Mean Girls The Musical is coming to Glasgow's King's Theatre
Tickets are now on sale here.
The musical, based on the iconic Paramount Pictures film, first hit the West End's Savoy Theatre on June 5, 2024.
Mean Girls The Musical (Image: Supplied) During its run, it attracted more than 330,000 attendees before closing on June 8, 2025.
The show also won the 'Best New Musical' award at the 2025 WhatsOnStage Awards.
Read more:
Ryanair to increase size of underseat 'free bag' following EU rule changes
Mean Girls The Musical debuted in 2017 at the National Theatre in Washington, D.C., and opened on Broadway in April 2018.
It played at the August Wilson Theatre to packed houses and later embarked on a successful US tour in 2019.
The show recently completed a second US tour.
Paramount Pictures released a new version of the film in 2024, featuring musical performances.
The musical tells the story of Regina, Gretchen, and Karen, known as 'The Plastics,' who rule North Shore High.
Cady Heron, fresh from being home-schooled by her zoologist parents, plans to end Regina's reign.
However, she soon learns that high school life is tougher than it seems.
The production promises a mix of iconic characters, sharp humour, and memorable songs.
The show features a book by Tina Fey, music and vocal arrangements by Jeff Richmond, and lyrics by Nell Benjamin.
Direction and choreography are by Casey Nicholaw, with scenic design by Scott Pask.
Costume design is by Katrina Lindsay, lighting design by Kenneth Posner, and sound design by Brian Ronan.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
a day ago
- The Guardian
‘They all looked the same, they all dressed the same': the betrayal of the Smurfs' communist roots
Smurfs, a new Paramount Pictures CGI-spectacle directed by Chris Miller, has received an all-round critical panning and faltered at the box office. But it does a serviceable job reminding viewers of the utter strangeness of the three-apples-tall characters originally conceived of by Belgian comic artist Pierre 'Peyo' Culliford in 1958. In the film, James Corden voices No Name Smurf, who experiences existential angst because unlike the other inhabitants of Smurf Village – Brainy, Grouchy, Hefty etc – he does not 'have his own thing', a skill or character trait that makes him stand out. This special trait is eventually identified as 'magic' and No Name is pressed – by a serenading Rihanna-voiced Smurfette – to realise his inner USP and 'don't let anyone ever say you are not anyone' and accept that 'you were born great'. An identity crisis might be a relatively novel experience for the motormouthed British actor, but it is certainly a first in the 67-year history of Peyo's blue cosmos. In fact, it may be a contradiction in terms: to be a good Smurf, in the proto-communist vision of the original comics, was to never elevate your own personality above the collective. Of Smurf Village's original 100 inhabitants, says French sociologist and Smurfologist Antoine Buéno, 'About 90% were totally indistinguishable. They all looked the same, they were all dressed the same.' While some Smurfs were identified by name, he says, this was usually through a skill that is related to how he (all of the original Smurfs were male) is useful to the community. 'The Smurfian society is an archetypal corporatist society, meaning that each Smurf that is identified represents a social function.' In Miller's latest reboot of the franchise, unleashing your true inner self is presented as the key to overcoming a problem – in Peyo's original book, it is the root of all evil. 'In the comics, each time a Smurf tries to be an individual, it creates a catastrophe,' Buéno says. For instance, in the second book of the original series, 1965's Le Schtroumpfissime (King Smurf), the inhabitants of the village hold a vote for an interim leader in the absence of Papa Smurf, but democracy does not become them. One nameless Smurf realises he can play the system by making promises he can't keep to each of his potential voters, and wins. But once elected, he rules as an autocrat, installing an oppressive regime marshalled by Hefty Smurf and forcing the other Smurfs to build him a palace. The book was translated into Dutch as De Smurführer. 'All bad comes from individuality, which is also linked with private property', says Buéno. 'Each time private property is claimed in the village, it ruins the whole balance of the society.' The 2011 book in which Buéno explored the hidden ideological underpinnings of Peyo's fictional world, Le Petit Livre Bleu: Analyse Critique et Politique de la Société des Schtroumpfs, triggered a bitter backlash from true blue fans, and is wilfully polemical in the way it spells out political allusions that the comics never make explicit. The revolutionary connotations of the Phrygian caps (red for Papa, white for all the rest) are plausible, the identification of bearded Papa Smurf as Marx and bespectacled Brainy as Trotsky perhaps less so. The search for messages hidden in the books may even have distracted from how genuinely original an exercise in storytelling the Smurfs were on the surface: a series of tales with 100 protagonists, of whom most look exactly the same, in which heroism lies in collective action. Speaking more than a decade after the publication of his Little Blue Book, Buéno sounds more balanced in his assessment. 'My theory was always that Peyo was not into politics at all', he says. 'But his genius was in creating a utopia that drew from our joint political history and coming up with images that spoke to everyone.' Using Smurf Village as an example of working socialism did not just die with the new reboot, it was washed out of the Smurfverse after Peyo sold the rights to his creation in the 1970s. 'For me, what we witnessed in the Smurfs is a perfect demonstration of Guy Debord's analysis of capitalism', says Buéno. 'Capitalism's strength lies in never frontally destroying its enemies, but taking them in and digesting them.'
