&w=3840&q=100)
Auto retail sales rise 3% in April after two months of decline: Fada
All categories, except commercial vehicles (CV), closed in the green, with two-wheelers, three-wheelers, passenger vehicles, and tractors up 2.25 per cent, 24.5 per cent, 1.5 per cent, and 7.5 per cent, respectively. However, CVs saw a 1.05 per cent year-on-year decline following OEM-led price increases against stagnant freight rates and fleet utilisation.
This comes after overall automobile retail sales declined for the second consecutive month (0.7 per cent) in March. The fall was attributed to a 2 per cent slide in two-wheeler sales, a 6 per cent drop in three-wheeler sales, and a 6 per cent decline in tractor sales.
Dealers indicate that advance purchases in March resulted in elevated carryover stocks, while holiday calendars dampened fresh enquiries and delayed conversions — particularly in the small commercial vehicle (SCV) cargo category, where price and product gaps have weighed heavily.
"In addition to the festivals, pause on the tariff war and sharp pullback by stock markets also helped in the recovery of sales in April," said C. S. Vigneshwar, president, FADA. In the PV segment, Maruti Suzuki led the surge with 138,021 units with a 39.4 per cent market share. On the other hand, Mahindra & Mahindra came in second (14 per cent), followed by Tata Motors (13 per cent), and Hyundai Motor (12.5 per cent).
'This reflects a discount-led market and elevated inventories—approximately a 50-day supply—amid cautious consumer sentiment that tempered enquiry-to-sale conversions,' he said. "Sustained SUV demand underpinned volumes even as entry-level customers remained cautious, underscoring the need for OEMs to recalibrate production and reduce stock levels to mitigate deeper discounts and carrying costs at dealerships," he added.
The rise in two-wheelers was attributed to buoyant enquiry growth in rural areas post-Rabi harvest, driven by strong crop yields, healthy reservoir levels, and a favourable monsoon outlook, while wedding-season tailwinds sustained rural offtake.
FADA expects improved numbers going ahead, as May's agricultural cycle is concluding on a strong note. 'The IMD's forecast of an above-normal southwest monsoon bodes well for rural incomes, farm-sector growth, and downstream demand, while a well-distributed rainy season is critical to containing food inflation. At the same time, Kantar's Rural Barometer and GroupM data signal heightened consumer selectivity in rural India—household spending has outpaced income growth, and inflationary pressures are tempering discretionary purchases,' Vigneshwar said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
US manufacturing falters despite policy boost: Donald Trump's tariffs and Biden's subsidies fail to lift sector; jobs, output remain stuck in post-pandemic rut
US manufacturing is showing persistent signs of stagnation despite a policy push from both political sides — with President Donald Trump deploying steep tariffs and former President Joe Biden previously handing out subsidies — to shore up domestic industry. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Job losses and tepid production data point to a sector still waiting for momentum to return. Factories in the US cut 7,000 jobs in June, according to the Labor Department, marking the second straight month of declines. Manufacturing employment is now set to fall for a third consecutive year. Activity also continued to contract in June, with the Institute for Supply Management (ISM) reporting that the sector has shrunk in 30 of the past 32 months since October 2022. The analysis highlights the limited impact of both the Biden-era factory investment boom and the Trump administration's aggressive tariff regime, reported by AP. 'The past three years have been a real slog for manufacturing,' said Eric Hagopian, CEO of Pilot Precision Products, a Massachusetts-based industrial tools maker. 'We didn't get destroyed like in 2008, but we've been in this stagnant, sort of stationary environment. ' The slowdown has been driven by several factors, including inflationary pressures that spiked following the post-COVID recovery and the Federal Reserve's sharp interest rate hikes in 2022 and 2023. Though Biden's clean energy and chip subsidies sparked a surge in factory construction between 2021 and 2024, investments have since slowed after Trump returned to power and Congress reversed many green energy incentives. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics, warned that 'manufacturing production will continue to flatline,' adding that employment in the sector is likely to shrink further in the coming year. Trump, meanwhile, is pursuing protectionist policies to encourage domestic manufacturing. The administration has imposed tariffs of 50% on steel and aluminum, 25% on autos and parts, and 10% on a range of other imports. While the levies offer some companies a pricing edge, they also raise costs on imported materials essential to US producers. 