going to make a good deal.' He added that he has had a 'great relationship' with President Xi. 'We respect him a lot. They respect us a lot.'

India, Russia reaffirm commitment to enhance defence cooperation
India, Russia reaffirm commitment to enhance defence cooperation

The Hindu

time13 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

India, Russia reaffirm commitment to enhance defence cooperation

India and Russia on Tuesday (August 5, 2025) reaffirmed their commitment to boost bilateral defence cooperation during a meeting between Indian Ambassador Vinay Kumar and Russia's Deputy Defence Minister Colonel-General Alexander Fomin. According to a statement by the Russian Ministry of Defence, the Indian envoy called on Col-Gen Fomin, who is in charge of international defence cooperation, and the meeting was held in a 'warm and friendly atmosphere, customary for Russian-Indian ties'. 'During the conversation, the two sides discussed in detail the pertinent issues of bilateral interaction in the sphere of defence and confirmed their intent toward the further strengthening of relevant cooperation in the spirit of particularly privileged strategic partnership,' said the statement. The meeting took place amid U.S. President Donald Trump's threats to slap harsh sanctions on India for buying crude oil from Russia.

NSA Ajit Doval in Moscow amid Trump tariff threats over India's Russian oil buys. What's on the agenda?
NSA Ajit Doval in Moscow amid Trump tariff threats over India's Russian oil buys. What's on the agenda?

Mint

time13 minutes ago

  • Mint

NSA Ajit Doval in Moscow amid Trump tariff threats over India's Russian oil buys. What's on the agenda?

National Security Adviser Ajit Doval has landed in Moscow, where he is scheduled to meet with Russian officials. This comes amid US President Donald Trump's threats to impose tariffs on Indian exports over the country's continued purchases of Russian oil. An anonymous source told Russia's state-run news agency TASS that Doval is expected to have 'several meetings' with Russian officials on Thursday, 7 August. Doval reached Moscow on Tuesday, according to Russian media. "A series of meetings is planned for August 7," the source said in TASS report. Doval was in Moscow last year in September. External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar is also scheduled to visit Moscow later this month. While Doval and Jaishankar's are part of routine annual consultations and were scheduled well in advance, they come against the backdrop of growing tensions in India-US relations over New Delhi's ties with Moscow. After imposing a steep 25 per cent tariff on India, Trump on Tuesday threatened to raise it 'substantially' over New Delhi's refusal to stop buying Russian oil. On Monday, too, Trump had warned that he would raise the tariff on India 'substantially', saying that India was not only buying 'massive amounts of Russian oil' but also selling it 'on the open market for big profits'. Washington argues that India — along with China — is helping President Vladimir Putin fund his war in Ukraine through those purchases. New Delhi has defended its position, saying criticism from the US and European Union about India's trade with Russia was 'unjustified and unreasonable.' It highlighted that the EU and US continue to buy energy and other materials from Russia when 'such trade is not even a national compulsion.' Over the years, Modi has maintained close ties with Putin, having visited Russia in October. The Russian president is expected to visit India later this year — a trip that will likely be on the agenda during Doval and Jaishankar's discussions in Moscow, Bloomberg reported Amid rising tensions with Trump, India last week reaffirmed its 'steady and time-tested partnership' with Moscow and has not, so far, instructed its oil refiners to stop buying Russian oil.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store