
Melbourne cottage dubbed the 'worst house on the best street' undergoes spectacular makeover - adding millions of dollars in value: 'It sold in just 11 days'
The unassuming weatherboard cottage, once dubbed 'the worst house on the best street', has just sold for $3.6million after an extraordinary architectural makeover.
The original, humble two-bedroom home in Northcote was purchased over a decade ago for just $935,000, on a block of land that was far from charming.
However, after an ambitious knockdown and rebuild, it's now one of the inner north's most enviable residences - and for good reason.
The Melbourne couple who lived in the property from 2013 until 2023 decided to roll the dice and go big, demolishing the tired, outdated home and replacing it completely.
'I sold it to them in 2013 when it was just a little bungalow,' said Sam Rigopoulos, Director and Auctioneer at Jellis Craig Northcote in Victoria.
'That's until they knocked it over and built this new house a couple of years ago.
'It was their plan to do that,' he added. 'They really enjoyed the process and are keen to do it again.'
Unsurprisingly, the home was snapped up in June - just 11 days after hitting the market.
With an already impressive price guide of $3.3–$3.5million, the recent sale fetched $100,000 over that, thanks to fierce competition from eager buyers.
'They did well,' Rigopoulos said. 'The land on its own had its own growth journey, and then they improved the capital on the block as well.'
'The entry-level on the land would be about $1.8million now to buy that block again.'
The couple engaged Hartman Construction to bring their vision to life, and the result is a designer dream home oozing style, craftsmanship and inner-city luxury.
On a 400 sqm block, the two-storey property now boasts exposed brickwork, polished concrete floors, and a chef-worthy kitchen with premium NEFF appliances - including an integrated Liebherr fridge/freezer and Blanco double sink.
It also features an entertainer's haven outside, complete with a built-in BBQ, wood-fired pizza oven and sparkling lap pool.
Inside, the home includes a dedicated office, an upstairs retreat with private balcony, a kitchen and diner with large wine fridge, and even a two-level double garage with rear lane access and space for a home gym or workshop.
Despite the hefty price tag, Rigopoulos said the new owners - a local family who had been house hunting for 18 months - were thrilled to finally secure their dream home after missing out on two other properties.
'It's a really good pocket, very well positioned… right in the thick of everything,' he added.
While the exact renovation costs remain under wraps, the rise in land value alone proves that timing and great vision really are everything.
The original home's modest exterior once blended in quietly with the rest of the street, but it's now a true architectural showpiece, drawing admiration from passersby and online viewers alike.
'This one really stands apart because of that nice brick foundation, and then the architecturally striking box on the top that has this really nice white timber screening,' Rigopoulos said.
He also mentioned that the uniqueness of this design sets it apart from other 'all-white' builds that follow a rather mundane formula that 'everyone's getting a bit sick of'.
'They're all quite stark, and there's almost too many of them in the market now - they're getting a little bit long in the tooth.'
In contrast, this home 'looks distinctly different' thanks to its beautiful landscaping, timber aspects and exposed warm bricks.
Every bathroom and bedroom in the home embraces a timeless neutral aesthetic, creating a sense of calm, cohesion and understated luxury throughout - especially with the matching wood panelling
Photos of the before and after are hard to believe, with the previous bungalow's outdated kitchen, design and furniture.
From ugly duckling to a multi-million-dollar masterpiece, the transformation is certainly impressive.
'I really like the upstairs section as it kind of zig-zags when you're looking at the property from the outside,' Rigopoulos said.
'I think that part is quite striking - whether you're looking at it from the front of the house, the pool or the back - it makes it feel really well considered and quite different.'
Every bathroom and bedroom in the home embraces a timeless neutral aesthetic, creating a sense of calm, cohesion and understated luxury throughout - especially with the matching wood panelling.
Soft earthy tones, layered textures and elegant wooden finishes elevate each space, showcasing an interior style that's both contemporary and refined.
The bathrooms are now fully tiled with sleek stone surfaces, floating vanities and brushed tapware that reflect the home's architectural finesse.
Meanwhile, the bedrooms have been styled with a designer's eye: plush grey carpets, subtle lighting, integrated study nooks, built-in robes, and flat-screen televisions flush against the wall.
The home that was once named 'the worst' is now a benchmark for luxury living in Northcote - and a dream come true for its proud new owners.
