Xbox layoffs expected to hit up to 2,000 people claims source
The next batch of Xbox layoffs could be the worst so far, with an industry insider predicting studio closures as well.
It's been reported for some time that Microsoft is planning another major wave of layoffs throughout the company and a couple of days ago it was claimed that the Xbox division would be amongst those impacted.
These layoffs will supposedly happen by the end of June, but previously no exact figures were given for how many people would be affected.
If a new rumour is to be believed though, Xbox could lose upwards of 2,000 employees – approximately 10% of its entire workforce.
The prediction comes from respected game designer George Broussard, who previously co-founded Apogee Software, better known nowadays as 3D Realms, and was one of the creators behind the Duke Nukem games.
In a Bluesky post from earlier this morning, Broussard claims to have heard 'internal developer stuff' from within Microsoft, with anywhere from 1,000 to 2,000 people expected to be let go.
Not only that, but there are concerns that entire studios could be shut down, which is sadly all too believable. After all, Microsoft killed no less than three studios last year, including Tango Gameworks, despite its last game, Hi-Fi Rush, winning several awards and purportedly being a success in the eyes of Microsoft.
Sign up to the GameCentral newsletter for a unique take on the week in gaming, alongside the latest reviews and more. Delivered to your inbox every Saturday morning.
News has reported imminent Xbox layoffs but I'm hearing internal developer stuff where people at most studios are anxious and worried. Word that entire studios may be shuttered. Expectation is 1000-2000 people. Xbox unit has about 10k people in it?, so 10-20%? Good luck to all involved. Brutal. — George Broussard (@georgebsocial.bsky.social) 2025-06-26T02:08:57.231Z
Although Broussard estimates that Xbox has roughly 10,000 employees, our research puts the number at about 19,450, once you take into account subsidiaries like Bethesda and Activision Blizzard.
Regardless, the worst case scenario of Microsoft letting go 2,000 employees would take a hefty chunk out of the Xbox workforce, putting the total post-pandemic losses at well over 4,000.
That includes 650 employees that were let go last September, and almost 2,000 job cuts at the beginning of 2024.
So far, more than 2,500 Xbox employees have been let go since Microsoft finalised its $75 billion purchase of Activision Blizzard, which remains the most expensive acquisition in the history of the games industry.
Even if the actual numbers are at the lower end of Broussard's estimate, the next round of layoffs will bring the total job losses at Xbox to more than 3,500. More Trending
While some cuts were inevitable, to eliminate duplicate jobs post-acquisition, the sheer volume of layoffs is well above the normal and exacerbated by both post-pandemic bloat and Microsoft's enthusiasm for AI.
Microsoft may also be looking to cut costs due to the Activision Blizzard purchase not being as lucrative as hoped, with the addition of Call Of Duty games on Xbox Game Pass barely improving subscriber numbers and the series as a whole still bleeding players.
This combined with dwindling hardware sales is no doubt what made Microsoft decide to port Xbox exclusives to PlayStation and Nintendo platforms, in a bid to bump up its revenue.
Yet despite its games reaching new audiences and performing particularly well on PlayStation, it doesn't appear to be enough for Microsoft, not if it's considering killing more studios to help save money.
Email gamecentral@metro.co.uk, leave a comment below, follow us on Twitter.
To submit Inbox letters and Reader's Features more easily, without the need to send an email, just use our Submit Stuff page here.
For more stories like this, check our Gaming page.
