logo
Misinformation rages as protests roil Los Angeles

Misinformation rages as protests roil Los Angeles

The Hill11-06-2025
As the immigration protests unfolded in Los Angeles, a flurry of misinformation hit social media platforms, sparking further confusion and tension in an already chaotic environment.
The demonstrations and the conflicting accounts surrounding them highlight the role social media plays in times of crisis.
In this case, social media appeared to play an even larger role as a growing number of users turned to artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots — often with varying degrees of accuracy — to discern what was real and what was not.
'The past is prequel … everything we're seeing is what we've seen in the past, simply in some cases with new technology applied,' said Darren Linvill, a researcher at Clemson University's Media Forensics Hub.
While accurate, real-time updates were published on the protests, so were posts containing fake images, conspiracy theories or misleading information that garnered hundreds of thousands of views online.
These posts were shared by various users, from smaller accounts to well-known political figures like Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas).
Cruz was among several on the social platform X to repost a video showing multiple police cars damaged or set ablaze. The Texas Republican shared the video to argue the protests in Los Angeles were not as peaceful as some Democrats claimed.
It was later revealed the video was not from this week, but from the protests over George Floyd's murder in 2020. A community note was eventually added clarifying it was old footage, prompting Cruz and others to delete the video.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom's (D) press office weighed in on the video, writing on X, 'Misinformation like this only adds to the chaos the Trump administration is seeking. Check your sources before sharing info!'
'What we're really seeing is any high risk event, which is time-bound, whether that be a natural disaster or a terrorist attack, has just become such fertile ground for online accounts to take advantage of,' explained Isabelle Frances-Wright, the director of technology and society at the Institute of Strategic Dialogue.
Other posts took images from video games or movies like 'Blue Thunder,' which takes place in Los Angeles, to make it seem like there is a significant military presence in the city after President Trump deployed the National Guard and Marines to quell the protests over the weekend.
'People believe what they want to believe, and so when they are seeing information that confirms their prior beliefs, they're going to repost it. They're going to believe it … regardless of whether that information is true,' Linvill said.
And on TikTok, an AI-generated video was shared Monday showing a National Guard member filming himself while on duty in Los Angeles.
The video did not include an 'AI-generated' label often put on TikTok videos, but fact-checkers pointed to various inaccuracies in the video to show it was fake.
The video, posted by an account with the handle @maybenotquitereal, had more than 970,000 views as of Tuesday.
Experts say the situation underscores the increasing influence social media has in shaping public opinion and the upped risks with AI in the mix.
'That has the potential itself to exacerbate the situation on the ground because people are going to be more passionate about their set of beliefs,' Linvill said.
'Every fake story that comes out, it's titillating, it's interesting, and it spreads the story and makes the whole story bigger of the riots,' Linvill continued. 'And that makes it simply more likely for angry people on both sides to want to go take part, to engage in the real world rather than just the digital world.'
As users tried to parse through the minefield of information, some turned to AI chatbots, like X's Grok or OpenAI's ChatGPT, to determine whether the posts were real and accurate. This showcases a new trend of increasing trust in AI, even if it bolsters confusion with potentially inaccurate information, Linvill explained.
'People want to believe AI. People have a tendency to trust technology, especially when the technology is again telling them something they want to believe,' Linvill told The Hill.
While many answers from the chatbots accurately pointed out fake or out-of-context shots, some users were left more confused from their response to a photo posted by Newsom on Monday.
Amid his battle with Trump over deploying the National Guard, Newsom posted photos of troops deployed in Los Angeles sleeping on the floors 'without fuel, food, water or a place to sleep.'
One user said they used ChatGPT's reverse photo search to determine when they were taken. The chatbot mistakenly said they were taken in 2021 during the U.S.'s withdrawal from Afghanistan, sparking a flood of rumors about Newsom's use of the images.
According to a screenshot from a BBC News Verify journalist, Grok shared a similar response initially about the photos, but it later said the images were real and from a San Francisco Chronicle report over the weekend.
'Grok is a machine to do what it's coded to do, and sometimes it simply doesn't have the context to answer the question, but it's always going to try to give you an answer, right or wrong,' Linvill said.
Frances-Wright, whose research focuses on technology's impact on society and the information ecosystem, further argued the community notes system used to add context to X posts still present a 'consistency' issue where fact checks will be placed on some posts, but not on others that are 'blatantly false.'
Amid the confusion came a deluge of conspiracy theories, a common occurrence during times of crisis.
Conspiracy theorist Alex Jones repeatedly claimed on X and his Infowars show that the protests are being funded by 'deep state' Democrats. Jones has more than 4 million followers, and his posts received hundreds of thousands of views.
No evidence has emerged to back Jones's claim.
Other posts with images of bricks emerged, with users claiming they were bought by prominent Democrats like George Soros to fund the protests against ICE.
'It's Civil War!!' said one user in a post that had more than 820,000 views. A community note was added clarifying the photo was taken by a Malaysian building supply company and is not connected to the LA protests.
Real Raw News, known for publishing misinformation and fabricated stories, shared a post Sunday claiming U.S. Marines arrested California National Guard Command Chief Master Sgt. Lynn Williams for opposing Trump's orders.
The claim was baseless, and even though Real Raw News is widely regarded as a fake news site, several users appeared to believe it. One user commented 'treason,' while another said they shared it to Facebook.
As of Monday afternoon, the post had nearly 514,000 views with more than 8,000 reposts.
Experts told The Hill posts with this language or conspiracy theories reinforce Trump's stance on immigration and his argument that the violence and chaos of the protests began before he deployed the National Guard and Marines.
The posts with misinformation 'are the same kinds of incendiary claims that we see over and over again across the ideological spectrum by a whole host of actors with different motivations,' said Frances-Wright.
It comes amid the Trump administration's broader push for mass deportations. Trump and his team blame Democrats for allowing what they say is an 'invasion' of migrants crossing the nation's southern border.
'Actors with specific political agendas [are] trying to use the moment and the confusion of a moment like this to further a political agenda,' added Frances-Wright, whose research focuses on technology's impact on society and the information ecosystem.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump signs executive order making it easier to remove homeless people from streets
Trump signs executive order making it easier to remove homeless people from streets