In a market where cookie-cutter homes are losing their shine, this bespoke build has not only turned heads but set a new standard for what's possible when you think outside the box.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
North Norfolk has highest proportion of properties owned outright
Nearly half of properties in North Norfolk are owned outright by their occupants, a higher proportion than any other local authority in England, new figures show. The thin strip of East Anglia coastline, which includes the seaside towns of Cromer and Sheringham, has for several years been the area of England with the largest percentage of population aged 65 and over. The data has been published by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) as part of its latest estimates of household tenure, which also includes figures for accommodation that is rented or owned with a mortgage or loan. North Norfolk tops the list for the highest percentage of properties owned outright by occupants (49.8%), followed by Rother in East Sussex (48.7%), Staffordshire Moorlands (48.2%), Derbyshire Dales (48.2%) and East Lindsey in Lincolnshire (47.3%). Three of these five – North Norfolk, Rother and East Lindsey – are also the local authorities where people aged 65 and over account for the largest share of the population. The areas with the greatest proportion of homes owned outright by occupants tend to be in coastal regions or away from cities, the ONS said. The top five with the lowest percentage of outright ownership are all in London: Tower Hamlets (8.4%), Hackney (10.0%), Southwark (10.8%), Islington (11.8%) and Lambeth (12.1%). However, the trend is reversed for properties that are privately rented. Here the top five areas with the highest proportion are all in the capital: City of London (51.8%), Westminster (47.9%), Kensington & Chelsea (42.8%), Newham (41.1%) and Tower Hamlets (41.0%). The bottom five are outside cities and away from heavily built-up areas: North East Derbyshire (10.3%), South Staffordshire (10.6%), Rochford in Essex (10.6%), Bromsgrove in Worcestershire (10.7%) and Maldon in Essex (11.7%). The ONS figures are for 2023 and suggest there were a total of 23.7 million households in England living in 25.4 million dwellings. Of this total, 8.3 million dwellings (32.6%) were owned outright, 7.6 million (29.8%) were owned with a mortgage or a loan, 5.3 million (20.8%) were privately rented and 4.2 million (16.7%) were socially rented, mainly from housing associations and local authorities. Wokingham in Berkshire has the highest proportion of properties owned with a mortgage or loan (42.3%), followed by Dartford in Kent (41.4%), Hart in Hampshire (39.5%), Bracknell Forest in Berkshire (39.4%) and Reigate & Banstead in Surrey (39.0%). The areas with the lowest proportion are again all in London: Westminster (13.3%), Kensington & Chelsea (13.8%), Camden (14.9%), City of London (15.1%) and Islington (17.1%). For properties that are socially rented, the top five areas are in the capital: Islington (38.9%), Southwark (38.5%), Hackney (38.5%), Lambeth (33.4%) and Camden (31.7%). The bottom five are Castle Point in Essex (5.3%), Wokingham (7.1%), Medway in Kent (7.3%), Wyre in Lancashire (7.6%) and Ribble Valley in Lancashire (7.8%).


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
NSW real estate agents threaten renters with fees if they are not home for tradespeople – but legally they don't have to be
New South Wales real estate agents are threatening renters with fees as high as $330 if they are not at home to let maintenance workers in, despite there being no legal requirement for renters to personally allow entry. On 8 July, Lauren Gillin's agency told her she needed to be home during a two-and-a-half-hour window seven days from that date to allow access for a smoke alarm inspector or pay a $90 fee. 'Please make yourself available, this inspection is compulsory, and access must be provided,' Gillin's property manager at Rich & Oliva said in a letter seen by Guardian Australia. 'Should access not be made available, a fee of $90 will be incurred for re-inspection.' In a statement, a NSW Fair Trading spokesperson said real estate agents must provide two days' notice for 'non-urgent repairs or inspection of a smoke alarm'. However, 'there is no requirement for the tenant to be in the property for the inspection,' the spokesperson confirmed. Further, 'the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW) limits fees and charges a landlord or agent can ask a tenant to pay, with only certain payments such as rent, rental bond and other prescribed fees allowed to be charged'. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email Gillin, a media manager at a community legal centre who lives in Haberfield in Sydney's inner west, said she was disappointed by the letter. 'It's an unreasonable request to be home for 2.5 hours on a weekday.' Tenants of an apartment block in the city's eastern suburbs received a similar notice from a different real estate agency, which Guardian Australia has chosen not to identify because renters said they were worried about the potential consequences. That agency wrote to the tenants in June, in an email seen by Guardian Australia, telling them they needed to be home on a day late that month between 9.30am and 10.30am for a mandatory fire safety inspection. The email warned that any failure to give access to the home would result in a re-inspection fee of $330 and advised the tenants to organise someone on their behalf to allow access if they could not do so. The Tenants' Union of NSW chief executive officer, Leo Patterson Ross, said the $90 charge Gillin faced did not 'strictly have any basis' because the agent or landlord could still give access to the smoke alarm inspector by organising entry. 'As long as the tenant hasn't actively prevented them from entering the property, then there's no basis for that charge,' he said. Patterson Ross said the $330 fee faced by residents of the eastern suburbs apartment block was 'pretty much the exact same situation' – there was no legal basis for the charge. 'The agent, probably, in a building like that where there's a lot of people, they don't want to spend their whole day walking around all the apartments,' he said. 'But there's nothing stopping them from doing that.' Patterson Ross said more than 2,100 people contacted the tenants' union in 2024 for advice about access issues. He said he regularly spoke to renters who had been threatened with fees for supposedly not allowing access to their homes, who assumed the charges were legitimate. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'No one's told the agent they can't do it and it becomes normal and then they train other people and it becomes process without anyone really checking whether it's compliant with the law,' Patterson Ross said. 'Generally, a lot of the pressure of enforcing the legislation is falling on the tenant at the moment.' Gillin said she tried to raise her concerns with one of the Rich & Olivia staff members, but did not feel the issue was resolved. The company did not respond to Guardian Australia's request for comment. On 8 July, Gillin lodged a complaint with the agency. In the email, seen by Guardian Australia, Gillin said her experience with the agency had otherwise 'been really positive' which made the letter she got from them 'all the more surprising'. She followed up on 9 July, citing legal advice she had received from the tenants' union and the NSW rental commissioner, Trina Jones, that she did not need to be at home during a smoke alarm inspection. Jones told Guardian Australia that a fee for not being present during a smoke alarm inspection could not legally be passed on to tenants. She said the state's rental taskforce – which was created earlier this year – contacted Gillin's agent to advise them of their responsibilities under the law and make clear the charge was not permitted. 'Illegal fees and charges remain an issue in the sector,' Jones said. 'Since January, the Rental Taskforce has overseen refunds of $165,303 to renters who were charged unlawful fees.' On Wednesday, Gillin said the smoke alarm technician let her know they had got a key from the agency to let themselves into the property. But she said the agency still had not responded to her complaint.


