EV battery maker Northvolt failed after blowing through $15 billion. This US rival thinks it won't suffer the same fate.
Backed by big names such as Goldman Sachs and BlackRock, the Swedish startup had set out to revolutionize electric vehicle battery production — not just recycling them, but making new ones, too.
Redwood Materials, a US rival run by Tesla cofounder JB Straubel, is trying to tackle the same problem without succumbing to overambition. To do that, it focuses on upstream materials, maintains strategic partnerships, and avoids direct competition with customers.
Why Northvolt failed
Northvolt's vision was as audacious as it was complex. With $15 billion in funding, the company planned to handle everything in-house: sourcing raw materials, recycling batteries into black mass (a powder rich in nickel, lithium, cobalt, and manganese), refining that material via hydrometallurgy, and then producing battery cells at a massive scale.
With that scope came massive risk. Building and scaling cell manufacturing — especially outside Asia — is notoriously difficult. Northvolt struggled to ramp up operations at its Arctic Circle facility and increasingly relied on Chinese equipment, which slowed production and created bottlenecks. Costs ballooned, debts mounted, and the company ultimately couldn't keep up.
"Northvolt went a little too fast," said an investor who has backed startups in this industry. "They tried to commercialize before perfecting the process at scale." This person asked not to be identified discussing sensitive matters.
Northvolt did not respond to a request for comment from Business Insider.
Redwood wants to be 'Switzerland'
Redwood Materials, by contrast, focuses on what it sees as the most valuable — and underinvested — piece of the EV battery supply chain: cathode active materials. CAM accounts for roughly 60% of a battery's value and 15% of the cost of an electric vehicle, according to Redwood.
There's no large-scale CAM production in North America, and that's the gap Redwood wants to fill.
"We're not making battery cells. That's never been part of the plan," said Cal Lankton, Redwood's chief commercial officer. "We don't want to compete with our customers."
Instead, Redwood recycles EV battery production scrap and old batteries into usable metals and refines them into CAM, which it sells to cell manufacturers such as Panasonic and Toyota. This strategy keeps the company neutral while generating revenue from multiple points in the supply chain.
"As JB would say, we can be Switzerland," Lankton told me when I met him recently at Redwood's campus in Nevada's high desert.
Unlike Northvolt, which produced its own batteries and used its recycled material internally, Redwood aims to sell its refined materials to a broad range of customers, reducing dependency on any one player and avoiding direct competition with partners that make batteries.
"What Northvolt set out to build is incredibly impressive — the scope, the aspiration of what they tried to do," Lankton said. "I don't want to come across at all as denigrating what happened."
However, he said that by trying to make batteries itself, Northvolt added extra layers of risk, complexity, and expense.
"You're competing with your customers. So you would only produce CAM for your own consumption, which was Northvolt's plan, right?" Lankton added. "So if any piece in there falls apart, the whole thing breaks."
Step-by-step
Redwood has also been more measured in its scaling. While Northvolt attempted to go from lab to commercial production in one giant leap, Redwood moves step-by-step — refining materials, building CAM capacity, and only taking on new challenges when it's ready.
For example, Lankton said that while Redwood initially intended to hold onto intermediate recycled materials until its CAM operations ramped up, the company made a tactical pivot: sell the intermediate products now, generate revenue, and prove its capabilities.
"A dollar today for a company in our position is much more valuable than a dollar to use in the future," Lankton said. "Let's convert that inventory into cash. Let's demonstrate our capability to our investors, to our customers, to the market."
Redwood also used to make copper foil, a main ingredient in batteries. When Chinese companies began churning this out in massive quantities, prices plummeted, so Redwood halted that part of its business.
"We're not dogmatic," Lankton said. "We're not going to take a business plan and just do it until we think it works and run ourselves into the ground."
Lessons from Northvolt
Northvolt's bankruptcy isn't just a cautionary tale — it's a live case study. The company's downfall underscores the perils of over-integration, overreach, and underestimating the difficulty of battery cell manufacturing.