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump signs executive order making it easier to remove homeless people from streets

President Donald Trump signed an executive order Thursday making it easier for local jurisdictions to remove homeless people from the streets. The order directs Attorney General Pam Bondi to 'reverse judicial precedents and end consent decrees' that limit jurisdictions' abilities to relocate homeless people. It also redirects federal resources so that affected homeless people are transferred to rehabilitation and substance misuse facilities. It also directs Bondi to work with Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Housing and Urban Development Secretary Scott Turner and Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy to fast-track federal funding to states and municipalities that crack down on 'open illicit drug use, urban camping and loitering, and urban squatting, and track the location of sex offenders.' 'President Trump is delivering on his commitment to Make America Safe Again and end homelessness across America,' Leavitt said in a statement Thursday. 'By removing vagrant criminals from our streets and redirecting resources toward substance abuse programs, the Trump Administration will ensure that Americans feel safe in their own communities and that individuals suffering from addiction or mental health struggles are able to get the help they need.' Advocates for the homeless condemned the executive orders with some saying that it will make homelessness worse for communities. 'These executive orders ignore decades of evidence-based housing and support services in practice. They represent a punitive approach that has consistently failed to resolve homelessness and instead exacerbates the challenges faced by vulnerable individuals,' said Donald Whitehead, executive director of the National Coalition for the Homeless, in a press release. The National Homelessness Law Center said the order 'deprives people of their basic rights and makes it harder to solve homelessness' in a statement on Thursday. The group said the order will expand the use of police and institutionalization in response to homelessness, while increasing the number of people living in tents, cars and on the streets. Order follows high court decision The order comes a month after the Supreme Court ruled in favor of an Oregon city that ticketed homeless people for sleeping outside. Justices rejected arguments that such 'anti-camping' ordinances violate the Constitution's ban on 'cruel and unusual' punishment. The case had been watched closely by city and state officials who have struggled to respond to a surge in homelessness and encampments that have cropped up under bridges and in city parks across the nation. It was also followed by people who live in those encampments and are alarmed by efforts to criminalize the population rather than build shelters and affordable housing. Homelessness in the US soared to the highest level on record last year, driven by a lack of affordable housing, a rise in migrants seeking shelter and natural disasters, which caused some people to be displaced from their homes, according to the Department of Housing and Urban Development. More than 770,000 people experienced homelessness in 2024, an 18% increase from 2023. It was the largest annual increase since HUD began collecting the data in 2007 (excluding the jump from 2021 to 2022, when the agency didn't conduct a full count due to the Covid-19 pandemic). As a candidate, Trump railed against the nation's homeless crisis, telling supporters during a September campaign rally it was 'destroying our cities.' 'The homeless encampments will be gone,' Trump said in remarks from North Carolina. 'They're going to be gone. Oh, you have to see, you have to – some of these encampments, what they've done to our cities, and we've got to take care of the people.' CNN's Shania Shelton contributed to this report. Solve the daily Crossword