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Lobbyist breaches go unsanctioned as critics call for Australia's rules to be strengthened
Not a single lobbyist has been sanctioned under the federal government's code of conduct and transparency rules for almost three years despite more than a dozen breaches, with critics arguing the scheme is 'as weak as a cup of cold milky tea'. And in Victoria, no lobbyist has been sanctioned since the establishment of the current regulator more than a decade ago, with the state government acknowledging there is a need for reform after warnings from the anti-corruption commission. Professional third-party lobbyists must comply with a federal code of conduct and disclose details to a transparency register, which is designed to strengthen public confidence in how politicians and their staff interact with vested interest groups. Lobbyists who work without being listed on a register or who fail to act honestly and fairly can be investigated for breaches of conduct. This includes lobbyists who do not disclose links to foreign companies and governments. But Guardian Australia can reveal no one involved in the 14 breaches substantiated by the federal attorney general's department since January 2023 has been formally sanctioned. Sign up: AU Breaking News email A departmental spokesperson said each breach was administrative in nature and 'resolved through engagement between the department and relevant lobbyists'. 'In most cases where breaches are substantiated, they are administrative in nature and remediated through communication with the responsible officers within lobbying organisations,' the spokesperson said. 'There were no reported breaches referred to the secretary for consideration during the relevant period.' Transparency International Australia's chief executive, Clancy Moore, said federal lobbyists breaking the rules 'do so with impunity'. 'Put simply, the federal lobbying code of conduct is as weak as a cup of cold milky tea,' Moore said. 'The commonwealth needs a big stick to sanction lobbyists who break the rules.' Crossbench MPs and the Greens have flagged pushing Labor to toughen the rules in the new term of parliament. One element of the rules persistently identified as a shortcoming is that the code of conduct only covers paid third-party lobbyists and their clients. Lobbyists employed internally by corporations and interest groups are not required to sign up. Currently about 360 lobbying organisations and more than 700 individual lobbyists are included on the transparency register. They represent a combined 2,400 clients. More than 40% of registered lobbyists are identified former government representatives, including former staffers, former government ministers and other ex-office holders. In Victoria, no lobbyist has been sanctioned by the state authority since the latest code of conduct was introduced by the Napthine government in 2013. Under current rules, the only sanction available in Victoria is the removal of a lobbyist from the register. The state's public sector commissioner, Brigid Monagle, said six potential breaches of the lobbying code had been investigated in the past five years. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'None of these potential breaches met the full requirements for removal under the terms of the code,' Monagle said. 'There may of course be other breaches that the commission has not been made aware of, and we encourage anyone with knowledge of a breach to make a report.' The Centre for Public Integrity's executive director, Catherine Williams, said Victorian regulation was not fit for purpose and regulators should have a broad range of sanctions to ensure smaller but significant breaches of the code do not go unpunished. 'Clearly, a uniform law would be optimal as it would simplify compliance for lobbying firms and individuals operating across multiple jurisdictions,' Williams said. 'Unfortunately, however, with the current regulatory patchwork across the country – and federally, a government yet to acknowledge that lobbying reform must be on the agenda – a uniform law is a very long way off.' In October 2022, the Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission (Ibac) raised concerns about potential corruption risks posed by lobbying. The Victorian government has accepted Ibac's recommendations, in principle, and is now consulting on possible changes. In New South Wales, six lobbyists were suspended from operating last month after failing to provide a regular update on which government officials they had met and on whose behalf. The NSW Electoral Commission, which regulates the lobbying industry, required this information to be updated every three months. Lobbyists must update the list even if they have been inactive during this period. There is no such requirement for lobbyists meeting with federal government officials.