The Guardian
a day ago
- The Guardian
‘They all looked the same, they all dressed the same': the betrayal of the Smurfs' communist roots
Smurfs, a new Paramount Pictures CGI-spectacle directed by Chris Miller, has received an all-round critical panning and faltered at the box office. But it does a serviceable job reminding viewers of the utter strangeness of the three-apples-tall characters originally conceived of by Belgian comic artist Pierre 'Peyo' Culliford in 1958. In the film, James Corden voices No Name Smurf, who experiences existential angst because unlike the other inhabitants of Smurf Village – Brainy, Grouchy, Hefty etc – he does not 'have his own thing', a skill or character trait that makes him stand out. This special trait is eventually identified as 'magic' and No Name is pressed – by a serenading Rihanna-voiced Smurfette – to realise his inner USP and 'don't let anyone ever say you are not anyone' and accept that 'you were born great'. An identity crisis might be a relatively novel experience for the motormouthed British actor, but it is certainly a first in the 67-year history of Peyo's blue cosmos. In fact, it may be a contradiction in terms: to be a good Smurf, in the proto-communist vision of the original comics, was to never elevate your own personality above the collective. Of Smurf Village's original 100 inhabitants, says French sociologist and Smurfologist Antoine Buéno, 'About 90% were totally indistinguishable. They all looked the same, they were all dressed the same.' While some Smurfs were identified by name, he says, this was usually through a skill that is related to how he (all of the original Smurfs were male) is useful to the community. 'The Smurfian society is an archetypal corporatist society, meaning that each Smurf that is identified represents a social function.' In Miller's latest reboot of the franchise, unleashing your true inner self is presented as the key to overcoming a problem – in Peyo's original book, it is the root of all evil. 'In the comics, each time a Smurf tries to be an individual, it creates a catastrophe,' Buéno says. For instance, in the second book of the original series, 1965's Le Schtroumpfissime (King Smurf), the inhabitants of the village hold a vote for an interim leader in the absence of Papa Smurf, but democracy does not become them. One nameless Smurf realises he can play the system by making promises he can't keep to each of his potential voters, and wins. But once elected, he rules as an autocrat, installing an oppressive regime marshalled by Hefty Smurf and forcing the other Smurfs to build him a palace. The book was translated into Dutch as De Smurführer. 'All bad comes from individuality, which is also linked with private property', says Buéno. 'Each time private property is claimed in the village, it ruins the whole balance of the society.' The 2011 book in which Buéno explored the hidden ideological underpinnings of Peyo's fictional world, Le Petit Livre Bleu: Analyse Critique et Politique de la Société des Schtroumpfs, triggered a bitter backlash from true blue fans, and is wilfully polemical in the way it spells out political allusions that the comics never make explicit. The revolutionary connotations of the Phrygian caps (red for Papa, white for all the rest) are plausible, the identification of bearded Papa Smurf as Marx and bespectacled Brainy as Trotsky perhaps less so. The search for messages hidden in the books may even have distracted from how genuinely original an exercise in storytelling the Smurfs were on the surface: a series of tales with 100 protagonists, of whom most look exactly the same, in which heroism lies in collective action. Speaking more than a decade after the publication of his Little Blue Book, Buéno sounds more balanced in his assessment. 'My theory was always that Peyo was not into politics at all', he says. 'But his genius was in creating a utopia that drew from our joint political history and coming up with images that spoke to everyone.' Using Smurf Village as an example of working socialism did not just die with the new reboot, it was washed out of the Smurfverse after Peyo sold the rights to his creation in the 1970s. 'For me, what we witnessed in the Smurfs is a perfect demonstration of Guy Debord's analysis of capitalism', says Buéno. 'Capitalism's strength lies in never frontally destroying its enemies, but taking them in and digesting them.'
