logo
Rayner's employment law forcing ‘stealth tax' on workers

Rayner's employment law forcing ‘stealth tax' on workers

Telegraph13-07-2025
's employment law reforms will act as a £5 billion 'stealth tax' on workers, a report has warned.
The Deputy Prime Minister is planning a raft of reforms that will make it easier for workers to strike and introduce new 'day-one' rights against unfair dismissal and zero-hours contracts.
But they will also work to suppress wages, effectively taxing employees by increasing costs for their bosses, according to analysis by the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA).
The think tank said smaller pay rises will equate to a £5 billion 'stealth payroll tax', based on the Government's own impact assessment of the cost on workers.
Business groups have already raised the alarm over the reforms, which they say will make firms more reluctant to hire workers.
The Employment Rights Bill, which returns to the Commons on Monday, contains measures to make it easier for workers to form unions and launch strike action.
Andrew Griffith, the shadow business secretary, said they would result in 1970s-style union militancy and hammer struggling businesses.
'Labour's love-in with the unions is dragging Britain back to the worst economic mistakes of the 1970s,' he said.
'The so-called Employment Rights Bill is nothing more than a Trojan horse for union power and state interference.
'Far from protecting workers, it will price people out of jobs, deterring investment and sending small businesses to the wall.'
In June, the Conservatives pledged to scrap the Bill if they return to office, warning the plans would 'grind our economy to a halt'.
The IEA's report, by Prof J.R. Shackleton, argues that the plans will 'put the public through the wringer' and 'extort more pay from the government – which means, of course, the taxpayer'.
The Telegraph understands the workers' rights plan has already been the subject of dispute between Ms Rayner and the Treasury, which is concerned about the impact on business confidence and economic growth.
The Office for Budget Responsibility, Britain's independent fiscal watchdog, has said they will have a 'probably net negative' impact on a range of economic indicators, including employment, prices, and productivity.
The Government's impact assessment found that the reforms will result in £5 billion higher costs for businesses, which the IEA said would be passed to workers in the form of lower wages.
Ms Rayner has argued that the new rules will boost living standards, giving the public an 'upgrade to our growth prospects and the reforms our economy so desperately needs'.
'Billions in hidden costs'
The professor of economics at the University of Buckingham said: 'Politicians love to announce new employment 'rights' because they think employers pay the bill – but that's an illusion.
'Every mandate, from parental leave to holiday entitlements, acts like a stealth tax that gets passed back to workers through smaller pay rises than they would otherwise receive. The only difference is that no money is raised for the Exchequer,' said Prof Shackleton.
'The Employment Rights Bill will make this much worse, imposing billions in hidden costs that workers will ultimately bear themselves.
'The Government is not protecting workers – it is harming them and undermining its own alleged number one priority to boost economic growth.'
A government spokesman said: 'Too many workers are trapped in insecure, low-paid work, with weak protections that are poorly enforced.
'Through our transformative Plan for Change, this government will deliver the biggest upgrade to workers' rights in a generation, contributing to economic growth, and our measures have strong support from businesses and the public.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Anger grows over police 'cover-up': We MUST be told the ethnicity of dangerous suspects, Tories warn after alleged rape of 12-year-old girl
Anger grows over police 'cover-up': We MUST be told the ethnicity of dangerous suspects, Tories warn after alleged rape of 12-year-old girl

Daily Mail​

time12 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Anger grows over police 'cover-up': We MUST be told the ethnicity of dangerous suspects, Tories warn after alleged rape of 12-year-old girl

