logo
Some council members oppose 15th Street Railcar Experience, claiming 'it came from a crook'

Some council members oppose 15th Street Railcar Experience, claiming 'it came from a crook'

Yahoo07-04-2025
CHEYENNE — Concerns about the nearly $5 million 15th Street Railcar Experience are growing among members of Cheyenne's City Council, with critics saying it is unrealistic and a poor use of public funds. Others say it is more attainable if approached in phases and will be a net positive for the development of downtown.
The project was one of the governing body's top priorities in 2024. It entails bringing two rail cars and a caboose to display on West 15th Street and converting the area to a pedestrian tourism attraction. Additionally, it involves the relocation of the Ol' Sadie steam engine from Lions Park to 15th Street, near the Cheyenne Depot Museum.
'The city was created by an action of the Union Pacific Railroad. And I think when people come here, they think about our rail history, our western history, those types of things,' said Cheyenne Mayor Patrick Collins. 'And, you know, I think it'd be a nice touch to be able to deliver on some of those historical promises.'
In January, Cheyenne City Engineer Tom Cobb estimated the total price of the project will be around $4.8 million. Between federal grant funds received from the Economic Development Administration, sixth-penny sales tax funds and money from the Cheyenne Depot Museum to support the project, city funds to be spent on this project are closer to $2.2 million.
However, some council members believe this money could be better used elsewhere.
Council member Michelle Aldrich said the city doesn't have $2.2 million available to complete this first phase of the project. She said she would rather see the money go toward city staff wage increases or road maintenance.
15th Street Rail Car Experience
This is the interior of one of the rail cars to be included in the 15th Street Rail Car Experience, currently in storage near Swan Ranch.
'This $3 million price tag we're being given doesn't include any interior work (on the rail cars), and they're not ADA accessible. And if you make them ADA accessible by cutting doorways into the sides of these train cars, you'll destroy the historic integrity of them,' she said.
Press on or cut your losses?
The first phase of the project includes renovation and asbestos abatement of the rail cars, site preparation on 15th Street and transportation of the cars from the rail spur where they are being stored near Swan Ranch to downtown.
Collins said he believes this first phase of the plan is manageable and allows the opportunity to later continue work on the project, like doing interior work on the cars, and allowing businesses and restaurants to lease them out.
'I don't know if, in fact, that will ever happen, but there's potential for that,' he said. 'As part of this design, we are bringing utilities to the cars ... so they could be used for a coffee shop or whatever they might be used for ... We want to put all that stuff in the ground beforehand, so that if, in fact, someday in the future, that were to happen. It's not part of the plan now, but we're trying to be proactive and looking to the future.'
15th Street Rail Car Experience
This is one of the rail cars to be included in the 15th Street Rail Car Experience currently in storage near Swan Ranch.
Council member Jeff White said he would continue to support this project because he doesn't want to lose what the city has already invested into it over the past few years.
'I find the whole thing a bit problematic. I'm hoping that it will be successful,' he said. 'The reason I am going to support it is because we already own the cars. What are we supposed to do with the cars? Are we just supposed to give them away at the cost of money that we paid for them? Then we suffer a huge loss that way.'
White said he also supports the project because it will result in a net increase of 55 parking spaces.
However, Aldrich said the city's pocketbooks would be better off taking the loss on the investments already made and trying to sell or get rid of the rail cars. She said expenses continue to add up as the city pays rent to store the rail cars and will also have to pay to remediate the soil where they sit because of the asbestos.
15th Street Rail Car Experience
One of the rail cars to be included in the 15th Street Rail Car Experience currently in storage near Swan Ranch is Southern Pacific 7077, a business/passenger car that is 85 feet long and weighs 140,000 pounds.