Redwood Materials is learning and taking a different tack by positioning itself not as a battery maker, but as an enabler of the EV battery supply chain.
"I think that's one of the strengths of Redwood, and I again, not to put too fine a point on it, something that Northvolt kind of struggled with, which is finding those pivot points when the original plan perhaps is getting more expensive or further out in the future," Lankton said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC (PSNY) Secures $200M Investment to Accelerate EV Expansion
We recently compiled a list of the 10 Best Low Cost Stocks To Buy Under $50. Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC is placed first on our list. Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC (NASDAQ:PSNY) tops our list for being one of the cheap stocks to buy. It is a Swedish EV company founded in 2017 and focuses on producing premium battery electric vehicles with a strong emphasis on innovation and sustainability. Its product lineup includes the Polestar 2 sedan, Polestar 3 and 4 SUVs, Polestar 5 grand-touring sedan, and the Polestar 6 roadster. Switch Auto Insurance and Save Today! Great Rates and Award-Winning Service The Insurance Savings You Expect Affordable Auto Insurance, Customized for You As of mid-2025, Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC (NASDAQ:PSNY) is demonstrating strong operational momentum and expanding strategically. In Q2 2025, the company reported retail sales of 18,049 vehicles, marking a 38% year-over-year increase. Sales in the first half of 2025 rose by 51% compared to the same period in 2024, driven by increasing consumer demand and market penetration. In Q1 2025 alone, sales surged 76% year-over-year, with gross margins turning positive at 7%, aided by a favorable sales mix and cost control. To support future growth, the business is expanding its manufacturing capabilities through a strategic partnership with Volvo Cars. The upcoming Polestar 7, a premium compact SUV slated for launch in 2028, will be manufactured in Kosice, Slovakia. This decision enhances the corporation's production capacity, leverages Volvo's established infrastructure, and strengthens its position in the competitive electric SUV market. A fleet of electric light vehicles recharging their batteries in a parking lot. Additionally, the company secured a $200 million equity investment from PSD Investment Limited, linked to Geely's founder, bolstering its financial position to scale operations and roll out new models. While Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC (NASDAQ:PSNY)'s trajectory shows promise, it must continue addressing typical EV start-up challenges, including cost structure management and cash flow improvements. While we acknowledge the potential of PSNY as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: The Best and Worst Dow Stocks for the Next 12 Months and 10 Unstoppable Stocks That Could Double Your Money. Disclosure: None.


Business Upturn
5 hours ago
- Business Upturn
Why China is pursuing Taiwan: Geopolitical objectives, potential outcomes, and public theories explained
Over the past decade, China's rhetoric, military build-up, diplomatic pressure, and policy strategy surrounding Taiwan have intensified—leading many to question whether a full-scale capture of Taiwan is inevitable. This analysis explores China's motivations, what would change if control is established, and the dominant geopolitical narratives discussing this issue. 1. Historical and ideological roots Civil War legacy: Taiwan is governed by the Republic of China (ROC), which emerged victorious in a 1912–1949 civil war. China's Communist Party established the People's Republic of China (PRC) in 1949 and has never renounced the use of force to bring Taiwan under Beijing's jurisdiction. Article 8 of China's 2005 Anti‑Secession Law formalizes this. National reunification principle: The PRC's official policy—'one China' and Xi Jinping's 'peaceful reunification' under the 'one country, two systems' framework—frames Taiwan as a breakaway province rather than a separate international entity. Political legitimacy: Taiwanese unification is a powerful domestic symbol for the CCP, often used in propagating nationalism and consolidating Xi's political mandate internal to China. 