The world reckons with a risky dollar
Why it matters: The U.S. is no longer a safe haven. In fact, it's the country from which risk capital is now fleeing in times of turmoil.
The big picture: Ever since the global financial crisis of 2008 to 2009, market strategists have tended to look at various different assets through an "RO/RO" lens.
Times of bullish greed are viewed as "risk on," which means buying equities and credit. Times of bearish fear are seen as "risk off," which means buying Treasuries and the dollar (which, in practice, generally means buying very short-term Treasury bills).
This time around, however, "risk off" days have seen sharp declines in Treasuries and the dollar, with those assets rising only on days when the stock market goes up. In other words, the dollar is now acting as a risk asset, rather than playing its normal role of safe haven.
Between the lines:"Abrupt and unilateral policy changes have shaken global confidence in American economic and security leadership, and US assets are paying the price," former U.S. Mint director Philip Diehl tells Axios, adding that fearful investors want to "sell the USA."
Diehl, who is now president of the U.S. Money Reserve, a precious metals company, sees a "rush to gold for protection."
That seems to be borne out in the price action for gold, which touched an all-time high just over $3,500 on Monday, up more than 25% this year.
Where it stands: The dollar has lost its traditional "safe-haven bid," JPMorgan analysts wrote in a research note earlier this month, adding that "there is a broader risk premium being baked into U.S. assets generally."
Making matters worse are worries about tariff-induced U.S. inflation.
Currencies are valued in very large part according to their "real yields," the interest rate in that currency minus the inflation rate. As U.S. inflation estimates rise, real yields fall, and the dollar becomes less attractive.
The big picture: For years investors had an "automatic reflex" to buy dollars and Treasuries in time of turmoil, Stephane Lintner, the CEO of Jiko, a money-markets brokerage, tells Axios. "I think we've lost that."
"Investors stopped treating the dollar as a flight to safety currency and started treating it as a risk currency, a risk asset," adds Steve Kamin, a former Federal Reserve economist now at the American Enterprise Institute.
"That goes for Treasuries, too," says Kamin, who recently published an article headlined"Dark days for the less-mighty dollar."
Follow the money: It's not clear whether any other asset has really replaced the dollar as the beneficiary of the safe-haven trade.
Gold, Swiss francs, and even bitcoin have sometimes (but not always) seen a bid on down days for the market, but all of them are still small enough in size that a tiny proportion of dollar outflows can move them significantly.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Journals
6 minutes ago
- Business Journals
The next normal in housing: 3 trends that will define real estate through 2028
Seismic shifts are changing the housing landscape. The AI boom is reshaping real estate workflows. Experience-driven living is emerging as a new standard for luxury buyers. And the largest wealth transfer in U.S. history is underway, altering who buys and what they value. These aren't passing trends, and Atlanta is poised to evolve with them. Here's how the market will look different in three years: 1. AI will be deeply embedded in both home design and transaction management. Artificial intelligence is rapidly restructuring how homes are bought, sold, built and lived in. For developers and brokerages, AI tools are optimizing everything from site selection to pricing and lead generation. For buyers, AI streamlines financing and forecasts long-term value. The result will be faster, more informed transactions in an increasingly competitive market, especially in the high-net-worth space. A study released by the Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies noted, 'AI could also play a big role in improving home automation products and features, better managing home energy and predicting when major home components and systems are likely to fail.' 2. Generational shifts will redefine what 'home' means. As boomers downsize, millennials gain buying power and Generation X enters peak earning years, real estate preferences are poised to evolve in deeply personal ways. Once dubbed the 'renter generation,' millennials are actively purchasing homes but seeking things like smart technology, wellness-centric features and homes that double as personal sanctuaries. Meanwhile, Gen X buyers want homes that serve multigenerational needs, balancing aging parents and grown children under one roof. Many boomers are choosing to age in place or purchase second homes near their adult children, which keeps inventory tight in addition to reshaping what retirement looks like. According to the National Association of REALTORS, 17 percent of all homebuyers in 2023 purchased multigenerational homes (the highest since NAR began recording this in 2013). For Atlanta developers and agents, responding to this generational complexity will be key to capturing long-term demand. 