logo
New report predicts major job losses in Ontario over US trade war

New report predicts major job losses in Ontario over US trade war

Ontario's auto industry, a vital pillar of the province's economy, risks losing thousands of jobs this year due to the US trade war, according to a new report from Ontario's Financial Accountability Office (FAO).
The non-partisan watchdog, which provides independent financial and economic analysis to the Ontario Legislature, released its findings Wednesday. It warns that US tariffs — and Canada's retaliatory measures based on trade actions announced on April 17 — could cause up to 68,100 job losses in 2025.
That figure could rise to 119,200 jobs lost in 2026 and 137,900 by 2029 if trade restrictions remain in place, with tariffs on steel, aluminum, vehicles and auto parts placing significant strain on the manufacturing industry. Among the hardest-hit areas would be Windsor, Guelph, Brantford and the Waterloo Region — all of which are heavily dependent on automotive production and exports.
'The actual impact of tariffs on Ontario's economy is uncertain and will depend on the magnitude and breadth of tariff coverage, as well as how businesses, households and economies respond,' the report reads.
If tariffs are reduced, the economic impact on Ontario would likely be less severe. However, the report warns that additional or higher US tariffs could push the province into a deeper recession than currently projected.
Peter Frise, a professor of automotive engineering at the University of Windsor, described the findings as 'very concerning,' and says the auto sector is a critical part of Ontario's manufacturing economy. 'Employment in this sector is extremely important across southwestern Ontario — anywhere from Oshawa to Windsor,' Frise said. 'It's a very significant part of the provincial economy, so anything that disrupts the auto sector is a very serious problem.'
Frise warned that the integrated nature of North America's auto industry means no single region is immune. 'There's no separating parts from assembly. It's all one system.'
Among the hardest-hit areas would be Windsor, Guelph, Brantford and the Waterloo Region — all of which are heavily dependent on automotive production and exports.
In a press conference, Ontario Premier Doug Ford rejected the recession prediction, saying 'no one can predict the future.'
'The tariffs will hurt absolutely, but I have confidence that we'll work things out with the United States and President Trump,' Ford said. 'We have a newly elected federal government. I'm sure the prime minister will be going down there to talk to President Trump. The only thing we will accept is zero tariffs.'
Ford said the deeply integrated supply chain means tariffs would harm both Canadians and Americans.
He previously warned that up to 500,000 Ontario jobs could be lost if American tariffs are applied to Ontario's export market.
Tariff chaos'
Ontario's economy is vulnerable to US tariffs, given that 85 per cent of its exports go to the US, and the province's auto sector is a key contributor, accounting for $36 billion of the $220.5 billion total. Last year alone, Ontario produced 1.54 million vehicles, most of them destined for American consumers.
David Adams, president and CEO of Global Automakers of Canada, says the FAO's findings reflect a growing concern within the industry, particularly in communities where automotive jobs anchor the local economy.
'It seems like all of the towns and cities that are most adversely impacted by the tariff situation are towns that have a big automotive presence,' Adams said.
Workers have every reason to be worried, he added. 'The current tariff chaos has to be on the minds of anybody really affiliated with the automotive sector in Canada at this point.'
Adams said he hopes for a more focused diplomatic effort now that the election is over. 'I think that's really got to be job one for the prime minister — engaging with President Trump in a more formal way … on how to find an off-ramp to these tariffs and how to address any trade concerns or issues in a more traditional way.'
Adams told Canada's National Observer that Canadians seem to have chosen a leader they believe can better manage the relationship with the US, adding that Carney appeared better equipped to handle negotiations with Trump moving forward.
Frise also agreed that Canada's new government brings hope for a diplomatic solution. 'There's always a path to resolve these problems — it's ultimately a question of US policy,' he said. 'Our prime minister now understands how industry works and may be better placed to counter some of these unwise policies coming from Washington.'
Ripple effects
The report underscores Ontario's dependence on trade with the US as more than 933,000 Ontarians work jobs that depend in some part on US exports.
According to the report, the real impact of tariffs depends on their scope and duration — as well as how businesses, consumers and governments respond. A rollback of tariffs could moderate the damage, but escalation would likely deepen the downturn.
Ontario has historically run trade deficits with the US — averaging $8 billion annually from 2013 to 2024, with a $4-billion deficit recorded last year.
Frise warned that the auto sector's struggles could quickly ripple through the broader economy.
'Each assembly job supports eight or 10 other jobs,' he said. 'If auto workers aren't getting paid, they're not spending money at restaurants, retail stores, or local businesses. The effects will be felt everywhere.'
Sheldon Williamson, a professor at Ontario Tech University, says to mitigate these risks, both the federal and provincial governments need to adopt a proactive approach.
'This includes advocating for stable trade relations with the US, investing in critical infrastructure and technologies to support EV manufacturing and providing targeted incentives to retain and attract automakers,' Williamson said. 'Supporting workforce retraining programs and strengthening ties with alternative markets — such as the EU or Indo-Pacific — could also help diversify Ontario's auto export base and reduce dependence on the US.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Canada, allies warn Iran working to ‘kill, kidnap and harass' people abroad
Canada, allies warn Iran working to ‘kill, kidnap and harass' people abroad