2. Strategic and economic incentives a. Strategic position and power projection Military anchoring in the First Island Chain: Taiwan sits on the so-called 'first island chain,' providing strategic depth in the Western Pacific. Controlling it would significantly extend China's naval and air capabilities, reducing US forward-operating access. Maritime chokepoint control: The Taiwanese straits are adjacent to vital shipping lanes—roughly 60 per cent of Asian maritime trade flows through nearby corridors. Chinese dominance over Taiwan would strengthen its hold over the South China Sea's commercial arteries. b. Technological and economic gain Semiconductor supremacy: Taiwan is home to TSMC, the world's largest semiconductor foundry, responsible for over 50 per cent of global chip fabrication. Full integration could accelerate China's ambitions in semiconductor independence and technological parity. Supply chain control: Taiwan plays a central role in global supply chains—particularly in electronics and green technology manufacturing. Its absorption would give China a critical advantage in these sectors. 3. What would change if China controls Taiwan? a. Shifts in global security and balances of power Decline of US strategic influence in Asia: Losing Taiwan would seriously weaken Washington's ability to project force in the Western Pacific and could unravel alliances with Japan, Korea, and Australia. Expansion of China's 'kill‑chain' reach: Models show that with Taiwan under PRC control, air-and-missile denial coverage expands, forcing US bases like Guam or the Philippines to operate at reduced effectiveness. b. Global economic fallout Unprecedented disruption: Even a brief conflict or aggressive blockade over Taiwan could cost the world economy over $10 trillion—short-term shocks similar to, or bigger than, the Ukraine war or 2008 financial crisis. Impact on capital and technology: Taiwan is a key conduit for foreign-invested capital and advanced microelectronics. Its loss could throttle foreign inflows, affecting Beijing's broader innovation-driven growth strategy. c. Political and cultural consequences Erosion of democratic autonomy: Taiwan's integration would mean dissolving its democratic institutions, curtailing civil liberties, and subsuming it under the PRC's authoritarian model—something sharply resisted by approximately 90 per cent of Taiwanese people. Continued 'political warfare': China would likely escalate its cognitive warfare campaigns—disinformation, political infiltration, propaganda—aimed at conditioning Taiwanese public opinion to accept Beijing's supremacy. 4. Public and strategic theories on Beijing's motivations Theory / Framework Key Idea Source Great Power Assertion Annexing Taiwan reinforces China's self-declared status as a leading global power, challenging the U.S.-led world order. Reddit , Wikipedia , Barron's 'Cognitive Warfare' Mastery Over time, China could annex Taiwan without force by eroding public will through propaganda and election manipulation. TIME , Wikipedia 'Anaconda Strategy' Beijing applies gradual diplomatic, economic, and military pressure to strangle Taipei's autonomy before physically seizing control. Council on Foreign Relations , Small Wars Journal Premptive Window Strategy Some Western analysts argue China might strike before U.S. internal political changes reduce deterrence or alliances weaken. Reddit , , Domestic Consolidation Taiwan serves as a rallying symbol at home, diverting attention from domestic issues and strengthening leadership legitimacy. Reddit , Small Wars Journal 5. Challenges and limits to a Taiwan takeover Massive military cost and human toll: Models show an amphibious invasion would be extraordinarily difficult—due to Taiwan's terrain, US and allied intervention, and Taiwan's own reserve mobilization plan. Economic blowback: China would face isolation from global markets, capital outflows, and loss of critical technology access—particularly in high-end semiconductors and foreign investment. Domestic risk amid PLA reforms: Xi's ongoing military leadership reshuffle raises questions about the People's Liberation Army's readiness for such a complex operation. 6. What the international community is doing US deterrence doctrine: US policymakers advocate a 'reassure and deter' framework—maintaining ambiguous support for Taiwan's defense while discouraging aggressive PRC action. Allied formation in the Indo-Pacific: Countries like Australia and Japan have pledged closer defense cooperation. A US congressional delegation is visiting Taiwan to reaffirm support. Taiwan civilian readiness: Under the 'Territorial Defense Force' model, Taiwan is enhancing its reserve system and investing in low-cost mobile defense weapons to make occupation prohibitively costly. Conclusion China views Taiwan as integral to its national identity and global power projection plan, but control requires overcoming immense global and domestic resistance. Economic gain and strategic depth are key motivators, yet the full takeover presents massive economic and geopolitical costs, including undermining Beijing's longer-term