Britain risks a repeat of the grooming gang scandal or last summer's riots if police do not share the ethnicity or immigration status of dangerous suspects, it was warned last night. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp responded to concerns that Warwickshire police 'covered up' the backgrounds of two Afghan asylum seekers involved in the alleged rape of a 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton. The Mail on Sunday yesterday reported the force advised councillors and officials not to reveal the background of the suspects for fear of 'inflaming community tensions'. It is believed they thought unrest would break out like that seen in Epping, Essex, where an Ethiopian asylum seeker staying in a hotel was charged with trying to kiss a 14-year-old schoolgirl. Warwickshire Police has defended its position, saying it was following national policy in not sharing ethnicity or immigration status. Mr Philp, a former policing minister, said: 'The police must be open about who is committing these alleged offences, and not try to hide it. 'Otherwise, we risk a repeat of the rape gang scandal where horrendous crimes were covered up because of the identity of the perpetrators. I also call on the Government to ensure that the immigration status and nationality of all offenders is published for each crime, and as quarterly totals. The public rightly expect complete honesty.' Councillor Stephen Shaw, deputy leader of Reform-controlled Warwickshire County Council, told the Daily Mail: 'We don't have any personal information on these men and we don't know what's happening with them until something bad happens. 'We need to get rid of these migrant hotels and houses of multiple occupancy [HMO] housing asylum seekers which are making our streets unsafe. 'You would think after Southport where police were more conscious about releasing personal information to prevent protests and rioting they would do the same here, but instead there appears to be a cover-up. It's two-tier policing. It's disgusting.' Ahmad Mulakhil and Mohammad Kabir, both 23, are accused of involvement in the attack on July 22. Mulakhil has been charged with rape while Kabir has been charged with kidnap, strangulation and aiding and abetting an assault. Mulakhil is said to have arrived in the UK on a small boat and both are believed to have been living in HMOs. A Warwickshire Police spokesman said: 'Once someone is charged with an offence, we follow national guidance. This guidance does not include sharing ethnicity or immigration status.' However critics pointed out that in May, Merseyside Police quickly released information that a man arrested after allegedly ploughing into crowds celebrating Liverpool FC's victory parade was a 'white British man from the Liverpool area'. Mr Anderson said on X there was an attempt to 'cover up again' for fear of 'inflaming' community tensions Reform MP Lee Anderson yesterday claimed the police were 'trying to cover up again'. Writing on X, he said that in Liverpool ethnicity information was released almost immediately and 'they [Warwickshire Police] really aren't doing themselves any favours'. Last night, George Finch, the 19-year-old Reform leader of Warwickshire council, said initial reports of Mulakhil's charge had 'caused unease locally as residents have very easily been able to join the dots' and they 'can see that they have not been told the full story'. Mr Finch warned: 'The continued cover-up of the true nature of Ahmad Mulakhil's immigration status risks public disorder breaking out on the streets of Warwickshire. 'I am disgusted that one year on from the social unrest that we saw in parts of the UK in 2024, the Home Office and police have clearly not learnt any lessons from the handling of similar incidents last year.' Labour' tinkering around the edges' with latest crackdown Harriet Line, Deputy Political Editor Labour has been accused of 'tinkering around the edges' with its plans to crackdown on small boat crossings. The Home Office has announced measures to get tough on smuggling gangs, despite more than 25,000 illegal arrivals so far this year – but the Tories branded them 'a series of gimmicks'. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper this weekend unveiled plans to introduce sentences of up to five years in prison for anyone who advertises small boat crossings or fake passports on social media. She said she would introduce a fast-track scheme to tackle the asylum backlog, with a new law to overhaul the appeals system, in a bid to get decisions on cases within weeks. And today, the Home Office will announce £100 million of extra funding to support the pilot of the new 'one in, one out' returns agreement between the UK and France. It will also pay for up to 300 more National Crime Agency officers and new technology and equipment to step up intelligence gathering on smuggling gangs. And there will be more overtime for immigration compliance and enforcement teams as well as funding for interventions in transit countries. The deal, agreed last month, means the UK will be able to send migrants back to France in exchange for asylum seekers with links to Britain. But Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp criticised the announcements. He told the Daily Mail last night: 'This weak Labour Government has come up with a series of gimmicks to grab headlines instead of fixing the issue. Tinkering around the edges which will make no real difference. 'There have been more than 25,000 illegal crossings so far this year, making it the worst year in history. Labour has failed and their laughable claim to smash the gangs lies in tatters. They have no serious plan, just excuses, while ruthless criminal gangs flood our borders with illegal immigrants.' A No 10 source hit back: 'The Tories focused on headlines and gimmickry, we're focused on what works. 'Through our returns deal with France, investment in a border security and speeding up returns, we're making steady progress.'