How the Trump–Musk relationship complicates Tesla's future
How the Trump–Musk relationship complicates Tesla's future

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

How the Trump–Musk relationship complicates Tesla's future

Tesla (TSLA) CEO Elon Musk's close ties with President Trump initially gave many investors hope for faster progress on initiatives like robotaxis and autonomous driving. Barron associate editor Al Root explains why that optimism was overblown and discusses the risks the Musk–Trump relationship still poses. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination here. Al, you know, it's interesting because I had some bulls on this program, Al. And part of their bullishness, full stop, was the relationship between Trump and Musk. Their thinking being, listen, it is a great thing for Musk to have this good friend in the White House who can perhaps foam the runway on some of these initiatives like robo taxis. Yeah, I mean, so the primary you just reiterated it or I'll just reiterate it. The primary benefit from the trust Trump Musk relationship was supposed to be nationwide uh autonomous driving standards, uh which would speed the adoption of this trillion dollar valuation that Dan Ives has for Dan Ives, for instance, and others have for robo taxis. Um, that was a bit Listen, I mean, you know, should I said it then? Maybe we did, maybe we didn't. It was a bit euphoric, right? The idea that just a relationship between the President and Elon Musk could create, you know, a trillion dollars in value, which it basically did overnight, right? Tesla stock, I can't remember, but we're talking like 480 in December. Um, so that was a bit euphoric. Uh so we probably overcooked that, just like we overcooked it on the downside when we thought the world was ending. I think the Trump Musk relationship is just sort of a risk for Tesla investors, and it kind of goes back to Musk's time, right? Is he going to stay involved in politics? Is he going to form a new political party? That's sort of like the downside risk. Uh, but if things sort of blow over and we just have to deal with like losing tax credits, then I think that, you know, we'll we'll sort of we can move on from the bromance and just sort of focus on whether they can sell cars and whether they can expand the robo taxis.