'The problem becomes we can either lose the (money spent) and not get reimbursed and lose what we've invested now, or we can keep going down this track — no pun intended — and end up with bigger and bigger dollars invested for something that the public may or may not want at all,' Aldrich said.
For the first phase of the project, the city received $618,400 in federal grant money. However, those funds will not be given to the city until two of the cars have been relocated to 15th Street. Council member Pete Laybourn expressed concern that these grant funds could be pulled soon by the second Trump administration, adding that the city needs to be particularly careful with expenses now as a result of the expected decrease in property taxes following the recent legislative session.
15th Street Rail Car Experience
The interior of one of the rail cars to be included in the 15th Street Rail Car Experience is currently in storage near Swan Ranch. It is the Southern Pacific 7077 business/passenger car, which is 85 feet long and weighs 140,000 pounds.
As of January, the city had spent around $580,000 of its own money on asbestos abatement of the rail cars, site design and a master plan update. This does not include expenses like storage rent and the original 15th Street Master Plan that first began in 2021 and was never realized. A total of $168,400 in federal grant funding had also been used on asbestos abatement.
'It came from a crook'
Laybourn said the initial plan was overly ambitious and has resulted in the current plan, which he also sees as bad business for the city.
'It's just an amazingly clear example of when ambition and ideas start to spin,' he said. 'They end up somewhere, and somewhere is that this entire idea was just really crazy, and it came from a crook.'
In September 2021, Cheyenne-based Wasatch Railroad Contractors filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. While this was ongoing, the company and its CEO, John Rimmasch, continued to advocate to the Cheyenne City Council for the original plan, which included a skybridge from the Cheyenne Depot Museum to the Union Pacific Railroad roundhouse and outdoor recreation expansion.
Cheyenne Railroad Visitor Experience
This aerial view outlines the preliminary 2021 plans for the Cheyenne Railroad Visitor Experience.
At the time, Rimmasch was also on the Cheyenne Depot board of directors.
'The guy was just utterly fearless, was reckless with people's lives and defrauded the federal government,' Laybourn said of Rimmasch.
Wasatch was a railroad equipment repair business. In April 2021, a tanker car formerly used to carry hazardous materials exploded inside Wasatch's Shoshoni shop, killing two workers aged 28 and 21.
A federal investigation was launched when Wasatch failed to complete a contract for the National Park Service in New Jersey. In April 2022, Rimmasch was found guilty on five counts of wire fraud and one count of knowing endangerment for exposing employees to asbestos. He was sentenced to 30 months in prison.
Collins said Rimmasch was an advocate of the project but was not leading the project.
'When we first started this project, those things had not happened yet. His legal problems and his financial problems occurred after this whole project started,' he said. 'But this wasn't John's project. This is a city project.'
However, Aldrich and Laybourn both told the WTE that Rimmasch was the one who 'sold' the city and Visit Cheyenne on the original plans, and they believe the current plans are residual of Rimmasch. He advocated for the project at a Cheyenne City Council meeting in October 2021, following his company's filing for bankruptcy.
'This is just kind of a strange story of how things can go on and on and end up in a strange place,' Laybourn said. '... Really, we should have pulled the plug before now and understood what John Rimmasch had done.'
Laybourn told the WTE that council member Mark Moody is the only other council member who currently opposes the project. He could not be reached before publication to confirm this.
Aldrich said she plans to take the members of the governing body to Swan Ranch to see the rail cars next week. She hopes that by showing the cars still need a lot of interior work, it will change some minds, and the council will eventually support a resolution to abandon the project.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Americans With Disabilities Act At 35 Unlocks $13 Trillion Market
Americans With Disabilities Act At 35 Unlocks $13 Trillion Market