Britain's new immigration hotspots mapped: Up to one in 20 residents in some boroughs are migrants who came here last year - so what is the figure in YOUR area?
Britain's new immigration hotspots mapped: Up to one in 20 residents in some boroughs are migrants who came here last year - so what is the figure in YOUR area?

Daily Mail​

time12 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Britain's new immigration hotspots mapped: Up to one in 20 residents in some boroughs are migrants who came here last year - so what is the figure in YOUR area?

Up to one in 20 residents in parts of England and Wales are immigrants who moved here last year, new analysis suggests. It comes after Government statistics last week revealed that the total population of the two nations shot up by 700,000 in 2023/24. Immigration fuelled the surge – the second largest since WW2. The Daily Mail can reveal that net international migration – defined as the difference between the number of people entering the country and leaving – was positive in all but one of 318 councils. Newham, home to roughly 374,000 people, saw an influx of 17,200 immigrants in the year to mid-2024. That suggests new migrants arriving from abroad in the last year now account for 4.6 per cent of the London borough's total population – roughly one in 20 people. Luton (4.3 per cent) and Coventry (4.2 per cent) had similarly high figures, according to estimates published by the Office for National Statistics (ONS). Experts say current immigration levels, which have hit all-time highs, are piling even greater pressure upon on housing, schools and the NHS. Our postcode search tool - available to use below - shows how the situation in your area has changed over the last 12 months, tracking births and deaths as well as net international migration. Robert Bates, research director at the Centre for Migration Control, said mass migration is 'changing the very fabric of Britain'. He said: 'Assimilation has been made impossible by the sheer scale of mass migration and our national culture is damaged as a result. 'Stretched public services - from the NHS and GP surgeries to public transport and schools - are being further eroded by a low wage, low-skill immigration system. 'Politicians have ignored the concerns of voters due to a misguided belief that open borders benefit the economy. 'We fast need a government which rejects this dogma and starts work to scrap a whole raft of failed visa routes, end foreign nationals' access to the welfare system, and invests in skills for the British workforce.' There were an estimated 61.8m people in England and Wales in mid-2024, up from 61.1m in mid-2023, according to the ONS' estimates. That increase, of 706,881 people, was eclipsed only by the 821,210 population rise in the 12 months to mid-2023, with growth in both years driven almost wholly by record rises in the number of migrants. Some 1.1m people are thought to have immigrated in the last 12 months, countered by the 450,000 believed to have emigrated. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage yesterday claimed the figures were' disastrous for the quality of life for everyone in the country'. There were slightly more births (596,012) than deaths (566,030) in the year to mid-2024, which added just 29,982 to the population. In terms of raw numbers, the biggest local authorities, such as Birmingham (38,700) had the most international migrants arriving. Given the West Midlands city has a population of 1.2million, however, the effects of international migration aren't as stark as they are in Newham. The City of London technically had the highest share of its current population down to international migration in 2024 (10.8 per cent) – although it is home to only 15,000 people. Only one local authority, South Holland in Lincolnshire, experienced a negative sum, due to more international migrants leaving than arriving. The ONS said it had 557 arrivals from abroad last year, but 695 people emigrated. Movement around the UK – known as internal migration – is recorded separately. Alp Mehmet, chairman of Migration Watch UK, said: 'The latest ONS figures are another eye-opener. 'While there is no breakdown of migration into nationality, sex, age or immigration status - as the ONS should do in the future - overall, the population of England and Wales increased by over 700,000 (the equivalent of Newcastle.) 'Just 30,000 of this was from births exceeding deaths.' Mr Mehmet also branded the government's response to the rising rates as 'complacent'. He said: 'Most worrying, these latest figures show that the speed with which the nature of our society is changing has not let up, and that the ethnic minority proportion of our population will become the majority in 30-35 years. 'The government must take decisive action to stem the immigration tsunami if we are not to become the island of strangers the Prime Minister referred to a few months ago.' The ONS cautions there might be some overlap in the data, although it is unclear by how much because of the difficulties in examining population flow. For example, the same person could be classed as both an international immigrant and internal emigrant. They could also die, further confusing the picture. Tory shadow Home Office minister Katie Lam said the data showed the population is rising at 'an unsustainable pace'. She said: 'This isn't about numbers on a spreadsheet, it's about pressure on housing, NHS waiting lists, school places, wages and it's about community and our culture. 'Britain simply cannot plan or build fast enough to keep up. 'We must secure our borders and deliver a fair and sustainable immigration system that works for the British people.' However Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said yesterday the figures 'confirm the truth of the Tory legacy on immigration'. She added: 'Their failed open borders experiment resulted in net migration quadrupling to a peak of almost a million per year in 2023 even as they promised it would fall. 'Since the election, net migration has come steeply down, and as part of the Government's Plan for Change we have set out new measures in the Immigration White Paper and have already changed immigration rules to bring net migration down further. 'To be successful, effective and fair, our immigration system must be properly controlled and managed. Out of the chaos and failure of the Tory past, that is what this Government will deliver.' Keir Starmer unveiled a crackdown on immigration in May, warning that failure to control the system risked turning Britain into an 'island of strangers'. Downing Street was forced to deny angry comparisons from MPs that it was an echo of Enoch Powell's infamous 'Rivers of Blood' speech. Scrambling to blunt the threat of Reform, Sir Keir has vowed to give voters what they had 'asked for time and time again' as he announced a package to 'take back control of our borders'. However, the month after the speech Sir Keir went on to say he 'deeply regretted' it, despite polling showing most Brits had no problem with the language used. His package of long-awaited policies to curb immigration involved a hiking of the skills threshold for immigrants and a toughening of the rules on fluency in English. Migrants will also be required to wait 10 years for citizenship rather than the current five and face deportation for even lower-level crimes. Policymakers estimate the Government's package will bring down annual inflows by around 100,000. It comes after Sir Keir signed a deal with French president Emmanuel Macron in a desperate attempt to solve the small boat Channel crisis. The Prime Minister and his French equivalent announced a 'one in, one out' migrant swap deal, although it was far less ambitious than expected.

