How Donald Trump ended up with a cabinet of incompetents
president Donald Trump
couldn't handle the truth. He didn't even know the truth. And he has no respect for truth, so even if he knew, why would he tell the truth about the truth?
At a White House lunch with African leaders on Wednesday, Trump engaged in a bizarre exchange with the New York Times White House reporter Shawn McCreesh.
The day before, when CNN's Kaitlan Collins asked the president who authorised the pause on weapons shipments to
Ukraine
– at a time when Russia is engaged in a barbarous onslaught, indiscriminately killing civilians – Trump replied, defensively: 'I don't know. Why don't you tell me?'
The Pentagon's puer aeternus,
Pete Hegseth
, was sitting right beside Trump. And reporters soon ferreted out the information that perennial screw-up Hegseth had ordered the pause without telling Trump,
Marco Rubio
and other top officials.
READ MORE
Trump reversed the Pentagon chief, reflecting a belated awareness of the fact that
Vladimir Putin
is playing him for a fool. Like a spurned lover, he keened that his Russian boyfriend's promises are 'meaningless'.
In a follow-up the next day, McCreesh asked Trump if he had figured out who had ordered the munitions to Ukraine halted.
When Trump said no, McCreesh pressed him: 'What does it say that such a big decision could be made inside your government without your knowing?'
Trump bristled. A jester like Hegseth had kept the king in the dark on a consequential move.
'If a decision was made, I will know,' Trump blustered. 'I'll be the first to know. In fact, most likely I'd give the order, but I haven't done that yet.'
It is not reassuring, at a time of man-made and natural disasters, that the president is spouting gobbledegook and his maladroit cabinet members are spinning out.
It's a paradox: if you choose your cabinet based on looks, you are likely to end up with a cabinet that makes you look bad. Running government is harder than bloviating on Fox News and assorted podcasts.
And if you demand uber-fealty from your advisers, you will end up surrounded by toadies who don't level with you.
In the dishy new book 2024: How Trump Retook the White House and the Democrats Lost United States, Josh Dawsey, Tyler Pager and Isaac Arnsdorf describe how Sergio Gor, a Trump aide who rose by publishing Trump's coffee table books, created draconian loyalty tests during the transition.
'Trump believed the biggest mistake of his first term was picking disloyal officials, and Gor was determined to disqualify candidates who had ever criticized Trump or anyone associated with him,' the authors write.
Kristi Noem is loyal to Trump. But perhaps it was too much to ask that someone who
executed her own puppy
was going to understand the humanitarian necessity of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (Fema).
Noem has been parroting Trump and talking about abolishing Fema since she got the job heading the department of homeland security. She recently enacted a debilitating rule designed to cut the Fema budget, dictating that every grant and contract over $100,000 (€85,500) needs explicit permission from her.
As CNN pointed out, that's 'pennies' in an agency where disaster costs soar into the billions. At the same time, the Times reports, the agency didn't answer nearly two-thirds of calls to its disaster line because it had fired hundreds of call centre contractors. (Now, confronted with the Texas disaster, the administration is backing off the eradication plan.)
As Trump was preparing to travel to Kerr County, Texas, to inspect flood damage on Friday, the White House posted a meme of him as Superman, playing off the new movie about the Man of Steel. But the initial federal response was less than super. Noem didn't authorise Fema's deployment of rescue teams until Monday, more than 72 hours after the flooding began, CNN reported, and there have been questions about crucial staffing shortages at the National Weather Service as floodwaters rose.
Pam Bondi enraged the Trump faithful when, after she inflamed conspiracy theorists about Jeffrey Epstein documents, her justice department said on Monday there was nothing more to see. No client list. Move along, please. 'Are people still talking about this guy, this creep?' an irritated Trump asked reporters about his erstwhile paedophile playmate.
Laura Loomer demanded that Bondi resign, writing on X: 'I cannot sugar coat how much good will Pam Bondi has cost the Trump admin with the base this week. She is a massive liability to President Trump.'
On Wednesday, Bondi angrily accused Dan Bongino, conspiracist podcaster turned FBI deputy director, of leaking stories that whipped up expectations for Epstein secrets. He denied it, and told people he was considering quitting.
Now furious right-wing conspiracists think there's a cover-up of the cover-up.
Vapidly, agriculture secretary Brooke Rollins suggested people on Medicaid could replace deported immigrants. They can pick our crops! It's unreal, but Sean Duffy, once a Real World cast member, is in charge of transportation
and
Nasa. And don't forget the scary spike in measles cases fuelled by the anti-vaccine crowd; thank you, RFK jnr!
It turns out, even good-looking dodos are still dodos.