Global News

time20 minutes ago

  • Global News

Canada, allies warn Iran working to ‘kill, kidnap and harass' people abroad

Canada joined the United States and 12 European allies Thursday in condemning what they said is a 'growing number of state threats' by Iran's intelligence services against people abroad, including dissidents, journalists and Jewish citizens of their countries. The joint statement issued by the U.S. State Department called attempts by Iran to 'kill, kidnap, and harass people in Europe and North America' a 'clear violation' of those nations' sovereignty. 'These services are increasingly collaborating with international criminal organizations to target journalists, dissidents, Jewish citizens, and current and former officials in Europe and North America,' the statement said. 'This is unacceptable.' The countries said they are committed to working together to prevent such attacks and called on Iran to 'immediately put an end to such illegal activities in our respective territories.' Story continues below advertisement 2:07 'The world would be a better place': Iranian-Canadians hope for end to Islamic Republic rule Iran has long been accused by the U.S., Canada and European nations of conducting transnational repression operations against Iranian dissidents abroad, as well as critics of the regime in Tehran. Former Liberal justice minister Irwin Cotler, a vocal critic of the Iranian regime, told Global News last year his security detail was temporarily increased to its 'highest level' due to an imminent assassination threat. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Cotler said he was first told Iran was behind an 'imminent and lethal threat on my life' in November 2023 — shortly after the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Iran-backed Hamas — and has been under RCMP protection ever since. 'I see this as a phenomenon not related to me personally, but to the larger threatening concern of transnational repression and assassination,' he said. Story continues below advertisement 'This has to be seen as a wake-up call for the community of democracies because this is a direct threat to our security, to our democracy and to our human rights.' Iran has been accused of hiring Hells Angels members in Canada to carry out killings, and immigration officials have found over a dozen senior Iranian regime members illegally living in Canada to date. Documents released by the public inquiry into foreign interference in Canada revealed Iranian Canadians are increasingly concerned about former officials from the Iranian regime targeting diaspora members and community organizations. Canada 'is known as a safe haven for Islamic regime officials and their families,' Tehran-born human rights activist Nazanin Afshin-Jam MacKay said in her presentation to the Hogue Commission during public consultations last year, according to the documents. 11:12 Canada is 'a haven for Islamic Republic agents' warns Iranian human rights activist Canada listed Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as a terrorist organization last year, and declared senior Iranian government and security agency officials inadmissible to Canada due to involvement in terrorism and human rights violations. Story continues below advertisement Yet the government has also had difficulty removing former regime officials from the country, with deportation orders issued to just three individuals out of 12 ongoing cases at the Immigration and Refugee Board, officials said in June. The FBI and U.S. prosecutors last year revealed multiple alleged Iranian plots to assassinate U.S. President Donald Trump in the run-up to November's U.S. presidential election. A threat on Trump's life from Iran prompted additional security in the days before a July campaign rally in Pennsylvania where Trump was shot in the ear, according to U.S. officials. But officials at the time said they did not believe Iran was connected to that assassination attempt. The U.S. Justice Department announced in November that an Iranian plot to kill Trump in the weeks before the presidential election had been thwarted. 1:35 FBI thwarts alleged Iranian plot to assassinate Trump Trump ordered a U.S. military strike on Iran during his first term that killed Qassem Soleimani, who led the IRGC's Quds Force. Iran vowed revenge against Trump and members of his first administration, including his former national security advisor John Bolton and former secretary of state Mike Pompeo. Story continues below advertisement The criminal complaint that revealed the alleged plot against Trump also said two people were arrested and charged for their alleged involvement in a plot to murder an American-Iranian journalist and critic of the Iranian regime in New York. The FBI also said during the U.S. election that Iranian hackers sought to interest then-president Joe Biden's campaign in information allegedly stolen from Trump's campaign last summer. There's no evidence that any of the recipients responded, officials said at the time. —With files from Global's Stewart Bell and the Associated Press

