logo
Making Alcatraz great again: Is Trump's obsession with Hannibal Lecter the real reason behind reopening the prison?

Making Alcatraz great again: Is Trump's obsession with Hannibal Lecter the real reason behind reopening the prison?

When news came over the weekend that President Donald Trump wants federal law enforcement agencies to reopen Alcatraz as a maximum-security prison, I remembered the school tour of the island I took as a child.
On that visit to the penitentiary-turned-museum, the park ranger explained to us that the reason Alcatraz was no longer functioning was because of how impractical and expensive it was to run an island prison in the middle of the San Francisco Bay. By the time the prison closed in 1963, the cost of running it was too high to justify, and the buildings in the middle of the windy, salt swept Bay were deteriorating quickly. It must also be mentioned that although no prisoners ever officially escaped from Alcatraz, five did go missing, marring its reputation as inescapable.
All the other school children and I understood why Alcatraz had been turned into a tourist attraction, but given Trump's history with real estate, business and federal bureaucracy, this ridiculous proposal makes perfect sense: Could reopening Alcatraz have anything to do with his old foe, Dr. Hannibal Lecter?
On social media, Trump did say on Sunday, May 4, that the reopened Alcatraz would house 'America's most ruthless and violent offenders,' and that the country 'will no longer be held hostage to criminals, thugs, and judges that are afraid to do their job and allow us to remove criminals, who came into our country illegally.'
Some of you may remember Trump's frequent mentions of 'the late, great, Hannibal Lecter' on the 2024 campaign trail. He even thanked the fictional character for helping him win the election at the National Republican Congressional Committee dinner in April. Lecter got so many mentions by Trump in 2024, you'd have thought he was on the FBI's most wanted list instead of the fiction section of your local bookstore.
The character, created by author Thomas Harris and played to Academy Award Winning perfection by Anthony Hopkins in the 1991 film adaptation of 'The Silence of the Lambs,' is a cannibalistic serial killer who immigrated from Lithuania. (What's his legal status?) An ultraintelligent former psychiatrist and questionable chef, the character appears to captivate Trump more than any real-life criminals.
I can just imagine how Lecter figured into Trump's plans for Alcatraz 2.0.
The following is a parody, not a real speech from President Trump
I'm sure by now you've all heard my genius news about how I plan to reopen Alcatraz as a federal prison for the most dangerous, oogie-boogie criminals. It's a wonderful plan that will help make the failing city of San Francisco great again.
Sure, I'm killing one of the city's biggest tourist attractions with an impractical plan that will cost the government untold millions of dollars, but in the great casino of life, losses are to be expected. Just look at how much I lost opening casinos in Atlantic City!
Some people call this plan a pipe dream, or just a way of getting back at the liberals who live in Sodom and Gomarrah by the Bay. Absolutely, it's both of those things. But it's also going to keep us safe from the scariest bad guys on the planet by putting them on what I assure you is an inescapable island — pay no attention to the 1979 movie 'Escape From Alcatraz' or the 1996 blockbuster 'The Rock.'
There's one villain who is such a scourge to the world that once agent Clarice Starling captures him, he will be the first inmate in the newly refurbished Trump Alcatraz Prison and Hotel Casino. I am of course talking about Dr. Hannibal 'The Cannibal' Lecter, who is absolutely a real guy.
Hannibal Lecter has evaded Democrat law enforcement for years like his patient Jame Gumb, aka Buffalo Bill. But under a Trump presidency, these monsters will no longer walk the streets looking for innocent people to snack on or ladies to wear as skin suits. They will be locked up at Alcatraz just like the unjustly imprisoned tax dodger Al Capone and that rapper Machine Gun Kelly.
And Hannibal Lecter isn't the only Eastern European criminal who will be housed at Alcatraz. For centuries, an illegal Transylvanian immigrant by the name of Count Dracula has been drinking the blood of our citizens while liberals do nothing. I will send Dracula to Alcatraz where he will share a cell with Count von Count from the recently defunded 'Sesame Street.' I had originally offered Dracula a job in my administration, but he said he couldn't bring himself to work with Stephen Miller, because 'the guy just creeps me out.'
On the subject of illegal aliens, I'm also sending both ALF and Mork from Ork to Alcatraz as I have canceled their intergalactic visas. They will be brought to justice by agents Scully and Mulder who are part of a special task force I've created since I declassified the X-files.
But I'm not stopping there, folks. Superman may not have been able to apprehend supervillain Lex Luthor, but the Trump administration will. Luthor is a terrible guy. He always cheated at shuffleboard whenever we were onJeffrey Epstein's yacht. But once I prove that Lex was overvaluing and undervaluing LexCorp for loans and lower tax rates — who would do something so criminal? — I'm going to lock him in a cell so deep on Alcatraz that not even Daily Planet investigative journalists Clark Kent and Lois Lane will be able to find him.
I also understand that for a brief period, Alcatraz was used to house those dangerous social justice activists known as the X-Men. They will be returned to the island where they can no longer imperil the world with their message of acceptance for those who are different. Magneto will of course have to be kept in a plastic cage, which I'm sure Elon Musk will be able to construct to the same fine standards as his Cybertrucks.
Once these violent, completely real villains are safely behind bars on Alcatraz, America will truly be great again.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Paramount and Trump in 'Advanced' Settlement Talks As Merger Deadline Nears
Paramount and Trump in 'Advanced' Settlement Talks As Merger Deadline Nears

