The ACLU demands the US release and return a Dominican woman living legally in Puerto Rico
SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico (AP) — In late May, a 47-year-old woman from the Dominican Republic was detained by police in Puerto Rico after she entered a municipal building seeking a permit to sell ice cream on the beach to support herself.
Upon being turned over to federal agents, the Dominican woman presented her passport, driver's license and work permits that proved she was living in the U.S. territory legally, her attorney Ángel Robles and the American Civil Liberties Union of Puerto Rico, said Monday.
Despite the documents presented, authorities recently transferred her to Texas as part of a federal crackdown on migrants living illegally in U.S. jurisdictions.
The woman, whose first name is Aracelis, has not been fully identified because she is a victim of domestic violence.
Aracelis is among hundreds of people who have been detained in Puerto Rico since large-scale arrests began in late January, surprising many in the U.S. territory that has long welcomed migrants.
Robles and the ACLU demanded Aracelis' release and return to Puerto Rico.
'It's outrageous,' Robles said in a phone interview. 'No charges have been filed against her, and she is not in the system.'
Because her name does not appear in a federal database, Robles' request for a bond hearing was denied. 'This case is one of unspeakable abuse,' said Annette Martínez Orabona, the ACLU director in Puerto Rico.
The case has fueled already simmering anger against the administration of Puerto Rico Gov. Jenniffer González Colón and local authorities who have been working with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents to arrest those believed to be living illegally in the U.S. territory.
In a letter sent Monday to the governor and the island's justice secretary, the ACLU accused Puerto Rico's government of violating the Constitution and local laws by providing ICE and U.S. Homeland Security with confidential information on nearly 6,000 immigrants.
It also accused ICE of using that data to go on a 'fishing expedition' that it called 'arbitrary and abusive.'
A spokesman for Homeland Security Investigations did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
In Puerto Rico, undocumented immigrants are allowed to open bank accounts and obtain a special driver's license.
The ACLU in Puerto Rico also accused González Colón's administration of not providing protocols to local government agencies for how to deal with such requests from the federal government.
The ACLU requested, among other things, that Puerto Rico's government issue an executive order barring public agencies from collaborating with ICE subpoenas not accompanied by a court order.
A spokeswoman for the governor did not immediately return a message for comment.
From Jan. 26 to March 20, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents have arrested more than 200 people, the majority of them Dominican. Updated numbers were not immediately available.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Black America Web
3 hours ago
- Black America Web
Federal Judge's Ruling Could Halt Mississippi's DEI Ban In Schools
Source: kickstand / Getty Across the country, several states have enacted bans on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in K-12 schools and higher education. Unsurprisingly, Mississippi is one such state, but a lawsuit filed by attorneys with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) could temporarily prevent it from being enforced. The Clarion Ledger reports that the ACLU's lawyers have requested that Federal Judge Henry Wingate put a restraining order on several state boards designed to enforce Mississippi's DEI ban at K-12 schools and public universities. The ACLU has argued that enforcement of the ban should be halted due to the law having vague language, leaving open different interpretations of how it should be enforced. They also argue that the ban infringes on educators' and students' First and Fourteenth Amendment rights by restricting their speech. The attorneys from the ACLU are representing several students and education advocacy groups. The ACLU has requested a 14-day temporary restraining order (TRO) on the ban and intends to file a motion requesting a second 14-day TRO as the issue is litigated. The state's Assistant Attorney General Rex Shannon is representing the state boards targeted in the lawsuit and has argued the TRO shouldn't be granted as it would infringe on the state's sovereignty. Wingate repeatedly asked Shannon what harms the state would experience should he grant the restraining order, but Shannon said he didn't have enough time before the case to provide specific harms. Wingate will make a decision on granting the restraining order in the next week. Mississippi's DEI ban did not pass without a fight. House Bill 1193 prevents Mississippi schools from having DEI programs and teaching 'divisive concepts.' Sounds vague? Apparently, that was the point, which is concerning, as Mississippi's DEI ban allows students, parents, and educators to sue schools if they feel the ban was violated. Should a school receive two violations, the state would withhold funds until the violations are corrected. Source: Dennis Macdonald / Getty From Mississippi Today: People could only sue after they go through an internal campus review process and a 25-day period when schools could fix the alleged violation. Republican Rep. Joey Hood, one of the House negotiators, said that was a compromise between the chambers. The House wanted to make it possible for almost anyone to file lawsuits over the DEI ban, while Senate negotiators initially bristled at the idea of fast-tracking internal campus disputes to the legal system. The House ultimately held firm in its position to create a private cause of action, or the right to sue, but it agreed to give schools the ability to conduct an investigative process and potentially resolve the alleged violation before letting people sue in chancery courts. 'You have to go through the administrative process,' said Republican Sen. Nicole Boyd, one of the bill's lead authors. 