Family faces trial for Tamkeen fraud
A mother, her four sons and five others are facing trial over claims they took more than BD230,000 from Tamkeen and the Social Insurance Organisation by filing fake job contracts and pay slips. Six of the eleven accused appeared before the First High Criminal Court.
The second defendant, who is in custody, was brought in. His brother, the first defendant, was not produced from prison.
Three others failed to attend and will be summoned again. The remaining five, all out on bail, stood before the court and denied the charges.
Defence lawyers, including Reem Al Mahhari and Zahra Hussain, asked for copies of the case file and time to reply.
The court set 8 July to have the first defendant brought from prison and for fresh summons to be issued to the three absentees.
The defence will also be expected to respond at the same hearing.
Prosecutors said the first and second defendants submitted forged contracts through online portals run by Tamkeen and the Social Insurance Organisation.
The forms claimed they had hired a number of staff to companies that did not exist, complete with invented roles and salaries.
Those papers were then used to add and remove names from the insurance system and to make claims for one-off retirement payouts and pensions.
The same details were later used in wage support requests to Tamkeen.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Tribune
3 hours ago
- Daily Tribune
Woman wins 25- year legal battle to register home
After a 25-year legal struggle, a woman has finally secured ownership of her home, following a ruling by the High Civil Appeals Court that upheld the validity of a property sale contract once deemed invalid. The dispute dates back to the year 2000, when the woman purchased the house for BD80,000. She paid the amount in three instalments— BD40,000 followed by two payments of BD20,000—to an agent representing the heirs of the deceased property owner. Although she received the property documents, she was unable to register the home in her name due to a 17-year restriction imposed by the Ministry of Housing, which barred property transfers during that period. The situation worsened when the property was seized by the Execution Court to settle a debt owed by one of the heirs, who had never formally transferred the property title. The court ordered the house be sold. In response, the woman filed a lawsuit to enforce her ownership rights. However, the First Instance Court declared the contract void, citing the restriction that was in effect at the time of sale. Her lawyer, Nabeel Al Qassab, appealed the ruling and submitted new evidence, including powers of attorney from the heirs authorising her to complete the title transfer. He argued that this constituted their approval of the original sale. Despite this, the Appeals Court initially upheld the lower court's decision. The case then went to the Court of Cassation, which overturned the verdict and sent it back to the Appeals Court for review. Upon reconsideration, the Appeals Court ruled that the powers of attorney clearly demonstrated the heirs' ratification of the transaction—even if the agent lacked authority at the time of sale. Under Article 436 of Bahrain's Civil Code, such ratification validates a contract if it meets key conditions: mutual consent, a defined property, a lawful purpose, and an agreed price. With those elements confirmed, the court ruled in the woman's favour and ordered the property to be officially registered in her name—bringing an end to a dispute that had lasted a quarter of a century.
Daily Tribune
3 hours ago
- Daily Tribune
Court restores marital home to husband after sham sale to ex-wife
A man has won back ownership of his home after the High Civil Court ruled that a BD270,000 property transfer to his ex-wife was a sham intended only to protect the asset. The court found that the sale contract between the couple was not genuine and ordered the house to be returned to the husband's name. The decision followed the submission of a signed statement from the ex-wife, confirming that the sale was only on paper and that her husband had remained the rightful owner throughout. The statement, dated 21 February 2010, was presented by the man's lawyer, Zuhair Abdullatif. The court deemed it legally binding, noting that the ex-wife neither denied her signature nor challenged the content. Under Bahraini law, a private document stands as valid unless its signature is explicitly denied. The man had purchased the home in early 2010 but soon faced financial difficulties. To protect the property, he transferred it to his wife's name in a fictitious sale, trusting she would safeguard it. Just one day after the transfer, the property was registered in her name. Less than a year later, she divorced him through khula, a form of wife-initiated divorce. Despite efforts to resolve the matter privately over the years, the ex-wife refused to return the property and even threatened to sell it. The man eventually took legal action, presenting the court with his ex-wife's written admission that the deal had been for formality only. In its ruling, the court referred to precedents set by the Court of Cassation, affirming that in sham transactions, the true intent of the parties takes precedence over the registered deed. If it can be proven that a transfer was only symbolic, actual ownership must be honoured. The court concluded that the sale was not real and ordered the Survey and Land Registration Bureau to remove the ex-wife's name and reissue the property deed in the husband's name.
Daily Tribune
2 days ago
- Daily Tribune
‘Seek voluntary treatment'
Drug users in Bahrain can avoid prosecution by voluntarily seeking treatment, but face legal action if caught with narcotics in their system, a Bahraini lawyer has said. Marking the International Day Against Drug Abuse and Illicit Trafficking, Jassim Al Issa explained that the law allows addicts or their relatives, up to the fourth degree, to request admission into a rehabilitation centre. In such cases, no criminal case is filed and the addict is treated without being sent to court. Charges 'If the person is caught using, or if traces are found in their blood, then the Public Prosecution brings charges,' he told The Daily Tribune. Al Issa referred to Law No. 15 of 2007, which sets out clear differences between users, promoters and traffickers. Penalties rise sharply depending on the individual's role. Someone found in possession of banned substances for personal use may face a fine of up to BD3,000 or jail time, under Article 32. Article 35 sets a maximum penalty of six months' imprisonment and a BD100 fine for certain acts committed without authorisation. Sterner treatment By contrast, traffickers face much sterner treatment. Offences under Article 30 carry penalties of life imprisonment or death, along with a fine ranging from BD5,000 to BD50,000. These penalties apply to those who import, produce, sell or fund narcotics or restricted plants, whether directly or through others. The law lists types of substances in detailed schedules covering both chemical and botanical forms. Tougher sentencing applies in cases involving repeat offenders, public servants tasked with drug enforcement, the use of minors, involvement in cross-border trafficking, or misuse of legal protection or position. Accidental violations 'The law also addresses banned prescriptions and restricted ingredients in certain medicines,' said Al Issa. 'This helps define what is prohibited and makes it easier to avoid accidental violations.' He urged addicts and their families to make use of the law's provision for voluntary treatment. 'A request can be submitted by the user or by a spouse or close relative. It prevents a criminal record and gives the person a chance to move on,' he said. 'This is far better than court-ordered rehabilitation, which still leads to a case being registered. Even if time spent in the facility is deducted from the sentence, the charge remains.'