3. Heirs and high-earning early buyers will skip the 'starter' phase entirely. The largest wealth transfer in American history is already changing the face of real estate. Cerulli Associates estimates that millennials and Gen Xers will inherit somewhere in the neighborhood of $84 trillion by 2045. As these heirs enter the housing market, many of them are bypassing the traditional 'starter home' in favor of going straight to second homes, investment properties or branded residences. In Atlanta, where luxury real estate still offers comparative value versus coastal hubs, this generational wealth shift is likely to accelerate demand for properties that combine values with smart financial positioning. The new luxury market will be intentional, not just impressive. As these trends converge, opportunity will lie in anticipating demand; and capitalizing on it will require storytelling, intelligent positioning and elevated service. Atlanta's edge lies in its ability to evolve quickly with a growing luxury inventory, a pipeline of innovative builders and developers and a consumer base that spans generations and geographies. The next normal will belong to the most adaptable players, not just the biggest ones. Atlanta Fine Homes Sotheby's International Realty was founded in 2007 and serves as the exclusive Sotheby's International Realty affiliate in Metro Atlanta, building upon the 280-year foundation and heritage of Sotheby's auction house. The company has offices in Buckhead, Cobb, Intown and North Atlanta. As President and CEO of Atlanta Fine Homes Sotheby's International Realty, David Boehmig touches every aspect of the company. His 26 years of experience in residential real estate is complemented by 10 additional years in commercial banking where he focused on real estate and small business financing.
Time Magazine
7 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
What Corp. for Public Broadcasting Shutdown Means For NPR, PBS
The Corporation for Public Broadcasting announced on Friday that it would begin winding down its operations after President Donald Trump rescinded $1.1 billion in funding for the nonprofit, which for decades has helped sustain NPR, PBS, and hundreds of local public media stations across the country. 'Despite the extraordinary efforts of millions of Americans who called, wrote, and petitioned Congress to preserve federal funding for CPB, we now face the difficult reality of closing our operations,' CPB President and CEO Patricia Harrison said in a statement. She added that the organization would work to support its partners during the transition 'with transparency and care.' The loss of federal support, enacted as part of a broader $9 billion rescissions package signed by Trump in July, will not bring an immediate end to national programming like PBS NewsHour or NPR's Morning Edition. But the decision is expected to pose serious challenges to the network of smaller, often rural public broadcasters that have long depended on CPB funding for their survival. The majority of the CPB's roughly 100 employees will be laid off when the federal fiscal year ends on September 30, according to a press release. A smaller team will remain through January to complete financial and legal obligations, including final disbursements and the expiration of system-wide music licenses. Harrison, who has led the CPB since 2005, called the decision to shut down 'difficult' but inevitable given the scale of the funding withdrawal. 'Public media has been one of the most trusted institutions in American life,' she said in her statement, 'providing educational opportunity, emergency alerts, civil discourse, and cultural connection to every corner of the country.' Here's what to know about the funding cuts. What is the Corporation for Public Broadcasting? Founded in 1967 under the Public Broadcasting Act, CPB was created as a nonpartisan nonprofit to channel federal appropriations to public television and radio stations across the United States, including affiliates of PBS and NPR. While national organizations like NPR and PBS generate their own revenue and receive only a small share of direct federal funding, their local member stations rely heavily on CPB grants. In many smaller and rural markets, federal money accounts for 25% or more of a station's total budget. In addition to distributing funding, the CPB also helped stations remain in legal compliance and negotiated system-wide rights, such as royalties for music and content use. Why did Republicans push to eliminate CPB funding? Trump and his allies have long accused NPR and PBS of leaning left politically and argued that taxpayer dollars should not support news organizations they see as ideologically biased. 'NO MORE FUNDING FOR NPR, A TOTAL SCAM!' Trump wrote on Truth Social on April 10, calling the organization 'A LIBERAL DISINFORMATION MACHINE.' After gaining unified control of Congress this year, Republicans pushed to eliminate CPB's funding through a process known as a rescission—a formal cancellation of previously approved federal spending. The Trump Administration proposed eliminating $1.1 billion that had already been appropriated for the CPB through fiscal year 2027. Congress approved the measure in July as part of a broader $9 billion package of rescinded funds, which also included cuts to foreign aid. Only four Republicans in both chambers of Congress broke with their party and voted with all Democrats against the package: Sens. Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, and Reps. Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania and Mike Turner of Ohio. 'If you don't like what's going on within NPR, you think that there's too much bias there, we can address that,' Sen. Murkowski said in a floor speech ahead of the vote. 