Senedd Member calls for restrictions on bottom trawling
The Conservatives' shadow climate secretary told the Senedd: 'It is a national disgrace that this Welsh Government is allowing such destructive and wasteful practices to take place.'
Ms Finch-Saunders warned: 'These practices effectively bulldoze through and destroy seabed habitats. They release high levels of carbon and they catch untargeted marine life.'
She stated bottom trawling is excluded in less than 1 per cent of seas, with restrictions around Skomer Island – only one of the 139 marine protected areas (MPAs) surrounding Wales.
Ms Finch-Saunders described the 'destructive' method of fishing as 'incompatible' with MPAs, which are meant to be sanctuaries for marine life.
She urged Welsh ministers to follow Westminster's lead, with the UK Government consulting on proposals to ban bottom trawling in 41 MPAs – an area spanning 30,000km2.
Ms Finch-Saunders pointed to the example of a ban in Lyme Bay in south-west England leading to a 430 per cent increase in the richness of the species mix.
Contributing to the debate on July 9, Joyce Watson raised long-held concerns about the impact of scallop dredging in the special area of conservation in Cardigan Bay.
She said: 'Scallop dredging, like other forms of dredging, is an incredibly destructive fishing practice – the entire structure of the seabed is damaged as rakes are dragged along.'
Her Labour colleague Carolyn Thomas said she was horrified to watch Sir David Attenborough's Ocean documentary film. But she added: 'It did say there was hope, that if bottom trawling ended – the ecosystems, the biodiversity could soon recover.'
Huw Irranca-Davies, the deputy first minister who is responsible for environment policy, described the use of bottom trawling around Wales as relatively limited.
He told the Senedd the main king scallop fishery in Wales is managed under a joint fisheries management plan with England to ensure long-term sustainability.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
4 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Laura Anne Jones MS on defecting from Tories to Reform UK
Even when things have gone on too long, it's hard to leave, because there are still nice moments. When I decided to leave the Conservative Party, it was a plaster I knew I had to rip off. I had been a loyal member for 31 years. I had stuck by it through all its ups and downs. I'd won seats, helped win seats, lost seats, lost elections, but not for a moment did I consider leaving. Even when it became a party that I no longer recognised, I held onto my love for the members and the activists, and some brilliant colleagues whom I will always admire greatly. Many of them are steadfast in their traditional values and formed my political family that had given me the honour to represent them and where I live. But the fact is, many now feel that the Conservative Party has left them, much in the same way as it left me. It was time to face facts. The party that I had fallen in love with had changed beyond recognition, in thought, in word and deed. It was no longer listening to or respecting its members. Reform is the only party that now represents decent, hard-working people, with traditional, patriotic values. People who love their country and are as devastated as I am at the erosion of our beautiful country and its values, faith and traditions. Now, many in Wales and the UK are now turning to Reform. In Wales, the Labour Welsh Government can't define a woman and has refused to act on the landmark Supreme Court ruling on the definition of a woman. They have wasted taxpayers' money on the most egregious ideological projects like 20mph speed limits, tree-planting schemes in Africa, and a collection of unused overseas Welsh Government offices across the globe, despite foreign affairs not being devolved. With a cost-of-living crisis biting and with people in abject poverty in some of our communities, this is unjustifiable. I believe Reform is the only party committed to driving that waste out of government, putting the cash back into our frontline services, into health, education and into opening Wales back up for business. Our farmers are being sold down the river by a Welsh Government who are obsessed with tree-planting targets, instead of supporting our agricultural food-producing sector to create a sustainable Wales. They have been failed, and they need to once again be listened to and valued, for the invaluable role that they play in our country's fabric. In Wales, we have the worst educational outcomes, the worst health statistics, with the longest waits in the UK - with waiting lists under Welsh Labour on the rise again! Our economy, our pensioners, our farmers, and our most vulnerable keep getting a battering and immigration is out of control. Things cannot carry on in this direction. Real change in Wales is long overdue. There is so much to undo and put right, and Reform is the only party able to stop Labour and Plaid getting into bed together once again, which is inevitable, and taking our beautiful country into decline again. It's time to not be restrained by party politics, to find the real solutions to our problems here in Wales. I cannot wait to play my small part in that, in Reform, fighting for my constituents, my region and for my beloved Wales, and take people along with me. With Reform, I truly feel that I am now part of the solution, not the problem. Come and join us. It's time to make the Welsh Dragon roar again! Laura Anne Jones is Senedd member of Wales South East.