This article originally appeared in
The New York Times
.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Irish Sun
3 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
Trump says Zelensky should NOT target Moscow after ‘asking Ukraine leader if he can make Putin feel the pain of war'
DONALD Trump has urged Volodymyr Zelensky not to target Moscow with US-manufactured missiles - just days after he reportedly Kyiv if Russia's capital was in reach. A bombshell report claimed that Trump asked the Ukrainian leader if he can 8 Donald Trump has urged Volodymyr Zelensky not to target Moscow with US long-range missiles Credit: Alamy 8 A bombshell report a few days ago claimed that Trump asked the Ukrainian leader if he can 'make them [Russia] feel the pain' Credit: Getty 8 Trump responded to the report by saying: 'I want to stop the killing of thousands of people a week' - pictured: Russia's attack on Lviv last week Credit: Reuters The US President asked: "Volodymyr, can you hit Moscow? Can you hit St Petersburg too?", according to the Zelensky responded: "Absolutely. We can if you give us the weapons." It comes as Trump pledged to send These are believed to include cruise missiles which could be able to reach Moscow and all the major Russian cities depending on what is sent. read more in Donald Trump But Trump has now pushed back on the reports of him enquiring about Ukraine's next targets. He told reporters that he has actually warned Zelensky to not even think about attacking Moscow if he ever wants the conflict to end. Trump did not directly mention the FT report but the White House did earlier today. Press secretary Karoline Leavitt argued Trump's words were taken out of context as the President "was merely asking a question, not encouraging further killing ". Most read in The US Sun She continued, in a statement to the Trump was also asked if he has now turned against Putin entirely and sided with Ukraine . Putin defies Trump's ultimatum and BOMBARDS Ukraine – as Kremlin mouthpiece warns Russia will 'turn Kyiv into Hiroshima' In recent days, the President has blasted Putin for his recent daily bombardments and urged Vlad to As he left the White House today however, he simply said: "I'm on nobody's side. "I want to stop the killing of thousands of people a week." The clearest sign yet that He issued a blistering crackdown on Moscow as he made a Trump made the comments as he also agreed to supply weapons to help Kyiv in the war in the hopes of driving Putin to the negotiating table. He vowed to send weapons compromising of "everything" in his arsenal in order to One of the proposed weapons which could be included in the package deal is America's joint air-to-surface standoff cruise missiles (JASSM). 8 Trump with his press secretary Karoline Leavitt who argued Trump's words were taken out of context Credit: Shutterstock Editorial 8 Firefighters working on a fire at a site of a strike following a mass Russian drone and missile attack on Kyiv Credit: AFP 8 It comes as Trump pledged to send "top of the line weapons" used by the US over to Nato so they can deploy them in Kyiv Credit: Reuters Surface-to-air Patriot missile systems and batteries are also said to be among the equipment being manufactured. A furious Trump added he is 'very unhappy' with Russia . The President has spent the first seven months of his White House return urging both sides to come to the negotiating table. But a snarling Putin has always declined and instead ramped up his ground and aerial offensives across Ukraine. And the They mocked the deadline with sources saying they may now demand even more Ukrainian territory instead of laying down arms. Russia will instead keep terrorising Ukrainian civilians during the seven-week period instead of surrendering in any form, they added. Within hours of Trump's tariff threat, Drones targeted a university in Sumy, wounding a 14-year-old girl and a 19-year-old student, while a missile hit a medical facility in Shostka. In response, Ukraine launched its own drone blitz across southwest Russia, injuring civilians and damaging homes and industrial sites in Voronezh and Lipetsk. What have experts said of Trump's sending long-range weapons to Ukraine? by Sayan Bose, Foreign News Reporter DONALD Trump sending long-range weapons to Ukraine could be a game-changer for the war by helping halt Vladimir Putin's nightly blitzes, experts said. Colonel Hamish de Bretton-Gordon, a decorated Mr de Bretton-Gordon told The Sun: "These weapons can strike Moscow - over 400 miles from the border. That allows the Ukrainians to strike drone factory production and ammunition sites, and others. "So this will have both psychological as well as physical effects. "People in Moscow will realise that they potentially could be targeted. "And when you also add to it the American bombings on Iranian sites that were supposed to be impregnable, it shows that American missile and drone technology rather superior to the Russian air defence system." The former army chief said these weapons will put real pressure on Russia, adding: "The metric has now changed and Trump's decision could make a huge difference." Ex-military intelligence officer Colonel Philip Ingram told The Sun how these long-range weapons could help strike Russian missile and drone launchpads - the ones that are used to launch nightly attacks on Ukraine. He said: "The Ukrainians are already attacking to hit Russian military logistics, defence industry bases. "And with these sophisticated weapons, they will have increased capability of doing so. "It will impact the ability of the Russians to prosecute these increasingly large drone and rocket attacks on a nightly basis. "And then that's the best way for the Ukrainians to stop it." 8 Russian attacks have continued to prove deadly in recent weeks with Donald Trump finally saying he has had enough - pictured Shostka Credit: Getty 8
RTÉ News
4 hours ago
- RTÉ News
ECB to test banks' resilience to geopolitical risk in 2026
The European Central Bank will test banks' resilience to geopolitical risk next year, telling them to come up with scenarios that would wipe out large chunks of their capital, chief ECB supervisor Claudia Buch said today. The ECB has long warned that geopolitics is one of the biggest risks for euro zone banks amid conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza, as well as the trade war stoked by US President Donald Trump. It will now assess banks' preparedness to that type of risk, but with a twist. In typical stress tests, banks are given scenarios and must calculate how much capital would be wiped out under each. In this exercise, however, the ECB will hand out levels of capital depletion and tell banks to come up with scenarios that could cause them. "In the 2026 thematic stress test exercise, we will follow up on this year's stress test by asking banks to assess which firm-specific geopolitical risk scenarios could severely impact their solvency," Buch told the European Parliament. Supervisors have been telling banks for months to prepare for politically motivated disruption, including a global dollar drought if the Federal Reserve withdraws its lifelines. Next year's exercise will be part of banks' self-evaluation of their capital needs, known in regulatory jargon as the Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP). The ECB runs thematic health checks on euro zone banks every other year, that is when there is no European Union-wide stress test by the European Banking Authority. Its latest, in 2024, was about cyber-resilience.
