El Salvador president denies that Abrego Garcia was tortured in prison
In a court filing in the U.S. on Wednesday, Abrego Garcia gave a first-hand description of his experience at the Salvadoran high-security prison CECOT and reported severe mistreatment.
His lawyers said he lost 31 pounds (14 kg) in his first two weeks there and was "subjected to severe mistreatment upon arrival at CECOT, including but not limited to severe beatings, severe sleep deprivation, inadequate nutrition, and psychological torture."
Bukele disputed that in a social media post on Thursday.
"But the man wasn't tortured, nor did he lose weight," Bukele said. "If he'd been tortured, sleep-deprived, and starved, why does he look so well in every picture?"
Bukele's post included pictures and video of Abrego Garcia in detention.
A Maryland resident whose wife and young child are U.S. citizens, Abrego Garcia was deported from the U.S. on March 15 to El Salvador, despite a 2019 immigration court ruling that he not be sent there because he could be persecuted by gangs. Officials called his removal an "administrative error."
Critics of U.S. President Donald Trump pointed to the case as evidence his administration was prioritizing increased deportations over due process - the principle that people in the U.S., whether citizens or not, can contest governmental actions against them in courts.
Trump has pledged to crack down on illegal immigration and says Abrego Garcia belongs to the MS-13 gang, an accusation his lawyers deny.
The Justice Department brought Abrego Garcia back to the U.S. on June 6 after securing an indictment charging him with working with at least five co-conspirators as part of a smuggling ring to bring immigrants to the U.S. illegally.
He has pleaded not guilty and the government says it plans to deport him again. He is currently detained in Tennessee while his criminal case is pending.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Football super-agent Jonathan Barnett accused of keeping woman as ‘sex slave'
Jonathan Barnett, a leading British sports agent who represented Gareth Bale and Jack Grealish, is being sued in American district court over accusations of human trafficking, rape and torture. An unnamed woman filed a lawsuit on Wednesday alleging that Barnett coerced the woman from Australia to the UK in 2017 and kept her as a 'sex slave' for six years, raping her over 39 times. She alleges that he 'trafficked, threatened, tortured and held' her in bondage across different locations around the world, including in Los Angeles, where the lawsuit has been filed. These threats alleged included those 'to her life and the lives of her minor children". The woman, who is referred to in the case as 'Jane Doe', has also sued Barnett's former employers Creative Artists Agency (CAA) - a Hollywood talent agency - which faces allegations that it 'used its employees and emissaries to assist Barnett in keeping' her as his 'sex slave'. Barnett and CAA have denied the allegations. 'The claims made in today's complaint against me have no basis in reality and are untrue,' Barnett said in a statement. 'We will vigorously defend this lawsuit through the appropriate legal process. I am looking forward to being entirely vindicated and exonerated.' Barnett, 75, retired last year after spending over 40 years as one of the most renowned sports agents, helping orchestrate Bale's world-record £85.3m move from Tottenham to Real Madrid in 2013. As well as Grealish, he also managed the likes of Ivan Toney and Jordan Pickford. He was ranked as the world's most powerful sports agent by Forbes in 2019. According to court documents, Barnett and Jane Doe first met in the 1990s through a professional athlete in London before reconnecting 27 years later, first online via LinkedIn before meeting in person. She was convinced to relocate to the UK from Australia with her teenage children, just weeks after getting back in touch in 2017, with Barnett's sports agency CAA Stellar covering moving expenses. The filing claims that she was raped in a hotel room in their first meeting as Barnett told her he 'owned' her. Barnett allegedly went on to impose strict rules of obedience on her, with the lawsuit saying she was made to refer to him as 'My Master'. The complaint goes on to describe that she would allegedly be 'tied up overnight without food or water' and would be forced to indulge in degrading acts such as drinking urine or ingesting faeces. 'This is a case about institutional abuse at the highest level,' the complaint reads. 'This case is about how one of the world's most powerful men in sports openly kept a sex slave for years, with the assistance of his employees, accountants, emissaries, and family members, and used his money and power to maintain coercive control over her and keep her in fear for her life and the lives of her children.' The lawsuit says that CAA 'knew or should have known' about the abusive behaviour, but the company strongly denies any prior knowledge of the complaints prior to first learning the allegations in January 2024. 'While the complaint attempts to connect these allegations to CAA's business, Ms. Doe has never been an employee, consultant, or contractor of CAA, ICM, or Stellar, nor has she ever had any business connection to CAA, ICM, or Stellar,' it said in a statement. Barnett was the co-founder of London-based sports agency Stellar Group in 1994 before it was sold to Hollywood agency ICM Partners in 2020. ICM later merged with CAA after being acquired by their larger rival. Jane Doe's lawyers are seeking compensation on her behalf. Barnett and CAA have 20 days to respond to the allegations by filing to the court.
