logo
Warning over low funding to tackle invasive species damaging British wildlife

Warning over low funding to tackle invasive species damaging British wildlife

Independent11-05-2025
Less than 1% of the Government's biosecurity budget goes on invasive species, despite the danger they pose to British wildlife, figures suggest.
Conservationists warned the funding to tackle non-native plants and animals was failing to match the risk they posed to 'cherished' native species from water voles to ladybirds, as well as to waterways, homes, businesses and local green spaces.
They have called for more resources for border checks to stop non-native species arriving here, and funding for local groups to tackle the problem on the ground.
A freedom of information request to the Animal and Plant Health Agency by Wildlife and Countryside Link (WCL) shows only £2.47 million of the estimated £250 million biosecurity budget was going to tackling invasive species.
And just £250,000 of that was being channelled to local groups tackling non-native species on the ground – which range from Himalayan balsam and floating pennywort choking waterways to rhododendrons and giant blackberries strangling woodlands and grasslands, conservationists said.
The figures also show £22.7 million of the wider biodiversity budget – around 3% of the spend on protecting important habitats and species – was spent on tackling invasive species.
This funding is thought to be going towards areas such as tree disease ash dieback and Asian or yellow-legged hornets which pose a huge threat to honeybees and other insects, WCL said.
Spending on stopping the spread of yellow-legged hornets bucks the trend of low funding, the conservationists said – with more than £2.2 million spent over the last two years, compared to just under £500,000 in the same period on local action for wider invasive species.
Research has found that efforts to stop the yellow-legged hornets in the UK have delayed the insect's establishment when it has already taken hold in many countries.
But Wildlife and Countryside Link coalition of conservation groups said while this was a big achievement, the hornet, a voracious predator of other insects which first arrived in Europe on a shipment of pottery 20 years ago, was likely to establish here at some point.
And the high costs of tackling it shows the need to give greater border check powers and resourcing to stop these species arriving in the UK in the first place, the conservationists said.
The wildlife experts say invasive species play a major role in more than 60% of extinctions worldwide.
In the UK, species are in serious decline due to invasive species including water voles, preyed on by non-native mink, red squirrels, which face competition and disease spread from their grey cousins, and white-clawed crayfish that are under threat from North American signal crayfish.
Lisa Manning, policy officer at Wildlife and Countryside Link, said: 'Invasive species are one of the biggest risks to cherished species from water voles to ladybirds.
'They also wreak havoc on our waterways and cause damage to businesses, homes and to local parks and other green spaces.
'But the funding and support from the Government is failing to match the level of this threat,' she warned.
'We need more border check powers and resources to prevent new harmful species arriving.
'And more funding is needed to fight invasive species that have already arrived, so that local groups can stop struggling on an annual basis and take the long-term action needed for nature,' she urged.
Erin Shott, advocacy officer at Plantlife, said: 'Local groups and volunteers are putting up a great fight to halt the spread of invasive species.
'But this action needs further co-ordination and dedicated funding if we're to stop further damage to treasured local nature sites and native British wildlife.'
David Smith, from insect charity Buglife, said that despite the UK's success on yellow-legged hornets, 'we cannot afford to rely on reaction alone'.
'With many more invasive invertebrate species on the horizon, such as Chinese mystery snails, which can carry harmful parasites, and Asian longhorn beetles, which threaten our trees, timber, and fruit industries, there is a growing danger to both wildlife and the economy.
'We must focus on prevention rather than cure,' he said.
An Environment Department (Defra) spokesperson said: 'This Government will never waver in its duty to protect the UK's biosecurity.
'That's why we are bolstering our national biosecurity with a £200 million investment to set up a new National Biosecurity Centre and just last week announced £10 million of funding for cutting-edge surveillance projects to detect the spread of diseases and non-native species.'
An Animal and Plant Health Agency spokesperson said: 'Our teams work hard to tackle the threat of invasive non-native species, which cost the GB economy nearly £2bn a year, and help deliver a seamless border that maintains frictionless trade while protecting biosecurity.
'Members of the public who encounter invasive non-native species should report them following instructions on the Non-Native Species Secretariat website.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New research exposes the risk of store-bought self-test kits
New research exposes the risk of store-bought self-test kits

The Independent

timea minute ago

  • The Independent

New research exposes the risk of store-bought self-test kits

Researchers from the University of Birmingham have warned that high street self-tests for conditions like vitamin deficiencies, menopause, and bowel cancer may not be fit for purpose. A review of 30 self-tests found many lacked crucial information on who should use them, how to interpret results, or what actions to take afterwards. Concerns were raised about the accuracy claims of these tests, with evidence often being unavailable or of low quality, and 18 tests were deemed "high risk". Experts, including Professor Kristien Boelaert, highlighted the potential for "false reassurance" and increased demand on the NHS due to these unregulated products. Calls have been made for urgent, tighter regulation of the booming self-test market, which is projected to reach £660m by 2030 in the UK.