'Because the whole idea is that, if there is a violation, the school needs to cure the violation. That's what the purpose is. It's not to create litigation, it's to cure violations.' So much of American and global history consists of 'divisive concepts.' So if a teacher says 'Slavery was bad,' or 'Mississippi has a shameful history of lynching,' and a child's parents disagree, the vagueness of the law seems as though it would allow them to file a suit claiming that Mississippi's DEI ban was violated. So that then begs the question: are we just going to stop teaching about historical horrors because it offends the people who think they were a good thing? Democratic Rep. Bryant Clark, son of Robert Clark, the first Black Mississippian elected to the state Legislature since the 1800s, argued Mississippi's DEI ban was unnecessary and particularly offensive given the state's dark history in its treatment of Black people. 'We are better than this, and all of you know that we don't need this with Mississippi's history,' Clark said during the debate period. 'We should be the ones that say, 'listen, we may be from Mississippi, we may have a dark past, but you know what, we're going to be the first to stand up this time and say there is nothing wrong with DEI.'' Mississippi's DEI ban is just one of many being enacted around the country. States such as Texas and West Virginia have passed similar laws banning DEI in K-12 and postsecondary education. Several colleges have already begun phasing out their DEI initiatives as a result of a 'Dear Colleague' letter sent by the Department of Education threatening to withhold federal funding from schools believed to have DEI initiatives and programs. SEE ALSO: Survey: High-Level Business Execs Say DEI Is Necessary UNC Asheville Dean Of Students Fired For Pro-DEI Comments SEE ALSO Federal Judge's Ruling Could Halt Mississippi's DEI Ban In Schools was originally published on
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
ICE agents detain mother in Pasadena in front of children without showing a warrant
A mother walking with her children in Pasadena was taken into custody by immigration agents over the weekend in an incident that was partially captured on video and has drawn sharp criticism from witnesses. Rosalina Luna Vargas, a mother of two and the primary breadwinner for her family, was detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers on Saturday morning around 8 a.m., according to bystanders. Her children were present at the time of the incident, which took place in broad daylight in the corner of Catalina and Del Mar. The encounter was recorded by Jillian Reed, a Caltech alum and local resident, who was driving by when she noticed a commotion on the sidewalk. In the footage she captured, three individuals in plain clothes—two of whom were masked and wore badges on lanyards—can be seen attempting to force Vargas into an unmarked Honda Accord. A third man, appearing younger and without any visible identification, also participated. 'I saw the commotion while driving, and when I slowed down, the kids shouted for help,' Reed said. 'They kept asking for a warrant. They told the officers they would stop resisting if they just showed them a warrant. One of the men said he had one but didn't show it.' The video cuts off just as Vargas's daughter pleads with Reed to call the police. According to Reed, she did call 911, reporting what she believed at the time to be a possible kidnapping. As the situation escalated, Vargas allegedly broke free from the agents and ran into the courtyard of the nearby Del Mar Park Assisted Living Facility, with her children following close behind. The agents pursued, but were confronted again by the children, who physically tried to shield their mother. 'They formed a human wall,' Reed said. 'One of the kids clung to her, telling her, 'Don't let go! Don't let go!' while crying. Then he started shouting to the crowd, 'I can't lose my mom!'' Reed said the staff at the assisted living facility intervened, telling the agents they were on private property and could not proceed without a warrant. The agents, she said, took photos of everyone present—including Reed—before leaving in two separate vehicles. Pasadena police later arrived and took statements from those at the scene. According to Reed, ICE agents returned later and took Vargas into custody. A family member told Reed the warrant in question was for someone else entirely, and that Vargas and her children had simply been 'in the wrong place at the wrong time.' Community members say the incident highlights growing concerns over ICE's arrest tactics and the lack of transparency in operations conducted in public areas without coordination with local law enforcement. Reed, still shaken, called the incident 'horrific' and questioned whether law enforcement procedures were followed. 'Only two of the three men had badges, and none were in uniform,' she said. 'I didn't know if I was witnessing a hate crime or a kidnapping. And because they might have been law enforcement, I wasn't even sure whether to call the police.' ICE has not publicly released details about the arrest, including the charges or the identity of the agents involved. The incident comes as federal immigration enforcement actions have intensified in parts of Southern California, prompting backlash in immigrant communities and renewed debate about due process, civil rights, and the rights of children in enforcement situations. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump Says He'll Announce TikTok Buyer In 'About Two Weeks'
President Donald Trump says he has a buyer for TikTok lined up. During this weekend's episode of 'Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo,' Trump said 'a group of very wealthy people' are ready to purchase the video sharing app, pending approval from China. Sounding confident that the deal will go through, he told Bartiromo, 'I think President Xi [Jinping] will probably do it.' Trump did not divulge the identity of the investors, but promised the Fox News host, 'I'll tell you in about two weeks.' Earlier this month, the president pushed TikTok's deadline to be sold or be banned for the third time, giving the app's parent company, ByteDance, until September 17 to secure United States-based ownership. A deal was reportedly close to closing in April before Trump announced his steep tariff plans for Chinese goods. After those plans fell through, ByteDance issued a statement that said, 'There are key matters to be resolved. Any agreement will be subject to approval under Chinese law.' Last year, Congress passed a bipartisan bill to force the sale of TikTok, or else the platform would have been banned, citing fears that it was sharing user data with the Chinese government. Trump Delays The TikTok Ban For A Third Time Self-Proclaimed 'Best Friend' Of Barron Trump Brags About Calling ICE On Popular TikToker World's Most Popular TikTok Star Leaves The U.S. After Being Detained By ICE