The Guardian
30 minutes ago
- The Guardian
‘Accelerated censorship': advocates criticize US supreme court ruling on LGBTQ+ books
Kiernan, a 24-year-old transgender person from Colorado, feels drained from dealing with legislation that consistently limits the spaces and freedoms of people like him. Since he transitioned in 2016, it's been the same – first bathroom bills, then censorship in the education system – routine attacks on LGBTQ+ rights that Kiernan feels have now just become part of living in the US. Now, in the wake of the Mahmoud v Taylor supreme court ruling, the stigmatization of these communities is likely to worsen. The highest court in the US ruled that parents in Maryland's Montgomery county school district can opt their children out of lessons that include books with LGBTQ+ themes and characters if they feel that it violates their religious rights. The move angered LGBTQ+ groups and civil rights advocates who also say that the lengthy and judicial process of these opt-outs could have chaotic implications for the US education system nationwide. 'LGBTQ-relevant books are just the beginning in accelerated censorship,' Sabrina Baêta, a senior member of PEN America, told the Guardian. 'What's to stop schools from backing away from any books that may be offensive? We have already seen other topics like Black history disappear as districts try to avoid anything potentially controversial.' PEN America highlighted in a recent report that teachers may be more likely to overlook topics that require parental consent, thereby brushing over crucial books and subjects in classrooms that promote diverse identities and learning. In administrative terms, the court's ruling also poses problems for teachers and educators. Rather than focusing on lessons at hand, they will have to grapple with what is or isn't appropriate on religious grounds. And while anything with LGBTQ+ themes will constitute a student being able to leave the classroom, it creates a grey zone for topics like science and history, where certain lessons – such as about reproduction – could be seen as now potentially inappropriate. Opt-outs are believed by experts to have a pernicious effect on educational environments, but their implementation is not a new phenomenon. For a short period between the 2022-2023 school year, the Montgomery county board of education allowed them after introducing several 'LGBTQ+ inclusive' texts into the curriculum. Less than a year after the books were introduced, however, the board rescinded this option, saying it 'could not accommodate the growing number of opt-out requests without causing significant disruptions to the classroom environment'. Moreover, a school board official stated that permitting some students to opt out while stories were being told would expose others to 'social stigma and isolation'. 'It's really frustrating and a burden on my psyche,' Kiernan said, speaking on the mounting number of bills and legislation that have recently targeted LGBTQ+ youth. 'These bills aren't doing anything positive for children; it's a political agenda that's trying to veil itself in support for religious people,' he said. 'I wish it would go away. Let people be people and stop using us as a political scapegoat.' Justin Driver, a professor at Yale Law School, submitted a document to the court in the Mahmoud v Taylor hearing in support of the Montgomery county school district, saying: 'the decision succeeds in opening Pandora's box in countless classrooms located in our nation's public schools.' Driver, who specializes in education law, believes it unwise that parents and students be granted the authority to veto individual school lessons and assignments, and added that legal experts have 'long extolled local control of public education'. 