Arrests in China after more than 230 kindergarten children poisoned by lead paint in food
The incident, which occurred in Gansu province earlier this month, is one of China's worst ever school food safety incidents and has drawn national attention. An investigative report released by the Gansu provincial party committee on Sunday found a litany of failures in safety and oversight, as well as attempts to cover up the incident, bribe people in charge and modify test results.
The report said the principal at the Tianshui kindergarten had wanted to attract more enrolments by 'enhancing' the colour and look of the food served to children. The school's cook bought industrial-grade pigment online, adding it to dishes despite the packages saying it was 'not for consumption'.
One pigment was found to have lead levels 400,000 times the safe legal limit. The report said the school had previously bought food-safe colouring, at a cheaper cost, but preferred the 'brighter' colours.
Initially 235 students were hospitalised after eating the coloured food. Local state media quoted a parent at the time saying children had suffered stomach pain and nausea, and some children's teeth had turned black. Final tests revealed that 247 students, as well as staff including the principal, had elevated lead levels in their blood as a result of eating the food.
Six kindergarten staff, including the principal, have been arrested, accused of knowingly serving toxic and harmful food. Disciplinary investigations have been launched into the actions of 27 others working for the school, hospital and government.
However, Sunday's report revealed mistakes and mishandling at almost every level of the process and response.
It said the Gansu Provincial Centre for Disease Control and Prevention neglected the case after accepting it, and took samples in a way that violated health regulations and led to a 'huge difference' in the test results and the actual levels.
At the Tianshui Second People's hospital, at least two children's test results were illegally 'modified' to record substantially lower lead levels, the report said.
'The management of Tianshui Second People's hospital and its laboratory department was chaotic, job responsibilities were not fully implemented, laboratory quality control was not fully implemented and relevant inspection personnel lacked systematic training,' the report said.
It also accused the local education bureau of having 'turned a blind eye' to the kindergarten – which charges high fees – operating without a proper licence, and not conducting food safety inspections at any private kindergarten for two years. It said officials in charge of preschool education across multiple departments were suspected of accepting benefits and bribes from the Tianshui kindergarten's major investor and others linked to the school.
The report said China's top anti-corruption authorities had filed a case for review and investigation against government officials of multiple levels, and opened an investigation into senior management at the hospital.
It said the children had been treated and all but one had been discharged after the first round of treatment, during which lead levels dropped by an average of 40%.
'The provincial party committee and the provincial government are deeply saddened by the abnormal blood lead problem in the Brownstone Peixin Kindergarten in Maiji district, Tianshui city, and express their deep apologies to the children and their parents,' the report said.
The release of the report was accompanied by reported protests by parents on Sunday evening outside the kindergarten. Footage shared online by Teacher Li, who monitors dissent inside China, claimed to show clashes between police and a few hundred people outside the Tianshui kindergarten.
The footage showed officers using physical force, including batons, and angry parents confronting individuals in plain clothes, questioning their use of violence. As police cars appeared to try to escort the plain-clothed individuals away, parents blocked the road, shouting: 'Hand over those who beat people up.'
Additional research by Lillian Yang
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
4 hours ago
- Reuters
Jiangsu Hengrui grants GSK global rights to drug portfolio in $500 million deal
HONG KONG, July 28 (Reuters) - China's Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals ( opens new tab said on Monday it has agreed to license the global rights of its HRS-9821 drug and 11 other programmes to GlaxoSmithKline Intellectual Property (GSK) for $500 million upfront. The Chinese pharma group said, opens new tab it could earn up to $12 billion in milestone payments if all options are exercised and targets are met. HRS-9821 is being developed to treat chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), while the other projects are in early development across areas such as oncology, respiratory, immunology, and inflammation. Shanghai shares of Jiangsu Hengrui climbed 6.6% and its Hong Kong-listed stock jumped 8.5%, outperforming the blue-chip CSI 300 Index's (.CSI300), opens new tab 0.1% slip and the Hang Seng Index's (.HSI), opens new tab 0.3% gain.
Daily Mail
12 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Urgent recall of popular cheeseburgers that can trigger 'life-threatening allergic reaction'
The FDA issued an urgent warning about a midwestern burger and sandwich brand after an undeclared allergen was found in food items sold across three states. Sheehan Brothers Vending, an Ohio-based catering business, recalled six of its staple meals after health officials detected sesame that was not noted on product labels earlier this month. Cheeseburgers, Spicy Chicken Sandwiches, Italian Mini Subs, Pepperoni Pizza Subs, Chili Cheese Coneys and BBQ Riblets with Coleslaw were named in the recall. Affected sandwiches were sold by the family business between July 2 and July 8 in 'micro markets' and vending machines across Ohio, Northern Kentucky and Eastern Indiana. The ready-to-go meals are premade and only need to be reheated in the microwave for less than a minute. All the items were individually wrapped in plastic and labeled with green and white stickers on the front. The FDA classified the recall as a Class I health risk, which is the most dire type of recall. 'People who have an allergy or severe sensitivity to sesame run the risk of a serious or life-threatening allergic reaction if they consume this product,' the agency wrote. 'Individuals exhibiting signs or symptoms of foodborne illness or allergies should contact a physician immediately.' Fortunately, no illnesses have been reported in connection to the undeclared allergen. Anyone with a sesame allergy who bought the contaminated products should throw them out and contact Sheehan Brothers Vending for a replacement pack. The family-owned business specializes in meeting the catering and vending needs of of office buildings. According to the company website, its vending machines 'carry homemade and name-brand sandwiches, salads, entrees, snacks, and beverages that offer healthy alternatives for consumers.' Sheehan Brothers also installs and runs micro markets, which are self-service shops and cafes in business and public spaces. 'We continually innovate to provide the most popular snacks, beverages, and homemade food items daily,' the company, founded in 1956, wrote. About 33 million people living in the US have a food allergy, according to Food Allergy Research & Education (FARE). Sesame is the ninth most common food allergy in the United States, the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology reported. 'When a person with an allergy to sesame is exposed to sesame, proteins in the sesame bind to specific IgE antibodies made by the person's immune system,' FARE wrote. 'This triggers the person's immune defenses, leading to reaction symptoms that can be mild or very severe.' The FDA recognizes nine major allergens: milk, eggs, sesame, fish, tree nuts, crustacean shellfish, peanuts, wheat and soybeans.