MORE: Microsoft confirms next gen Xbox home and portable consoles with AMD partnership
MORE: Xbox aggregated game library coming to PC with hints of Steam support
MORE: Xbox VR headset officially announced and it's much more expensive than normal
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
2 hours ago
- Metro
Games Inbox: Why I sold my Xbox Series X to get a Switch 2
The Tuesday letters page wishes someone would form a new publisher to rival EA and Ubisoft, as one reader asks when the next Nintendo Direct is. To join in with the discussions yourself email gamecentral@ Jumping out The news that a former creator of Xbox thinks that Microsoft has given up, willingly or not, on making hardware came only a day after I sold my Xbox Series X in order to fund a Nintendo Switch 2. I didn't do it primarily because of the Switch 2 though, that was kind of just the excuse. I've had an Xbox console since the 360 and, like Phil Spencer said, I'm stuck in the 'ecosystem'. But I've had enough of it. I'm not going to get another next gen system that's going to be playing runner-up all generation, especially when I know it won't have any exclusives. I don't like anything Microsoft is doing at the moment, including the focus on AI and the upcoming job cuts. They bought Activision and then they just became Activision. The company that I used to like in the Xbox 360 era is gone now and it's not coming back. The Switch 2 is just an aside though. I can afford it now but what I'll look for now is getting a PlayStation 6 when It comes out. It'll be my first Sony console since the PlayStation 2 but I'm looking forward to it. 84Colbat Almost there I know Microsoft has announced their next gen plans already but I don't think there's anyone optimistic enough to think that it's anything more than a token effort. That exec has been working on Xbox since the beginning, and I'm sure knows lots of people that are still there, so if she thinks Xbox hardware is 'dead' I'm not going to call her wrong. Sign up to the GameCentral newsletter for a unique take on the week in gaming, alongside the latest reviews and more. Delivered to your inbox every Saturday morning. Whether it matters or not I'm not sure, from Microsoft's business point of view, but I don't really care. There's no way I'm going to buy an Xbox console again, not after the last two generations, and clearly I can play anything I want on PlayStation 5. Plus, if I was that desperate for Game Pass or any future exclusives they might make, I'd just play it on PC. As I understand, designing and manufacturing a console is expensive so given how things are going not making them anymore may actually save Microsoft money, but either way I'd say in terms of gaming they are at least 90% software only already. Tamos Hardcore audience What I don't get about the Xbox hardware plans is who do they think is going to buy their new consoles, given how badly the Xbox Series X/S is doing? I wouldn't say they'd be able to count on hardcore fans at all. In fact, I'd assume they're the least likely to give them another chance, given how the last two generations have gone. And I don't see them attracting new fans either, because that means more casual gamers who certainly aren't going to pay £500+ for a PC handheld. I don't imagine they're likely to pay around that for a new home console either, unless there's something very special about it. There's no sign that Microsoft is pivoting to casual friendly games, so I'm not sure what options are left. What I could understand is if the next gen Xbox was basically a PC in a box, but they specifically said it wasn't that, so I guess I just don't get it. Hammeriron Email your comments to: gamecentral@ Evil evolves The interesting thing to me about Resident Evil Requiem not being open world is just how tightly focused it feels. Village wasn't exactly open world, but it did have a lot of areas you could go back and forwards from. Requiem seems to be mostly set in a spooky hotel and a bombed out Raccoon City, and apparently Raccoon City isn't in it much anyway. Maybe there's more, I'm sure there is, but I like the vibe so far. There's almost a Silent Hill feel to some of it so far and that means Resident Evil is yet again evolving. I think that's great, whether I even like the changes or not. Constant change is why Resi is celebrating its 30th anniversary this year and other franchises could learn a lot from that. Grando Direct information I see that Elden Ring on Switch 2 seems to be getting ready for release, since it has an age rating now, but would that just be released without warning or would they do it in a Nintendo Direct? I know it was briefly in the April one but with a game that big I wouldn't have thought it would just slip out. Surely it's time for Nintendo to do a post-launch Direct that can give us a clearer picture of what the second half of the year is going to look like. We know about games like Elden Ring, and Hyrule Warriors 3, but they have no date or much information about them. I like my Switch 2, but I want to know what's next. Probst GC: We'd be shocked if Nintendo didn't have multiple Directs this year. Although there is a possibility that all or most of them will be focused on a single game, like the recent Donkey Kong Bananza one. New players I don't know what the chances are of EA Sports FC 26 being a flop, or even just not selling as well as EA hoped, but personally I hope it doesn't. Not because I have any love for the series or EA but we cannot afford to let any other big publishers go under. It's very unlikely EA will go bust any time soon but the second they start doing badly they become prey for the likes of Microsoft and Sony, and then that's another independent publisher gone. It's the same with Ubisoft. They might not be anyone's favourite publisher, but we do not need any less choice in gaming. Or even more well-known companies to be owned by the same giant corporation. What I'd really like to see is new publishers being created but I think the only real attempt like that was Embracer Group, which took the usual dumb venture capitalist approach of trying to buy up other smaller companies and then getting impatient when they didn't immediately start making money. I think CD Projekt may eventually grow into a large publisher, that publishes more than their own stuff, but not any time soon. If I had the money, I'd set one up and sign up a bunch of AA indie games – ones like Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 that look almost like AAA games – and take it from there. You don't have to own the developer, just publish them and take your cut and help nurture new studios. That sort of long term thought just doesn't seem to happen anymore though. Pinky Horrific soundtrack I've just had the best evening going about domestic mundanities but with the chip music of World Of Horror playing in the background (courtesy of a streaming site). Can't believe how good this is. I've promptly moved the game from saved for later to buy now. It's so good. I've no idea how the game will sit with me but when the music is this good then I don't think I can go wrong. Classic chiptune goodness. D Dubya Movie tie-in So, what are people's guesses as to what the next big Nintendo game to be announced will be? We've had Mario Kart and that's really it in terms of mainline entries, unless you count Donkey Kong as a 3D Super Mario. That's a whole question in itself and I have no idea of the answer, except I assume that there's going to be some kind of actual Mario game out around the time of the movie sequel next April. Whether that'd be 2D or 3D though I don't think there's any way of telling. So I guess that might be the next one, but I'd be surprised if Animal Crossing wasn't also announced within the next eight months or so. We all know how weird it was that they stopped supporting the old one, so surely that means work on the Switch 2 game must've started a long time ago? Unfortunately, most speculation for Nintendo is along the lines of not understanding why they haven't done it already. A spin-off instead of Splatoon 4 is weird, no Super Smash Bros. Ultimate Deluxe at launch is weird, and Hyrule Warriors 3 instead of a remake or better spin-off is also quite the choice. The Mario Bros. movie coming out next year is really the only thing you can base a prediction on but even then, it's nothing you can take to the bank. After all, Nintendo did exactly nothing for the first one. Badgerman Inbox also-rans I'm willing to bet that whoever used the term 'liquid metal' did it specifically to make a Terminator 2 reference. If you heat it up all metal is liquid and I'm pretty sure there's not a load of mercury, or whatever, sloshing about in my PlayStation 5. Whistler RE: EA Sports FC 26 vs. Rematch. I would rather play a game where thousands of real players are in it and tons of leagues and teams agree to be in the game than Rematch. Especially on how you can build your team and how fun it is when Team of the Season and Beyond starts. Anon More Trending Email your comments to: gamecentral@ The small print New Inbox updates appear every weekday morning, with special Hot Topic Inboxes at the weekend. Readers' letters are used on merit and may be edited for length and content. You can also submit your own 500 to 600-word Reader's Feature at any time via email or our Submit Stuff page, which if used will be shown in the next available weekend slot. You can also leave your comments below and don't forget to follow us on Twitter. MORE: Games Inbox: Is EA Sports FC 26 going to be a flop? MORE: Games Inbox: Is AI going to ruin video games? MORE: Games Inbox: Has the Nintendo Switch 2 been a disappointment?
Daily Mirror
4 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Beatles song banned for lyrics - but John Lennon thought reason was 'crazy'
The Beatles had a number of songs banned by radio stations, but one of John Lennon's most famous tracks for the band was banned for a very different reason The Beatles, known for stirring the pot, certainly did so when John Lennon's bold statement in 1966 that they were "more popular than Jesus" sparked outrage among American Christians, contributing to the band's cessation of touring later that year. Their knack for pushing boundaries also saw several of their songs slapped with bans by radio stations. The BBC censored 'A Day in the Life' over alleged drug references, while 'The Ballad of John and Yoko' faced bans from some US stations for its mention of Christ. The trend of controversy carried on even after John, Paul McCartney, George Harrison, and Ringo Starr went on to solo endeavours post-1970. For instance, the ECHO delved into how Paul McCartney and Wings' 'Hi, Hi, Hi' was shunned by the BBC for perceived nods to sex and drugs. John's Beatles legacy includes one particularly infamous tune, 'Happiness Is a Warm Gun', penned by him in 1968 and presented under the Lennon-McCartney songwriting banner like all compositions from the duo for the Fab Four. The title, which kick-started the song, was lifted straight from the May 1968 issue of American Rifleman magazine, where an article by Warren W. Herlihy depicted his experience teaching his son shooting skills, reports the Liverpool Echo. Regarding his first impression upon seeing it, John remarked, "I just thought it was a fantastic, insane thing to say. A warm gun means you just shot something." The song was part of the Beatles' iconic 'White Album', released in November 1968, a tumultuous time for the band as creative differences began to emerge. Despite their differences, they collaborated to craft this intricate track. John revealed that he merged "three sections of different songs" to create the final piece, which tackled various themes. Upon its release, certain sections of the song were interpreted as references to sex and drugs. The 'warm gun' in the title was seen as a metaphor for John's desire for Yoko Ono, leading to a ban by the BBC and commercial radio stations. The line 'I need a fix' was also perceived by some as a reference to heroin. However, John disputed this, explaining: "'Happiness Is A Warm Gun' was another one which was banned on the radio – they said it was about shooting up drugs. But they were advertising guns and I thought it was so crazy that I made a song out of it. It wasn't about 'H' (heroin) at all". The lyrics 'Mother Superior jumped the gun' stemmed from John's longing for Yoko. He wasn't overly concerned that the song's sexual undertones were picked up by censors. John elaborated: "Oh, well, by then I'm into double meanings. The initial inspiration was from the magazine cover. But that was the beginning of my relationship with Yoko and I was very sexually oriented then. When we weren't in the studio, we were in bed." Although 'The White Album' garnered mixed reviews and radio stations boycotted 'Happiness Is A Warm Gun', critics commended the song, which all Beatles members proclaimed their favourite on the album. A Record Mirror magazine review described it as "a serene ballad, but is soon taken over in the true vein of this foremost stylist". US singer-songwriter Tori Amos observed: "The Beatles had the ability to make you think about the world, not just your own little world. They could put the microcosm and macrocosm in the same song. They sang of drugs and guns without telling me what to feel about it. That's genius."
Telegraph
8 hours ago
- Telegraph
AI doctor four times better at identifying illnesses than humans
Microsoft has developed an artificial intelligence (AI) system that it claims is four times better than doctors at diagnosing complex illnesses. The tech company's AI diagnosis system was able to correctly identify ailments up to 86pc of the time, compared to just 20pc on average for British and American physicians. Announcing the findings, Microsoft claimed it had laid the groundwork for 'medical superintelligence'. It comes as Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, is seeking to bring AI into widespread use in the NHS to improve efficiency. In April the NHS waiting list rose for the first time in seven months, reaching 7.42m in a blow to one of the Government's key pledges to cut waiting times. Microsoft claimed its system could solve problems more cheaply than doctors – beating physicians even when sticking to a budget for diagnostic tests. The system, known as Microsoft AI Diagnostic Orchestrator, or MAI-DxO, was tested on 304 cases from the New England Journal of Medicine, a medical journal known for publishing complex medical cases from Massachusetts General Hospital. The system comprised a virtual panel of five different AI bots, each serving different roles such as 'Dr Hypothesiser', 'Dr Test-Chooser' and 'Dr Challenger' that would internally deliberate before asking further questions or ordering tests and providing a diagnosis. In one case, the system diagnosed embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma, a rare form of cancer that normally occurs in children, in a 29-year-old woman. The system was able to diagnose 85.5pc of conditions when paired with the most advanced AI model developed by ChatGPT developer OpenAI and when it had no budget limit on ordering tests. However, even when it had to stick to a $2,000 (£1,458) budget for tests, it was correct more than 70pc of the time. The 21 human doctors, who had an average of 12 years' experience, spent an average of $2,963 on tests. The average doctor was correct 19.9pc of the time, although they were unable to use textbooks or software to look up information and were generalist physicians, rather than specialists. Microsoft's AI tool correctly diagnosed the condition more than half the time even when unable to order any tests, Microsoft said. 'Complement' doctors The researchers said the journal that had provided the cases was behind a paywall and that many were published after the AI system was trained. This ensured that the cases could not have been included in the datasets used to build the AI, and the system had to arrive at the diagnoses itself. Microsoft's AI health division is led by Mustafa Suleyman, the British entrepreneur who co-founded DeepMind before the lab was acquired by Google. He who moved to Microsoft last year. The company said it received 50m health queries a day on its Bing search engine and Copilot chatbot, adding: 'AI companions are quickly becoming the new front line in healthcare.' However, it said AI would complement rather than replace medical professionals. '[Doctors] need to navigate ambiguity and build trust with patients and their families in a way that AI isn't set up to do,' the company said. Last week, Mr Streeting unveiled an NHS app that he said would include a chatbot that serves as a 'doctor in your pocket'.