More wealthy travellers are booking flights to the UK. Here's where from
More wealthy travellers are booking flights to the UK. Here's where from

The Independent

time42 minutes ago

  • The Independent

More wealthy travellers are booking flights to the UK. Here's where from

Emirates has reported a surge in bookings from affluent international visitors to the UK, claiming the trend is "driving forward economic growth" for the country. The airline saw first class bookings from China jump 27 per cent and from India by 17 per cent in the first half of the year, compared to 2024. Business class bookings from Australia also rose 10 per cent. Regional UK airports such as Glasgow and Newcastle are expected to see an increasing number of Chinese visitors, with inbound passenger numbers projected to rise by 18 per cent and 45 per cent respectively in the second half of 2025 compared with a year earlier. All Emirates journeys on these routes involve passengers transiting through Dubai. The airline recently signed a declaration of intent with tourism agency VisitBritain to boost inbound tourism. 'The UK is one of the most important markets in Emirates' global network, and the growth in bookings we've seen over the past year reflects that,' Emirates UK divisional vice president Jabr Al-Azeeby said. 'We've seen a noticeable increase in inbound arrivals from key destinations such as Australia, India, and China, driving forward economic growth here in the UK.' The Government's ambition is for the UK to have 50 million international visitors a year by 2030. An estimated 41.2 million inbound visits were made in 2024. 'Expanding airline routes and seat capacity into our regional gateways is crucial to our competitive tourism offer,' VisitBritain chief executive Patricia Yates said. 'International visitors are forecast to spend more than £34 billion in the UK this year. 'Making it easier for visitors to explore our nations and regions boosts that spending across more of Britain, supporting jobs, businesses and driving growth for local economies.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store