Amid Attacks, Iran's Exiled Opposition Remained Divided. Who Are They?
After 12 days of devastating Israeli attacks, the stability of Iran's government is a subject of intense debate. And some in Israel and the United States have pressed not just for the destruction of Iran's nuclear program but also for 'regime change.'
Overthrowing the government in Iran has been a goal of some in the Iranian diaspora too, ever since the 1979 revolution that disposed the shah and replaced the monarchy with a theocratic Islamic Republic. The war has amplified a range of voices in the opposition abroad, which has a history of infighting as well as organized online harassment of journalists, academics and others that has escalated at times into threats of physical violence.
Here are a few of the overseas voices opposed to the Islamic Republic — and how they have responded to the conflict.
Decentralized activist groups
Iranians in the diaspora who oppose the Islamic Republic include exiled leftists, nationalists, secular democrats, former prisoners, journalists, human rights advocates and artists.
This loose network lacks organizational structure, according to Taghi Rahmani, a prominent dissident who lives in Paris. But he said it has been effective in calling attention to human rights abuses in Iran with protests around the world, and voicing the demands of ordinary Iranians seeking change.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
40 minutes ago
- Fox News
Far-left actor John Cusack says Iran 'should get' nukes to protect Middle East from US and Israel
Anti-Israel and anti-Trump actor John Cusack expressed hope last Friday that Iran will get a nuclear weapon. In a post shared to X, the actor said Iran should get a nuclear weapon so that it can deter the U.S. and Israel's aggression in the Middle East. "Iran will surely rush to get a nuclear weapon- and they should get one," he wrote, adding, "it's the only way to deter US and Israel from bombing every country in Middle East." Cusack published his post almost a week after President Donald Trump ordered U.S. military strikes on three major Iranian facilities believed to be developing nuclear weapons. Long-range B-2 stealth bomber aircraft dropped 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs on the locations on June 21 in an attack that Trump called "a spectacular military success." Cusack has been harshly critical of Israel's actions in its war in Gaza and war with Iran on social media. Prior to posting support for Iran getting nukes, he appeared to suggest that U.S. support for Israel meant the country was supporting a "genocidal" regime. He wrote, "Blind allegiance for Israel is alliance to a genocidal regeme[sic] - it's a nation state - run [by] a murderous gangster - not some fixed star." Earlier, he posted that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been killing innocent children, and he accused the U.S. of being complicit. The actor also condemned both countries for recent strikes in Lebanon. "Isreal [sic] bombs Lebanon! [W]ell they can't have any days when they are not illegally bombing someone while US grovels," he wrote. Additionally, Cusack posted that democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani winning the New York City mayoral Democratic primary was a "f--- you to billionaires, dem establishment, and the genocide in Gaza - the bombing of Iran." And in a post from last Wednesday, Cusack accused Israeli soldiers of murdering innocent Palestinians seeking aid and blasted Democratic Party figures for not speaking out about it. "The fact that so many in the dem party will not speak out and work every day to stop this genocide - Should haunt them for the rest of their lives - and end their political careers," he wrote in part.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Deadly strike hits beach café in Gaza
The Hamas-run Gaza health ministry said at least 30 people were killed when a strike hit a beach café in Gaza. The Israeli military said that it was targeting Hamas and takes steps to avoid civilian casualties. NBC News' Matt Bradley reports.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Team Trump Is Serious About Unleashing the Espionage Act on the Media
Donald Trump hates leakers. He isn't a fan of journalists, either. He wants to punish them both in response to reporting that early Pentagon intelligence found the administration's recent strikes against Iran weren't as effective as the president has been claiming. 'They should be prosecuted,' Trump said when Maria Bartiromo of Fox Business asked him about his contention that Democrats leaked the intelligence, adding that the administration could attempt to force reporters to reveal their sourcing by saying: 'National Security.' One of the ways Trump has discussed cracking down on leakers and the press is by wielding the Espionage Act, a 1917 law criminalizing the dissemination of sensitive information that could harm U.S. national security or aid a foreign nation. In the months leading up to his second presidency, Trump and several of his advisers and close allies talked about novel ways the Espionage Act could be unleashed not just against government leakers and whistleblowers, but against media outlets that received classified or highly sensitive information, according to two sources involved with such conversations with Trump. 