Forbes

time23 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Americans With Disabilities Act At 35 Unlocks $13 Trillion Market

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) became law on July 26, 1990. It declared that inclusion was a civil right, not an afterthought. This past June, at the 35th anniversary of ADA event hosted by Fred Moltz, Chief Accessibility Officer of Verizon, I saw where accessibility is headed. The conversations ranged from the challenges of integrating AI into accessibility programming to the expanding focus on neurodiversity, the lessons of kiosk and user-interface design, and the growing opportunities for people with disabilities in the workforce. Most powerful was the network of leaders convened that day, signaling a shift: accessibility is no longer about compliance. It is about innovation and growth. The ADA started a movement. The next phase will require rethinking accessibility not as a legal requirement but as a business imperative. Looking Back: Where We Started In 1990, accessibility was an unknown. I wore analog hearing aids fitted by an audiologist, but the only accessory available to me was a clunky phone amplifier attachment sold by Radio Shack. These devices were large and conspicuous, and I often felt stigmatized and overlooked. Whether or not it was ever stated outright, I sensed that my visible hearing aids influenced how others perceived my potential and, at times, my opportunities. Even the language of the time reflected a different mindset. Terms like 'handicapped,' 'crippled' and 'impairment' were commonplace, underscoring how society viewed people with disabilities as broken or limited rather than as individuals deserving of equal access and opportunity. Digital technology was hardly available to the average consumer. IBM PCs were running MS-DOS with Windows 3.0, and I had just purchased my first Macintosh IIfx, a powerhouse for its day which I used for desktop publishing. It hinted at what technology could offer but remained out of reach for many. There were no streaming devices or mobile integrations, and little thought was given to how people like me could fully participate in a noisy, fast-changing world. The ADA changed that. It reshaped our built world and provided the legal foundation for inclusion and dignity. But it would take another three decades for businesses to understand that accessibility could be more than compliance, it could be a Progress The cultural shift since then has been profound. Technology companies have led the charge. Apple has embedded accessibility into its core design language, from VoiceOver to Live Listen, demonstrating how inclusion can be a natural part of product development. Microsoft has elevated accessibility to a corporate priority, appointing a Chief Accessibility Officer and creating tools like Seeing AI and Immersive Reader that improve education and workplace inclusion. Google has launched Live Caption, TalkBack, and Project Relate, expanding access to communication and information. Retail and service companies are catching up. Starbucks has introduced signing stores and trained baristas in American Sign Language, while Target has improved its physical and digital accessibility standards to serve all customers better. Delta Air Lines has emerged as a leader in accessible travel. Its Advisory Board on Disability, the longest-running airline board, guides decisions across its operations. Delta pioneered an accessible flight map for low-vision travelers on hundreds of aircraft, based on honest user feedback. It is also collaborating with the FAA and DOT to develop in-flight wheelchair seating, allowing travelers to remain in their wheelchairs, a milestone project likely to influence the industry. These efforts have positioned Delta as a model for inclusive travel and customer service. This is not just corporate goodwill. These companies are proving that inclusive design attracts new customers, strengthens brand loyalty, opens untapped markets, and reduces litigation risk. Accessibility, once seen as an expense, has become an engine for growth and resilience. Organizations like Disability:IN, The Valuable 500, and M-Enabling are educating leaders to integrate accessibility into their organizations, making it a central part of corporate strategy rather than an afterthought. Yet even with these advancements, accessibility remains inconsistent. Too many organizations still approach it as compliance rather than innovation. That mindset is a liability and a missed opportunity. Accessibility as an Economic Driver Accessibility is also economic, and investors are increasingly recognizing its potential. Samaritan Partners, led by Chris Maher, invests in ventures like the Schoolhouse Hotel, where universal design drives inclusion and commercial returns. Enable Ventures, founded by Regina Kline, has become the first impact fund dedicated exclusively to disability-led innovation, closing the capital gap for overlooked founders. The Disability Opportunity Fund is supporting accessible community development and infrastructure. Collectively, these efforts are opening the door to a global disability market worth over 13 trillion dollars in annual disposable income, a figure that includes people with disabilities and their friends, families, and caregivers (World Economic Forum). Yet research shows that fewer than 5 percent of Fortune 500 companies report accessibility as a strategic priority, leaving enormous economic and competitive value untapped. Three Approaches to the Future To move accessibility beyond compliance and into competitive advantage, three approaches are essential. Maher represents the investor lens. He argues that sustainable accessibility-driven businesses require the same discipline as any other, a clear value proposition, a path to scale, and leadership delivering impact and returns. Robert Ludke offers