Food Aid in Gaza Has Become a Horror
Food Aid in Gaza Has Become a Horror

Atlantic

time27 minutes ago

  • Atlantic

Food Aid in Gaza Has Become a Horror

Capping off all the other horrors in wartime Gaza is the food-distribution situation that has prevailed since late May. Famished Palestinian civilians must approach one of very few aid-distribution locations under the auspices of the Israeli and United States governments. A shocking number of civilians seeking aid have reportedly been shot dead by Israeli soldiers or shot at by U.S. contractors on their way to these sites. According to the United Nations, more than 1,000 Palestinians have been killed in this scramble for sustenance since May 26. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu broke the last cease-fire in the Gaza war on March 18 by launching air strikes that killed more than 400 Palestinians in 36 hours, a reported 183 of them children. He had also imposed a total blockade on March 2, allowing no aid whatsoever into the Strip from March until late May. The resulting situation was untenable. But the Israeli government did not trust any of the international institutions with experience in humanitarian-aid distribution, so together with its U.S. backers, it cooked up an alternative: the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, a nonprofit registered in Delaware and funded with $30 million from the Trump administration. According to one report, GHF has billed itself as seeking, among other aims, to ' facilitate President Trump's vision ' for the Gaza Strip. Trump has said a variety of things about that vision, but one prospect he has articulated includes the forced removal of all Palestinians from the territory and its transformation into a 'Riviera' for 'international people.' According to The Washington Post, some for-profit companies are behind GHF, including McNally Capital, a Chicago private-equity firm. Among the entities initially involved with the group, some have since withdrawn, including the Boston Consulting Group. The foundation's initial head, Jake Wood, resigned on account of humanitarian concerns. GHF is now run by Johnnie Moore Jr., a pro-Israel evangelical activist and former aide to Jerry Falwell, and John Acree, a former USAID official. GHF began operations on May 26 in the south of Gaza, near Rafah. Since then, it has operated four main aid-distribution centers (compare this to the more than 400 that the UN and other traditional aid agencies once ran). The aid boxes themselves have been described by Palestinians as woefully inadequate as Gaza continues its slide toward outright famine. The food distribution points have practically become shooting galleries. Israeli troops told reporters from the newspaper Haaretz that they had been ordered to open fire on Palestinians with live ammunition as a means of crowd control. The newspaper quoted one soldier as describing the zones as a 'killing field.' The report singled out Brigadier General Yehuda Vach, commander of Division 252, which operates in northern Gaza. Vach reportedly told his men that ' there are no innocents in Gaza.' Some suggested that using live fire to disperse crowds in northern Gaza, for fear they would rush UN aid trucks, was Vach's policy more than that of the Israeli military command or government. But reports have also circulated about U.S. contractors deliberately shooting Palestinians and boasting about direct hits. Israel refuses to allow outside journalists into Gaza, making these and other related accounts difficult to confirm or disprove. What is indisputable is that GHF has an effective monopoly on delivering humanitarian aid into an ever more desperate Gaza Strip. Virtually all of the traditional distributors of aid have been barred by the Israeli authorities. And by most accounts, the results are ghastly. The UN relays that a third of the more than 2 million Palestinians in Gaza go days without eating, and credible reports suggest that infants and the elderly are dying of malnutrition and dehydration—according to one issued by a group of international nonprofits, more than 100 people have died of hunger, including 80 children. Agence France-Presse says that its local journalists are now in danger of imminent death from starvation. Israel claims that it is allowing ample food, water, and medicine into the Strip, but if that's the case, the supplies are apparently not reaching those who need them most. Much of the world is appalled by these conditions. On Monday, 30 governments, many friendly to Israel, plus the European Union, demanded an end to the war and condemned 'the drip feeding of aid' to the Palestinians in Gaza whose suffering, the group noted, had 'reached new depths.' More than 100 aid agencies have signed a letter demanding that Israel allow additional food, water, medicine, and other supplies into Gaza immediately. Far from ameliorating Gazans' suffering, GHF has instead established a system that presents them with an impossible dilemma. Palestinians are drawn in desperation to four centers, where they must risk their lives in order to gain the supplies they need to live. Many also walk away disappointed but uninjured. There is no evidence that GHF, its founders, or its backers intended to create death traps rather than alternative distribution centers. But for many weeks, this is how the sites have functioned, and GHF's response has been to simply carry on as before. What GHF may have begun inadvertently, it now perpetuates without correction and with full awareness. Palestinians face a Hobson's choice between starvation and the real possibility of being shot down for no intelligible reason. For that there is no excuse—and quite possibly criminal culpability.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store