Albo keeps mum on big China question
The US earlier this month warned China was looking to move on the democratically self-governed island by 2027.
Aside from torching the decades-long status quo, such a move would deal a major blow to global supply of semiconductors – crucial components in modern tech – and massively disrupt vital trade routes.
The Prime Minister was on Monday (AEST) quizzed on how Australia would respond to an escalation in the Indo-Pacific ahead of his meeting with Donald Trump at the G7 summit in Canada this week.
Mr Albanese said Australia was committed to 'peace and security in the region'. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says Australia will 'play an important role in the Pacific' but has stopped short of committing to Taiwan's defence. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia
'That's what we want and Australia is a trusted partner to promote peace and security in our region,' he told reporters in Calgary.
'We have been so forever. If you look at the role that Australia has played, we'll continue to play an important role in the Pacific.'
Mr Albanese pointed to his stop in Fiji as 'a reminder of the fact that Australia is a trusted partner in the Pacific'.
'What that does is to add to security in our region,' he said.
'That is our job. That is what we do and we all want to see that advanced.'
The Trump administration has been calling on Canberra to hike defence spending in response to China – a call the Albanese government has firmly pushed back on.
US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth earlier this month warned Beijing posed an 'imminent' threat.
'Let me be clear, any attempt by Communist China to conquer Taiwan by force would result in devastating consequences for the Indo-Pacific and the world,' Mr Hegseth told the Shangri La Dialogue.
'There's no reason to sugar-coat it. The threat China poses is real and it could be imminent.
'We hope not but certainly could be.'
He raised Australia's defence spending in a one-on-one with Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles on the sidelines of the conference, saying it 'should' be 3.5 per cent of GDP.
In a read out, the US Embassy said the two senior officials 'discussed aligning investment to the security environment in the Indo-Pacific, accelerating US force posture initiatives in Australia, advancing defence industrial base co-operation, and creating supply chain resilience'.
'On defence spending, Secretary Hegseth conveyed that Australia should increase its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of its GDP as soon as possible,' the embassy said.
Australia's closest allies, including the UK, have committed to dramatically ramping up defence to at least 3 per cent, making the Albanese government a clear outlier.
Mr Marles, who also serves as defence minister, again pushed back against Washington's request on Monday.
He insisted Australia has been 'spending more on defence' under Labor.
'We have engaged in the last couple of years in the biggest peacetime increase in defence spending in Australia's history,' Mr Marles told the ABC.
'And that has been a function of the very complex strategic landscape that we face.
'In many ways, the threatening strategic landscape that we face.'
He repeated Mr Albanese's lines that Labor would 'assess our strategic landscape, what are our needs, what's our national interest and then resource it'.
'I mean what we inherited obviously was a defence establishment which wasn't in great shape from the Coalition,' Mr Marles said.
'What we've given to it is strategic clarity.
'We have reprioritised tens of billions of dollars of expenditure but what we've also done is increased spending on defence in order to resource our needs, and we'll continue the process of assessing that and where there is a need resourcing it.'
Labor has committed tens of billions more to defence since coming to power, but much of the funds are tied up in long-term projects, such as AUKUS.
The Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) report warned late last month Australia must boost its immediate readiness to go to war or risk having a 'paper ADF'.
ASPI said that while Labor was spending on longer-term projects it was not pumping nearly enough cash into keeping Australia combat-ready in the near term.
The report, authored by former Home Affairs deputy secretary Marc Ablong, called for 'defence funding to be increased to reflect the reality of the threats facing Australia'.
It said that while the Albanese government 'claims to have made a 'generational investment in Australia's defence', that investment has been put off for another generation', pointing out that the bulk of the billions pledged by Labor would not kick in until after 2029.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
14 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
‘You should be so ashamed': Pro-Palestine supporters slammed as Hamas refuses to disarm
Sky News host Rowan Dean slams Western leaders, such as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, Foreign Minister Penny Wong, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, and French President Emmanuel Macron, for being 'responsible' for Hamas' continuous terror. The UK Telegraph has reported that Hamas has come out and said they will not stop the war until they have Jerusalem as their capital of a Palestinian state, which occupies all of the current area of Israel. 'Every single person marching on the bridge today is doing this, you are encouraging the perpetration of this horror show,' Mr Morrow said. 'Hamas have now got the moral high ground because of you marchers on the bridge. 'You should be so ashamed of yourself.'
