
Prison time ordered after man found guilty of fifth, sixth OWIs
Jerry Bacinett, 51, could have faced up to a decade in prison for each OWI charge had he not taken the agreement. Under Wisconsin law the fifth and sixth convictions carry the same penalties, which can also include up to $25,000 in fines.
Bacinett's fifth OWI dates to a filing from August 2023. He was arrested again in the fall of 2024, while the earlier case was still pending. That meant he technically faced two OWI-5 charges until his no contest plea convicted him of one and changed the second into an OWI-6 charge.
He missed a court appearance for his arraignment in the latter case one month ago. A status conference five days later saw him enter a not guilty plea. The warrant for his arrest was quashed.
Monday's proceeding initially looked like a rerun of the Jan. 10 hearing, with Bacinett not in court. But he wasn't skipping it, just running late. Bacinett told the court he wanted to accept the plea agreement.
According to the criminal complaint, the earlier case began when officers responded to a call about a vehicle crashing into a utility pole. They found a truck with damage consistent with such an impact parked at a nearby residence.
A woman who answered the door at the residence said Bacinett had come home and gone straight to bed. She woke him and told him police wanted to speak with him, but he had trouble standing when he reached the door. He told officers he had not been drinking, but they could smell alcohol on him.
Bacinett failed sobriety tests, and a breath test returned a level of .228. A later blood draw came back even higher: .338.
Bacinett's prior convictions included cases in Trempealeau, Buffalo and Clark counties dating to 1991.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
UPDATE: Springfield's 6th Street, Oberlin Ave reopen after crash
Update at 5:30 p.m. The intersection of 6th Street and Oberlin Avenue has reopened, SPD Lieutenant Tim Jenkins told WCIA. SPRINGFIELD, Ill. (WCIA) — A Springfield intersection is currently shut down due to a crash Thursday afternoon. The crash involved two vehicles at the intersection of 6th Street and Oberlin Avenue. Springfield Police Lieutenant Tim Jenkins told WCIA that while there are conflicting witness statements, the crash appears to have been caused by a car that was driving north on 6th Street at a high rate of speed. That car collided with another car that was crossing Oberlin Avenue, Jenkins said. 3rd teen arrested in Champaign shooting that left a 14-year-old with 'potentially life-threatening' injuries Three people were taken from the scene with injuries, Jenkins added. All of them are expected to be ok. The cars also crashed into a utility pole, but Jenkins said it was only an ancillary pole. CWLP crews have already disconnected the wires from it. The intersection of 6th and Oberlin will be closed for at least another hour while the crash scene is cleaned up, Jenkins said. He added that the car allegedly speeding on 6th Street flipped over, and first responders are waiting on tow trucks. This is a developing story. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword


UPI
a day ago
- UPI
Five years after Beirut port blast, Lebanon clings to hope for Justice
Friends and relatives of the victims of the 2020 Beirut port blast carry portraits of their deceased relatives as they gather outside the port to commemorate Monday he fifth anniversary of the massive explosion there. At least 218 people were killed and and some 6,000 injured. Photo by Hamzeh Wael/EPA BEIRUT, Lebanon, Aug. 4 (UPI) -- Lebanon, long plagued by impunity and a lack of accountability, marked the fifth anniversary Monday of the Beirut port explosion that devastated large parts of the capital. The day brought cautious hope that truth and justice may finally be achieved. The investigation into the blast -- one of the largest non-nuclear explosions in history, which killed 218 people, wounded more than 6,000, and destroyed entire neighborhoods on Aug. 4, 2020 - is reportedly nearing completion after years of delay due to political interference. The painful memories of that day remain vivid, as victims' families have never stopped fighting to uncover what caused the massive explosion and who was responsible for the 2,750 tons of ammonium nitrate that had been improperly stored at the port for seven years before igniting. A separate investigation by the Lebanese Army and the FBI estimated that 500 to 600 tons of ammonium nitrate exploded at the port, raising questions about what happened to the remaining quantity. On Monday, the victims' families -- most of them dressed in white and black-- gathered again close to the blast site to mark the anniversary, carrying photos of their loved ones and holding placards that read: "August 4 is a crime, not an accident" and "Independent judiciary = just truth." They were joined by a large crowd, and for the first time, by several government ministers, including Minister of Justice Adel Nassar and Minister of Social Affairs Haneen Sayed, who lost her mother in the explosion. Lebanese President Joseph Aoun renewed his pledge Monday to uncover the "full truth," saying that "justice will not die" and that holding those responsible for this "great crime" accountable would be a top priority. "No one who contributed to this humanitarian disaster through negligence, failure or corruption would escape punishment," Aoun said in a statement. Aoun's election and the formation of a reformist government led by Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, a renowned judge who headed the International Court of Justice at the time of his nomination last January, paved the way for the resumption of the port blast investigation. Judge Tarek Bitar, the lead investigator who was forced to halt his work three years ago due to political pressure, resumed proceedings earlier this year. He has since summoned additional high-ranking officials, including former ministers, political figures and security personnel for questioning regarding their failure to act on the dangerous storage of ammonium nitrate at the port. A former public prosecutor, Ghassan Oueidat, and a deputy in parliament, Ghazi Zuaiter, still refuse to be questioned. According to Cecile Roukoz, a lawyer whose brother, Joseph, was killed in the port explosion, Oueidat and Zuaiter are like "all politicians and people of influence, who are used to impunity -- to having protection and avoiding accountability." "They believe there will be a compromise in their favor, but the port explosion case will be different," Roukoz told UPI. After five years of "great