'For some bids, the tariff helps us stay competitive,' said Chris Zuzick, VP at Waukesha Metal Products in Wisconsin, AP quoted. But steel prices, buoyed by the protectionist policy, have soared — reaching $960 per metric ton in the US, more than double the $440 world average as of June 23, according to SteelBenchmarker. Despite the high duties, firms like Pilot Precision still source steel from France and Austria — even after paying tariffs — because of price and quality dynamics. Further complicating matters is the lack of clarity around policy. Trump has repeatedly delayed and revised tariff schedules, leaving manufacturers in limbo. 'Customers do not want to make commitments in the wake of massive tariff uncertainty,' an ISM survey respondent from the fabricated metal products industry noted. A computer hardware firm added, 'The situation remains too volatile to firmly put such plans into place. ' The recent slowdown may also reflect a reversion to pre-pandemic norms. After losing nearly 1.4 million jobs in early 2020, factories surged during the COVID-driven goods boom, adding 379,000 jobs in 2021 and 357,000 in 2022. But hiring then plateaued in 2023 and has since reversed. As of June, factory payrolls stood at 12.75 million — almost unchanged from the 12.74 million recorded in February 2020. 'It's a long, strange trip to get back to where we started,' said Jared Bernstein, chair of Biden's Council of Economic Advisers. While manufacturers wait for clearer signals from the Trump administration's upcoming 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' many remain cautious. Hagopian is hopeful that targeted tax breaks might help, and Zuzick echoed that it's too soon to judge the tariff impact: 'Manufacturing doesn't turn on a dime.' With policy flip-flops, cost pressure and weak demand all in play, most factories are keeping hiring and investment plans on hold. 'Everyone,' Zuzick said, 'is kind of just waiting for the new normal.'
Mint
6 hours ago
- Mint
Brics+ could get the globe to work out a better-balanced world order
Gift this article At first there were four. Then five. And now eleven. Egypt, UAE, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia and Indonesia have joined Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa (collectively called Brics) in the newly expanded Brics+ group of nations. At first there were four. Then five. And now eleven. Egypt, UAE, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia and Indonesia have joined Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa (collectively called Brics) in the newly expanded Brics+ group of nations. Brics+ is an eclectic grouping of countries. It owes its conception to a Wall Street report written a quarter of a century ago about the initial four 'Bric' countries and the promise of their economic prospects, mostly driven by demographics. What began as a clubbing meant for global investors to focus on has since evolved into a formal alternative platform for countries to counter Western dominance of multilateral institutions. This makes it an important forum for a post Pax-Americana world, if you will. Also Read: Brics isn't an anti-US forum, it's a voice of the Global South The group is as notable for its differences as for its common purpose. Its members make up 49% of the world's population and 41% of global output (in purchasing power parity terms). In many ways, Brics+ is at par with the G-7 in economic importance. A few members are outright adversaries of the West, such as China, Russia and Iran. Others like India, Brazil, Indonesia and the UAE are keen to retain their flexibility to swing both ways. Only India recognizes China as a competitor; all others have sought to befriend China through this group or keep their relations with it and the West on an even keel. Until the latest meeting in Brazil, Beijing was gradually exerting greater influence on the group. Its dominance was clear in the group's recent expansion. With Russia's support, China overwhelmed Indian and Brazilian hesitation, which resulted in the addition of six countries and 'non-voting partnerships' with 10 other nations. Even though Beijing's rhetoric is nuanced, its objective is clearly to push Brics towards a more stridently anti-Western stance. The goal of India (and Brazil) is to keep an alternate channel open, but not be seen as 'anti-West.' This jockeying for influence will continue within the group, with China assured an edge by its deep trade relationships with all other members. Also Read: Brics isn't out to build a wall but serve the Global South The Brics+ group of countries met in Rio de Janeiro at its 17th summit. All 11 members were represented at the meeting for the first time. However, the heads of state of Russia and China did not attend in person. Vladmir Putin, president of Russia, could only attend virtually because there is an outstanding warrant for his arrest for war crimes issued by the International Criminal Court. The absence of China's President Xi Jinping was a bit puzzling, since this was the first time he has not attended a Brics summit meeting and had played a very visible role in the earlier summits held in Russia's Kazan and South Africa's Johannesburg. Now consider the positions taken by Brics. Group communiques have consistently supported a two-state solution for the Palestine-Israel conflict and an expansion of permanent membership of the United Nations Security