the strategist's view. A former staffer for Senator Tom Harkin, one of the ADA's chief architects, he now advocates through his firm, Value Inclusion that inclusion expands markets and strengthens organizations from within. Frances West exemplifies the leadership approach. As IBM's first Chief Accessibility Officer and now through her consultancy, FrancesWestCo, she challenges companies to embed inclusion into their culture and operations. She continues to preach what she practiced at IBM: accessibility must be modeled at the top, measured like any other business priority, and used as a catalyst for innovation. Together, these approaches, capital, strategy, and leadership, define the blueprint for where accessibility must go Skills and Networks Accessibility is not only a matter of technology or policy. It is about careers, independence, and mobility. The CTA Foundation, led by Steve Ewell, supports nonprofit programs and startup pitch competitions and convenes leaders to explore how technology can improve the lives of older adults and people with disabilities. At CES 2025, the Foundation hosted its largest-ever Accessibility Roundtable, showcasing how inclusion can drive creativity, collaboration, and growth. Companies like Verizon's Office of Accessibility are turning conversation into action by hosting dialogues on technologies, inclusive design and business models. Organizations like Toyota, Mitsubishi Electric America Foundation, and Amazon demonstrate how industry collaboration with communities can accelerate accessibility across Work: Travel and Leisure Leaders like Fred Maahs, founder of Journeyable, are reshaping inclusive travel by connecting people with disabilities to verified accessible experiences around the globe. Journeyable empowers travelers to explore confidently while helping the hospitality industry recognize the economic value of inclusive tourism. Innovators such as Discover Live offer virtual, live‑guided travel experiences that make destinations accessible to individuals who face physical, financial, or logistical barriers. These platforms demonstrate that accessibility is as much about technology and experience design as physical accommodations. Wheel the World, a U.S.-based travel platform, is taking inclusive tourism further by offering curated, fully accessible trips for people with disabilities, including lodging, transportation, and activities tailored to individual needs. According to the Harris Poll, commissioned by Open Doors Organization, Americans with mobility disabilities spend approximately $58.2 billion annually on leisure travel, taking nearly as many trips as travelers without mobility issues (Bloomberg). This represents a massive and underserved customer base. These initiatives highlight that accessibility in travel and leisure is more than just regulatory compliance. It is a strategic business opportunity. Organizations that deliver seamless, barrier‑free experiences win customer loyalty and position themselves competitively in a multi‑billion‑dollar market. What Comes Next The following 15 years will define whether accessibility becomes embedded in the DNA of business or remains a patchwork of good intentions. Artificial intelligence holds promise for making accessibility more personalized and scalable. Imagine AI-driven assistants that provide real-time language translation, cognitive support tools for people with neurodiverse needs, or adaptive interfaces that adjust to a user's unique sensory profile. These possibilities could radically expand participation in work, education, and society. But there are complicated questions. Will AI replace human interpreters in ways that compromise cultural nuance? Can automated systems maintain users' privacy and dignity? The rapid adoption of AI makes these questions urgent and demands that accessibility experts have a seat at the table in its design. Hardware innovations are also reshaping the landscape. Smart glasses like the Ray Ban Meta Smart Glasses reframe how we access visual and auditory information on the go. Companies like Nuance Hearing are advancing assistive listening beyond traditional hearing aids, creating devices that integrate seamlessly into daily life. These are not clunky add-ons. They are sleek, lifestyle-oriented tools that make accessibility feel natural, even aspirational. Imagine this future by 2035: airports where AI-powered wayfinding guides direct passengers with low vision from curb to gate without human intervention, workplaces where adaptive software reshapes workflows in real time for employees with cognitive differences, and hotels where accessibility is designed so intuitively that no one needs to ask for accommodations. This is not science fiction. It is the logical outcome of combining accessibility with technology, design, and intent. In short, accessibility is moving from reactive and compliance driven to proactive and user-centered. The companies that get this right will not only meet legal standards, but they will also set cultural ones. ADA at 50: A Call to Action By the ADA's 50th anniversary, we could live in a world where people with disabilities lead in every sector, where travel and technology are designed by default for all, and where accessibility is a cultural expectation, not a compliance exercise. For me, the journey from a clunky Radio Shack phone amplifier and MS-DOS-based PCs in an era when words like 'handicapped,' 'crippled,' and 'impairment,' defined public discourse to today's AI-powered tools and integrated design is a reminder of how far we have come. But it also underscores how much work remains. The ADA began with urgency. Its future depends on imagination. If accessibility is not part of your growth strategy, it is part of your risk profile. The companies that seize this opportunity will define the next decade of innovation. Those who do not will be left behind.

