
NTSB to determine probable cause of Boeing 737 door plug blowout Tuesday
On January 4, 2024, a door plug blew out on a Boeing 737 Max at more than 16,000 feet in the air, leaving a gaping hole in the side. On Tuesday, the National Transportation Safety Board will hear the investigation's findings and vote on the probable cause of the incident was.
The findings could put to rest one of the biggest questions around the terrifying incident: Who is to blame?
The hearing comes at a fraught time for Boeing, as well, which is now the focus of the fatal crash of a 787 Dreamliner operated by Air India this month.
While there is no indication yet that Boeing's work caused the crash of the nearly 11-year-old plane, confidence in Boeing could suffer further unless it is cleared as the cause. And after two fatal 737 Max crashes in 2018 and 2019, respectively, were traced back to design and software errors, and the Alaska Air door plug incident was caused by the jet being delivered to the airline by the embattled aircraft maker without the four bolts needed to hold it in place, Boeing had little reputation left to lose.
In the January 2024 door plug blowout, passengers' clothing and phones were ripped away and sent hurtling out of the plane, and the missing piece from Alaska Air flight 1282 was later found in an Oregon backyard. Through a combination of crew skill and luck, with no one seated next to the hole, it could easily have turned into a tragedy.
In the NTSB's preliminary findings, it was revealed that four bolts that hold the door plug in place on the Boeing 737 Max were missing at the time of the plane's delivery to Alaska Air in October 2023. The plane made 153 flights over 10 weeks before the incident, including 22 flights between Hawaii and the mainland. Had the incident occurred over the Pacific at 35,000 feet rather than minutes after taking off from Portland airport, it could have led to the loss of the plane.
What has not been revealed is who exactly was responsible for leaving the bolts off the door plug during the manufacturing process. Boeing revealed there was no internal paperwork showing that the door plug had been removed and then put back in place without the bolts, so workers who were moving the plane along the production line were not aware it needed to have the bolts reattached.
The NTSB already held a fact finding hearing into the incident in August, where it revealed interviews with Boeing employees who said they felt pressure to work too fast to avoid mistakes.
A Boeing employee, identified as a Door Master Lead, told investigators that much of the assembly work needed to be redone because of the later discovery of problems, as happened with the door plug that was removed to fix some rivets.
The worker said there was no special training to open, close or remove a door plug versus a regular door. The worker's team was 'put in uncharted waters to where… we were replacing doors like we were replacing our underwear.'
As a result of the incident the Federal Aviation Administration announced additional oversight of Boeing and limits on its production levels. The aircraft maker only recently returned to the production level for the 737 Max that it planned ahead of the incident.
Boeing said it has taken its own steps to improve the quality and safety of its planes, and it replaced the CEO at the time of the incident, Dave Calhoun. And last month the Justice Department dropped criminal charges it had planned against Boeing for defrauding the FAA during the certification process for the Max ahead of two fatal crashes in 2018 and 2019.
The complete final report on the Alaska Air incident from the NTSB will be available in a few weeks.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 hours ago
- Yahoo
Lufthansa Technik breaks ground on engine maintenance facility in Calgary
Lufthansa Technik has broken ground on a C$120m ($87m) aircraft engine maintenance and repair facility at YYC Calgary Airport in Calgary, Canada. The facility will cater to a broad range of North American carriers, focusing on near-wing and quick-turn services. Over the next two years, a 150,000ft² engine repair shop will be developed in partnership with Calgary Airports for Lufthansa Technik Canada, a subsidiary of Lufthansa Technik. The facility will primarily service CFM International LEAP-1B engines, which power the Boeing 737 MAX fleet. Additionally, it will feature Canada's first engine test cell for latest-generation aircraft engines. The project is expected to create a minimum of 160 permanent jobs at Lufthansa Technik Canada by 2030, with an additional 170 temporary jobs during the construction phase. The engine repair station and test cell are scheduled to be operational by 2027. Lufthansa Technik vice-president of commercial engine services Georg Fanta said: "The increasing number of new aircraft leads to a growing demand for maintenance capacities for their engines." Lufthansa Technik Canada is working closely with Calgary Airports (formerly the Calgary Airport Authority) to finalise the design and logistics of the facility. The airport authority is responsible for the financing, planning, construction, and deployment phases, as part of YYC AeroNex, a hub for aviation support and training services at Calgary Airport. A long-term lease agreement has been signed with Lufthansa Technik Canada. Calgary Airports president and CEO Chris Dinsdale said: "This engine repair station and test cell will boost regional economic development and reinforce Calgary's role as a gateway for aviation innovation and excellence." "Lufthansa Technik breaks ground on engine maintenance facility in Calgary" was originally created and published by World Construction Network, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Why The Boeing 737 Flies With Its Wheels Exposed
