Coalition says Australia needs ‘immediate action' needed to solve 'desperate situation' in Australian Defence Force
The federal Coalition has reiterated the need for Australia to boost its defence spending, with the shadow defence minister warning the situation was becoming 'desperate' and 'immediate action' is needed.
The Albanese government has rejected the Trump administration's calls for Australia to increase it's defence spending, despite NATO agreeing to increase it's target to 5 per cent of GDP by 2035.
Defending the position on Sunday, Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said Australia's defence spending should be driven by the capabilities we need, not an arbitrary target.
"We start with the capability. We don't start with the dollars," Mr Burke told Sky News Australia.
But shadow defence minister Angus Taylor said the Albanese government wasn't even meeting the goals set out in its own Defence Strategic Review.
'It should be based on need, but his own defence strategic review has laid out where the money needs to be spent, and it's not being spent. I mean, this is the point, this government's not even meeting its own goals,' Mr Taylor told Sunday Agenda.
'Forget the pressure being put on by the United States, this is about what's appropriate for us.
'We are seeing authoritarian regimes across the globe flexing their muscles, and open democratic societies like ours need to stand up for what we believe in.
'And if we are to have control of our own destiny, if we're to play the role we need to play in ensuring we have peace through deterrence in our region, the spending is too low. And the government's own plan demonstrates that."
Mr Taylor said defence experts were warning that Australia risked having a 'paper ADF'.
'This is a desperate situation now, and it needs immediate action,' the shadow minister added.
The shadow defence minister said there were 'a whole series of areas' in defence that are currently underfunded.
'Our naval surface fleet is not where it needs to be,' he said.
'Right now we're even seeing ships that are not getting the appropriate level of maintenance and sustainment, so they're not in operation as they should be.
'We know we need to increase spending on recruitment and making sure we're getting the people we need into our defence force. We are thousands and thousands of people short of where we should be.
"But we also know we need hardening of our northern facilities in places like Tyndall, in Darwin, in Townsville.
'We need to make sure that the Henderson sub facility is getting the investment it needs to be able to build the subs, and also play our role in maintenance and sustainment.
'We need to invest in that drone and counter-drone technology, which we know is playing such an important role in conflicts across the globe.
'All of these things desperately need investment. The underinvestment is really showing.'
Mr Taylor said keeping Australians safe and making sure we have peace in the region was the 'first and most important imperative' for government and an inability to do this is a major failure.
'If a government is not in a position to make the investments necessary to achieve peace through deterrence in the region it is in, then it has failed its people,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Perth Now
26 minutes ago
- Perth Now
A group of wealthy people ready to buy TikTok: Trump
US President Donald Trump has said in an interview that he has found a buyer for TikTok, a group of "very wealthy people" who he will reveal in about two weeks. Trump made the remarks in an interview on Fox News Channel's Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo. Being able to find a buyer could allow TikTok to continue operating in the United States amid national security concerns over a Chinese firm's ownership of the platform. "We have a buyer for TikTok, by the way," Trump said. "I think I'll need probably China's approval. I think President Xi (Jinping) will probably do it." Under former US president Joe Biden's administration, Congress had passed legislation requiring TikTok to cut ties with its Chinese parent company ByteDance and secure ownership by an investor from a country not deemed a "national adversary" by January 20, the day Trump took office again. When no deal was reached by the deadline, TikTok briefly went offline in the US until Trump, on his first day back in the White House, signed an executive order granting a 75-day extension. On April 4, he provided an additional 75-day extension, and on June 19 extended that again by 90 days, pushing the deadline to September 17. Trump, who has expressed fondness for the app, reiterated that TikTok played a role in his election victory by boosting his popularity among younger voters. "I have a soft spot for TikTok," he said. with EFE

The Age
38 minutes ago
- The Age
Why Trump-induced mayhem doesn't scare your super fund
Monday caps off a wild financial year for global markets, and therefore, for the retirement savings of just about all of us. But despite all the turmoil in the world, the past 12 months have been a story of remarkable recovery for superannuation balances. Big super funds' most popular investment options have made returns of about 9 per cent for the year to June, and members who took a bit more risk may have made 10 per cent or more. It's a far cry from the depths of the ' Liberation Day' in April, when some big super funds' returns for the financial year to date had been smashed to close to 1 per cent. So, will the good times for investors continue in the year ahead? No one knows for sure, and the outlook is even more uncertain than usual thanks to the unpredictability of US President Donald Trump. Loading We can be more certain about one thing, however. Despite the sense of Trump-induced chaos, super giants will continue putting a large chunk of members' money to work in the US. That might seem surprising at first glance. The man in the White House has been a key contributor to much of the market volatility, and yet super funds are still betting big on the US? Huh? Hasn't the US become a riskier place to invest? Well, yes, big investors have correctly said the US has become riskier. However, there are logical reasons why the people managing our super money will probably continue to plough a lot of that cash into Wall Street, even as Trump pursues his highly unpredictable and damaging policy agenda in America and abroad.

Sky News AU
43 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Security expert brands Anthony Albanese's handling of US strikes on Iran 'disturbing' following revelation Prime Minister had advanced knowledge of attack
Strategic Analysis Australia director Michael Shoebridge has argued Anthony Albanese's response to United States strikes on Iran was made "even more disturbing" by revelations the Prime Minister had advanced knowledge of the attacks. Mr Albanese came under intense scrutiny over his and the government's reaction to news the US had bombed three of Iran's key nuclear facilities. The government initially put out a statement attributed only to a spokesperson which failed to explicitly support the attacks before the Prime Minister later held a press conference to give direct backing. Critics of Labor and Mr Albanese claimed the response showed the government was out of step with the Trump Administration and had been caught flat-footed by the US. However, on Sunday Sky News Australia revealed the Prime Minister did have advanced knowledge the US planned to attack Iran's nuclear sites, although not the exact timing on when the strikes would occur. According to Mr Shoebridge, the revelation is likely to prompt further questions about Mr Albanese's handling of the issue. "I think it's good that our government knew about this beforehand, but the fact that the government knew before it happened, that the US was going to bomb Iran, makes the Prime Minister's performance even more disturbing," he told Sky News. "Let's remember, the strikes happened on a Sunday. Almost every other world leader reacted that day. It wasn't until Monday that we got a stilted press conference from the Prime Minister and he still sounded clueless and flat-footed. "That made sense when we thought the whole thing had come as a surprise to him, but knowing he had pre-warning makes his performance quite bizarre." Shadow defence minister Angus Taylor last week claimed Mr Albanese had expressed "anti-US alliance' sentiments by failing to quickly back in the strikes and it is possible that criticism will be renewed following the revelation Labor had advanced warning. The back and forth over the government's response comes as the relationship between Australia and the US continues to experience increasing scrutiny after the re-election of President Donald Trump. Critics of the government have highlighted past comments from senior Labor figures about the US President to suggest there is a disconnect between the leadership of both countries. Australia has also come under pressure over its approach to defence spending, with Trump Administration officials pushing for Labor to lift its outlay. Mr Albanese and Defence Minister Richard Marles have both stuck by existing plans to increase spending to 2.3 per cent of GDP, despite pressure to reach 3.5 per cent from US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth. "We have increased our defence investment,' the Prime Minister said on Friday. 'What we're doing is making sure that Australia has the capability that we need - that's what we're investing in.'