Revamping snow clearing, sidewalk repair on the docket for Edmonton city committee
Revamping snow clearing, sidewalk repair on the docket for Edmonton city committee

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Revamping snow clearing, sidewalk repair on the docket for Edmonton city committee

The City of Edmonton's community and public services committee is set to make recommendations to council on how to potentially update snowing clearing and sidewalk repair policies to improve accessibility. City administration will present options to the committee, detailed in a public report, including proactively repairing sidewalks and getting more snow plows on the road. If committee receives the report for information — which is Administration's recommended action — Administration will continue with option one, which it says will reprioritize resources without impacting the budget. Option one would aim to clear "high social vulnerability areas" earlier. Other options could include adding various numbers of equipment, sidewalk repair and staff. The total budget for snow and ice control is $67 million each year. As Edmonton has grown, so too has the total length of public sidewalks, with a increase of eight per cent over the past 10 years. In 2022, a high priority sidewalk index was created for each sidewalk block in Edmonton and looks at various factors. These include pedestrian volume, proximity to places like schools, senior centres, high frequency bus stops, as well as the social vulnerability index, which looks at how various populations in Edmonton rely on sidewalk access. Those factors are part of the process in making recommendations to committee, administration said. Both sidewalk maintenance and enforcement services would retain their existing model under option one, which administration would pursue if the committee recommends it. The city manages close to 5,776 kilometres of public sidewalks with a $5.9 million annual operating budget dedicated to sidewalk maintenance, while minor and major capital renewals are funded separately. The report, and other options, will be presented to the community and public services committee on Aug. 11 where councillors will vote on whether to recommend changes to all of city council.

Why tensions are rising over Richmond's Gilpin Court
Why tensions are rising over Richmond's Gilpin Court

Axios

time5 hours ago

  • Axios

Why tensions are rising over Richmond's Gilpin Court

Richmond's oldest public housing complex is at the center of a growing battle between City Council and the group overseeing it. Why it matters: The fight over Gilpin Court revives questions over how Richmond can redevelop aging neighborhoods without displacing residents. Catch up quick: Tensions began in April when the Richmond Redevelopment and Housing Authority (RRHA) proposed privatizing Gilpin — a move its CEO, Steven Nesmith, said would improve financing options for redeveloping the 80-year-old complex. Opponents feared it'd turn Gilpin into market-rate homes instead and push people out. The board overseeing RRHA rejected the privatization proposal, but Nesmith reintroduced it last month for a September vote. That was after the authority signed an agreement with a New Orleans-based developer, HRI Communities, in May to redevelop the complex. The latest: Now, City Council members are alleging that RRHA broke state law. Council unanimously passed a resolution last week saying RRHA had needed its approval before signing that redevelopment agreement for Gilpin. But the plan can't move forward without the board's vote to transfer Gilpin to a private entity. What they're saying: RRHA says the law doesn't apply to properties it already owns, The Richmonder reports. "Given that this has never been an issue, it is puzzling why it is being raised now," RRHA spokesperson Angela Fountain told The Richmonder. Fountain also told Axios that its governing Board of Commissioners gave Nesmith the authority to enter into an agreement like this in 2023. The other side: "We are not trying to stop redevelopment," 5th District Council member Stephanie Lynch said in a recent meeting. "We are trying to delay displacement, because that is what will happen if we were to allow this to move forward." The intrigue: Some of RRHA's tactics are also raising questions. Last month, the RTD reported that RRHA had hired a firm that offered Gilpin Court residents $20 to attend a June City Council meeting in support of privatization. Nesmith pitched it as ramping up community engagement, but some residents told RTD they felt manipulated. Fountain told Axios that "RRHA did not directly pay, compensate or coach any residents" about the redevelopment issue. Zoom out: Gilpin is the latest in decades of efforts to reshape Richmond's public housing, which are often met with criticism over displacement and transparency. This includes: Creighton Court, which is undergoing a multiphase redevelopment into a mixed-income neighborhood. Mosby, whose revitalization is in early planning. And Whitcomb, which is in limbo.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store