University fined £585,000 following free speech investigation
The investigation by the Office for Students (OfS) found documents which govern university policy also failed to safeguard academic freedom, as well as finding failings in the management and governance of the university.
It was launched following protests calling for the dismissal of senior academic Professor Kathleen Stock in 2021 after she was accused of transphobia.
Professor Stock faced protests on the campus after publishing a book on gender identity, an experience she told the BBC was like a 'surreal anxiety dream'. She resigned her position at the university in 2021.
The university's vice-chancellor, Professor Sasha Roseneil, said the university would legally challenge the OfS's findings.
The OfS report found no evidence Professor Stock said anything unlawful during her time at the university and concluded its 'Trans and Non-Binary Equality Policy Statement failed to uphold the freedom of speech and academic freedom public interest governance principles' required by the watchdog.
It also found the university did not have 'adequate and effective management and governance arrangements' in place and that the shortcomings led to a 'chilling effect' with staff and students potentially self-censoring certain views.
Arif Ahmed, director for freedom of speech and academic freedom at the OfS, said: 'Free speech is a fundamentally important aspect of our successful and vibrant higher education sector. All universities and colleges have a duty to protect academic freedom and to take steps to secure freedom of speech within the law.
'So it is right that we investigate where we have concerns that students may not be benefiting from the free and robust exchange of ideas, or that academics are not able to teach or research what they choose.'
He said the university had made 'significant and serious breaches' of the OfS's requirements and the penalties were 'appropriate for the scale of wrongdoing we found'.
Professor Roseneil warned of the implications of the report's outcome for the wider higher education sector.
'The OfS's findings mean that it is now virtually impossible for universities to prevent abuse, harassment or bullying on our campuses,' she said. 'It means universities cannot protect groups subject to harmful propaganda or determine that stereotyped assumptions should not be relied upon in the university curriculum.
'The OfS is effectively decreeing libertarian free speech absolutism as the fundamental principle for UK universities. In our view, the OfS is perpetuating the culture wars.'
She criticised the way the three-and-a-half year investigation was conducted, saying nobody employed by the university was interviewed.
'The circumstances around Professor Stock's departure from the University of Sussex are deeply regrettable,' she said. 'Sussex has consistently and publicly defended her right to pursue her academic work and to express her gender critical beliefs.
'Academic freedom and freedom of speech are the foundational elements of a university, and the university is committed to ensuring that diversity in all its forms, particularly diversity of thought and identity, are able to flourish at Sussex.'
Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said free speech and academic freedom were 'non-negotiables' in universities and 'robust action will be taken' if they are not upheld.
'If you go to university you must be prepared to have your views challenged, hear contrary opinions and be exposed to uncomfortable truths,' she said. 'We are giving the OfS stronger powers on freedom of speech so students and academics are not muzzled by the chilling effect demonstrated in this case.
'Through our Plan for Change we will restore the integrity of our universities as rigorous centres of intellectual debate, sparking new ideas that will cement their status as engines of growth and opportunity.'
The OfS is the independent regulator for higher education in England and Wales.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
3 days ago
- Fox News
WATCH: Despite Trump criticism on stock trading ban, Hawley says president ‘wants to get it done'
Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., said that despite President Trump's harsh criticism against a bill to ban stock trading among government leaders, the president 'wants to get it done.' (Credit: Nicholas Ballasy)
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Universities ‘on notice' they could face penalties over free speech
Universities have been put 'on notice' that they could face penalties if they fail to uphold free speech, the education minister said as new protections for academic freedom came into force. Skills minister Baroness Jacqui Smith has said the Government will 'not tolerate the silencing of academics or students who voice legitimate views'. The Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act, which comes into force on Friday, will require universities and colleges in England to promote academic freedom to ensure discussions can take place on campuses without fear of censorship of students, staff or speakers expressing lawful opinions. It also bans universities from using non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) in cases of bullying, harassment and sexual misconduct. The Office for Students (OfS), England's higher education regulator, can investigate universities and colleges and impose fines if it has found they have failed to protect free speech rights. In March, the OfS issued a record penalty of £585,000 to the University of Sussex after a three-and-a-half year probe into the resignation of academic Professor Kathleen Stock. The OfS's investigation found the institution's trans and non-binary equality policy statement had 'a chilling effect' of possible self-censorship of students and staff on campus. It was launched after high-profile protests called for the dismissal of Prof Stock in 2021 over her views on gender identity. Professor Arif Ahmed, director for freedom of speech and academic freedom at the OfS, previously suggested universities could face higher fines in the future if they fail to uphold free speech. Baroness Smith said: 'Academic freedom is non-negotiable in our world-leading institutions, and we will not tolerate the silencing of academics or students who voice legitimate views. 'These strengthened protections make this explicitly clear in law, and the record fine already handed down by the OfS has put universities on notice that they must comply or face the consequences. 