'Why not the press?' Trump has said, one of the sources relays, when commenting on how, in his mind, it makes absolutely no sense that the law has traditionally been used to prosecute leakers but not journalists who publish confidential national security disclosures. Trump's desire to weaponize the Espionage Act hasn't abated six months into his second term. If anything, it's intensified. In recent days, amid a prolonged meltdown over the intel leak about the strikes against Iran to outlets like CNN and The New York Times, the president has privately brought up using the Espionage Act on reporters again, according to one of the sources and also a senior Trump administration official. The president's lieutenants are listening, and — per the administration official — looking for the right case to launch their 'maiden voyage' of an unprecedented type of Espionage Act prosecution — one which would also serve to broadly intimidate news organizations when it comes to publishing classified government information or protecting the identities of their confidential sources. Trump himself is keen on doing this especially if the administration can't convince a journalist to set aside their First Amendment protections and voluntarily give up a source who can't otherwise be conclusively identified by an internal leak hunt. The sources say they don't know if the federal investigation into the Iran bombing intelligence leak — which is being carried out in coordination with Trump loyalist Kash Patel's FBI — will ultimately yield that opportunity. However, government officials and other Republicans close to Trump stress that administration brass at the Justice Department, White House, and elsewhere are actively on the lookout for a test case of a leak that could be used to file criminal charges against American reporters and their publications as supposed 'co-conspirators.' 'All we'd really need is one text or email from a reporter telling a source: 'Can you pull something for me?' or something very direct of that nature,' the senior Trump official says. 'If somebody in the media wasn't careful even for a split second, that could make the difference between a reporter, and a criminal.' When asked for comment on the administration potentially using the Espionage Act against leakers and journalists, Anna Kelly, a spokesperson for the White House, provided a statement to Rolling Stone: 'Leaking classified information is a crime, and anyone who threatens American national security in this manner should be held accountable.' Barack Obama oversaw a steep incline in the Justice Department using the Espionage Act to imprison journalistic sources, cracking open a door that Trump was more than happy to blow open during his first term. 'Obama's Justice Department indicted eight journalistic sources under the Espionage Act, more than all U.S. presidents before him combined,' The Intercept reported in 2019. 'Donald Trump is now surpassing Obama's eight-year record in just over two years in office.' Any Espionage Act prosecution of a journalist or media outlet — simply for publishing information that made Trump mad enough — would be a dark, significant escalation that would invariably face numerous First Amendment challenges. Still, Trump and some of his lieutenants felt they could have cracked down harder during his first four years in office, and they're now hoping to make up for lost time. 'Oh, it'll be brutal,' a conservative lawyer close to Trump said in December, of his coming blitz against the press, whistleblowers, and anonymous leakers. 'We've learned our lessons from the first time and one lesson is you have got to be even more aggressive.' Indeed, when it comes to Trump's crackdowns and intimidation campaigns against not just the media but freedom of speech, in general, the current administration is already making good on its promises to dial up the authoritarian threats and, ultimately, actions. Trump has a personal history with the Espionage Act, beyond musing about weaponizing it to go after leakers and journalists. The Justice Department charged him with over 30 violations of the law related after he hoarded a trove of highly sensitive government documents at his Florida beach club. Aileen Cannon, the Trump-appointed district judge who oversaw the case, dropped the charges last summer. More from Rolling Stone White House Pushes B.S. About 'Big Beautiful Bill' as Popularity Craters Kristi Noem Secretly Pocketed Cash From Dark Money Group: Report Rick Scott Demands More Cuts to Medicaid, Which His Company Allegedly Scammed Best of Rolling Stone The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence
