Uganda's long-serving President Museveni to seek reelection, official says
KAMPALA, June 24 (Reuters) - Uganda's President Yoweri Museveni will seek reelection for another term in polls due early next year to extend his nearly four-decade rule, according to a senior official from the ruling party.
Although he was widely expected to run for office again, it is the first confirmation from his National Resistance Movement (NRM) party.
Uganda will hold its general election in January, in which voters will also elect lawmakers.
Museveni, 80, has been in power since 1986 and is Africa's fourth longest-ruling leader. The ruling party has changed the constitution twice in the past to allow him to extend his rule.
In a video posted late on Monday by state broadcaster UBC on social media platform X, the chairperson of the ruling party's electoral body Tanga Odoi said Museveni would pick up forms on June 28 to represent the party in the polls.
"The president ... will pick (up) expression-of-interest forms for two positions, one for chairperson of the party and the other to contest if he is given chance for presidential flag bearer," Odoi said.
NRM and other political parties are at present vetting and clearing their candidate for the polls.
Museveni's closest opponent will be pop star-turned-politician Bobi Wine who came second in the last polls in 2021 and has already confirmed his intention to run in 2026.
Wine, whose real name is Robert Kyagulanyi, rejected the 2021 results, saying his victory had been stolen through ballot stuffing, intimidation by security forces and other irregularities.
Rights activists and critics have long accused Museveni of using patronage and security forces to maintain his grip on power but he has denied the accusations and says his long rule is due to popular support.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
I thought I knew what Keir Starmer believed – now, it's anyone's guess
Harriet Harman once described a politician's waking nightmare. As social security secretary in the New Labour government, she was delivering her first speech to the party conference in October 1997. 'All these unfamiliar words started coming up on the autocue. I couldn't go back to my notes, and just had to carry on. I realised that Gordon Brown had made the changes to delete all my references to spending plans.' Something similar happened to Keir Starmer in May, as he read a speech on immigration from the prompter in Downing Street. He told Tom Baldwin, his biographer, in an interview published on Friday, that when the unfamiliar phrase 'an island of strangers' scrolled up on the glass screens, he just read it out. 'I wouldn't have used those words if I had known they were, or even would be interpreted as an echo of [Enoch] Powell,' he told Baldwin. 'I had no idea – and my speechwriters didn't know either.' Starmer had arrived back from a three-day trip to Ukraine the night before, and learned that morning that his former home in Kentish Town had been firebombed in the small hours. His sister-in-law was living there and called the fire brigade: no one was hurt, but Starmer was 'really shaken up'. He said, 'It's fair to say I wasn't in the best state to make a big speech,' and that he almost cancelled it. Baldwin wrote: 'Emphasising he is not using the firebomb attack as an excuse and doesn't blame his advisers or anyone else except himself for these mistakes, Starmer says he should have read through the speech properly and 'held it up to the light a bit more'.' Now, a month and a half later, he said: 'That particular phrase – no – it wasn't right. I'll give you the honest truth: I deeply regret using it.' Both parts of his confession to Baldwin were unwise in the extreme. It was unwise to admit that he doesn't always read his speeches before he delivers them – or that he doesn't always read them 'properly', which is the same thing. The pressures on a prime minister's time are intense, and any prime minister has to rely on speechwriters they can trust to produce most of the words that have to be pumped out. But a politician should never admit that their words are not their own, or blame their speechwriters while insisting that they are not blaming them. Especially not one, such as Starmer, who already has a reputation for being the puppet of Morgan McSweeney, his chief of staff, who saw him as the figurehead for his bid to take the Labour Party back from the Corbynites five years ago. But this confession was particularly unwise because it suggests that Starmer's critics were right to detect the echo of Powell's 'rivers of blood' speech in the prime minister's words. The message of the speech was entirely different. Powell complained that the effect of immigration was that the existing population 'found themselves made strangers in their own country'. Starmer's speechwriters, by contrast, were making the point that 'fair rules' hold a country together. 'In a diverse nation like ours – and I celebrate that – these rules become even more important. Without them, we risk becoming an island of strangers, not a nation that walks forward together.' The sentiment is worthy and uncontroversial, even if the phrasing is a bit poetic. But the meaning was completely clear in the next paragraph: 'So when you have an immigration system that seems almost designed to permit abuse … you're actually contributing to the forces that are slowly pulling our country apart.' I don't know who would actually disagree with that – apart from Enoch Powell, who didn't want any immigration at all. Some of Starmer's critics have also seized on his comment – in the foreword to the immigration white paper, so he presumably did hold these words 'up to the light' – that the 'damage done to our country' by the Conservative 'experiment in open borders' is 'incalculable'. But again, it is hard to disagree: the writer of Starmer's foreword is not saying that immigration is damaging, but that quadrupling it when you promised to reduce it is. Even those who think the UK can easily absorb a net immigration of 906,000 in a 12-month period have to accept that the Tory failure to control immigration has, as the foreword's author said, opened a wound in 'trust in politics'. So Starmer should have defended 'his' words to Baldwin. The message was the right message: that there should be fair rules for immigration, and that immigration has been too high. Now we just do not know what the prime minister thinks. Is the real Starmer the liberal lefty human rights lawyer who implied to Baldwin that he thinks that any attempt to control immigration is Powellism? Or is it the man reading McSweeney's words off the autocue, saying, as he did just before he got to the 'island of strangers' paragraph: 'I know, on a day like today, people who like politics will try to make this all about politics, about this or that strategy, targeting these voters, responding to that party. No. I am doing this because it is right, because it is fair, and because it is what I believe in.' What does he believe in? I thought I knew, but now that he has given that self-pitying interview to his biographer, I am not so sure.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Who do voters want as the 2028 Republican candidate? New poll shows clear frontrunner to succeed Trump
Vice President JD Vance has surged as a clear frontrunner in early polling for the 2028 Republican presidential nomination, according to a new Emerson College survey. Vance leads the 2028 GOP field with 46 percent support, far ahead of Marco Rubio's 12 percent and Ron DeSantis' 9 percent. Independent Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. garnered 5 percent support, while Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley each earned 2 percent. The poll surveyed 1,000 registered voters, including 416 Republican primary voters, between June 24 and 25, with a 4.8-point margin of error for GOP respondents. Meanwhile, 17 percent of respondents were undecided, and six other candidates polled at 1 percent or less. Vance's support has grown significantly since Emerson's November poll, rising from 30 percent to 46 percent, while DeSantis and other contenders saw little change. In November, half of the respondents were undecided. President Donald Trump himself has praised both Vance and Rubio, though he has stopped short of officially designating either of them as his successor. 'You look at Marco, you look at JD Vance, who's fantastic,' Trump told NBC News in a May interview on Meet the Press. 'You look at—I could name 10, 15, 20 people right now just sitting here. No, I think we have a tremendous party.' Trump also denied plans to seek a third presidential term in that interview, saying he intends to be a two-term president. Though he previously claimed he wasn't joking about serving a third term, which is unconstitutional, Trump later said those remarks were meant to troll the media. On the Democratic side of Emerson College's most recent survey, former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg edges out ex-Vice President Kamala Harris with 16 percent to 13 percent in the Emerson survey. Also in contention are California Governor Gavin Newsom at 12 percent and Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro with 7 percent, though nearly a quarter of Democratic voters remain undecided. Harris's support has notably dropped from 37 percent in November.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
‘It's very concerning': conservatives react to Zohran Mamdani's New York primary showing
He is the democratic socialist who has been described as a gift to the Republican party. Zohran Mamdani's stunning showing in the Democratic primary election for mayor of New York this week was seen by some as perfect fodder to whip up a new 'red scare'. Donald Trump called him 'a 100% Communist Lunatic', writing on social media: 'We've had Radical Lefties before, but this is getting a little ridiculous.' But at a gathering of religious conservatives in Washington on Friday, the first attendee interviewed by the Guardian expressed admiration for what Mamdani had pulled off in beating establishment favorite Andrew Cuomo. Kevin Abplanalp, who has worked on political campaigns, said: 'He ran a fantastic ground game. I was very impressed with his grassroots work. Cuomo was a terrible candidate so it's a combination of a repudiation of Cuomo and excitement over a younger guy with energy and different ideas.' Abplanalp, 49, executive director of the group Coalition for Liberty, added: 'He's a bit too socialistic for my taste but it is New York. They've had Marxists before. It is what it is.' Mamdani was endorsed by Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, a leading progressive some believe could now be encouraged to mount a bid for the White House in 2028. But that prospect was met with complacency and ridicule at the Freedom & Faith Coalition's Road to Majority conference. Abplanalp commented: 'That is hilarious. I don't think she has the requisite experience. We've had other presidents who don't have the requisite experience: Jimmy Carter for one. Do people want to have another train wreck of someone that just talks a good game? There's nothing on her résumé that screams executive capability.' The annual gathering was addressed by senators from Pennsylvania, Ohio and Oklahoma along with Virginia'a governor, Glenn Youngkin, and Trump's border 'czar', Tom Homan. In the eyes of many delegates, Mamdani's surprise victory was evidence of liberal eccentricity in New York that will not fly elsewhere. Andrea Moore, 55, from Virginia, said: 'I'm a little surprised but at the same time it is New York.' She told an anecdote about an Uber driver who was upset about New York potentially giving people who illegally crossed the border '$2,000 a month of taxpayer money and the right to vote immediately'. As for Ocasio-Cortez running for president, she remarked: 'I don't think I'd fear it but I'd probably laugh about it.' Steven Perkins, 74, who is retired and from South Dakota, said: 'It's not just that we're conservatives but we know our communities. You get out of the big core cities and people are pretty conservative and traditional and they aren't ready for all of this much change to occur. There's this big reaction. The Democrats better wake up.' Mamdani, 33, combined charisma and social media savvy with a policy agenda focused on New York's affordability crisis. His plans include freezing rent for many residents, free bus service and universal childcare paid for by new taxes on the wealthy. Some at the Road to Majority conference found this affront to capitalism. Darin Moser, 56, from Mount Airy, North Carolina, said: 'It's very concerning. The United States was built on freedom and free markets and we need to stay on that because that's what's made us successful and the most successful nation in the world.' One attendee, who did not wish to be named, blamed the media for making socialism seem like the answer to their problems. He said: 'If you repeat anything enough times people are going to believe it but it's not been proven. Socialism or communism has proven to fail every time it's been put into play. It comes around newly clothed but it's the same worn-out policy.' The ascent of Mamdani, who would be New York's first Muslim mayor, triggered an onslaught of Islamaphobic attacks across social media, including from some Republican members of Congress. Centrist Democrats remained nervous about backing him, fearful that he could damage the party in swing states. But in the view of Ronald Wilcox, 63, from Fairfax county in Virginia, Democrats have already embraced extremism and lost touch with reality. 'The left has no limit to what they will vote for,' he said. 'I trust no Democrat because there's no limit to how bad a person can be and they'll still support him.' Could the US ever elect a socialist president? Wilcox, who works in direct mail, replied: 'I won't say never but the mood of America, the new generation, is embracing Trump. The young generation is moving to conservative, the Asians are moving to conservative, the Latinos are moving to conservative because we share their values.'