Council to include India and Brazil. In the financial realm, the group has emphasized the need to increase quotas of the International Monetary Fund and the shareholding of emerging and developing countries in the World Bank. US President Donald Trump leaned into the current situation by threatening a 10% additional tariff on Brics+ countries for their supposedly 'anti-American' approach. Of course, the situation might change, but Trump's words provided common cause to the 11 nations to strengthen their resolve. Trump seems to be playing a delicate game of trying to weaken the dollar so that America can export more, but doing so without losing the extraordinary privilege that issuing the world's top reserve currency bestows upon the US. Trump's choice of instrument to achieve such a balance is a policy of import tariffs, which is a blunt tool in this context and could create a lot of unintended collateral damage. Pessimists argue that Brics+ only represents a platform for 'transactional multilateralism." In the absence of shared values, a grouping of diverse countries such as this will dilute their individual stands on sensitive issues and reinforce only whatever can achieve a group-wide consensus. There is already some evidence of this in the group's careful wording on the Ukraine conflict, the non-reference to Pakistan on Pahalgam, a dilution of the two-state idea for Israel and Palestine in response to Iran's objection and a soft-pedalling on South Africa's permanent Security Council seat. Also Read: Brics for India: A trade springboard, not an anti-West wall Can Brics+ survive all the differences among member nations? Will it remain relevant in a world that has watched older post-World War II multilateral institutions turn dysfunctional? Paradoxically, the answer appears to be 'yes.' Even though member nations seem to have very different reasons for being part of this club, Brics+ still offers each country some value. For India, membership offers a way to align with other emerging economies, demonstrate leadership of the Global South, exert extra pressure on the UN for a permanent Security Council seat and retain strategic autonomy. For many developing nations, particularly in Africa and Asia, very few means exist to voice themselves on the global stage (other than trade groups). Imperfect as it is, Brics+ is one of the few forums based neither on a military alliance nor trade ties. Its primary purpose is rooted in geopolitics, with geo-economics playing a secondary role. That's why, Brics+ will keep playing a significant role—at least until the world figures out a new order. P.S. 'Nothing endures but change," said Greek Philosopher Heraclitus. The author is chairman, InKlude Labs. Read Narayan's Mint columns at Topics You May Be Interested In
Mint
8 hours ago
- Mint
Thai Cabinet May Endorse New Central Bank Governor on Tuesday
(Bloomberg) -- Thailand is poised to name its new central bank chief on Tuesday, ending a months-long process to find a successor to incumbent Governor Sethaput Suthiwartnarueput, whose rocky five-year tenure ends in September. Finance Minister Pichai Chunhavajira told reporters on Monday that he has chosen one of the two finalists shortlisted by a panel to select the next Bank of Thailand chief, whose term would start Oct. 1. The nomination will be part of the weekly cabinet meeting's agenda, and if approved then be presented for the official royal endorsement. Finalists are Vitai Ratanakorn, 54, president of the Government Savings Bank, and Roong Mallikamas, 56, currently a deputy BOT governor. Sethaput's successor will need to wade into monetary policies at a challenging juncture for Thailand, which faces crippling household debt, negative inflation, weak domestic consumption — as well as fallout from 36% US tariffs on Thai exports starting in August. Vitai is seen as a proxy candidate of the Finance Ministry, as the GSB has spearheaded government efforts to provide financial relief to small businesses and households burdened by heavy debt in the post-Covid era. He was been criticized last week in an open letter by a former BOT governor, who said Vitai wouldn't be able to make independent decisions. Vitai, who has master's degrees from Chulalongkorn and Drexel universities, subsequently defended himself in a Facebook post by saying he could confidently govern 'without being influenced by any group.' Roong, who has a PhD from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, is seen as the policy-continuity choice. She's worked at central bank for nearly three decades, most recently as deputy governor for financial institutions stability. She was previously a member of the BOT's Monetary Policy Committee, which is responsible for setting the nation's benchmark interest rate. Governor Sethaput, who reached the official retirement age of 60 in February, has come under intense pressure from two different prime ministers in as many years to lower interest rates and raise the inflation target to stoke an economy whose growth has lagged most of its Southeast Asian neighbors. He defended the Bank of Thailand's policies, saying surging household debt required a conservative approach. More stories like this are available on