pain," she said she believes those responsible will be brought to trial, justice will be served and the truth will finally be known. Others still have doubts. Ibrahim Hoteit, whose 46-year-old firefighter brother was killed in the explosion, said that truth and justice cannot be achieved unless the judiciary is fully independent and free from political influence. Hoteit argued that Judge Bitar has been "selective" in his approach, failing to summon all former suspected government, security, military and army intelligence officials for questioning. This, he added, has led to a division among the victims' families. "How would he close the investigation and issue his indictment if he hasn't questioned all those people?" he told UPI. The indictment should clarify not only who brought in and authorized the storage of the ammonium nitrate, but also who was smuggling it over the course of seven years, how it was used and what ultimately triggered the explosion. Despite facing threats and repeated attempts to obstruct his work over the past years, Bitar was determined to resume the investigation and is now close to concluding it, with plans to issue the indictment by year's end, according to a well-informed judicial source. The investigative judge, however, is still awaiting responses from seven Arab and European countries regarding "requests for assistance" related to "certain undisclosed information," according to Youssef Diab, a journalist who specializes in judicial affairs. Diab told UPI that Bitar is also seeking a French technical report that will determine whether samples taken from the port scene contain explosive materials other than ammonium nitrate, and if there is any trace of a missile or bomb. That would clarify whether the port blast was due to negligence, systemic corruption or possibly an Israeli strike, as suggested by witnesses and media reports at the time. "I am confident that we will know what happened," Diab said, adding that the indictment will include details about how the blast occurred, what caused it and who was responsible. The port explosion case will then be transferred to the Judicial Council, which will rule on whether the judge was right or wrong -- partially or fully -- in his conclusions. The hope is that this case will put justice back on track and "mark an end to the long-standing culture of impunity and lack of accountability in Lebanon," Roukoz said.


Newsweek
3 days ago
- Newsweek
Russia's New Deadly Glide Bomb Revealed
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Russia has introduced a new guided glide bomb into its full-scale invasion, which marks Moscow's push to develop aerial weapons to bombard Ukraine's infrastructure. Ukrainian authorities said that Russia's new UMPB-5 guided aerial bombs had been dropped by Sukhoi Su-34 fighter jets on two regions in the last two months amid testing of the new weapon. Analysis shared with Newsweek by the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD), a Washington, D.C., think tank, said that the glide bomb was part of Russia's growing efforts to develop cheap standoff guided munitions. Newsweek has contacted the Russian Defense Ministry via email for comment. File photo: Ukrainian rescue workers survey the rubble of a residential building hit during a Russian overnight drone and missile strike in Kyiv, Ukraine on June 23, 2025. File photo: Ukrainian rescue workers survey the rubble of a residential building hit during a Russian overnight drone and missile strike in Kyiv, Ukraine on June 23, It Matters Before Vladimir Putin's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Moscow underestimated how many glide bombs and other guided munitions it would need. Russia's glide bombs before the war were relatively expensive and so used sparingly. The FDD's John Hardie said Russia's failure to destroy most of Ukraine's air defenses at the invasion's start pushed Moscow to swiftly develop cheap glide bombs with standoff range that will allow its air force to play a greater role. What To Know Ukrainian authorities said the UMPB-5 was first used in Ukraine's Sumy region and then on two consecutive days of strikes on the city of Kharkiv on July 24 and 25; one attack hit a hospital. In the second instance, a Su-34 released the bomb about 65 miles away from Russia's neighboring Belgorod region; this is according to Spartak Borysenko from the Kharkiv Prosecutor's Office, which investigates such attacks as war crimes. Borysenko said Russia is still testing the weapon and that its exact characteristics are not yet known. But the name of the UMPB-5 glide bomb suggests it is a derivative of the UMPB D-30SN, which was first seen in spring 2024, the FDD said. The latter model has a longer range than the 50 miles of its predecessor and has warhead that weighs 2.5 times more, at around 550 pounds. Cheap glide bombs are playing a greater role in Russia's aggression with Moscow; an average of 160 were dropped each day in July 2025, according to President Volodymyr Zelensky—eight times more than spring 2023. The main one used is the UMPK, or "Universal Gliding and Correction Module," first seen in January 2023. It is designed to fit on dumb bombs and was initially employed with the FAB-500 M-62, a 1,100-pound-class high-explosive bomb, but since adapted for bombs of various sizes. Borysenko said that Moscow started using a modified UMPK with larger wings and a range of at least 60 miles in the Sumy and Kharkiv regions in May. With further testing, this range could increase, as suggested by a Russian Telegram channel. Russia is also developing low-cost air-launched cruise missiles, such as the recently unveiled S8000 BanderoL, which can be launched via remotely piloted aircraft. What People Are Saying John Hardie, deputy director of FDD's Russia Program, said Moscow is using a new UMPB-5 guided glide bomb, which: "appears to be a more-powerful derivative of a bomb introduced last year, reflecting the Russian Air Force's efforts to develop a growing variety of cheap standoff guided munitions." Spartak Borysenko, from the Kharkiv Regional Prosecutor's Office, said: "UMPB-5 is a new ammunition that the Russians began using about two months ago … they are currently testing it, and the exact characteristics are not known for certain." What Happens Next Hardie said that details about these new munitions remain scarce, but Russia's Air Force and Naval Aviation are focused on producing large quantities of inexpensive standoff munitions. Whether Russia will address its shortcomings in destroying enemy air defenses is a problem "that will be much harder to solve," Hardie added.