Perth Now
14 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Tradition Aussies can no longer afford
A two-speed booze tax kicks in Monday, as beer taxes are frozen while spirits are slugged by the twice-a-year price hike. Anthony Albanese made the two-year beer tax freeze an election promise and has paused any tax increases on kegged beer. But the freeze creates an unequal playing field between draught and liquor, as cocktail and spirit drinkers will see venues pass on the latest tax hike at the till. 'With cost-of-living pressures biting hard, even the smallest increase in price is noticed by customers and businesses alike,' Night Time Industries Association boss Mick Gibb told NewsWire. 'We're not asking for special treatment, just equal treatment. Freezing the beer excise is a great thing, but we can't leave behind the small bars, live music venues and performance spaces that aren't running beer taps. 'While there's lots of factors involved in pricing a cocktail or a drink, if there's a cost input that the government has control over, they should be leveraging it to give people a bit of breathing room.' Tax increases on draught beer have been paused for two years. Glenn Campbell / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia Substantive, quarterly inflation data released this week shows inflation has flattened out to 2.1 per cent over the past year. Despite this reprieve for household budgets, the majority of average workers cannot afford a quick drink after work, the Night Time Industries Association finds. The association's latest quarterly report found people on salaries between $80,000 to $150,000 were staying in, while people being paid more than $150,000 were going out more and more. 'Cost-of-living pressures are far from over, with many venues reporting consumers are foregoing the after-work drink for less frequent, but more extravagant experiences for special occasions at a premium restaurant or an international artists' gig,' Mr Gibb said. The Australian Distillers Association says distillers and venues cannot cop the price hike. 'This is incredibly disappointing. It's not just another tax hike, it's a significant one that distillers and hospitality venues simply can't absorb,' distillers boss Cameron Mackenzie told NewsWire. 'In the end, it's customers who'll be left paying more for their favourite spirits' Half of Australian distilleries were in the regions, he said, and drove manufacturing, jobs and tourism. 'This tax hike hits everyone: producers, venues and consumers who'll see higher prices for their favourite gin and tonic.' Out campaigning, the Prime Minister poured plenty of beers, but the tax freeze was announced weeks before the election date was officially called. The Labor government has enacted the beer tax freeze, promised by Anthony Albanese before the campaign period earlier this year. Mark Stewart / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia At that time, Treasurer Jim Chalmers called the tax break modest. reported last week the lost tax revenue would equal $95m over four years. The Prime Minister's office declined to say how much the tax break would cost the budget. 'We're focused on easing the cost of living for Australians, and we know that every little bit helps. This will help take a bit of pressure off beer drinkers, brewers and bars,' a spokesperson said. 'Whether it's a tax cut for every taxpayer, help with energy bills, or the new relief that's rolling out this month like higher wages for award workers, we're doing everything we responsibly can to help with the cost of living.' The tax freeze only applies to beers on tap at licensed hospitality venues. Stubbies and cans at the bar or bottle store are excluded. Distilled spirits are totally excluded from the freeze no matter where they are purchased or how they are consumed. From Monday, taxes on spirits with more than 10 per cent alcohol will increase 1.6 per cent. Alcohol taxes rise in February and August every year. For beer, the rates vary depending on alcohol content, the size and type of container it's packaged in, and whether it was made at a commercial brewery or a 'brew-on-premise' venue. Kegs of the most common beers at pubs are usually 50 litre. Tax on each 50-litre keg of full strength beer will stay at $43.39 for the next two years. Willie the Boatman brewery has canonised Anthony Albanese with a pale ale. Jason Edwards / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia Wine falls under a separate tax regimen than beer and spirits. Wine is taxed at 29 per cent of the wholesale value. The beer and spirits excise has ticked up and along without reform for more than 40 years. The Australian Hotels Association says the decades-old format needs to change. 