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Paramount and Trump in 'Advanced' Settlement Talks As Merger Deadline Nears

A deal to settle a lawsuit from President Trump against CBS News over its handling of a 60 Minutes interview could be close. Lawyers for both sides moved to pause all proceedings until Thursday, citing 'good faith' and 'advanced' settlement discussions, according to a court document filed on Monday. More from The Hollywood Reporter Canada Scraps Digital Services Tax After Trump Trade Talks Threat Trump "Terminating" U.S.-Canada Trade Talks Over Streaming Tax That's It, The F-Word Is Officially Boring The move comes ahead of the merger termination deadline on July 7. If the deal isn't completed by then, a second 90-day extension would expire on Oct. 6. In the scenario that the transaction isn't greenlit at that point, it's believed that Paramount and Skydance will abandon the deal rather than seek another extension. The holdup involves the Federal Communication Commission's refusal to transfer Paramount's broadcast licenses. The dispute has influenced Paramount's approach to a lawsuit accusing it of deceptively editing an interview with Kamala Harris. A mediator recently proposed a $20 million settlement to resolve the lawsuit, with the majority going to Trump's presidential foundation, The Wall Street Journal reported, which noted that Trump has insisted on an apology. It's been reported that CBS offered as much as $15 million. Trump's legal team faced a Monday deadline to reply to CBS' motion to compel discovery. 'The Parties respectfully submit that good cause to stay all proceedings exists because the Parties are engaged in good faith, advanced, settlement negotiations,' reads the filing. Absent a deal, the court is expected to rule on CBS' bid to dismiss the lawsuit in the coming months. In that filing, the network argued that the complaint is an 'affront to the First Amendment' and that Trump is looking to 'punish a news organization for constitutionally protected editorial judgments they do not like.' The pathway to Skydance's acquisition of Paramount getting approved involves a settlement of the 60 Minutes lawsuit, after which the FCC will approve the transfer of the broadcast licenses. Best of The Hollywood Reporter How the Warner Brothers Got Their Film Business Started Meet the World Builders: Hollywood's Top Physical Production Executives of 2023 Men in Blazers, Hollywood's Favorite Soccer Podcast, Aims for a Global Empire

Inside CBS News, Staffers Voice Disgust, Anger, Relief and Anxiety After Trump Settlement
Inside CBS News, Staffers Voice Disgust, Anger, Relief and Anxiety After Trump Settlement

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Inside CBS News, Staffers Voice Disgust, Anger, Relief and Anxiety After Trump Settlement