Can Trump impose tariffs without Congress? U.S. appeals court skeptical
Can Trump impose tariffs without Congress? U.S. appeals court skeptical

Global News

time20 minutes ago

  • Global News

Can Trump impose tariffs without Congress? U.S. appeals court skeptical

Appellate court judges expressed broad skepticism Thursday over President Donald Trump's legal rationale for his most expansive round of tariffs. Members of the 11-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington appeared unconvinced by the Trump administration's insistence that the president could impose tariffs without congressional approval, and it hammered its invocation of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to do so. 'IEEPA doesn't even mention the word 'tariffs' anywhere,' Circuit Judge Jimmie Reyna said, in a sign of the panel's incredulity to a government attorney's arguments. Brett Schumate, the attorney representing the Trump administration, acknowledged in the 99-minute hearing 'no president has ever read IEEPA this way' but contended it was nonetheless lawful. The 1977 law, signed by President Jimmy Carter, allows the president to seize assets and block transactions during a national emergency. It was first used during the Iran hostage crisis and has since been invoked for a range of global unrest, from the 9/11 attacks to the Syrian civil war. Story continues below advertisement Trump says the country's trade deficit is so serious that it likewise qualifies for the law's protection. 4:17 New poll sheds light on how Canadians feel about tariff negotiations with the United States In sharp exchanges with Schumate, appellate judges questioned that contention, asking whether the law extended to tariffs at all and, if so, whether the levies matched the threat the administration identified. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'If the president says there's a problem with our military readiness,' Chief Circuit Judge Kimberly Moore posited, 'and he puts a 20% tax on coffee, that doesn't seem to necessarily deal with (it).' Schumate said Congress' passage of IEEPA gave the president 'broad and flexible' power to respond to an emergency, but that 'the president is not asking for unbounded authority.' But an attorney for the plaintiffs, Neal Katyal, characterized Trump's maneuver as a 'breathtaking' power grab that amounted to saying 'the president can do whatever he wants, whenever he wants, for as long as he wants so long as he declares an emergency.' Story continues below advertisement No ruling was issued from the bench. Regardless of what decision the judges' deliberations bring, the case is widely expected to reach the U.S. Supreme Court. In filings in the case, the Trump administration insists that 'a national emergency exists' necessitating its trade policy. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade, a specialized federal court in New York, was unconvinced however, ruling in May that Trump exceeded his powers. The issue now rests with the appeals judges. 2:37 Trump frustrated with India trade talks, thinks 25% tariffs will help: Haslett The challenge strikes at just one batch of import taxes from an administration that has unleashed a bevy of them and could be poised to unveil more on Friday. The case centers on Trump's so-called 'Liberation Day' tariffs of April 2 that imposed new levies on nearly every country. But it doesn't cover other tariffs, including those on foreign steel, aluminum and autos, nor ones imposed on China during Trump's first term, and continued by President Joe Biden. Story continues below advertisement The case is one of at least seven lawsuits charging that Trump overstepped his authority through the use of tariffs on other nations. The plaintiffs include 12 U.S. states and five businesses, including a wine importer, a company selling pipes and plumbing goods, and a maker of fishing gear. The U.S. Constitution gives the Congress the authority to impose taxes — including tariffs — but lawmakers have gradually ceded power over trade policy to the White House. Trump has made the most of the power vacuum, raising the average U.S. tariff to more than 18%, the highest rate since 1934, according to the Budget Lab at Yale University.

