Mexico headline inflation seen easing in June with core rate climbing: Reuters poll
The median forecast from 17 analysts projected an annual headline inflation rate of 4.31% for June, down from 4.42% in May, though still above the official target of 3%, plus or minus one percentage point.
In contrast, core inflation, often seen as a better gauge of price trends because it strips out highly volatile items, was estimated to have accelerated further to 4.22%, its highest level since April of last year.
On a monthly basis, consumer prices were expected to have risen 0.27%, while core prices were forecast to increase by 0.38%, according to the survey. Official data will be released on Wednesday.
At the end of June, the Bank of Mexico cut its benchmark rate by 50 basis points for a fourth consecutive time, continuing an easing cycle that began in 2024 after rates reached their highest level on record.
However, in its latest statement, the central bank's board adjusted its forward guidance, dropping previous references to further 50 basis point cuts. Instead, it said it would continue to assess "additional cuts."
Markets interpreted the change in tone as a signal that the central bank may slow the pace of monetary easing at its next meeting on August 7.
A Citi survey published this week showed consensus among participants for a 25 basis point cut in August.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
24 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump threatens to escalate trade war amid confusion over new tariff rates
Donald Trump vowed to further escalate his trade wars on Tuesday, threatening US tariffs of up to 200% on foreign drugs and 50% on copper, amid widespread confusion around his shifting plans. Hours after saying his latest deadline for a new wave of steep duties was 'not 100% firm', the US president declared that 'no extensions will be granted' beyond 1 August. 'There has been no change to this date, and there will be no change,' Trump wrote on social media, a day after signing an executive order that changed the date from 9 July. On Monday, he announced plans to impose US tariffs of up to 40% on goods imported from 14 countries, including Bangladesh, Japan and South Korea. But he extended a pause on the duties' introduction, allowing three more weeks for negotiations. More letters will be sent to countries, informing them of new tariff rates 'today, tomorrow, and for the next short period of time', according to Trump. Global stock markets have largely shrugged off the latest threats. On Wall Street, the benchmark S&P 500 was up just 0.03% and the Dow Jones industrial average was down 0.3%. In recent weeks, some investors appear to have embraced the Taco – or Trump Always Chickens Out – trade. Speaking on Tuesday at the White House, Trump laid out plans to step up his controversial trade strategy, which economists have warned risks exacerbating inflation. Imported copper will face a US tariff of 50% in a bid to bolster US production of the metal, the administration announced. US copper prices rose 12% to hit record levels. After providing manufacturers with around a year or a year and a half's notice, pharmaceutical imports are also 'going to be tariffed at a very, very high rate', the president said. 'Like 200%.' 'We're going to be announcing pharmaceuticals, chips and various couple of other things – you know, big ones,' he added, of the administration's tariff plans.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
The RBA's decision to hold rates isn't a calamity, but its shift in language is confounding – and worrying
Following a spate of soft data, financial markets had priced in a near certainty that the Reserve Bank would cut interest rates this week – so it came as a shock to many when they chose to leave the official cash rate unchanged at 3.85%. As the treasurer noted, the decision was 'not the result millions of Australians were hoping for.' Mortgage holders can take heart, however, from the RBA governor's words at the post-decision press conference, where she implied that a rate cut following the August meeting was pretty well in the bag. 'The board decided to wait a few weeks' she told reporters, adding that the decision was around the timing rather than direction of rates. Despite these assertions – and following the release of the May monthly inflation data – markets are not entirely convinced, pricing in an 85% chance of a rate cut next month. To many, 85% may not seem that different from 100%. But in reality, it tells us a lot about how today's announcement has unnerved markets. With all due respect to some of my economist colleagues, a decision to cut rates at a later date will not make a discernible difference to our economic fortunes – although obviously every week of higher rates is felt keenly by mortgaged households, especially younger ones with the highest levels of debt. What is possibly a more significant outcome from Tuesday's decision is the erosion in trust of the RBA due to the large swings in tone between meetings, despite efforts to rebuild trust in the past six months or so. I wrote in this masthead just seven weeks ago that the RBA had adopted a surprisingly dovish tone for the first time in a long time, following the May monetary policy meeting. Indeed, the RBA acknowledged then that an out-sized 50 basis point cut had even been considered at that meeting (albeit briefly) following Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariff announcements. This stance represented a significant shift in attitude from the previous board meeting and indeed much of the previous year. And yet now, here they are swerving backwards. To me, this is quite confounding – and worrying. One of the reasons that a rate cut was widely expected this week was because the monthly inflation indicator