'But you don't need to gut the entire Corporation for Public Broadcasting.' In an op-ed for the Fairbanks Daily News-Miner, she warned that the loss of CPB's $12 million in funding for Alaska's public stations—which covers between 30 and 70% of each stations' budgets—would be 'devastating.' Sen. Collins expressed similar concerns: 'I share the frustration with the biased reporting by NPR, and I would support defunding it. Nevertheless, local TV and radio stations continue to provide important coverage. In Maine, this funding supports the emergency alert network, coverage of high school basketball championships, a locally produced high school quiz show, and classical music stations.' The Senate Appropriations Committee on Thursday advanced a bill that would eliminate future funding for CPB altogether—a move that Harrison said 'will cause irreparable harm, especially to small and rural public media stations.' 'The absence of future funding eliminates CPB's ability to fulfill our statutory mission—providing support to nearly 1,500 local public media stations and making needed investments that help stations serve their communities,' Harrison said before announcing the decision to wind down operations. Despite the push in Congress to eliminate funding for public broadcasting, most Americans still support public media. A Harris Poll conducted in July on behalf of NPR found that 66% of U.S. adults favor continued federal funding for public radio, including 58% of Republicans and 77% of Democrats. 66% of respondents said that federal funding for public radio is a good value for taxpayer dollars. What does this mean for NPR, PBS, and local stations? National programming like PBS NewsHour, All Things Considered, and children's shows will not disappear overnight. But the loss of CPB funding threatens the financial stability of the local stations that carry these shows—particularly those in rural or underserved regions that have long depended on federal support to stay on the air. Without CPB grants, some stations may be forced to reduce staff, cut programming, or shut down altogether. That could have a significant impact in smaller communities, where public media stations are often among the few remaining sources of local journalism. Researchers have classified many rural areas as 'news deserts' due to the decline of local newspapers and commercial outlets. Public broadcasters have filled that gap in many communities by providing access to local news coverage, educational content, and emergency alerts. Those stations may seek new funding from state governments or private donors, but these solutions are not likely to fully replace the funding CPB provided. The New York Times reported that roughly 120,000 new donors have contributed an estimated $20 million in annual value to public media over the last three months, according to the Contributor Development Partnership, a firm that analyzes fundraising data. Total donations this year are about $70 million ahead of last year's pace—a sharp uptick sparked in part by public concern over the loss of federal support. The day Congress approved the rescissions, member stations saw a spike in giving, the Times reported. Rocky Mountain Public Media in Colorado received more than 6,600 donations in one weekend, including a $500,000 gift. WUNC in North Carolina raised over $1 million. WMNF in Tampa brought in more than $280,000—unusually high numbers for both.
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bessent: Trump ‘not going to fire' Powell
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent insisted Wednesday that President Trump isn't going to fire Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, but suggested the pressure on the Fed to lower interest rates will continue. Bessent was asked on MSNBC's 'Morning Joe' if the president should say he will let Powell finish his term to give certainty to the markets, after indications he would try to fire the head of the central bank have rattled them. The secretary pushed back on the question. 'I'm not sure where that question comes from, because President Trump has repeatedly said he's not going to fire Chair Powell,' Bessent said. 'He might like for him to resign, but he's not going to fire him. He's said that on numerous occasions. I think he may have even said it again yesterday.' The president said Tuesday he doesn't think Powell should resign before his term is up in May but bashed him for not lowering interest rates. 'I think he's doing a bad job, but he's going to be out soon anyway. In eight months, he'll be out,' the president said. When asked about the pressure campaign on the Fed chair to lower rates, Bessent said it is part of the role. 'I think anyone who goes into public service should expect pressure. I get pressure from the president, from the Congress, from constituents,' Bessent said. Trump last week indicated to Republicans during a meeting in the Oval Office that he plans to fire Powell, a senior White House official told The Hill, and markets quickly dipped, with the S&P 500 falling into the red. He said later that day it is 'highly unlikely,' but he doesn't 'rule out anything.' While he appeared to reach a breaking point with Powell, he has since backed off amid warnings about how such a move would impact the markets from officials and outside voices. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