Metro
5 days ago
- Metro
I'm a film critic – here are 5 movies that are criminally underrated
Tori Brazier Published July 17, 2025 4:14pm Updated July 17, 2025 4:57pm Link is copied Comments Not every film always gets the attention and accolades it deserves. From awkwardly-timed releases, poor marketing efforts and audiences sometimes just not turning out for no clear reason, it can hurt. As a film critic, some of these have bothered me more than most and I still question why they didn't get the love I feel they were worthy of. Here are five of these movies... (Picture: Netflix) Better Man, famously, was the musical biopic about Robbie Williams where he was played by a CGI chimpanzee. It sounded utterly insane at first, but actually ended up putting a poignant and original twist on Williams' no-holds-barred autobiographical movie. Unashamedly British in its humour and swearing – and packed with nostalgic tunes – Better Man sadly flopped quite spectacularly at the box office over the Christmas period, making just $22.5million on a reported $110m budget – but hopefully it can finally find the audience it deserved now it's streaming on Prime Video (Picture: Paramount Pictures) An absolute gem of a film, The Ballad of Wallis Island has achieved cult status already among fans of its heartwarming and off-beat British humour thanks to buzz that built immediately after its Sundance Film Festival premiere in January. Its premise of an eccentric millionaire attempting to reunite his favourite musical duo for a gig on a remote island is simple but expertly well-executed, thanks to the talents of long-time comedy duo Tim Key and Tom Basden, who wrote and star in it, alongside multiple Oscar-nominee Carey Mulligan. Over 18 years in development, it's still showing in some cinemas following its UK release in May so make sure you pop along and see it; then you can be smug about catching this upon original release in years to come (Picture: Alistair Heap/Focus Features) Many people won't agree with me on this one, but I really enjoyed Netflix's irreverent (some would say blasphemous) take on Jane Austen's Persuasion, starring Dakota Johnson, in 2022. Johnson's heartsick but knowing Anne Elliot, a spinster at 27, swigs rather more wine than I remembered from the novel, with the film featuring anachronistic language and features such as 'goss' and ghosting advice. Some fans were aghast at what was dubbed the 'Fleabagification' of Austen (Johnson breaks the fourth wall) but I think its value and entertainment lies in being a bold adaptation that surprised (Picture: Netflix) Rocketman got a pretty decent showing in 2019, earning impressive and near-matching critic and fan scores of 89% and 88% on Rotten Tomatoes, and $195.2m at the box office. It also nabbed an Academy Award for best original song and other critical praise - but it feels like it didn't land as solidly as it should. This is in large part due to Freddie Mercury biopic Bohemian Rhapsody the year before, which seemed to suck a lot of attention up in this genre thanks to overhype. Rocketman painted a more interesting and unflinching portrayal of its protagonist, Elton John, the musical arrangements and orchestrations were sensational - and Taron Egerton should have received an Oscar nomination for his performance (Picture: David Appleby/Paramount Pictures) The Ballad of Buster Scruggs is easy to overlook when it's part of Joel and Ethan Coen's stacked filmography, which also includes Raising Arizona, Fargo and No Country for Old Men. But their last collaboration to date offers a satisfying and action-packed collection of six Western-style shorts set out on the frontier and starring the likes of Liam Neeson, Brendan Gleeson, Tim Blake Nelson, Tom Waits and Harry Melling. We've got singing gunslingers, bank robbers, gold prospectors and a young woman navigating the Oregon Trail. A Netflix original that made an impact on me when it showed at the BFI London Film Festival in 2018, it did win prizes including three Oscar nominations, but its week-long cinema run allowed it to fade into the obscurity of Netflix's vast back catalogue (Picture: Netflix) I could share several more examples of films that, in my book, should have earned more attention and admiration than they actually got. In the era of streaming, it's easier than ever for the smaller budgeted titles to get lost in the noise too - although there's also a healthy amount of subjective opinion to go with all my picks too (some more than others) (Picture: Alistair Heap/Focus Features)