The National
33 minutes ago
- The National
A true just transition will save jobs and the planet
We have families here who have been working in oil and gas for generations. We have communities whose very fabric was built around that industry. We're in the middle of a major shift. The decline in oil and gas production isn't something in the distant future, it's already happening. And with it, the jobs are going – some reports have said we're facing Grangemouth-scale losses on a weekly basis across the North-east. I want to be really clear that I truly believe the Scottish Government is absolutely committed to a just transition. And I support that – I welcome it. And it's not just words, it has been backed by action. READ MORE: Sandie Peggie 'wanted to post bacon through mosque letterbox', tribunal told We've seen investment coming into the north-east through the Just Transition Fund, and recently we saw the launch of a new oil and gas transition training programme tailored specifically to our region. That's vital, because we're not talking about abstract change, we're talking about retraining real people for real jobs in sectors like renewables, offshore wind, hydrogen and carbon capture. I recently visited the St Fergus gas terminal in my constituency, a place that is central to the UK's energy supply, processing about a third of the gas the UK uses. It was eye-opening, and it gave me a deeper appreciation of just how skilled the workforce is, and how deeply embedded the oil and gas sector is in our local economy. And that's why I think we need to be really honest about what the transition means in practice. Because it's not just about switching energy sources, it's also about making sure that we don't leave entire communities behind as we move forward. Of course we must protect our climate and meet our climate obligations. I have grandchildren, and want to make sure the world we leave behind for them is sustainable. But we also must be honest about how we do that in a way that doesn't destroy jobs and decimate local economies in the process. A return to Thatcher and the treatment of the coal mines and their workers must be avoided at all costs. That's why the word 'just' really matters. We must make sure people whose work powered our country for decades aren't tossed aside now that we're changing direction. What I hear a lot from people is that if Scotland and the UK are still consuming oil and gas (which we are), and if we're not drilling for it ourselves here, then where is it coming from? Are we just importing it from elsewhere? And if so, are we not just offshoring our carbon footprint? It's a fair question. And I think it's one that we need to answer properly. Because when we talk about reducing emissions, are we measuring the carbon we produce in Scotland, or the carbon we use? Those are very different things. It would feel like smoke and mirrors if we claimed a reduction in emissions simply because we're not drilling here, while still burning the same amount of fuel that has been shipped in from abroad. The public deserves transparency on that. We can't pretend we're doing better for the planet if all we're doing is moving the problem offshore. From what I understand, most UK emissions accounting is based on what we produce territorially. But that doesn't reflect what we consume. And when you look at that difference, it raises big questions about how honest we're being with ourselves. This leads me to another question that I want to put to the public. If we are assuming we won't license new oil fields, if that is the direction of travel, then what are the consequences? Not just for emissions, but for jobs, for our energy security, and for local economies like ours? If we're not producing enough of our own energy, we're leaving ourselves vulnerable to the whims of global markets and political figures such as Donald Trump or Vladimir Putin. We need to add that into the equation when we're talking about what's realistic, responsible, and safe for Scotland's future. I'm not here to say 'drill baby drill', absolutely not. I firmly believe in our climate responsibilities. But I also believe we must think practically, not just ideologically. Is our current position realistic? Is it fair? Is it in line with what other countries are doing? That brings me to Norway, a country that often gets held up as the gold standard in balancing energy and climate goals. Norway is still drilling. It is investing in renewables, yes, but the country is also using the oil and gas sector to fund the green transition. Is that something we can learn from? Is there a model that supports jobs and meets climate targets? Public money alone won't be enough. To really shift our economy at the scale we need, we must have significant private investment too. That includes renewables, yes, but it can also come from oil and gas companies willing to invest in cleaner technologies. There's a huge opportunity here. We can align climate objectives with economic growth if we get this right. Right now, key powers over energy policy and licensing are still held by the UK Government. That limits what the [[Scottish Government]] can do, even when the will is there. So, I suppose what I'm calling for an honest conversation. We need to stop pretending it's one or the other, we either save the planet or save jobs. It's not enough to have big ambitions if we don't have the infrastructure, investment and workforce to get us there – without hurting the people who built this country's energy industry in the first place. And of course, the big question is: will it help secure our future as an independent nation, because if so, we need it on the balance sheet.