The midnight settlement between Paramount Global and President Donald Trump was greeted by CBS News employees with what one called a reaction of 'disgust and relief.' Disgust, because universally within CBS News and at 60 Minutes, the lawsuit (which was about the editing of an interview the program conducted with former Vice President Kamala Harris) was perceived as baseless, and a multimillion-dollar settlement cut by corporate executives is seen as unwarranted. Relief because the months-long melodrama over the suit appears to be over (though there are still some big loose ends that need to be tied). More from The Hollywood Reporter Paramount Settles Lawsuit With Trump Over Kamala Harris '60 Minutes' Interview for $16 Million Paramount and Trump in "Advanced" Settlement Talks As Merger Deadline Nears '60 Minutes' Correspondents Sent a Letter to George Cheeks Demanding He Name Tanya Simon EP Perhaps most importantly, there is what sounds like widespread relief that CBS or the program will not be forced to apologize for something that they do not believe warrants an apology. Or as Paramount co-CEO George Cheeks emphasized at the company's shareholder meeting Wednesday morning: 'Yes, the company has agreed in principle to settle the lawsuit, and as reported, it does not include an apology.' CBS News chief Tom Cibrowski also emphasized that there is no apology on an editorial call with staff Wednesday morning, and thanked employees for tuning out the noise as they did their jobs. If there was going to be a revolt at 60 Minutes, as some insiders feared, a forced apology could have been a tipping point. The agreement to release full transcripts of future interviews with presidential candidates is not perceived to be nearly as troubling as anything that insinuated that the show made a mistake with how it handled the Harris interview. Nonetheless, the settlement 'threatens journalists' ability to do their job reporting on powerful public figures,' the Writers Guild of America East said in a statement Wednesday. The WGAE represents many staffers on 60 Minutes. So, why settle? 'Look, companies often settle litigation to avoid the high and somewhat unpredictable cost of legal defense, the risk of an adverse judgment that could result in significant financial as well as reputational damage, and the disruption to business operations that prolonged legal battles can cause,' Cheeks said. 'A settlement offers a negotiated resolution that allows companies to focus on their core objectives, rather than being mired in uncertainty and distraction.' And yet there remain unanswered questions, two big ones, specifically: succession at 60 Minutes, and fear about the future of CBS News. Who will succeed Bill Owens? The show's venerable former executive producer resigned in April as corporate executives sought to assert more control over the newsmagazine, which has long operated with a degree of independence from the rest of CBS News. Shortly after Owens resigned, all of the 60 Minutes correspondents sent a letter to Cheeks requesting that Tanya Simon, a longtime producer on the show and daughter of late correspondent Bob Simon, be named permanent EP. CBS has declined to name a permanent successor, and staff on the show are hoping that with the suit resolved Simon gets the nod, and if not, to understand why. Wendy McMahon, who had been leading CBS News and Stations, also resigned, telling staff that 'It's become clear that the company and I do not agree on the path forward.' Both Owens and McMahon are said to have opposed a settlement, but were also strongly opposed to any sort of apology. And staff are quietly dreading what changes new ownership could bring to the show, or to CBS News writ large. Photos of Skydance CEO and incoming Paramount CEO David Ellison sitting a few feet from Trump at a recent UFC event in New Jersey have been making the rounds in the newsroom at the CBS Broadcast Center on West 57th, and at the 60 Minutes offices across the street. 'I'm already beginning to think about mourning, grieving. But I'm holding out hope,' 60 Minutes correspondent Lesley Stahl told The New Yorker. 'I know there's going to be a settlement. I know there's going to be some money exchanged. I know that. And then we will hopefully still be around, turning a new page, and finding out what that new page is gonna look like.' Trump, in a press avail last month, told reporters, 'Ellison's great, he'll do a great job with it,' when asked about the looming Skydance takeover. While Ellison and Paramount's incoming president Jeff Shell have talked about CBS as a crown jewel asset, Shell has also been clear that it needs to be run more efficiently, and broadcast news divisions have long been loss leaders, defined by brand-defining credibility rather than profit-driven motives. On Wednesday morning, another veteran media executive joked that Trump's presidential library could be adding a 60 Minutes wing whenever it opens its doors. In addition to Paramount, Trump has settled other lawsuits with The Walt Disney Co. (over comments made by ABC News anchor George Stephanopoulos); tech giant Meta over suspensions on Instagram and Facebook after Jan. 6; and X, the platform owned by Elon Musk, over a suspension. Among the four companies, Trump has secured about $60 million earmarked for the museum, after legal fees. Best of The Hollywood Reporter How the Warner Brothers Got Their Film Business Started Meet the World Builders: Hollywood's Top Physical Production Executives of 2023 Men in Blazers, Hollywood's Favorite Soccer Podcast, Aims for a Global Empire

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store