'We recognise the need for the government to raise revenue from liquor excise but the way excise was going up every six months was keeping people at home, drinking alone rather than getting out and socialising in safe, local venues,' AHA president David Canny told NewsWire. 'We want to make sure a beer poured at the bar doesn't become a luxury item and this is a great step towards that.' Hospitality and brewing groups say the tax freeze will support jobs, promote socialisation and provide general cost-of-living relief. Martin Ollman / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia This two-year freeze helped support 300,000 hospitality staff, Mr Canny said. 'It is great to see the Albanese government has listened and acted on this unpopular hidden tax,' he said. 'There's no better place to have a beer than down at the local – they are a place for community and connection – and anything that makes it a little bit more affordable is worthwhile. 'It's a win for common sense in the middle of a cost-of-living crisis.' The Brewers Association of Australia similarly enjoyed news of the freeze but had its eye on long-term change. 'We certainly thank the Prime Minister, the Treasurer and the Assistant Treasurer for backing this in,' Brewers Association chief executive Amanda Watson told NewsWire. 'Brewers will continue to work with the government to ensure future excise reform is looked at seriously to support a sustainable Australian brewing sector.'
ABC News
44 minutes ago
- ABC News
ACTU Secretary Sally McManus calls for one property limit on negative gearing tax breaks
The Australian Council of Trade Unions will call for bold reform to negative gearing and the capital gains tax at the government's productivity roundtable this month, proposing the tax breaks be limited to one investment property. Sally McManus, the union's secretary, told ABC's Insiders the current arrangements should continue for five years but after that date "we've got to bite the bullet". "Otherwise, we're just saying 'too bad young people, you're not going to be able to ever own a home'," she said. "Since 2019, the problem has just got worse. It's going to continue to get worse unless the government is brave enough to do something about it." Labor took negative gearing reforms from opposition to the 2016 and 2019 federal elections, at which they were defeated. Ahead of this year's election it emerged that Treasurer Jim Chalmer had asked his department to model the impact of changes to negative gearing and capital gains tax concessions, but Prime Minister Anthony Albanese hosed down speculation Labor was planning to scale back the tax breaks. Ms McManus did not divulge whether she believed the government, after its landslide victory earlier this year, would go for the proposal but stressed that the union would "go and argue it". "In the end, the government will make their decisions based on what they think is in the national interest. We would say that it is in the national interest," she said. The ACTU's proposal would raise about $1.5 billion in tax revenue each year, according to Ms McManus, who added that those with investment properties would have time to adjust their portfolios. "Part of the problem is that we've been keeping a whole lot of capital in housing. And it's not those people's fault. They've done that because it has worked for them and they've made smart decisions around that," she said. "But it's also meant that capital is not being invested in areas that are going to increase productivity, like Australian businesses and other ways that it can be invested." Nearly half of all Australian landlords had negatively geared properties, according to figures released in December, that showed the highest earners are hauled in tens of billions of dollars from tax concessions and loopholes. Mr Chalmers has signalled he will use the three-day roundtable to seek new economic reforms, prioritising "consensus" among unions, business and economists. He has said he wants any reform proposals brought to the roundtable to be budget neutral or budget positive. Earlier this week, the Productivity Commission released the first of several reports requested by Mr Chalmers in the lead-up to the roundtable, in which it called for a 20 per cent tax rate on profits for companies with revenue of up to $1 billion. That would represent a significant cut for all but the largest companies from the current rate, which is 25 per cent for companies with turnover under $50 million and 30 per cent for all others. It also called for a new 5 per cent tax on net cashflow rather than profits, which could see some large companies pay a higher rate but would provide immediate tax relief for smaller companies seeking to build their capital.