How to get the best bang for your (extra) buck in a three-paycheque month
How to get the best bang for your (extra) buck in a three-paycheque month

Toronto Sun

time30 minutes ago

  • Toronto Sun

How to get the best bang for your (extra) buck in a three-paycheque month

Published Jul 31, 2025 • Last updated 17 minutes ago • 3 minute read Canadians who get paid biweekly receive 26 paycheques spread across 12 months, which means there are two months in the year when they will get three paycheques. Photo by JONATHAN HAYWARD / THE CANADIAN PRESS Some extra cash may be about to land in your bank account. But don't label that third paycheque a bonus, experts warn. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account 'What happens a lot of time is when we have this extra come in, we treat it as extra,' said Christine White, a certified financial planner with Money Coaches Canada. White said she typically sees two reactions from her clients: those who didn't realize an extra paycheque was coming, and those who get excited about it. Canadians who get paid biweekly receive 26 paycheques spread across 12 months, which means there are two months in the year when they will get three paycheques. This year, if your first paycheque was received on Friday, Jan. 3, the months of January and August will be your three-payday months. If your first paycheque was Jan. 10, you'll receive three paycheques in May and October. White suggests it's important to have a plan for the money before it hits your bank account. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. 'If we know we're going to have these two three-pay months and we have a plan for them, then we can decide consciously and with intention what we want to spend it on,' White said. For Sara McCullough, she says she generally ignores the two extra paycheques when building monthly budgets for her clients. 'I base their income and expenses on two paycheques a month,' said McCullough, a certified financial planner and founder of WD Development. Then, she looks into what could be done with the additional cash. In her opinion, it could go under one of four categories: catch-up, buffer for upcoming bills, breathing room and future you. The extra paycheque could be an opportunity for many Canadians to catch up on paying down credit card bills or a line of credit, she said. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. McCullough said it could also just serve as a buffer amount in the bank. 'This might not be total bonus money,' she said. 'There's a known expense coming up. 'Your best option in that case is to let it stay in your account,' McCullough added. If someone is already ahead on their catch-up and cash cushion needs, the extra money opens up room for getting ahead. 'The get-ahead breathing room is when you're not carrying high-interest debt, and your other months are functioning smoothly,' McCullough said. This could be a chance for people to build up their emergency fund, or replenish amounts set aside for house repairs, vacations or their next vehicle, for example. Then comes the 'future you' category, McCullough said. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. '(If) you don't see any big expense that you would need money for, then we can look at a TFSA or first home savings account contribution,' she said. White said this could also be an opportunity for Canadians hoping to build up savings for a down payment but stuck in the paycheque-to-paycheque cycle. She suggested putting that extra cash into savings twice a year automatically — helping build that nest egg. But it doesn't always have to be tied to financial goals and debt. 'We have a lot of competing demands for our money, or a lot of things we want to do at the same time,' White said. She often tells her clients to divide the extra paycheque across several goals — a third for debt, a third to have fun and a third for investing, for example. 'Then, you feel a little bit responsible, but also a little bit of joy from it,' White said. Canada Canada Toronto & GTA Tennis Columnists

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store