The Guardian
15 hours ago
- The Guardian
The voice of our own inner critic can be strong. How can we break free from the mental prison?
The Buddha was bold in his approach to human psychology. He described psychological suffering as pervasive and inherent to the human experience. Suffering is present not only in moments of loss and pain, but in how the mind contracts, shaped by past actions and entrenched habits. In this sense, we live in a mental prison of our own making with walls continually constructed and reconstructed largely out of conscious view. Thoughts, perceptions and feelings appear solid and true, and a relentless internal voice tells us who we are, what we ought to be and do and what the world must deliver. At its worst, our psyche can feel like 'a bad neighbourhood' that we might avoid walking through alone, to quote writer Anne Lamott. During such times, support, friendship and self-nurturing are crucial. But even outside more troubling mental states, the walls of our minds can limit the view. Sound familiar? It's no coincidence that in contemporary life, the pursuit of mental freedom has become mainstream – even commercial. Modern seekers are microdosing psilocybin, participating in ayahuasca ceremonies, experimenting with cognitive-enhancing supplements like nootropics, and trying biohacking techniques – cold plunges, saunas, sensory deprivation tanks to name a few. And then, of course, there are silent meditation retreats: two days, 10 days, 30 days, even three months. On these retreats, participants report glimpsing a reality beyond the known self, a shift so impactful it can redirect the entire course of their lives. In fact, many committed to Buddhist meditation speak of such moments as pivotal. While sudden breakthroughs can be transformative (particularly when integrated well), once the intensity fades, familiar anxieties return. The architecture of our inner world, temporarily dismantled, rebuilds itself. The Buddha might have recognised the yearning behind this search, but cautioned that while insight can arise spontaneously, the path is ultimately gradual and gentle, requiring ethics, restraint, mindfulness and mental persistence. We chase instant fixes, hoping the next practice or product will deliver, only to feel let down. Caught in this need for immediate release, we often avoid examining the quieter mechanisms that keep us trapped. One such mechanism is what modern Buddhists refer to as the judgmental or comparing mind – not to be confused with wise discernment. As our awareness deepens, we begin to see the extent to which we internalise rules, expectations, and criticism. The comparing mind isn't kind or reasonable. When triggered, it can be oppressive, self-flagellating and cruel. It can appear in the body as constriction and discomfort – a tightening of the jaw and chest, a sinking feeling in the pit of the stomach. Sometimes it's so constant we only notice it when we pause and tune in. Western thinkers like Sigmund Freud and Michel Foucault explored how we internalise authority, self-police, and punish ourselves. Foucault described how we internalise the gaze of those in power, monitoring our behaviours, actions and even our thoughts. Freud referred to the 'superego,' which tames instinctual desires, but also devolves into shame and guilt; essential to social cohesion, he said, but when overactive, the cause of neuroses and mental distress. Buddhism recognises similar dynamics, albeit through a different lens. As a way to work with the inner critic, we are first invited to actively extend a spirit of non-harm toward all beings – this includes ourselves. This elicits an ever-deepening awareness of how we move through the world and treat others, as well as our own hearts, in the pursuit of mental liberation. Then, through meditative inquiry, we begin to see our punishing thoughts with greater clarity – their shape, origin and propensity. Shame and blame aren't repressed, but understood and, where possible, gently disarmed and pacified. What does this look like, practically? First, notice how it lives in the body and stays with it. Offer yourself some mercy. This is part of being human – a mind that grasps, compares, and cajoles. As calm returns, a small sense of freedom may emerge. Don't miss that. From here, trace what gave rise to the pattern: fatigue, an interaction, a memory or something else. Notice the belief or storyline the mind clings to. In other words, what is the sticky thought at play? In seeing this clearly, the mind may loosen its grip. Over time, and with continued observation, these habits may naturally dissipate. During a retreat, I once became struck by the cruelty of my thoughts. I hadn't noticed it in the rush of daily life, but in stillness, it hit me in a visceral way. Every time I meditated, my mind scorned me: I wasn't doing it well enough, this wasn't the practice for me, I was too sleepy, hungry, or ill-suited. I had a bad temperament, the voice said, and I might as well give up. Exhausted, I went to the teacher to report on my experience, and she said very directly, as if she already knew, 'it's remarkable how violent we can be to ourselves'. It's hard, this being human thing. But the Buddha's path, like many spiritual paths, is a hopeful one. It teaches us how to alleviate suffering through humility, curiosity and patience, rather than fighting fire with fire. To paraphrase the Buddha, 'hatred is never appeased by hatred … but by love alone'. With practice, the grip of the inner critic is released, and space for something else emerges. It may happen suddenly, but it's more likely to happen over time. As the punishing narrator recedes into the background, we access greater moments of mental release and ethical clarity. Then, one very fine day, we might walk straight out of the prison's doors, and as we do, we might realise the doors have been wide open this whole time. Dr Nadine Levy is a senior lecturer at the Nan Tien Institute. She coordinates its health and social wellbeing program and the graduate certificate in applied mindfulness