'Public schools must now brace themselves for a dizzying array of curricular opt-out demands,' Driver said, adding: 'the American education system will be much poorer for it.' When the conservative-dominated court ruled 6-3 in favour, siding with the Muslim, Christian and Catholic parents who brought the case, Justice Samuel Alito authored the majority opinion, and the three liberal justices – Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson – were in dissent. In the ruling, Alito wrote: 'We have long recognized the rights of parents to direct 'the religious upbringing' of their children. And we have held that those rights are violated by government policies that substantially interfere with the religious development of children.' While parents will be able to uphold these rights under the new ruling, teachers may be overwhelmed at the beginning of the school year. Schools could struggle to determine what constitutes infringement on someone's religious liberty while simultaneously honoring the freedom of speech guaranteed by the first amendment. Assessing the validity of removing books on religious grounds will also be problematic, given the broader ongoing campaign by parents' rights groups and religious organizations to remove LGBTQ+ content from schools across the nation, especially in Republican-led areas. 'The creation of opt-outs is license to censor the very existence of the LBGTQ+ community and their families,' the PEN American writer AJ Connelly concluded in her report. 'It is not difficult to imagine that other groups might soon be added to the list of those who may not be named,' she added.
The Sun
30 minutes ago
- The Sun
Dramatic footage reveals moment Julio Cesar Chavez Jr is arrested by ICE just days after losing Jake Paul fight
DRAMATIC footage has captured the moment boxer Julio Cesar Chavez Jr was arrested by ICE for his alleged involvement in organized crime. It came just days after the former middleweight world champion was beaten by YouTuber-turned-boxer Jake Paul in California. 5 5 5 Chavez Jr - son of the legendary Julio Cesar Sr - was arrested in Los Angeles and faces deportation back to Mexico. Police cam footage has emerged of the 39-year-old being arrested by ICE agents - put in cuffs and chained up. US officials say he is affiliated with the notorious Mexican Sinaloa drug cartel - helping with "trafficking firearms, ammunition, and explosives". Homeland Security posted his mugshot and wrote: "On July 2, ICE arrested Mexican boxer and criminal illegal alien Julio Cesar Chavez Jr. "He is now being processed for expedited removal from the United States. "This Sinaloa Cartel affiliate has an active arrest warrant in Mexico for his involvement in organized crime and trafficking firearms, ammunitions and explosives. "Under President Trump, NO ONE is above the law—including world-famous athletes. "Our message to any cartel affiliates in the U.S. is clear: We will find you and you will face consequences. "The days of unchecked cartel violence are over." President Donald Trump designated the Sinaloa Cartel as a terrorist organization on his first day back in office in January. Chavez Jr's wife Frida Munoz was previously married to the son of former Sinaloa cartel leader Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman. El Chapo is serving a life sentence in a U.S. prison and his son Edgar was assassinated in 2008. Describing Chavez Jr's alleged connection, the statement says he applied for US permanent residency last year due to his marriage to a US citizen "who is connected to the Sinaloa Cartel through a prior relationship with the now-deceased son of the infamous cartel leader Joaquin 'El Chapo' Guzman". In January 2024, Chavez Jr was arrested in LA and later convicted for illegal possession of an assault weapon. A year earlier, a local judge issued an arrest warrant against him for allegedly trafficking weapons for a criminal organisation. He also allegedly made multiple fraudulent statements to US immigration authorities in attempts to gain permanent residency and over-stayed a tourist visa that expired last February. A lawyer for Chavez Jr called his arrest "nothing more than another headline to terrorise the Latin community". Lawyer Michael Goldstein told NBC,: "This is the first we've ever heard of these outrageous allegations." Chavez Jr won the WBC title in 2011 and made three defenses of the belt but his later career has been plagued with scandals and a lack of discipline. His record is now 54-7-1 after losing over ten rounds to Paul in Anaheim. 5 5