modernization strategy. Multiple scholarly frameworks—from great power theory to cognitive and political warfare—explain why China may pursue Taiwan even short of war. International deterrents and Taiwan's own resilience planning are central to preventing conflict, although no one can accurately predict Beijing's next move. Ahmedabad Plane Crash Vipul Sipani is a qualified IT professional with over eight years of active working experience. He is a trained web technologist and a certified Ethical Hacker v8 security analyst. Vipul has also been a consultant with the detection and prevention of cyber crimes, with the Cyber Crime Investigation Cell (CCIC) of Rajasthan State Police. Vipul is currently working as editor-in-chief at and he is reachable on [email protected]


Business Upturn
5 hours ago
- Business Upturn
No new crypto ban from China in 2025: Clarifying misinformation spreading on social media
Fact Check: Viral claims about a new cryptocurrency ban in China are false. The policy referenced dates back to 2021 and remains unchanged. What's being claimed A viral message circulating online claims: 'China has officially banned cryptocurrency trading, mining, and related services, citing financial risks, capital flight concerns, and environmental impacts.' Many users on social media, including Twitter and Telegram groups, have shared this message, causing confusion among crypto investors and enthusiasts across the globe. The truth China did indeed impose a ban on cryptocurrency trading, mining, and related activities — but this happened back in September 2021. The report being circulated as 'breaking news' is actually a recycled screenshot from a Reuters article published on September 24, 2021, which clearly mentions the original date and the update timestamp (September 27, 2021). No fresh announcement has been made by Chinese regulators in 2025 regarding a new crypto crackdown. What the 2021 policy said In 2021, China's central bank and other regulators declared all crypto-related transactions illegal. The policy cited: Financial risk and market volatility Concerns about money laundering and capital flight Environmental concerns from high-energy usage of crypto mining operations These reasons were cited at the time of the original ban and have not been reiterated in any official announcement this year. Why the confusion? The misinformation appears to have originated from: Outdated screenshots of past news being reshared without context Misleading captions that present old news as a new development Viral posts designed to influence crypto market sentiment, often timed with market volatility A post featuring the 2021 Reuters headline has been making the rounds, with some users falsely claiming it is from August 2025. Official clarification Multiple sources, including Bitcoin Junkie and crypto analysts, have confirmed that no new ban has been issued by Chinese authorities in 2025. The People's Bank of China (PBoC) and Chinese state media have also made no statements or press releases regarding any additional regulatory steps this year. What the Reuters article actually says: 'China's top regulators ban crypto trading and mining, sending bitcoin tumbling' Published: September 24, 2021 — Updated: September 27, 2021 The date in the screenshot (which many users overlook) clearly proves that it's an old report. How to avoid falling for fake news in the crypto space Check the date of the article or screenshot Verify from credible financial news outlets (e.g., Reuters, Bloomberg, CNBC) Be cautious of Twitter and Telegram forwards that lack official links or timestamps Look for official regulator announcements on government portals or reputable media Claims and reality check Claim Reality 'China banned all crypto again in 2025' False — no new ban announced 'Reports are based on recent Reuters article' Partially true — article discusses policy review, not a ban 'It's new national regulation' False — the discussion was regional (Shanghai), no national decree 'Chinese regulators are considering yuan-based stablecoins' True — indirectly confirmed by company lobbying and meeting context Market impact Although the false report did create temporary panic among some retail investors, the broader crypto market has largely remained stable. Analysts believe seasoned investors quickly identified the misinformation. Conclusion China's stance on cryptocurrency remains unchanged since 2021. No new policy banning crypto trading or mining has been enacted in 2025. The message claiming 'China has officially banned crypto in 2025' is false, misleading, and should not be acted upon. Always fact-check before reacting to viral financial content. Ahmedabad Plane Crash News desk at