'Through our Plan for Change we are restoring our world class universities as engines of growth, opportunity and innovation, and fostering a culture of free inquiry and academic freedom is at the heart of that.' In January, Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson announced the Government would be pushing ahead with key measures in the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act. But she announced the 'statutory tort' – which could have allowed individuals to bring legal proceedings against universities that failed to comply with freedom of speech duties – would be removed from the legislation. Ms Phillipson said the tort would create 'costly litigation that would risk diverting resources away from students'. The implementation of legislation, passed under the previous Conservative government in 2023, was paused by Labour in July last year after the general election due to concerns it could be 'burdensome' for universities. A new OfS complaints scheme will allow academics, external speakers and university staff to raise concerns about restrictions on their lawful free speech, which could lead to fines if their free speech is not protected. Students will be able to make complaints to the Office of the Independent Adjudicator. Prof Ahmed said: 'Free speech and academic freedom are fundamental to the quality of students' education and their experience in higher education. 'From today universities and colleges take on new legal duties to secure and promote freedom of speech and academic freedom. 'The OfS's regulatory requirements to prevent and address harassment and sexual misconduct are also fully in place. 'These are an important set of measures which will further protect students from harassment while ensuring that students and academics are free to discuss controversial views, including those which some might find shocking or offensive.'
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
English universities now have a duty to uphold freedom of speech – here's how it might affect students' sense of belonging
The Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act, which comes into force on August 1 2025, means universities in England now have a new duty to uphold 'robust' strategies to ensure freedom of speech on campus. To support universities in navigating the boundaries of lawful and unlawful speech, universities regulator the Office for Students appointed its first director for freedom of speech and academic freedom in 2023. Arif Ahmed, who is also a professor of philosophy at the University of Cambridge, has reportedly said that coming across views students might find offensive is part of a university education. It's possible, though, that feeling offended comes up against the important concept of 'belonging' at university. In the context of higher education, belonging is often defined as feeling at home, included and valued. It is linked to more students staying in their courses, having enhanced wellbeing, and being able to learn well at university. But feeling offended and feeling you belong at university don't have to be contradictory. Some of our research has found that belonging can also mean being able to challenge the dominant culture at a university, which may exclude students who don't fit a particular mould. Some students explained that they proactively resist the prevalent image of the 'typical' student. For example, in highly selective universities, students are often extremely competitive and industrious with a tendency to overwork. But this culture may not align with the work-life balance prioritised by some students. This form of 'positive not-belonging' often takes the form of friendship groups and communities that cultivate an alternative kind of belonging. These groups may well enable greater freedom of self-expression, without fear of being judged or feeling pressured to conform to pre-existing academic cultures. While some students are able to carve out these collective and alternative communities for belonging, many others feel their presence and sense of belonging is conditional – especially minority ethnic students. Clearer advocacy for free speech might help these students feel more comfortable speaking up and building a stronger sense of belonging. We must not forget that the idea of belonging carries power dynamics, and often has implications for what is perceived as up for debate – and what is not. Existing free speech What's more, the views of students suggest that free speech is already part of their experience at university. In 2023, the Office for Students added a question about freedom of expression to the annual National Student Survey, which gathers final-year undergraduates' opinions on their higher education experience. The question, added for students at English universities only, asked how 'free' students felt to express their ideas, opinions and beliefs. The results showed that 86% did feel they had this freedom. This has remained stable in the latest survey, with a slight increase to just over 88% in the 2025 results. The Office for Students also commissioned YouGov to poll research and teaching staff at English universities about their perceptions of free speech in higher education in 2024. Some positive results mirrored the student data. For example, 89% of academics reported that they are confident they understand what free speech means in higher education. But the polling also found that 21% did not feel free to discuss controversial topics in their teaching. This lack of perceived freedom of expression does not only have a negative impact on staff. It is widely understood that a key purpose of higher education is to nurture students' independent thinking and self-awareness. A key step toward this goal is not to be afraid of engaging in difficult conversations, including asking questions. However, this does not happen automatically. Universities need to provide clear scaffolding, guidance and practical steps to protect freedom of speech. It is also important to normalise and promote conversations about topics such as cultural differences and intercultural competence, which refers to the ability to interact with people from different cultural backgrounds effectively and appropriately. If addressed, these discussions can help to foster inclusion, and promote diversity of thought and expression. Get your news from actual experts, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter to receive all The Conversation UK's latest coverage of news and research, from politics and business to the arts and sciences. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