for May had been softer than expected, both in headline and underlying terms. Underlying inflation, which is the measure that the RBA is focussed on, dropped to just 2.4%, the lowest annual pace in more than three years. While these numbers are a little volatile and not a full picture, they provide enough evidence to show that inflation is not deviating from the RBA's expectations, which would be the only justification to postpone another rate cut. Yet the RBA statement said that inflation data for May was 'at the margin, slightly stronger than expected' and that they will only feel confident once the June quarter data is out in black and white before their eyes. This makes one wonder how good the models are if there's that level of uncertainty with two-thirds of the story already in the bag. The RBA also suggests that 'private domestic demand appears to have been recovering gradually.' While I agree with the governor's assertion that 'reasonable people can differ in their interpretation of the data,' I think that, in this instance, the RBA has got it wrong. Consumer demand and confidence are unequivocally weak, despite tax cuts, lower inflation and two rate cuts, and wild gyrations in US tariff policy will continue to undermine business confidence and investment. We were told by the governor that there was 'really good debate in the [RBA] boardroom,' but it's hard to agree that recent data deserve such debate. In fact, given the level of downside risks created by uncertainty – especially as we face the next wave of crazy on tariffs from President Trump – the weighting to cut should have been easy if economic data was all that was under consideration. Yes, the labour market remains robust, with unemployment at 4.1%. And low productivity is producing unit labour cost growth at rates we'd prefer to see lower. But we are not seeing this translate into higher prices. The bank's own liaison tells them businesses can't do this under current soft conditions, but officials seem worried that another 25 basis point cut this month, as opposed to next, will threaten that, even as they forecast further rises in unemployment. The decision to hold rates passed by six votes to three. One has to assume that the three RBA board members voted to hold, so the six independent members were split 50-50. Despite reform of the RBA monetary policy decision-making board, officials still appear to have considerable sway over the final outcome. As I've noted, I don't think it's a calamity for the economy as a whole that we wait another month for an interest rate cut (although I would be deeply concerned if the cut flagged by the governor for the August meeting did not appear.) What does concern me about this latest decision is the significant swerving in language. One minute we are told inflation is in the bag; seven weeks later, we are worried that it's not, despite the data strongly indicating otherwise and despite the potential impact of very high levels of uncertainty playing out, both internationally and at home, which is anathema to growth. Confidence has given way to uncertainty and timidity. The RBA will need to exercise caution in its communications in the lead-up to, and following, the next monetary policy meeting if it does not want to further undermine confidence in its decision-making ability. Nicki Hutley is a consulting economist
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Justin Marks: ‘Was time to move on' from Daniel Suarez
July 9 - Earlier this month, Trackhouse Racing announced that Daniel Suarez and the organization would be parting ways in 2026. Following the Chicago Street Race on Sunday, Trackhouse owner Justin Marks addressed the divorce with reporters. "When we ... mapped out our three-year and our five-year plan and the sponsorships and everything that we're trying to accomplish over the next five years of the company, we just got to a point where we felt like that relationship had borne a lot of fruit for us, but it was time to move on," Marks said. Suarez, the only Mexican-born driver to win a national series race in a NASCAR event, has been with Trackhouse since its NASCAR debut five years ago, initially starting off as the team's only driver. But he's the only driver on a current team of three yet to win a race in 2025, and he's the lowest of the group in the regular-season points standings. Teammate Ross Chastain is eighth and has one victory; Shane van Gisbergen, who won in Chicago on Sunday, is 27th; while Suarez in 29th. Addressing the possibility of bad blood, Marks spoke of meeting with Suarez on Saturday night, with the two reminiscing about their years together. "Him and I are in a really good place." Trackhouse and Suarez have previously called the parting a "mutual decision" that allows the veteran driver the chance to pursue another opportunity for next season. Marks echoed that sentiment Sunday, while also acknowledging the need to make a change. "Look, Daniel has been a huge part of this company for four and a half years now," Marks said. "This isn't a sport where you do the same thing forever." In an interview with SiriusXM NASCAR Radio, Suarez spoke of this being a new chapter for him. "I have known about this for a while," Suarez said. "I'm actually a little bit relieved that this is out and people know about it and we can talk about it and we can move forward with future plans and continue to work. I'm excited for whatever comes next." Suarez, 33, has won two races in 305 Cup starts. This is his fifth season with Trackhouse Racing , and he has made the playoffs twice. His best season was in 2022, when he finished 10th and won his first Cup Series race. He finished 12th last season, winning his second race in the process. Trackhouse has yet to name a replacement for the No. 99 Chevrolet. --Field Level Media