World's smallest snake thought to be extinct
World's smallest snake thought to be extinct

The Independent

timea minute ago

  • The Independent

World's smallest snake thought to be extinct

The Barbados threadsnake, the world's smallest snake, has been rediscovered after nearly two decades, having last been seen in 2006. Previously feared extinct and listed as 'lost to science', the tiny reptile was found by Connor Blades of the Barbados Ministry of Environment in March this year. The snake, which is blind, burrows, eats termites and ants, and measures up to four inches, was confirmed by Blades after careful identification. Its rediscovery was announced by the Reconservation group, which is collaborating with the local environment ministry. Scientists hope the rediscovery of the Barbados threadsnake will champion efforts for wildlife habitat protection.

Revealed: The number of steps you need to improve your life expectancy
Revealed: The number of steps you need to improve your life expectancy

Telegraph

time2 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Revealed: The number of steps you need to improve your life expectancy

Walking 7,000 steps a day is the sweet spot for preventing many chronic diseases that can lead to an early death, a major study has shown. While the goal of 10,000 daily steps has become firmly established in the public consciousness, an international team of researchers found even a modest amount of walking brings major benefits. British scientists said it finally 'debunked the myth' of 10,000 steps and should encourage people to try and hit the lower target. The major review of 57 studies involving 160,000 adults, which was published in The Lancet, concluded that for most conditions health benefits tended to level off beyond 7,000 steps. Hitting 7,000 steps a day was found to reduce all-cause-mortality by 47 per cent, cardiovascular disease by 25 per cent, cancer by six per cent, diabetes by 14 per cent, dementia by 38 per cent and depression by 22 per cent. Health benefits were also apparent from 4,000 steps when compared to 'inactive' people who walked just 2,000, the study led by the University of Sydney found. Every extra 1,000 steps brought better outcomes, researchers found. Commenting on the study, Steven Harridge, professor of human and applied physiology at King's College London, said: 'Humans are designed to be physically active – our evolutionary heritage as hunter gatherers. 'There has been debate about the amount of activity an individual should be doing with 10,000 steps as a generalised target, not well evidenced. 'This paper shows that 7,000 steps is sufficient for reducing the risk for most diseases covered, and 10, 000 steps does not confer much additional benefit.' According to World Health Organisation data, insufficient physical activity is the fourth most frequent cause of death in the world, with 3.2 million deaths a year related to physical inactivity. Many health organisations recommend hitting 10,000 steps a day, although there is little evidence for the target, which is believed to have arisen from a Japanese marketing campaign in the 1960s. In the run-up to the 1964 Tokyo Olympics, the company Yamasa sought to capitalise on the sudden interest in fitness, so designed the world's first wearable step-counter. They called it the Manpo-kei, or '10,000-step meter'. The company appears to have chosen the figure at random, as a fun goal, but it has stuck ever since. The new paper found that for heart disease, walking more than 7,000 steps was beneficial, but for most conditions there was little gain from putting in more effort. Experts said it was still unclear why walking brings such striking benefits but said it is likely to increase cardiorespiratory fitness, which is known to be positively associated with better health and all-cause mortality outcomes. Commenting on the research, Dr Daniel Bailey, an expert in sedentary behaviour and health at Brunel University of London, said the 7,000 steps target was more achievable for many people than 10,000 steps. 'Just adding more steps from your starting point can have important benefits for health,' he said. 'This study adds to existing evidence by showing that the more steps people do, the less their risk of developing different health conditions. 'The finding that doing 5,000-7,000 steps per day is beneficial, is an important addition to the literature which helps to debunk the myth that 10,000 steps per day should be the target for optimal health.' The Alzheimer's Society also welcomed the study saying it demonstrated that inactivity is a major risk factor for dementia. Dr Richard Oakley, associate director of research and innovation at the charity said: 'It adds to the evidence that what's good for the heart is good for the head.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store