Although the Boeing 737's recent history has been rather checkered, that doesn't negate its previous 50 years of stellar service and ever-increasing versatility. What started as a short-range aircraft intended to serve small domestic airports has evolved tremendously over the years. Certain versions now offer long-range transatlantic flights, a far cry from the puddle jumper it used to be. While much about the 737 has changed (not always for the best), one unique design feature has remained: its main landing-gear wheels are still exposed when the gear is retracted. (Traditional doors still cover the nose wheel.) The reason for this goes back to the aircraft's original purpose, service to the less-developed regional airports of the 1960s. Not all of them had extensive repair facilities, so the idea was to keep the 737 as simple as possible. Landing gear doors are big, heavy, complex mechanisms that could be prone to failure, especially back then. A main landing gear design that placed the wheels flush with the underside of the fuselage when retracted eliminated the need for doors. Read more: Cheap-Feeling, Underpowered, Or Just Ugly, These Cars Don't Justify Their Price Another way Boeing designed the 737 for small regional airports was to give it short landing gear that placed it lower to the ground when parked, making it easier for maintenance crews to work on the engines and the underside of the aircraft. Although most airports today have belt loaders for luggage and jet bridges for passengers, they weren't nearly as common at smaller airports in the 1960s. The 737's low height meant passengers could board by a set of stairs, and baggage handlers loading and unloading luggage by hand could reach the low cargo bay doors. Some say the 737's low ride height is another reason why the main landing gear wheels are exposed. They believe there simply isn't enough room for doors large enough to cover them. Others disagree, pointing out that the BAC 1-11, another short-haul airliner, does have landing gear doors despite its low ride height. It entered service in 1965, two years before the 737 first flew, so the decision to leave the wheels exposed was likely not because of landing gear door technical challenges. The main reason landing gear retracts is to reduce drag. It may seem like leaving the wheels exposed would work against this goal, but the way Boeing designed the 737, the additional drag over a completely smooth belly is negligible. The landing gear's most noticeable feature is a giant hubcap on the wheel that remains exposed. When retracted, the tire sits as flush as possible to the body, and the hubcap continues that smooth surface across the wheel without falling off like a Cybertruck's. They're not there to look good, but to improve aerodynamics. Since the opening has to be slightly bigger than the tire's diameter to fit inside, a rubber seal presses against the tire to close off the compartment from rain and debris when the gear is up. Cleverly, once the plane lifts off, the brakes automatically apply to stop the wheel from spinning before it enters its compartment. While there are no landing gear doors, that's not to say that there aren't other aerodynamic aids at work. When retracted, a fairing attached to the landing gear struts covers the entire mechanism. It sits flush with the underside of the aircraft, just like doors over the landing gear would. You can see how this works in the video above. It looks a little funny and out of place when the gear is down, but when it's up, this fairing is the reason why all you see is a smooth belly, with only the wheels exposed. Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox... Read the original article on Jalopnik.


Bloomberg
4 days ago
- Bloomberg
NTSB Casts Blame on Boeing, FAA for 2024 Midair Blowout
US safety investigators pointed to breakdowns in Boeing Co. 's manufacturing processes as well as poor oversight by the US Federal Aviation Administration as key factors that led to a panel blowing off a 737 Max aircraft shortly after takeoff last year. The midair blowout in January 2024, which left a gaping hole in the side of the plane operated by Alaska Airlines, didn't result in any fatalities, but it plunged Boeing into crisis as regulators and policymakers scrutinized quality lapses at the planemaker's factories. Early on in its investigation, the National Transportation Safety Board found that the door-sized panel, known as a door plug, left Boeing's factory in Renton, Washington, without four bolts meant to keep it in place.