RTÉ News
4 hours ago
- RTÉ News
How has Russia responded to Trump's 50-day ultimatum?
If the threat of hefty US tariffs being imposed on Russia and its trading partners has worried the Kremlin's leadership, they are not showing it. Russia's President Vladimir Putin has not responded to yesterday's announcement by US President Donald Trump that the US will impose 100% tariffs on Russia and its trading partners if Moscow fails to halt its war in Ukraine within 50 days. Those secondary sanctions would penalise buyers of Russian oil exports, particularly China and India. Mr Trump also announced that the US would supply Ukraine with high-grade US military equipment, including up to 17 Patriot air defence systems, to be paid for by NATO countries. Mr Putin's silence is not surprising. He has not reacted to other recent critical comments about him by Mr Trump either. All the messaging coming from the Kremlin indicates that it is unfazed by Mr Trump's 50-day ultimatum, or at least that is how it wants to be perceived. This afternoon, Reuters cited three anonymous sources close to the Kremlin's power base, who said that Mr Putin will not stop the war under pressure from the West. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov has described the US president's comments yesterday as "very serious". "We certainly need time to analyse what was said in Washington," he said. Yesterday, Mr Peskov had downplayed US plans to supply Kyiv with Patriots and instead focused on highlighting that Russia was ready to start a third round of direct talks with Ukraine. The US, said Mr Peskov, was "continuing" to arm Ukraine as it had already been doing, as if to say that the Trump administration's policy reversal was not newsworthy. But it was big news. Few could have predicted in February, when Mr Trump held his first amicable phone call with Mr Putin, that the US president would end up threatening sanctions against Moscow and supplying Ukraine with billions of dollars worth of weapons, as he agreed yesterday in Washington with NATO chief Mark Rutte. Just months ago, both presidents were talking about a new US-Russia trading relationship. Instead, Russia's rejection of a US proposal for a 30-day ceasefire (which Ukraine agreed to as early as 11 March), its belligerent stance during two rounds of direct talks with Ukrainian officials in Istanbul in May and June, and its decision to intensify its air war on Ukrainian cities in recent weeks has made Mr Trump reach for the stick, not the carrot, to get Russia to agree to a ceasefire deal. Other senior Russian officials have brushed aside Mr Trump's comments too. Dmitry Medvedev, a firebrand and former Russian president who sits on the country's security council, posted on X this morning that Russia "didn't care" about Mr Trump's 50-day warning to end the war. "Trump issued a theatrical ultimatum to the Kremlin. The world shuddered, expecting the consequences. Belligerent Europe was disappointed," he wrote. Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov, speaking today during a visit to China, said that Russia wants to understand the motivation behind Mr Trump's decision. But it is hard to believe that Mr Lavrov, a seasoned diplomat, cannot interpret why the US president has changed course. Quite simply, Mr Trump has grown tired of the Russian leader's nice talk, or "bulls**t" as he described it last week. Others like Russian deputy foreign minister Sergey Ryabkov told Russia's state news agency TASS that Moscow remains "unshakeable" and views ultimatums to be "unacceptable". Even without hearing directly from Mr Putin, the response from Moscow to yesterday's statements by Mr Trump implies that Russia is in no mood to slow the momentum of its war. The threat of new US sanctions on Russia and its trading partners has not spooked the markets either. The MOEX, the main benchmark index on the Moscow stock exchange, has risen 1.6% since trading began yesterday morning when news broke about Mr Trump's intention supply Patriots to Ukraine. It is not a significant increase but has bucked a two-week dip in the value of Russian stocks. Nor have oil markets slumped since yesterday's ultimatum by Mr Trump. Brent crude, the main global benchmark for oil prices, dipped $1.6 yesterday but steadied today, trading about $1 lower than yesterday morning. Not a significant drop. That suggests that investors doubt the US will follow through on its threat to impose tariffs on countries that buy Russian oil exports. Or, that Mr Trump's 50-day deadline allows enough time for oil traders to see how things play out in the coming weeks before deciding to sell off. It could take weeks for Mr Trump's ultimatum to start bearing any real pressure. And a lot can change in the next 50 days. Russia could decide to further ramp up its war effort to gain as much land as possible in that time. On the frontlines, the bloody business continues as usual.