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Support for Scottish windfarms will increase energy bills
The offshore floating wind sector will be one of the biggest beneficiaries of reforms to the main scheme the UK Government operates to encourage firms to commit to the upfront investment required. In the latest round of the Contracts for Difference programme floating windfarm developers will be guaranteed £271 per megawatt hour (MWh) for their output regardless of what prices prevail in the market. The value of the revenue guarantee has increased by more than 10% since the latest allocation round was completed last year, when the strike price for floating windfarm output was set at £245/MWh. Mr Miliband is so anxious to ensure that the round is a success that he has also agreed to extend the standard term of CFD awards to 20 years from 15. READ MORE: Just transition fund farce deepens as Scottish firms fight over windfarm scraps The changes were announced weeks after Scottish Renewables said bold action was required from ministers to maintain the momentum behind the development of the emerging floating windfarm sector, which champions reckon can play a crucial role in the net zero drive. While only two floating windfarms have been developed off Scotland to date their performance has reinforced hopes that such schemes could offer big advantages compared with conventional facilities that have foundations on the seabed. Floating windfarms can be deployed in deeper waters allowing them to harness stronger winds that blow more consistently than those nearer to the shore. They could be placed far enough offshore to ease the concern of critics such as Mr Trump who complain about the impact of windfarms on views. Scotland is seen as being well placed to capitalise on the development of floating windfarms because of its geography and its oil and gas industry heritage. Around 90% of the waters off Scotland are deep. Dan Jackson, who is leading work on Cerulean Winds' plans for the Aspen floating windfarm off Aberdeenshire, has noted that wind strengths in the area it is targeting are more than double what they are in southern England. READ MORE: Investors eye Scottish floating windfarm bonanza The hope is that success in the floating market will help compensate for the disappointments that Scotland has suffered to date in terms of the economic impact of renewables activity. While firms have invested heavily in conventional developments on land and offshore, with CFD support, the benefits have gone mainly to companies based outside Scotland. The number of jobs created in Scotland has fallen well short of expectations. A report on the SNP Government's £500m Just Transition Fund released this month found that it helped create just 110 jobs in its first two years. Excitement about the potential value of floating wind activity in Scotland increased after US private equity investors agreed two years ago to provide £300m backing for a plan to turn the Port of Ardersier on the Cromarty Firth into a major low carbon energy support facility. But some people will be concerned that Scotland will benefit disproportionately from the support that will be provided for floating windfarm developments. Lots of firms have shown interest in Scotland. Crown Estate Scotland awarded leases covering acreage on which firms expect to deploy around 25 windfarms in rounds completed in the last three years. Successful applicants included Cerulean, Shell, SSE and ScottishPower. However, firms appear less enthusiastic about the waters off England. In June a licensing round covering acreage off South West England generated a disappointing response. READ MORE: SNP Government green jobs failure seen in English city's success The concern about Scotland's share of floating windfarm funding support will be heightened by the fact that the costs of the technology are much higher than those for established alternatives. In the allocation round that it is expected will be launched next month conventional offshore windfarms will be guaranteed £113/MWh for their output compared with £102/MWh last time. Onshore windfarms will be guaranteed £92/MWh against £89/MWh. Developers will get top up payments if market rates fall below the strike prices guaranteed under the CFD round. If rates rise above the strike price developers will have to pay over the difference. However, Governments have run the CFD scheme for years in the expectation that the amounts paid to developers will far exceed recoveries. Mr Miliband boasted that the budget for the allocation round that was completed last year would be increased by £500m to £1.5bn. The latest data collected by the regulator Ofgem indicates that wholesale prices averaged around £80/MWh in May. If rates remain around that level floating windfarm developers will be in line for big payments under the CFD contracts awarded in the forthcoming round. The costs will be added to the energy bills of householders across the UK irrespective of whether projects in the areas they live in will benefit. READ MORE: As Chevron closes Aberdeen office, what now for North Sea jobs? The proposals for the latest CFD round underline the fall in the price of solar energy schemes, which are more widespread south of the border. The strike price for solar will fall to £75/Mwh from £85/MWh. Scotland could also benefit from the increase in the strike price for larger hydropower schemes, to £168/MWh from £142/MWh. However, Scottish energy giant SSE has provided a reminder that the performance of hydropower and other renewable schemes depends on the weather. This month the energy giant revealed that its hydropower output slumped 40% in the latest quarter amid the sunshine the UK enjoyed. In a trading update issued at SSE's annual general meeting the Perth-based firm welcomed the increase in the length of new CFD contracts. The company also praised the Government's decision to retain a UK-wide electricity pricing system although critics claim this prevents householders in Scotland from benefiting from the abundance of renewable electricity in the country. SSE warned a shift to a system under which prices varied in different parts of the UK would lead to cuts in investment. As chief executive Alistair Phillips Davies retired after 12 years in post, the company made clear at the AGM that it remained keen to invest in renewables generation assets and the network improvements that will be required to make the most of them. However, SSE expects gas-fired power to remain a key part of the energy mix for years. READ MORE: Israeli-owned firm takes control of UK's biggest gas field It continues to cause the SNP Government discomfort by championing plans for a new gas-powered plant at Peterhead with related carbon capture facilities. First minister John Swinney would love to see Scotland secure the jobs the plant would create but is under intense pressure to oppose the development from the greens the [[SNP]] wants to keep onside.
